speeches · June 2, 1983
Speech
Paul A. Volcker · Chair
For release on delivery
11:00 A.M., E.D.T.
June 3 1983
r
Remarks by
Paul A. Volcker
Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
f
at the
Commencement Exercises
of
New York University
New York, New York
June 3, 1983
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
This is a proud and happy day.
A proud day for NYU, which for 150 years has adapted
its lasting educational mission to the changing needs of
thousands of students.
A proud day for New York, so many of whose sons and
daughters have passed through Washington Square on their way
to lives and careers enriched by their experience here.
I know from personal experience, a proud day for you
graduates, families, and friends.
And, of course, a proud day for me to be honored by
NYU where I have many friends of long standing, including
both your President, Dr. Brademas, who also serves as Chairman
of the Board of Directors of one of my alma maters, the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, and my presenter, Dr. Kavesh, who for
many years has been both friend and counselor.
The pagentry of this gathering itself tells the tale.
You entered in colorful streams from three sides of Washington
Sguare, led by traditional symbols of learning and experienced
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
teachers. Collectively, you represent a wide variety of
professional and cultural interests. Individually, you
bring fresh minds and renewed vigor to the work of the world.
What could be a more fitting reflection of the special role
of New York and the University — as a magnet for talent from
all over the world, an example of strength from diversity, and
an incubator of change and renewal.
I am told Bob Hope once started a commencement address
by saying his job was to give sound advice about entering the
real world. He summed up his theme in one word: "Don't."
It may have been funny when he said it, but today I
suspect that line may strike a more serious note with some of
you. Not so long ago, a college education was looked upon
almost as a guarantee to the "good life." But today jobs for
college graduates are not so automatically available. Both
private and public institutions are under financial and competitive
pressure. A steady climb up the career ladder may seem less certain.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
But, of course, you cannot escape that real world —
even if some of you will defer the matter for a yea ror two
while further equipping yourselves with graduate study. And
my theme will not be Bob Hope's.
I am not about to deny the reality of too many years
of recession and economic turbulence. But I am also convinced
that, after the obvious difficulties of recent years — indeed,
partly because we have relearned some basic lessons in those
years — we have the makings of a new era of economic growth
and greater stability.
My confidence does not rest primarily on the evidence
we now see of economic recovery — although that is a heartening
reality. More fundamentally, some of the attitudes and behavior
that underlay our difficulties seem to be giving way to healthier
patterns.
In the mid and late 1960's, after two decades of un-
paralleled prosperity in the Western World, the notion spread
that we had finally learned how to maintain reasonably steady
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 4-
growth and low unemployment — that we could, as the saying
goes, "count on it."
But in the process, we fell prey to a human failing —
we began to assume the answer instead of working at it. Those
were the days when economists wrote learned dissertations on
how much a college education was worth in dollars and cents —
while the college students decided grade standards should be
relaxed.
Ten years later, when you seniors were freshmen, the
vision had turned sour. The inflation rate was running at 1
percent or more a month, and we had higher levels of unemploy-
ment, too. We were in the midst of a doubling or more in the
price of oil. Productivity growth had practically ceased.
The average worker saw the real value of his salary check
declining even though we had unprecedented increases in
nominal wages. Speculation in real estate, gold, diamonds,
and other so-called "tangibles" became the "in thing" with
the investment crowd.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Much has changed since then. I'm not going to argue
that you are entering any economic nirvana. Inflation is down
and we can see signs of improving productivity. But those
gains have come after severe recession, and we still hear
doubts and uncertainty about how lasting the progress will be.
But I believe we are in the process of building habits
and expectations that are consistent with greater stability
and growth. Part of that process, I am told, has been reflected
in a different mood on college campuses around the country. I
suspect that mood has been amply reflected here — a greater
diligence and discipline in your study, a recognition that, in
the end, a higher standard of living depends on our ability to
work efficiently, to keep abreast of technological change, and
to live with intense competition.
That change in attitudes is not confined to universities,
and I believe there is much greater understanding that lasting
prosperity requires a firm foundation of monetary stability.
I am reminded of that partly facetious commercial for an
investment house that brags "They make money the old fashioned
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 6-
way. They earn it." I doubt that line would have struck so
responsive a chord ten years ago.
Maybe the new economic challenge sounds exhausting and
uncomfortable — it's not the image of the "laid back" years.
But let me assert that you will find that environment both
challenging and invigorating — and out of that process will
come the increasing productivity and real incomes we all want.
Obviously, I'm in no position to offer guarantees along
with my vision — its realization will depend, in no small
part, on the efforts of your own generation. And today, your
stage will be larger — and more complicated than ever before.
Today, we are reminded at virtually every turn that the
relevant frame for action is, if not the whole world, then
very large parts of it. Earlier this week we saw the political
embodiment of that in the Economic Summit — seven national
leaders compelled to discuss their own nations' economic
priorities in an international setting. In strategic and
defense matters the point has long been self-evident. Anyone
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
spending time in New York will recognize the internationaliza-
tion of our cultural activities. At the more pedestrian level
of what we eat, wear, and drive we could no longer escape
"foreign" influence if we tried. And, of course, from the
perspective of others, the "American" influence often seems
even more overwhelming — whether it is acid rain in Canada or
the more benign and ubiquitous Levis.
