speeches · April 1, 2008
Speech
Ben S. Bernanke · Chair
For release on delivery
9:30 a.m. EDT
April 2, 2008
Statement of
Ben S. Bernanke
Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
before the
Joint Economic Committee
United States Congress
April 2, 2008
Chainnan Schumer, Vice Chainnan Maloney, Representative Saxton, and other members
of the Committee, I am pleased to appear before the Joint Economic Committee. In response to
deterioration in the near-tenn outlook for the economy and intensified strains in financial
markets, in recent months the Federal Reserve has eased monetary policy substantially further
and taken strong actions to increase market liquidity. In my remarks today, I will first offer my
views on conditions in financial markets and the outlook for the U.S. economy, then discuss
recent actions taken by the Federal Reserve.
Although our recent actions appear to have helped stabilize the situation somewhat,
financial markets remain under considerable stress. Pressures in short-tenn bank funding
markets, which had abated somewhat beginning late last year, have increased once again. Many
lenders have been reluctant to provide credit to counterparties, especially leveraged investors,
and have increased the amount of collateral they require to back short-tenn security fmancing
agreements. To meet those demands, investors have reduced their leverage and liquidated
holdings of securities, putting further downward pressure on security prices.
Credit availability has also been restricted because some large financial institutions,
including some commercial and investment banks and the government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), have reported substantial losses and writedowns, reducing their available capital.
Several of these finns have been able to raise fresh capital to offset at least some of those losses,
and others are in the process of doing so. However, financial institutions' balance sheets have
also expanded, as banks and other institutions have taken on their balance sheets various assets
that can no longer be financed on a standalone basis. Thus, the capacity and willingness of some
large institutions to extend new credit remains limited.
- 2 -
The effects of the fmancial strains on credit cost and availability have become
increasingly evident, with some portions of the system that had previously escaped the worst of
the turmoil--such as the markets for municipal bonds and student loans--having been affected.
Another market that had previously been largely exempt from disruptions was that for mortgage
backed securities (MBS) issued by government agencies. However, beginning in mid-February,
worsening liquidity conditions and reports oflosses at the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
caused the spread of agency MBS yields over the yields on comparable Treasury securities to
rise sharply. Together with the increased fees imposed by the GSEs, the rise in this spread
resulted in higher interest rates on conforming mortgages. More recently, agency MBS spreads
and conforming mortgage rates have retraced part of this increase, and conforming mortgages
continue to be readily available to households. However, for the most part, the nonconforming
segment of the mortgage market continues to function poorly.
In corporate debt markets, yields and spreads on both investment-grade and speculative
grade corporate bonds rose through mid-March before falling more recently. Issuance of
investment-grade bonds by both financial and nonfinancial corporations has been quite robust so
far this year, but issuance of new high-yield debt has stalled. Strains continue to be evident in
the commercial paper market as well, where risk spreads remain elevated and the quantity of
commercial paper outstanding, particularly asset-backed paper, has decreased. Commercial and
industrial loans at banks grew in January and February, but at a considerably slower pace than in
previous months.
These developments in financial markets--which themselves reflect, in part, greater
concerns about housing and the economic outlook more generally--have weighed on real
economic activity. Notably, in the housing market, sales of both new and existing homes have
- 3 -
generally continued weak, partly as a result of the reduced availability of mortgage credit, and
home prices have continued to fall.) Starts of new single-family homes declined an additional 7
percent in February, bringing the cumulative decline since the early 2006 peak in single-family
starts to more than 60 percent. Residential construction is likely to contract somewhat further in
coming quarters as builders try to reduce their high inventories of unsold new homes.
Private payroll employment fell 101,000 in February, after two months of smaller job
losses, with job cuts in construction and closely related industries accounting for a significant
share of the decline. But the demand for labor has also moderated recently in other industries,
such as business services and retail trade, and manufacturing employment has continued on its
downward trend. Meanwhile, claims for unemployment insurance have risen somewhat on
balance, and surveys indicate that employers have scaled back hiring plans and that jobseekers
are experiencing greater difficulties finding work. The unemployment rate edged down in
February and remains at a relatively low level; however, in light of the sluggishness of economic
activity and other indicators of a softer labor market, I expect it to move somewhat higher in
coming months.
