speeches · March 10, 1971
Speech
Darryl R. Francis · President
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND INFLATION
Speech given by Darryl P. Francis
President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
at the Labor-Management Symposium
University of Portland, Portland, Oregon
March 11 , 1971
It is good to have this opportunity to dis
cuss with you some vital issues relative to collective
bargaining and price stabilization. The numerous
proposals advanced in recent months to stabilize
prices through direct government actions indicate
the wide concern for our process of wage settlement.
Proponents of direct action or guidelines point to
the large negotiated wage increases in recent months
as evidence that general monetary and fiscal stabili
zation actions are ineffective. It is my view that
these sizable increases are to be expected following
periods of excessive inflation.
Inflationary pressures developed strong momen
tum from 1965 through 1968 as a result of excessive
spending fostered by overly expansive monetary and
fiscal actions. Monetary actions were taken in early
1969 to reduce this excessive demand. Prices are now
responding to these actions. The rate of price in
crease, using any of the commonly quoted indices, has
declined since early last year. The course of the
economy from an inflationary boom to growth at stable
prices is not a costless transition. The nature of
this course was brought sharply into focus in recent
months by the continuing price and wage increases at
a time of rising unemployment.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 2 -
In my remarks, I shall first outline the course
of the economy subsequent to the restrictive monetary
actions that were taken. I will then discuss some
problems of wage and price determination in the col
lective bargaining process and some proposals for
smoothing the path of the economy during its adjust
ment to a lower rate of total spending growth.
In early 1969, when monetary action was first
taken to reduce excess demand, resources for production
were being fully utilized. The unemployment rate was
down to 3.4 per cent, the lowest for any quarter since
1953. Although capacity utilization in manufacturing
was somewhat below the levels of 1965 and 1966, a major
investment boom was under way, indicating great demand
for producer goods and equipment. The ratio of inven
tories to monthly sales in manufacturing and trade was
below the average since 1957.
Reflecting the high level of resource utiliza
tion, the rate of gain in real output had declined in
early 1969. Growth in real product had declined to a
3 per cent rate from a 4.8 per cent rate during most of
the previous year. Spending, however, was maintained
at an annual growth rate of 7.8 per cent, only slightly
below the 8.8 per cent rate of two previous quarters.
Reflecting both the high rate of spending and
resource utilization, price inflation was accelerating.
Consumer prices, which rose at a 4.6 per cent rate from
July 1967 to March 1969, increased at a 6.1 per cent
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 3 -
rate from March 1969 to April 1970. Wholesale prices
and the general price index were likewise increasing
more rapidly.
Reduction of Excessive Demand
This inflation like all others had its origin
in monetary growth. It was caused by excessive total
spending, which in turn was a result of excessive money
creation. When the public has more money than it wants
to hold, in relation to its expected income levels,
it increases its rate of spending. Incomes are bid up
to levels consistent with the increased stock of money.
If real outnut is close to capacity, the rise in money
incomes will be reflected mainly in price advances
rather than increases in output. Conversely, a smaller
quantity of money held by spending units than is con
sistent with expected income levels will cause a
reduction in spending and relieve upward pressures on
prices.
Given expected time lags, the inflationary
buildup of 1965-68 and the slowdown of 1969-70 have
followed this classic monetary pattern. From January
1967 to January 1969, the stock of money rose at a
7.6 per cent annual rate. Beginning in early 1969,
monetary growth was slowed to about 5 per cent per
year, and at mid-year the rate was reduced to almost
zero. In early 1970, monetary growth resumed at a
moderate 5.1 per cent rate.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 4 -
Course of Economic Slowdown
Under ideal conditions, a slowdown in soend-
ing would not be a painful orocess. As spending
units reduced their rate of spending, the upward
pressure on prices would be eased. All markets
would reflect this slower rate of demand growth.
First, there would be a reduction in growth of demand
for consumer goods and services. As oroducers re
ceived the lower demand signals through reduced sales,
downward pressure would be exerted in the resource
markets. Both labor and capital markets would reflect
the reduced demand. Wage increases would subside, and
nominal interest rates would decline, but emoloyment
and production would remain unchanged.
Unfortunately, this ideal functioning of the
labor and other markets has not been realized in ad
justments of modern industrial economies to lower
levels of demand growth. The response to a reduction
in total demand varies widely from one sector of the
economy to another. Such variations not only cause
hardships in employment, incomes, and profits but also
prolong the period required for achieving relatively
stable prices following a prolonged period of inflation.