I want to take just a few moments to suggest some of the
implications of the "one world" economy in which we live. In
recent years, ease of travel and instant communications have
made it about as easy — and maybe a little more exciting —
to lend money abroad as at home. For a while the process went
smoothly, but over the past year the "debt problems" of a
number of developing countries, particularly in Latin America,
have burst into general attention.
At first blush, the problem may seem abstract and
distant — and certainly of more concern to others. But it
takes only a moment's reflection to realize that a debtor in
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
difficulty poses problems for his creditors as well. And the
creditors of Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, and other
countries in varying degrees of difficulty are the commercial
banks of the industrial countries, with U. S. banks playing a
particularly prominent role. Left untended, we could all too
easily visualize a crisis that would reflect back on the
capacity and willingness of those same banks to finance our
own expansion.
Further reflection suggests that a country with a debt
problem is not in a position to spend scarce dollars for
more imports, threatening the livelihood of those involved
in selling to it.
Mexico is a case in point. Between the end of 1981
and the end of 1982, U. S. exports to Mexico dropped by
$11 billion. More generally, the slowdown in growth in
1982 in other countries dealt a severe blow to our
export industries and made a major contribution to the depth,
breadth, and length of our recession. Recall that today,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
about one-seventh of our entire output of agricultural,
manufactured, and other goods is exported — about twice
the ratio of 20 years ago.
In that light, the effort to manage the international
debt problem goes beyond vague and generalized concerns
about political and economic stability of borrowing countries.
The effort encompasses also the protection of our own financial
stability and the markets for what we produce best.
In that perspective, I cannot share the reluctance
expressed by some to provide, along with other strong countries,
additional needed support to the international institutions —
particularly the International Monetary Fund that must be
at the center of any successful effort to contain and manage
the international debt problem. Relative to the potential
benefits, the costs are minimal — and we can all be encouraged
that the relevant committees of the Congress have acted on
the pending legislation.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-10-
But a successful effort to manage the problem goes
beyond the capacity of international institutions alone, or
as a practical matter governments and central banks. Com-
mercial banks have themselves had to work with one another
and the borrowers on an unprecedented scale. And that
process, for all its difficulties, will have to continue
not just in 1983, but for some time to come.
In the end, the resolution of the debt problems of
Third World countries, no matter how different their particular
circumstances., will rest less on financial legerdemain than
on their ability to export their way back to financial health.
They must sell their products abroad to earn the wherewithal
they need.
They can't very well do that if we and the other industrial
countries with the biggest markets close our markets to them.
It is easy to understand an impulse toward protectionism in
the face of worldwide recession and joblessness. To some
degree, every country has yielded at the margin. But the
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-11-
time has come, with recovery underway, to draw the line,
and yield no further.
That should be possible in a world of economic
expansion — and indeed the expansion that we and others in
the industrialized world want would only be threatened by
closing our markets. The lesson of history is clear — if
one major country turns inward, others will follow. In the
end, the markets for all contract instead of expanding.
I could go on to describe other challenges to our
prosperity — issues that have international as well as
domestic consequences. But rest easy, I won't. My point
is simply that little we do of any importance at home is
without effects abroad, and vice versa.
In those circumstances, the seemingly obvious direct
effects of a particular action, when generalized among many
countries and many participants, may have the opposite — or
at least a different — ultimate result. It is the economic
equivalent of Benjamin Franklin's immortal words — "We must
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-12-
all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
That, quite simply, is the world in which you will be living —
it is a carousel you cannot stop.
In some ways, it is not a comfortable world ,but it
won't lack for challenge and excitement. In fact, it has
something of the character that you must have sought in
choosing NYU, in the middle of New York City, in the first
place.
Here at Washington Square, and elsewhere in the
University, you have experienced a diversity — a diversity
of background, of goals, of interests -— rare in any
educational setting.
You know something of the problems and the satisfac-
tions — of living in a world metropole, at once unfeeling
and competitive but also capable of human warmth and sus-
taining the highest levels of achievement. At its best,
that learning experience blends into a sense of shared
commitment and common concern about the larger whole.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-13-
To that extent, you have had a long head start in
understanding the problems, and enjoying the satisfactions,
of the real world. You will soon disperse — physically and
in your career paths. And as you do so, I hope you will
retain the values of your shared university experience <—
an appreciation of the larger framework within which you
seek your individual goals, a spirit of analysis and
independent inquiry, a respect for your neighbor's needs
and his individuality, whether that neighbor be next door
or in the next country. Our success, as a nation, as a city,
as an individual can only be met as part o fthe larger common
concern of humanity.
Members of the graduating classes, I have not perceived
my function today as promising you a bed of roses. But it
is a world where hard work, and courage, and human concern
can be amply rewarded in more ways than you may now imagine.
And I can also wish you a little luck — for sooner than you
realize it will be a world shaped not by my generation but by yours.
* * * * * * * **
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Paul A. Volcker (1983, June 2). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19830603_volcker
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19830603_volcker,
author = {Paul A. Volcker},
title = {Speech},
year = {1983},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19830603_volcker},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}