After rising at an annual rate of about 3 percent over the first three quarters of last year,
real disposable income has since increased at only about a 1 percent annual rate, reflecting
weaker employment conditions and higher prices for energy and food. Concerns about
employment and income prospects, together with declining home values and tighter credit
conditions, have caused consumer spending to decelerate considerably from the solid pace seen
during the first three quarters of last year. I expect the tax rebates associated with the fiscal
J In February, sales of existing homes are reported to have turned up slightly, but sales of new homes continued to
move down.
,
-4-
stimulus package recently passed by the Congress to provide some support to consumer spending
in coming quarters.
In the business sector, the pullback in hiring that I noted earlier has been accompanied by
some reduction in capital spending plans, as weaker sales prospects, tighter credit, and
heightened uncertainty have made business leaders more cautious. On a more positive note, the
nonfinancial business sector remains financially sound, with liquid balance sheets and low
leverage ratios, and most firms have been able to avoid unwanted buildups in inventories. In
addition, many businesses are enjoying strong demand from abroad. Although the prospects for
foreign economic growth have diminished somewhat in recent months, net exports should
u.s.
continue to provide considerable support to economic activity in coming quarters.
Overall, the near-term economic outlook has weakened relative to the projections
released by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) at the end of January. It now appears
likely that real gross domestic product (GDP) will not grow much, if at all, over the first half of
2008 and could even contract slightly. We expect economic activity to strengthen in the second
half of the year, in part as the result of stimulative monetary and fiscal policies; and growth is
expected to proceed at or a little above its sustainable pace in 2009, bolstered by a stabilization
of housing activity, albeit at low levels, and gradually improving financial conditions. However,
in light of the recent turbulence in financial markets, the uncertainty attending this forecast is
quite high and the risks remain to the downside.
Inflation has also been a source of concern. The price index for personal consumption
expenditures rose 3.4 percent over the twelve months ending in February, up from 2.3 percent
over the preceding twelve-month period. To a large extent, this pickUp in inflation has been the
result of sharp increases in the prices of crude oil, agricultural products, and other globally traded
-5 -
commodities. Additionally, the decline in the foreign exchange value of the dollar has boosted
some non-commodity import prices and thus contributed to inflation. However, the so-called
core rate of inflation--that is, inflation excluding food and energy prices--has edged down
recently after firming somewhat late last year.
We expect inflation to moderate in coming quarters. That expectation is based, in part,
on futures markets' indications of a leveling out of prices for oil and other commodities, and it is
consistent with our projection that global growth--and thus the demand for commodities--will
slow somewhat during this period. And, as I noted, we project an easing of pressures on
resource utilization. However, some indicators of inflation expectations have risen, and, overall,
uncertainty about the inflation outlook has increased. It will be necessary to continue to monitor
inflation developments carefully in the months ahead.
* * *
I tum now to the Federal Reserve's policy responses to these fmancial and economic
developments.
Well-functioning financial markets are essential for the efficacy of monetary policy and,
indeed, for economic growth and stability. To improve market liquidity and market functioning,
and consistent with its role as the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve has supplemented its
longstanding discount window by establishing three new facilities for lending to depository
institutions and primary dealers.
The lending facilities now in place offer depository institutions and primary dealers two
complementary alternatives for meeting funding needs. One pair of facilities--the discount
window for depository institutions and the Primary Dealer Credit Facility for primary dealers-
offers daily access to variable amounts of funding at the initiative of the borrowing institution. A
- 6-
second pair of facilities--the Term Auction Facility for depository institutions and the Term
Securities Lending Facility for primary dealers--makes available predetermined aggregate
amounts of longer-term funding on pre-announced dates, with the interest rate and the
distribution of the awards across institutions being determined by competitive auction. Although
these facilities operate through depository institutions and primary dealers, they are designed to
support the broad financial markets and the economy by facilitating the provision of liquidity by
those institutions to their customers and counterparties.