As an example of this wide variation in response to reduced demand, let's take a carpet manufac
turer. Our hypothetical manufacturer may have been
operating at full capacity. During the inflationary,
stages of the business cycle, labor was in short supply,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 5 -
and he negotiated regular wage and salary increases
with the union. Each manufacturer was trying to
hire the other's workers. In the early stages of
the upswing, rising wages simply reflected higher
profit incentives. The higher profit incentives re
sulted from increased demand for carpets.
Carpets are a type of good which consumers
can purchase either now or in the future depending
on their financial situation. When the rate of mone
tary growth was reduced, they found themselves with
less money than anticipated. Spending on carpets was
reduced or held constant, and our hypothetical carpet
manufacturer quickly accumulated an excessive inventory.
He was then forced to hold the line on prices or make
price reductions in order to reduce inventory levels
and maximize profits. If the manufacturer did all the
work himself, he would doubtless accept lower returns
to both his labor and capital and would continue to
operate at full capacity by reducing the price on
carpets until all that he could produce cleared the
market.
In most instances, however, carpet manufacturers
will first reduce hired labor costs by cutting the
hours worked and eliminating overtime. Then if the
profit incentive is not sufficient to maintain cur
rent output, they will lay off workers until the reduced
output of carpets will clear the market at a profit
able price.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 6 -
If we take into account the thousands of other
employers in similar situations, we can see why the
economy's oath toward price stability has not been a
smooth or costless route. The recent rise in unem
ployment attributed to a decline in civilian spending
was further aggravated by a sham decrease in employ
ment attributed to a cutback in defense expenditures.
In many instances, especially in the building
trades, the bargaining power of unions has been suffi
ciently strong in wage neqotiations to reduce the
number of workers demanded at the higher wage rate
after a sizable amount of unemployment developed.
Nevertheless, labor unions cannot ignore supply and
demand forces. This higher level of unemployment
resulting from excessive bargaining power reduces the
upward pressure on wages and prices. A growing number
of unions realize that excessive wage gains lead to a
reduction in the number of workers that firms will
retain and will often moderate their wage requests
during periods of slackening demand. Even in extreme
cases there are limits to attainable wages. Such
limits are provided by labor substitutes such as
capital equipment, incentive for new technology,
"do-it-yourself" techniques, and the rising threat
from nonunion labor especially during periods of siz
able unemployment.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 7 -
Proposals for Improving Labor Markets
The disparity of adjustment in the various
sectors of the labor market to reduced demand growth
has led to numerous proposals for improving this
market's performance during the current slowdown.
Host proposals involve increased governmental action
toward restraining waqes and prices. Proponents of
this view believe that monetary and fiscal restraints
on total spending alone are not sufficient to reconcile
price stability and a high level of employment.
Concurring with this view, the Committee for
Economic Development recently stated that the percent
age gains from major labor settlements negotiated in
the first half of 1970 were well above those of a year
earlier and more than three times those in 1964. To
many businessmen such an observation indicates per
manent incompatibility between the nation's goals of
high employment and stable prices. In view of this
incompatibility, they propose an "incomes policy,"
which when stripped of its diplomatic veneer, simply
means some form of governmental action in wage and
price determination.
Such arguments imply that wage and price deter
mination by government guidelines or other methods of
control provide greater welfare than wages and prices
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 8 -
which are determined through the collective bargain-
gaining process. In reply, I suggest that
(1) The impact of collective bargaining settle
ments on the average price level has been
greatly overstated.
(2) The so called cost-push impact is essentially
a short-run phenomenon. In the long run nei
ther average prices nor total employment are
greatly affected by excessive union bargaining
power;
(3) The guidelines and other government control
proposals are neither workable nor compatible
with a free society; and
(4) Alternative government actions could be taken
that will improve the functioning of the labor
markets and at the same time avoid most flaws of
governmental pricing. Furthermore, these actions
will benefit both workers and consumers.
Overstatement of Collective Bargaining Power
Beginning with the first point, much of the
impact on average prices attributed to excessive col
lective bargaining settlements more likely results from
expectations of further inflation. First, it is my
view that unions have sufficient bargaining power to
negotiate wages much above equilibrium rates in only
a few sectors of the economy. Even in these limited
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 9 -
sectors if wages and orices become excessive during a
high level of unemployment, the unions face the pros
pect of major inroads from nonunion workers. It is
estimated that only about two-thirds of nonresidential
construction workers and no more than 20 to 40 per cent
of those in residential construction are unionized.-
The St, Louis Globe Democrat reported on March 3 that
there is "deep concern among both the unions and unionized
contractors over the inroads made by nonunion con
struction firms." Even in the absence of the nonunion
factor, price and wage increases in such sectors are
limited. All such increases, which reduce sales and
increase layoffs, have a sobering effect on future
bargaining.
