speeches · October 12, 1973
Speech
Arthur F. Burns · Chair
For release on delivery
Saturday, October 13, 1973
10:30 AM EDT
OCT 1 g 1973
The Outlook for the Dollar
Remarks by
Arthur F. Burns
Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
The Business Council
Hot Springs, Virginia
October 13, 1973
Any evaluation of the international outlook for the
dollar can best begin with an assessment of the inflationary
problem here at home. As a result of the massive exchange
rate adjustments that have taken place over the past several
years, the international competitive position of the dollar has
been much improved. But that gain will be in danger of erosion
if we do not achieve effective control over the inflation that has
been plaguing our economy. In a world of freely changing ex-
change rates, such as we have recently had, a failure to exercise
reasonable discipline over the internal behavior of our economy
is quickly and decisively communicated to foreign exichange
markets.
So far this year, as we all know> our country has suffered
an extraordinary upsurge in the price level -- the sharpest, by
far, since the Korean War. This galloping inflation reflects a
variety of special influences. There has been a worldwide
economic boom superimposed on the boom in the United States.
We have encountered critical shortages of basic materials.
The needed expansion in industrial capacity Jiad not been put in
-2-
place because of the abnormally low level of profits between
I966 and 1971 and also because of numerous impediments to
new investment on ecological grounds. Farm product prices
escalated sharply as a result of crop failures in many countries
last year. Fuel prices spurted upward, reflecting the developing
shortages in the energy field. And the depreciation of the dollar
in foreign exchange markets has served to boost prices of
imported goods and to add to the demands pressing on our
productive resources.
In view of these powerful special factors, and the cyclical
expansion of our economy, a sharp advance in our price level
wcxuld have been practically inevitable this year. But govern-
mental policies have also not dealt vigorously enough -with our
underlying inflationary problem. Monetary policy began moving
toward restraint in the spring of 1972. Yet, in retrospect, it
appears that the degree of restraint should have been somewhat
greater* This situation has now been fully corrected. Fiscal
policy, despite ejaergetic efforts to restrain expenditures, was
not restrictive enough; the fiscal 1973 budget deficit of over $14
billion was clearly inappropriate at a time of rapidly advancing
prosperity. Wage-price controls were eased suddenly last
January, and, more important, the relaxation was widely interpreted
-3-
to mean the virtual end of controls. And our governmental
farm programs were too long aimed at limiting production --
a holdover from earlier times which was not fully corrected
until early this year.
Once inflationary pressures become deeply entrenched,
it takes time to eradicate them. For example, the rise we have
had in consumer prices, and the strong continuing demand for
labor, threaten an escalation in wage demands extending well
into 1974. Already, wage rate advances are creeping up.
With productivity gains tending to level off, larger increases
in employee compensation will result in greater upward cost
pressures on our price level. Thus, although the special
factors affecting prices this year are likely to be on the wane,
I am not hopeful that the rate of inflation can realistically be
expected to fall below the 4-5 per cent range next year.
In this situation, public policy must aim at keeping the
growth in aggregate monetary demand within moderate bounds.
At the same time, however, our policies must not become so
restrictive as to run the danger of plunging the economy into
recession, thereby inevitably triggering corrective measures
that may of themselves release new inflationary forces.
-4-
The problem of bringing inflation under control is
worldwide. Other countries have been experiencing price
rises and cost pressures as large or larger than ours. This
worldwide inflation is most unfortunate^ and it will require
strong remedial action everywhere. But one fortuitous result
of the fact that recent inflation rates abroad have tended to
exceed our own is that we have not lost ground competitively,
as we did during the late 1960rs.
Moreover, the ability of American businessmen and
farmers to compete against foreign producers has been vastly
altered by the changes in exchange rate relationships that have
taken place over the past few years. The two formal devaluations
of the dollar, revaluation by some of our major competitors,
and the floating of currencies that has been the general regime
since March, have increased the average dollar price of the
major foreign currencies by over 25 per cent since May 1970.
These drastic exchange rate changes are bound to have
large effects upon all kinds of international transactions -- not
only trade, but also tourism, other services, and both direct
and portfolio investment* The changes will take time to work
out their full effects, but we have already seen a very rapid
-5-
improvement in the U. S. balance of payments this year. The
improvement has been hastened by the boom abroad, which has
generated strong demands for our goods, and by food shortages
abroad at a time when we had large agricultural supplies avail-
able for export.
The U. S. trade balance has moved from a record deficit
of $7 billion in 1972 to a deficit at an annual rate of $3-1/2 billion
in the first half of this year, and the deficit appears to have
vanished since then. Other elements of the balance of payments •-.-
notably investment income and capital inflows --have also
registered improvement. Hence the combined deficit on current
and long-term capital transactions (the so-called "basic balance")
has greatly diminished -- from $10 billion in 1972 to an annual
rate of $3-1/2 billion in the first half of this year, and to perhaps
a $1 billion rate in the third quarter. On the official settlements
basis, we actually had a small surplus in the second quarter of
this year and a larger surplus in the third*
We can reasonably expect further improvement in the
balance of payments in 1974. The trade balance should move
into surplus, benefiting from continued strong demands abroad
for our products, from readier availability of U.S. supplies for
export, and from the cumulating effects of past exchange rate
changes in stimulating export sales and limiting imports. The
prospects for foreign investment in the United States have also
greatly improved, while U.S. firms now have less incentive to
invest abroad. In view of these prospective developments, the
"basic balance11 may well move into surplus next year for the
fir st time since 19 57.
Foreign exchange markets have begun to reflect a general
recognition of the dramatic improvement that has recently
occurred in our international economic position. The dollar
strengthened materially in foreign exchange markets in August
and it has remained quite steady since then. In recent days,
the dollar has performed well in the face of terribly unsettling
news. There is a consensus among economists that the dollar
has by now been sufficiently devalued to assure the restoration
of a satisfactory U*S. payments position. Indeed, the opinion is
now widely held by informed observers that the dollar is actually
undervalued. And there is ample reason to hope that the renewed
strength of the dollar will be reflected during 1974 in some further
reduction of U.S. indebtedness to foreign central banks.
While the floating exchange rates of recent months have
been generally deemed necessary, our government and govern-
ments around the world hope to see greater stability soon restored
to exchange markets. The major exchange rate adjustments
that were needed are now behind us. There is a broad consensus
that internationally agreed rules for exchange rate behavior are
essential, but that restoration of exchange rate stability cannot
be achieved without much better control of inflation, both here
and in other countries. This is the paramount task to which
economic policy in all advanced countries must now be dedicated.
In thinking about the outlook for the dollar*, we must
never lose sight of the fact that our economy is the strongest
in the world, that our country is still richly endowed with
natural resources, and that we enjoy a large measure of
political and social stability. We certainly have the capability
to do as well as any other country in controlling inflation. Our
management of aggregate demand -- though it may be inadequate
at times — is better than that in most other countries, and it
will become better still if the Congress makes progress --as
I am confident it will --in improving its budgetary controls.
What we need now more than anything else is to persevere in
the fight against inflation.
Cite this document
APA
Arthur F. Burns (1973, October 12). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19731013_burns
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19731013_burns,
author = {Arthur F. Burns},
title = {Speech},
year = {1973},
month = {Oct},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19731013_burns},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}