speeches · February 7, 1996
Speech
Alan Greenspan · Chair
For release on delivery
10 00 a m , E S T
February 8, 1996
Remarks by
Alan Greenspan
Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
before
The National Partners in Homeownership
Washington, D C
February 8, 1996
Many of you may not know that Henry Cisneros is an
alumnus of the Federal Reserve System Immediately before
joining the President's cabinet, the Secretary served as the
Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Dallas
Federal Reserve Bank He was always generous with his time
and expertise, and I am delighted to be able, in some small
way, to reciprocate
I probably do not have to convince this audience
that housing plays a central role in the economy and, more
important, in the life of every person in our country
Although significant housing problems and challenges remain,
the progress this nation has made during the past 50 years
in expanding and improving our housing has been enormous
Since World War II we have doubled the number of houses and
apartments nationwide By almost all measures, housing
quality has improved and overcrowding has diminished And
the proportion of families and individuals who are home
owners has risen from about half to nearly two-thirds
But the housing progress has not come evenly over
the years The housing sector of the economy has been both
an accelerator and a brake for economic growth. Because
housing construction is highly cyclical and particularly
sensitive to credit conditions, its importance in the
economy--and the attention we at the Federal Reserve devote
-2-
to it--are greater than its typical 4 percent share of gross
domestic product would suggest
Financial innovations and regulatory changes of the
past two decades have somewhat eased the burden placed on
housing when monetary policy must be tightened to contain
inflation "Disintermediation" is a word not often heard in
the 1990s The proliferation of new mortgage instruments
and the maturation of the secondary mortgage market have
reduced the vulnerability of housing demand to interest rate
variations and to regional differences in interest rates
resulting from geographic mismatches in the demand for, and
supply of, home mortgage credit
But the housing finance system has not been
trouble-free in recent years One stress point has been in
lending for real estate acquisition, development, and
construction Readily available credit during the mid-
1980s, combined with excessive optimism by developers,
contributed to overbuilding, especially of income
properties The overbuilding resulted in sharp cutbacks in
real estate lending across the board toward the end of the
decade During this period some undoubtedly worthy
projects-- even single-family developments --were denied
credit The credit crunch served as a reminder of the
burden placed on housing by boom-and-bust cycles Large
swings in the pace of activity cause both inefficiencies in
production and disruptions in consumers' planning
-3-
One positive result from that difficult episode,
born of necessity, was that developers broadened their base
of financing by seeking out new credit sources and exploring
new ways of funding their projects and operations This
broadened base should help provide some added stability to
real estate development in the future
Despite the whole array of improvements in our
system of mortgage finance, housing continues to play a
disproportionate role in the ups and downs of our economy
For instance, as the nation came out of the recession at the
beginning of this decade, housing accounted directly for
nearly one-fifth of the total growth in output during the
subsequent two years, a share not much different from the
average of previous recoveries Given the long-term nature
of a housing commitment and the heavy use of credit, housing
remains a sector more dependent than most on financial
markets and consumer confidence, two determinants that can
change quickly
To be sure, the past three years have been good
ones for housing Starts exceeded 1-1/4 million each year
Single-family construction--most of which is destined for
owner-occupancy--was particularly strong and accounted for
an unusually large share of all starts, as the multifamily
sector continued to work off the excess supply built up
during the 1980s Indeed, all of the key indicators of the
new home market-- starts, permits, and sales--have been
-4-
running above their averages for the 1980s The existing
home market also has been quite healthy overall, although
the story varies some by region
It is no coincidence that this good time for
housing has come when inflation has been moderate and income
growth has been reasonably steady These are precisely the
conditions that promote housing affordabality, consumer
confidence, and healthy lending institutions Expectations
of subdued inflation have held the speculative component of
housing demand in check and have contained the inflationary
premiums required by mortgage lenders One result is that
the proportion of its monthly income that the typical
household must devote to mortgage payments on a new house is
now the lowest in more than twenty years And the steady
expansion of the economy has given consumers the confidence
they need to be willing to make the long-term commitment
typically involved in home purchase
Along with the housing production gains of the past
three years has come an increase in the rate of
homeownership The proportion of all households that own
their home, at 65 1 percent late last year, is the highest
since the early 1980s
More than economics comes into play in interpreting
the prevalence and changes in homeownership Surveys have
repeatedly found that most Americans aspire to homeownership
as a value in itself Homeownership undoubtedly means
-5-
different things to different people. For many, it probably
means more space For others, it means more amenities For
perhaps most, the "pride of ownership" often brings with it
a sense of financial security, residential stability, and
community status
While this aspiration underlies the market,
economics and demography drive changes in the ownership
rate As you know, the ownership rate dipped during the
1980s, after four decades of gradual increase The first
reason for the reversal was that consumers were less able to
buy Income growth lagged, and interest rates remained high
throughout the first half of the decade even after coming
down from the peaks in 1980 and 1981 Housing was far less
affordable, requiring a bigger commitment of household
income Confidence was down as well Furthermore,
households had less financial reason to buy Smaller gains
m house prices and absolute declines in some major markets
greatly diminished the investment return from owner-occupied
housing
In addition to the improvement m the economic
conditions for home purchase in the past few years,
demography-- specifically the aging of the population--also
has given a boost to the single-family market As the baby
boomers mature, they anticipate fewer future changes in
their jobs, marital status, and family size This expected
