speeches · December 1, 1980
Speech
G. William Miller · Governor
Department of theTREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 TELEPHONE 566-2041
FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY
EXPECTED AT 10:00 a.m.
December 2, 1980
STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE G. WILLIAM MILLER
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TAXATION AND DEBT MANAGEMENT
OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
My purpose here today is to advise you of the need for
legislation, before Congress adjourns, to increase the public
debt limit.
The present temporary debt limit of $925 billion will
expire on February 28, 1981, and the debt limit will then
revert to the permanent ceiling of $400 billion. Enactment
of debt limit legislation prior to February 28 will thus be
necessary to permit the Treasury to borrow to refund maturing
securities and to pay the Government’s other legal obligations.
Moreover, based on our present estimates, the existing limit
of $925 billion will clearly not be enough to meet the Treasury's
financing needs in February.
Our current estimates of the debt subject to limit, with
our usual assumption of a constant $15 billion cash balance,
but without any provision for contingencies, are as follows:
December 31, 1980 $928 billion
January 31, 1981 928
February 28, 1981 943
Digitized for FRASEMR -757
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-2-
Based on these estimates, the present $925 billion limit would
need to be increased by $18 billion, to $943 billion through
February. Also, to stay within the present debt limit in December
and January the Treasury will need to reduce its cash balances
below optimum levels and postpone borrowings until Congress acts
on new debt limit legislation. Such postponements of borrowings
could be very costly, since our cash balances are generally
invested at interest rates equal to or higher than the rates
paid on our borrowings and since postponed borrowings will result
in later congestion in financial markets and possibly higher
financing costs to the government. In view of the current highly
volatile conditions in financial markets, we should make every
effort to avoid adding to market uncertainties and to conduct
the Government's financing activities in an orderly manner and
with minimum market impact.
In addition, the Treasury, and the market, will need to
begin planning in the middle of January for the Treasury's
scheduled announcement on January 28 of the new Administration's
first major quarterly refunding operation. The note and bond
issues announced on January 28 would normally be auctioned
in the first week of February so the securities may be
issued by the refunding date of February 15. Consequently,
even if the Treasury manages to stay with the present debt
limit in January, the debt limit must be increased in January
to permit the Treasury to conduct an efficient refunding
operation at the lowest possible cost to the taxpayer.
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-3-
The present $925 billion limit through February 28, 1981,
was enacted by Congress on June 28, 1980, based on estimates
provided by the Congressional Budget Office which were consistent
with the First Budget Resolution for FY 1981, adopted by Congress
on June 12, 1980. That resolution contained a recommended debt
limit of $935.1 billion through September 30, 1981. However,
the Second Budget Resolution, adopted by Congress on November
20, 1980, contained a recommended debt limit through September
30, 1981, of $978.6 billion, an increase of $43.5 billion
from the debt estimate in the First Budget Resolution. While
we have serious doubts as to whether the $978.6 billion limit
will be adequate to accommodate proposed tax cuts, spending
increases, and changes in economic conditions through September,
we believe that our estimated $18 billion increase in the debt
subject to limit for the first five months of the fiscal year
is reasonably consistent with the $43.5 billion increase
recommended by Congress in the Budget Resolution for the entire
fiscal year.
In view of the current rapid growth in Federal debt and the
difficulties in estimating debt levels, I would suggest that
future debt limit legislation provide larger allowances for
contingencies. As you know, the Treasury’s debt limit requests
to your Subcommittee have for many years included a standard
allowance for contingencies of only $3 billion, so our current
estimate of a $943 billion debt subject to limit on February
28, 1981, would normally be presented to your Subcommittee
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-4-
as a debt limit request of $946 billion. Yet, for example,
the recent court settlement of the Penn Central payment, which
was not anticipated in the FY 1981 Budget, was $2.1 billion.
I believe the contingency allowance should be at least $6
billion under current circumstances, so a reasonable estimate
of our February debt limit need would be $949 billion.
While the President's revised budget and debt limit
recommendations for the fiscal year 1981 will not be available
until January, it is recommended that the Senate agree to
House Joint Resolution 636, which passed the House on November
21, 1980. This Resolution provides for an increase in the
debt limit to $978.6 billion through September 30, 1981.
Senate approval of this measure will avoid the need for
further Congressional action during this session of Congress
and will avoid the need for emergency action by Congress on
debt limit legislation early next year.
A principal objective of this Administration is to help
assure an orderly transition in January as the new Administration
takes office. An essential part of that orderly transition
is to assure that the finances of the government are in order
as the new Administration assumes its responsibilities. It
would be inappropriate, in my view, to expect the incoming
Administration to appear before Congress in late January or
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5
early February to request emergency debt limit legislation based
on the budget estimates submitted in January by the outgoing
Administration. The new Administration should be permitted
sufficient time to prepare its own budget and debt recommendations
and to appear before Congress on that basis.
Also, if our current debt estimates through February turn
out to be too low, for example, because of lower than expected
economic growth and thus lower tax receipts, the new Congress
might be required to act in January on emergency debt limit
legislation to avoid a default on obligations of the United States
In the circumstances, I urge your subcommittee’s support
for House Joint Resolution 636.
OoO
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
G. William Miller (1980, December 1). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19801202_miller
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19801202_miller,
author = {G. William Miller},
title = {Speech},
year = {1980},
month = {Dec},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19801202_miller},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}