speeches · October 9, 1970
Speech
Andrew F. Brimmer · Governor
For Release on Delivery
Saturday, October 10, 1970
8:00 p.m., E.D.T.
CENTRAL BANKING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Record of Innovation
Remarks by
Andrew F. Brimmer
Member
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System
At the
Tenth Anniversary Celebration
of the
Bank of Jamaica
Sheraton-Kingston Hotel
Kingston, Jamaica
October 10, 1970
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CENTRAL BANKING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Record of Innovation
By
Andrew F. Brimmer*
The ten-year life of the Bank of Jamaica coincides
almost precisely with the "Decade of Development11 proclaimed by
the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1960. In fact, I
understand that, when the organization of the Bank was being
considered, serious thought was given to the possibility of com-
bining central banking functions and responsibility for develop-
ment financing in the same institution. However, that course was
not followed, and the Bank of Jamaica has now accumulated a
decade of experience in central banking.
Yet, it appears that the Bank has been concerned with
problems of economic development almost as much as it has with
the traditional functions of central banking. Of course, this is
by no means surprising: while Jamaica has made significant eco-
nomic progress in recent years, it still faces a difficult task
in raising the standard of living of its citizens. And to this
task, the Government of Jamaica has assigned a high priority.
* Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
I am grateful to several members of the Board's staff
for assistance in the preparation of these remarks. Mrs. Dorothy
Helprin provided information on recent economic developments in
Jamaica. Messrs. Robert F. Emery, Yves Maroni, and Michael D.
O'Connor conducted the survey of central banking experiences in
Asia, Latin America, and in Africa and the Middle East, respec-
tively. Mr. Frank O'Brien was especially helpful in knitting
together the diverse regional experiences.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-2-
Thus, the celebration of the first ten years of achieve-
ment by the Bank of Jamaica is also a good occasion to review the
role which central banks have generally played in promoting eco-
nomic development in the last decade. It also provides a vantage
point from which to look ahead to see what opportunities central
banks in developing countries may have to encourage and assist
the development process in the 1970's.
In focusing on the innovative steps that central banks
have taken to help foster economic development, I am not overlook-
ing the fact that virtually all of these institutions have per-
formed most of the traditional central banking functions -- such
as managing the note issue, serving as fiscal agent for the
government, supervising the commercial banks, and managing the
nation's foreign exchange reserves, including the operation of
exchange controls in numerous countries. Moreover, many of the
central banks have carried out these assignments with considerable
skill.
Nor do I wish to ignore the crucial contribution that
central banks can make to economic development by achieving --
and maintaining -- reasonable stability in domestic prices and
equilibrium in the balance of payments. A central bank that uses
its powers to discharge effectively these traditional central
bank responsibilities makes a fundamental contribution to devel-
opment because these are conditions that encourage and sustain
growth. The converse of this is the fact that a central bank
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-3-
that does not pay adequate attention to creating and maintaining
the climate for growth -- or one that does not have enough inde-
pendence to do so — is undercutting the cause of growth, or
permitting it to be undercut by others. One of the basic conclu-
sions from a survey of the actions of central banks in developing
countries suggests that the nations that have prospered most are
also the ones that have the best long-term records in maintaining
internal stability and external balance. It is also significant --
and encouraging -- that in the last few years many, perhaps most,
of the countries that embarked in the 1950fs on development pro-
grams that were unrealistic in view of their resources and infla-
tionary in their effects, have shifted to more realistic programs.
Most of them have found the road back to economic realism dis-
couragingly long, and some of them are far from reaching the end
of it yet. Consequently, whatever additional responsibilities a
central bank may acquire, its basic commitment to the maintenance
of economic stability -- both domestically and externally --
should not be downgraded.
In assessing the role that central banks in developing
countries have played in the 1960fs, several questions should be
raised:
- Have central banks in developing countries --
while not ignoring their traditional tasks --
taken innovative steps to encourage economic
development?
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-4-
Have these central banks been able to alter
the flow of credit in favor of development
needs?
- Have they assisted in creating institutions
specifically designed to provide development
finance?
- Have central banks in developing countries
succeeded in efforts to encourage the mobil-
ization of savings by private financial
institutions?
- Have these banks used their proximity to the
centers of political power to advise their
governments as to the importance of monetary
and fiscal stability in creating a climate
conducive to investment and economic growth?
Finally, what is the record of success -- and
of disappointment — harvested by these central
banks in the struggle for economic development?
To answer these questions, a comprehensive survey was made
of the special efforts made by central banks in developing countries
to orient economic growth toward the goals of economic development.