As indicated by the large per cent of nonunion
workers, not all construction price and wage gains of
recent years can be traced to excessive bargaining power.
Much of the wage increase in this sector thus may reflect
the unattractive features of such employment. In this
case, additional wage incentives are appropriate.
Larger wage increases than merited on the basis
of supply and demand conditions for labor will create
inefficiencies in the economy and cause problems in
the allocation of resources. Furthermore, if labor
unions through excessive bargaining power are able to
obtain a larger share of real product, they will have
1/ Further Weapons Against Inflation, Committee for
Fconomic Development, Nov. 1970.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 10 -
a retarding effect on economic growth. The returns
to capital will be reduced, and a lower than optimum
rate of capitalization will result. It is my belief,
however, that this problem of excessive bargaining
power should be solved by improvement of the labor
markets rather than through efforts to control wages
and prices.
Cost-Push Impacts: Short-Run
Next let's briefly examine my belief that any
cost-push impact on orices following periods of exces
sive demand is of short run duration unless accompanied
by further monetary growth. Upward pressure on prices
which results from collective bargaining will lead to
layoffs if not accompanied by higher product demand.
Those workers who are laid off will eventually obtain
jobs elsewhere unless total demand continues to decline.
This will tend to offset the wane gains and the higher
prices in sectors where unions have excessive bargain
ing power.
Controls and Guidelines Unworkable
I will now set forth in detail my view that most
alternative proposals to the collective bargaining pro
cess are neither workable nor compatible with our ideas
on freedom. Although all-out war conditions are much
more favorable than those at present for the implementa
tion of direct controls, some of you will remember the
numerous problems of administering the Office of Price
Administration (OPA) during World War II. The number
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 11 -
of workers required to operate and enforce this pro
gram was staggering. By 1944, 325,000 price control
2/ 3/
volunteers- in addition to 65,000 paid employees-
were being utilized.
When direct controls were used throughout the
economy from March 1942 to October 1946, the consumer
price index rose 6 per cent a year, and there is fairly
general agreement that the index understated the actual
rate of inflation because of black market operations
and the declining quality of products. Wages rose at
a slightly faster rate than consumer prices. Finally,
in 1946, after a year of post-war domestic crises in
cluding numerous strikes, food shortages, and a high
rate of inflation, most provisions for direct controls
were ended.
Some proponents of an "incomes policy" suggest
that controls on wages and prices should be limited to
guidelines or voluntary wage-price policies rather than
legally enforceable controls. It is my belief that such
actions are useless. If conditions are such that wage
rates can be increased through collective bargaining
beyond levels dictated by the guideposts, I can imagine
great flexibility in the morals and ethics of those to
2/ U.S. Office of Price Administration, Renewal of the
Price Control Act, Congress, House Bankinq and Currency
Committee, April 12, 1944, p. 58.
2/ U.S. Department of Commerce, Statistical Abstract of
the United States, 1946, n. 207.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 12 -
whom the guides apply. The social responsibility
argument calls for major conflicts of interest on the
part of union negotiators. The rewards to union mem
bers are in inverse proportion to the virtue demon
strated. Both for those who have blind faith in the
guidelines and for the profit maximizers, the choice
of action is easy - the former to obey and the latter
to ignore them. For other Americans, the decision of
whether or not to obey the guidelines is difficult.
Furthermore, if guidelines are effective, they
perform all the functions of leal controls and have
all the undesirable attributes of such controls. Some
one must determine the appropriate wages and prices
to assure a level of output that will just clear the
market. I doubt that we have such wisdom lodged in
either governmental or private agencies.
Even if a voluntary "incomes policy" were work
able, it violates basic freedoms of our society. It
invites the use of additional legal power of the govern
ment to produce compliance. Most business concerns
could have major costs imposed on them through threats
of anti-trust and tax investigations or ultra-rigid
enforcement of other regulations. In fact, few of us
are completely free of potential harm from governmental
excesses. Thus, both voluntary and legally imposed
controls open the door wider for more extensive govern
ment power. Government power used for apparently good
purposes today, such as holding down wages and prices,
may be used for less desirable purposes at some other
date.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 13 -
Greater Benefits Through Alternative Actions
Finally, there are actions which the govern
ment can appropriately take within a free market
framework to improve the current situation. These
alternative actions offer greater opportunity for
welfare gains than do efforts to directly control
wages and prices. I would first suggest further
relaxation of import restrictions. The resulting
increase in worldwide competition would tend to stabi
lize prices for all goods and services traded in the
international market. The removal of archaic building
codes would aid the construction industry. In addition,
I would suggest the removal of some serious bottlenecks
to labor entry into some sectors, especially construction.