The Primary Dealer Credit Facility was put in place in the wake of the near-failure of
Bear Steams, a large investment bank. On March 13, Bear Steams advised the Federal Reserve
and other government agencies that its liquidity position had significantly deteriorated and that it
would have to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy the next day unless alternative sources of funds
became available. This news raised difficult questions of public policy. Normally, the market
sorts out which companies survive and which fail, and that is as it should be. However, the
issues raised here extended well beyond the fate of one company. Our financial system is
extremely complex and interconnected, and Bear Steams participated extensively in a range of
critical markets. With financial conditions fragile, the sudden failure of Bear Stearns likely
would have led to a chaotic unwinding of positions in those markets and could have severely
shaken confidence. The company's failure could also have cast doubt on the fmancial positions
of some of Bear Steams' thousands of counterparties and perhaps of companies with similar
businesses. Given the current exceptional pressures on the global economy and financial system,
the damage caused by a default by Bear Steams could have been severe and extremely difficult
to contain. Moreover, the adverse effects would not have been confined to the financial system
but would have been felt broadly in the real economy through its effects on asset values and
-7 -
credit availability. To prevent a disorderly failure of Bear Steams and the unpredictable but
likely severe consequences of such a failure for market functioning and the broader economy, the
Federal Reserve, in close consultation with the Treasury Department, agreed to provide funding
to Bear Steams through lPMorgan Chase. Over the following weekend, lPMorgan Chase agreed
to purchase Bear Steams and assumed Bear's financial obligations.
The Federal Reserve has taken additional measures to improve market liquidity. We
have initiated a series of twenty-eight-day single-tranche term repurchase transactions with
primary dealers, expected to cumulate to $100 billion outstanding, in which dealers may offer
any of the types of collateral that are eligible for conventional open market operations. We have
also expanded and extended reciprocal currency arrangements ("swap lines") with the European
Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank. Using these swap lines, the participating central
banks are providing dollar liquidity to financial institutions in their jurisdictions, which should
improve the functioning of the global market for dollar funding. These facilities and programs
will be kept in place as long as conditions warrant their ongoing use. We are working closely
with the Securities Exchange Commission to monitor the financial conditions and funding
positions of primary dealers who might seek Federal Reserve credit.
To date, the recent liquidity measures implemented by the Federal Reserve seem to have
been helpful in addressing some of the strains in financial markets. Funding pressures on
primary dealers appear to have eased somewhat, and liquidity seems to have improved in several
markets, including--as noted earlier--the market for agency mortgage-backed securities. To the
extent that these measures improve market functioning, they will have favorable effects on the
ability and willingness to make credit available to the broader economy. More-liquid markets
-8 -
also increase the efficacy of monetary policy, which in tum improves our ability to meet the
goals set for us by the Congress--namely, to promote maximum employment and price stability.
As you know, in response to the further weakening of economic conditions, the Federal
Reserve has continued to ease the stance of monetary policy. The FOMC reduced its target for
the federal funds rate by a total of 125 basis points in January and by an additional 75 basis
points at its March meeting, leaving the current target at 2-114 percent--3 percentage points
below its level last summer. As the Committee noted in its most recent post-meeting statement,
we anticipate that these actions, together with the steps we have taken to foster market liquidity,
will help to promote growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity.
Clearly, the U.S. economy is going through a very difficult period. But among the great
strengths of our economy is its ability to adapt and to respond to diverse challenges. Much
necessary economic and financial adjustment has already taken place, and monetary and fiscal
policies are in train that should support a return to growth in the second half of this year and next
year. I remain confident in our economy's long-term prospects.
Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.
Cite this document
APA
Ben S. Bernanke (2008, April 1). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_20080402_bernanke
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_20080402_bernanke,
author = {Ben S. Bernanke},
title = {Speech},
year = {2008},
month = {Apr},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_20080402_bernanke},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}