For the purpose of this discussion, these efforts can be grouped
under four headings: the mobilization of savings, the fostering of
development finance institutions, the allocation of credit for devel-
opment, and advice on the development process.
Before proceeding further, I must explain the numerous
references to particular countries in the comments below. In every
instance, my purpose is to illustrate the general range and pattern
of measures adopted by central banks to help promote economic devel-
opment, and no country is singled out as a target for criticism or
invidious comparison. The conditions mentioned are often widespread.
However, without specific illustrations, we would be left with a
collection of miscellaneous generalizations.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-5-
Mobilization of Domestic Savings
While external capital, from either public or private
sources, can speed the development effort, the developing country
must depend primarily on its own resources. This being the case,
the mobilization of domestic savings is of fundamental importance.
To the extent domestic savings are made available for development
purposes, the prospects for noninflationary financing or develop-
ment are enhanced. Thus, the central bank can make a significant
contribution through policies which encourage savings to remain at
home and to flow to financial institutions and away from money
lenders, real estate, and other speculative activity. Moreover,
savers must be assured as to the liquidity of the instruments
issued by financial institutions in return for their funds -- as
well as about the soundness of the institutions themselves.
Once the question of safety is answered, savings are
attracted by the promise of reasonable earnings. Thus, the
interest rate on savings deposits must be competitive with alter-
native uses of funds. However, in the highly inflationary
environment of many developing countries, savings will not flow
to financial institutions -- that could make them available for
productive investment -- unless interest rates are high enough to
yield realistic earnings in the face of inflation. This means
that the rate of interest should be "positive11 in the sense that
it exceeds the rate of inflation.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-6-
Where deposit rates are negative in this sense, the flow
of savings into financial institutions is restricted to a few special
cases -- such as deposits by individuals with no other means of hold-
ing their funds, by those who use savings accounts for current trans-
actions, and by those who deposit funds for special purposes, such as
gaining access to bank credit. In the meantime, other institutions
offer higher rates, such as finance companies, credit cooperatives,
mortgage banks and the mortgage departments of commercial banks. In
this respect, one should note that the Jamaican authorities have taken
a positive step by freeing interest rates on time deposits of six months
or over.
In Africa and the Middle East central banks are generally
strictly limited -- in terms both of time and amounts -- in the
extent to which they can lend to governments. However, by speci-
fying certain asset ratios, central banks in this part of the
world have channeled a share of private savings to governments --
so that they could be used for the purpose of development. Included
in the composition of almost all such ratios were short-term govern-
ment obligations. Given the fact that in Africa private demand for
credit i s often quite slack, commercial banks might hold idle funds --
or invest abroad -- if they did not hold Treasury bills to satisfy
such liquidity ratios.
While this has been a successful me^ns of mobilizing
savings that could be made available for development purposes, it
would not be desirable under all circumstances. If the liquidity
ratio becomes an instrument for ensuring a market for the obliga-
tions of governments, it can lose some of its usefulness as a
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-7-
monetary tool. Further, in an economy in which credit is tight,
such mobilization of funds would squeeze the private sector from
which the bulk of investment generally comes.
The Bank of Israel has encouraged the development of a
wide variety of instruments attractive to savers. These measures
include deposits denominated in dollars, deposits tied to the
price index for value maintenance, and, recently, full removal of
ceilings on interest rates. The result was an unusually high
private savings rate. In Brazil and Chile, the value of financial
instruments has frequently been linked to a price index to over-
come the disabilities of low interest rates.
In Asia, several central banks in recent years have
played a major role in the mobilization of savings for development
through dramatic reform of archaic interest rate structures. The
best example is that of Korea, where in 1965 interest rates on
deposits were increased sharply -- from 15 to 26 per cent in the
case of one-year bank deposits. Commercial bank loan rates were
also raised substantially. This reform, supervised by the Bank of
Korea, was followed by an increase in the national savings rate
from 7 per cent in 1964 to 16 per cent in 1969, and inflationary
pressures were simultaneously reduced. In this period also, Korea
emerged as a country with an exceptionally high rate of economic
growth, averaging 11 per cent per year from 1964 to 1969.
The lesson from this body of experience suggests that
central banks might look to raising the real return that the banking
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-8-
system is able to provide to the orginary saver -- if more local
resources are to be mobilized to finance the investment required
for economic development.