stability makes the selection of owner - occupied housing,
-6-
with its substantial transactions costs, more appropriate
It is worth noting, however, that despite some recent gains,
the ownership rate among younger adults remains below that
of their parents, when they were young adults
Houses remain the single most important store of
wealth for much of the population Consumers view their
home equity as a cushion against possible hard times And
many consumers also tap their home equity directly for
various purposes, including home improvements, auto
purchases, college tuition, and debt consolidation Home
equity lines of credit, rare just ten years ago, are now
held by roughly 5 million homeowners
Even as we work to expand opportunities for
homeownership, we need to keep renters in mind, recognizing
that they, too, are full partners in our communities Our
population is diverse Owning is not the right choice for
everyone Someone anticipating a move in the near term or a
big change in income--in either direction--probably is well
advised to avoid the transactions costs of buying and
selling And owning does involve financial risks Housing
does not appreciate in all places at all times, the risks of
capital loss are real While owning affords stability m
some respects, renting offers flexibility, freedom of
movement to new job or personal opportunities, and less of a
responsibility for monitoring and maintaining the physical
plant
-7-
Indeed, the Partnership's action plan extends
beyond promoting homeownership Many of the specifics are
intended to expand housing opportunities for both owners and
renters, One recurring theme among the 100 specific actions
to which you have committed is to take advantage of
technological advances Electronic technology clearly has
improved the operation of the mortgage market, enabling the
faster flow of more information at much lower cost than in a
paper-based industry Technology has changed the
underwriting, originating, and servicing of mortgages and
has enabled more efficient pricing of a wider variety of
mortgage products tailored for increasingly specialized
segments of the market
Of particular note, technology has aided the
measurement and pricing of risk on low-downpayment loans to
first-time homebuyers and in this tangible way has broadened
the potential market for homeownership The full and timely
flow of information is critical to all participants in this
market, and the Partnership's emphasis on this strategy is
well-placed Buying a house and taking out a mortgage is
complicated and often intimidating to consumers, especially
those of limited means
At the Federal Reserve, through our regional
Reserve Banks, working with community groups, we have long
attempted to provide information on the process of home
buying and mortgage borrowing Since 1990, the Federal
Reserve has sponsored or co-sponsored more than 600
conferences, seminars, and informational meetings on
affordable housing, fair lending, and related community-
development In our own attempt to improve understanding
through technology, last year the Board produced and
broadcast teleseminars on the basics of homeownership to
first-time homebuyers across the country Today, the
information contained in those live broadcasts is available
in videotape format to potential homebuyers, financial
institutions, and civic and nonprofit groups And the
Atlanta Fed recently developed a software product, called
"Partners," that helps bankers determine borrower loan
eligibility and pursue creative techniques for qualifying
low- and moderate-income borrowers More than 30,000 copies
of the software have been distributed nationwide, and the
program recently became available on the Internet
These efforts, together with the wide range of
initiatives of almost all other participants in the mortgage
and housing industries, appear to be bearing fruit In
1994, the latest full year for which statistics from the
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data are available,
originations of conventional home purchase loans to lower
income households expanded at more than twice the rate of
lending to higher income households Anecdotal information
suggests that these gains have continued
-9-
The most far-reaching and lasting way in which the
Fed can promote expansion of housing opportunities is by
doing what we can to provide a stable platform for economic
growth As I have mentioned, neither inflation nor boom and
bust cycles are friends of housing Steady, sustainable
growth in economic output, and thus incomes, provides
consumers with the economic means and confidence required
for the long-term decisions inherent in housing choices
Under any conceivable scenario, the housing sector
will continue to be critical to the overall performance of
the economy Population projections have been revised
upward in recent years By most estimates, Generation X,
augmented by a continuing flow of immigrants, should keep
the demographic component of housing demand growing about as
rapidly during the next several years as it has since 1980
This impetus is important, because over the long run the
number of housing units built depends more on demographics
than on financial markets, even though interest rates
certainly can and do affect the short-run timing of housing
construction
Among the important issues facing our nation,
deficit reduction has particularly significant implications
for housing In the past year, long-term interest rates
have moved down as the outlook for deficit reduction have
improved and have fluctuated with the ebbs and flows of the
-10-
budget negotiations The stakes for housing--and for long-
term growth of our economy--are high Our economic
prospects in coming years will hinge on our ability to
increase national saving and to ensure that such saving is
invested wisely Making a serious commitment to balancing
the budget within the foreseeable future is an essential
first step--but only a first step Making good on our
commitment by resisting the temptation to depart from that
path will be a significant challenge.
Budgets of governments at all levels --federal,
state and local--seem certain to be under pressure for years
to come Thus, approaches such as the National
Homeownership Strategy, with its emphasis on voluntary
cooperation among the private, public, and community
sectors, are particularly timely As professionals in the
housing and mortgage industries, you know how best to cut
costs of production and financing, how best to open markets
by reducing regulatory and discriminatory barriers, and how
best to expand opportunities through education, information,
and technology I applaud and encourage your efforts
Cite this document
APA
Alan Greenspan (1996, February 7). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19960208_greenspan
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19960208_greenspan,
author = {Alan Greenspan},
title = {Speech},
year = {1996},
month = {Feb},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19960208_greenspan},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}