Action should be taken to completely eliminate discrimin
atory restrictions on entry into unions. Relatively
higher Day scales for trainees after attaining moderate
skills might be helpful in attracting more labor into
sectors of short supply. Where bottlenecks to entry are
retained through union action, I would suggest the appli
cation of anti-trust legislation.
Chairman Burns of the Federal Reserve Board of
Governors has suggested the expansion of Federal training
programs to increase the supply of skilled workers where
wages are rising with exceptional rapidity, the suspension
of the Davis-Bacon Act to help restore order in the con
struction trades, and the modification of the minimum
wage laws in the interest of improving job opportunities
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
14 -
1/
for teenagers.— I heartily concur with these sug
gestions and recently the Davis-Bacon Act was sus
pended. It seems to me that unions would prefer
these proposed alternative actions to direct wage
and price controls. Such controls actually replace
a major union function while these measures would
greatly improve the functioning of our labor markets
SUMMARY
In summation, economic activity does not adjust
painlessly from excessive demand and rapid inflation
to relative price stability. Prices continue to rise
long after the rate of increase in spending and output
declines. The various sectors decline at uneven rates.
Labor markets adjust to the lower rate of demand
growth through workers being laid off and accepting new
jobs at lower wages elsewhere rather than through across
the board wage adjustments within each firm or industry.
This inefficient method of wage determination prolongs
the period required to achieve price stability. The
lags in price and employment adjustment to the slower
rate of spending growth may extend over a three or four
year period. During such periods of adjustment we often
hear the warning that the price system is not working.
Proponents of this view contend that cost-push forces
emanating from collective bargaining are not subject
4/ Arthur F. Burns, "The Basis for Lasting Prosperity,"
"("Paper delivered at the Pepperdine College Great Issue
Series at the Beverly Hilton Hotel, Los Angeles, California,
December 7, 1970), p. 22.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 15 -
to supply and demand forces. This argument was made
in the early 1950's, and it is being made again in the
current slowdown.
The implication is that the Government must pre
vent prices and wages from rising in the private sector
through legal prohibitions or other devices. Currently,
an "incomes policy" is being proposed to meet assumed
failures in the labor market.
It is my belief that the so-called excessive
wages negotiated in collective bargaining are not as
serious as indicated by the proponents of wage-price
guidelines and direct controls. If the stock of money
is insufficient to support inflation, higher wage agree
ments cause unemployment in these sectors. This is a
restraining influence because excessive unemploynent
in any sector tends to reduce the bargaining power of
the union.
Market distortions caused by a more moderate rate
of demand growth are temporary, and Government regula
tions once in effect tend to become permanent. Workers
laid off as a result of the slowdown will get other jobs
eventually, and the shift will have little impact on
average wages or prices.
Efforts to control wages and prices through
guidelines or by force have never been successful when
accompanied by excessive monetary expansion. Under
the more favorable conditions of World War II, direct
controls suppressed prices only slightly. The laws
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 16 -
were repealed soon after the fighting ceased despite
the excessive demand for goods and services. The
guidelines are an invitation for governments to use
extra-legal power and are, in addition, a major
source of conflict between personal gain and social
responsibility.
Alternative proposals for improving the labor
markets offer greater opportunities for success than
the direct approaches proposed. Freedom of entry,
reduction of discrimination, rewards to trainees in
relation to productivity, and elimination of minimum
wages are fruitful areas for government action. A
broadening of anti-trust laws may be necessary in some
instances where bottlenecks to entry are maintained.
Organized labor should look upon each of these measures
more favorably than direct controls since the latter
obviates one of the major functions of unions.
Finally, inflations are caused by monetary ex
cesses. Consequently, a slower rate of money growth is
the solution to the problem. We had labor unions and
collective bargaining covering a greater percentage of
our labor force in the early 1950's but still halted a
major post-World War II inflation with a slower rate of
money growth. The economy is again moving along a sim
ilar course toward price stability. We have a relatively
high level of unemployment, and the welfare of consumers
and capital owners has declined. These are the prices
we nay for earlier excesses in money creation.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Darryl R. Francis (1971, March 10). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19710311_francis
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19710311_francis,
author = {Darryl R. Francis},
title = {Speech},
year = {1971},
month = {Mar},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19710311_francis},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}