One of the major obstacles to channeling potential savings
to investment in developing countries is the lack of liquidity of
financial assets. A number of countries have adopted measures to
enable an investor to liquidate his holdings -- without incurring
prohibitive capital losses. Mexico provides an outstanding example
of action intended to assure the liquidity of savings. This involved
a commitment by issuing institutions to repurchase their financial
instruments at par at any time regardless of their maturity.
The Bank of Mexico, the Nacional Financiera, and, ultimately, the
government, stood behind the financial institutions bidding for
savings. In effect, this meant guaranteeing that these institu-
tions would always be able to meet their obligations to savers.
Of course, the development of almost every type of
capital market institution enhances the liquidity of financial
instruments. Countries such as the Philippines, India, and
Malaysia have rather advanced capital markets, where funds can be
marshalled and channeled for development purposes. The Central
Bank of the Philippines has played a major role in developing an
open primary and secondary market in Treasury bills. Such action,
of course, requires that governments be willing to pay the higher
interest costs associated with a free Treasury bill market.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-9-
The creation of efficient stock exchanges (where appro-
priate) would increase the liquidity of financial investments.
However, where such exchanges do exist in some developing countries,
inadequate public disclosure of financial data on listed firms is
a principal holdback to the expansion of securities markets. In
the case of the combined stock exchange of Malaysia and Singapore,
extensive public disclosure has been a principal factor in making
the exchange outstandingly successful. Other developing countries,
and their central banks, pondering how to increase the availability
of funds for investment, might well study this example. Other
promising areas would appear to be development of a Treasury bill
market and markets for commercial paper.
In addition to action to increase the attractiveness of
savings and to ensure adequate liquidity, central banks may encour-
age saving in at least two other ways -- both aimed at reassuring
savers as to the security of their deposits. One is by means of
deposit insurance. The other is examination of banks with the
objective of enforcing standards of sound banking.
Central Bank Assistance to Development Institutions
In some places -- the Latin American countries provide
a rather widespread example -- central banks were founded to pro-
vide commercial banking, and some of them have even been given
specific development banking assignments. Over time, however,
there has been a separation of these functions, since experience
indicated that their location in one institution tended to produce
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-10-
conflicts of interest and to interfere with the effective performance
of central banking functions. But this separation does not mean
that central banks have played no role in the growth of development
banking institutions. Central banks -- with varying degrees of
appropriateness and effectiveness -- have provided capital for devel-
opment lending institutions, such as agricultural and industrial
development banks. They have extended credit to them, purchased
their securities, or helped to create a market for their securities.
In Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico,
India, Afghanistan -- and quite generally in Africa -- central banks
have subscribed to some part, usually a minor part, of the equity
capital of developmental institutions. However, on the whole, this
technique has had only limited use. This is as it should be, because
heavy dependence upon central banks for provision of equity capital
would have been inflationary. In general, it is best that develop-
ment institutions be financed by noncentral bank sources, including
governments, intergovernmental agencies, and private investors,
whose funds represent savings.
Extension of credit to development institutions by central
banks is subject to the same difficulty. To the extent that the
loans are renewed, and are never repaid, they assume the character-
istics of a capital contribution that does not come out of savings.
Much the same can be said of the fairly widespread practice, partic-
ularly in Latin America, of direct purchase by central banks of the
obligations issued by development finance institutions.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-11-
Iri view of this inflationary potential, some central banks
have turned to less direct -- and less inflationary -- methods of
helping development finance institutions raise their capital. This
has been done in El Salvador, Guatemala, Dominican Republic,
Argentina, and Honduras. In all except one of these countries, the
central bank has attempted to create a market for the securities of
development finance institutions of various kinds. They have
attempted to do so, in more or less noninflationary ways -- including
the use of profits from the ordinary operations of the central bank.
At various times over several decades, banks in Argentina, Guatemala,
and Honduras have tried to increase the liquidity of investments
through the use of repurchase commitments.
In general, it seems that central banks in developing
countries have not exhausted their financial expertise in trying
to make a contribution in this area. As an example, it appears
that efforts to make markets for the securities of development insti-
tutions (which have been explored only tentatively) might be reopened,
with greater determination and with more stress on ways to keep
securities lodged in private hands. It might also be asked whether
the guarantee instrument could be put to effective use here, without
opening a line to central bank resources that would channel infla-
tionary funds into the economy.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-12-
Allocation of- Credit for Development Purposes
In a substantial number of developing countries, the
commercial banks are foreign-owned, and most of them traditionally
have concentrated on financing foreign trade and domestic commerce.
In the face of this situation, a number of central banks have
attempted to influence the flow of commercial bank credit away
from such traditional uses and toward capital development projects.
The central banks of Latin America, Asia, and Africa have all made
extensive, and varied, efforts in this direction. In fact, it is
probably in this area that the greatest amount of central banking
expertise and effort has been expended with the objective of pro-
moting economic development.
With the allocation of credit in mind, differential
discount rates have been used in a large number of countries. In
Latin America, these include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia,
Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela.
In the Middle East and Asia, Israel, India, Indonesia, Korea,
Pakistan, the Philippines, the Republic of China, and Thailand
have also employed differential discount rates. Ordinarily, the
central bank charges a preferential rate on discounts or advances
against favored types of paper to induce the commercial banks to
increase their lending or to reduce the cost of funds to those
activities in which this paper originates.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-13-
Experience suggests that the use of differential rates
has not been universally successful. The potential for effecting
a change in the pattern of lending by the use of multiple discount
rates would increase as recourse to central bank credit by the
commercial banks became more extensive. But it could seriously
frustrate efforts to pursue a restrictive credit policy at times
when such a policy may be needed on overall economic grounds.
Several central banks have sought to allocate credit by
the establishment of portfolio ceilings. This technique has been
used in Costa Rica continuously since 1948, and to some extent in
Colombia. It has also been used in the Philippines, Nigeria, and
the Congo (Kinshasa). The Costa Rican regulations provide an
overall ceiling for each bank with separate subceilings on loans
for major economic sectors and on some subsectors. The system may
have helped to change the pattern of credit flows, although the
data are subject to questions as to the accurate classification of
some of the commercial bank loans. The Colombian system, which was
in use briefly in the early 1960fs, may also have had some effect
on the pattern of credit allocation. But the fact that it was
discontinued suggests that the Colombian authorities were dissatis-
fied with the results, or that the difficulties of securing compliance
were too great in view of the results achieved.
Central banks in developing countries have made extensive
use of reserve requirements as a tool of monetary management. A
number of these institutions have linked differential reserve
requirements to the composition of commercial bank portfolios to
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-14-
influence the allocation of credit. This technique has been
employed in an elaborate way in Mexico. Commercial banks are
allowed to maintain a lower cash reserve ratio, provided that
prescribed percentages of their portfolio consist of specified
types of loans or investments. The prescribed percentages may be
changed as the central bank shifts emphasis from one type of loan
to another. Portfolio ratios associated with reserve requirements
have also been used to some extent in Argentina, Brazil, Chile,
Colombia, the Dominican Republic, and Peru. In Colombia, the
system was combined with a secondary reserve requirement under
which the banks were to hold specified bonds of the State Agricul-
tural Industrial and Mining Bank.
The Mexican authorities appear to be satisfied with the
results obtained under their system,which has been in use for
over 20 years. They believe that the system was instrumental in
inducing commercial banks to take an interest in types of produc-
tive loans which they had not made because of inertia or force of
habit. Furthermore, there seems to be a feeling that, since banks
have become accustomed to making such loans and have them to be
remunerative, they may well continue such lending in the absence
of the regulation.
The import deposit requirement technique (primarily
intended to deal with balance of payments difficulties) has also
been employed by some central banks to influence the allocation
of commercial bank credit. Generally, the deposits are required
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-15-
to be held by the central bank. Alternatively, the commercial
banks are required to hold with the central bank reserves equal
to the deposits. Imports for development purposes and other essen-
tial needs may be favored with a low requirement, and a progressively
higher requirement may be applied as the essentiality of the imports
diminishes. The import deposit requirement technique (with differ-
ential rates) has been used in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador, Indonesia, Pakistan, Paraguay, the Philippines, Uruguay,
and Vietnam.
As a technique to influence the allocation of credit
under a policy of promoting economic development, the import
deposit scheme may leave domestic producers of nonessential and
luxury goods with ready access to credit. It may also provide
domestic producers of all goods subject to the import deposit
requirement with a degree of protection against imports that may
not be needed in the long run.
Virtually all central banks in the African and Middle
East regions have taken steps to influence the flow of bank loans
to priority or favored activities within the private sector. Tech-
niques used include credit guidelines, quantitative rediscount
ceilings, direct approval of bank loans, and selective liquidity
ratios. Countries using one or several of these techniques include
Nigeria, the Ivory Coast, Tunisia, Congo (Kinshasa), and Israel.
In general, the practice in the region is replete with direct and
quantitative controls.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-16-
The results of these efforts appear to be mixed.
However, at least in the Congo (Kinshasa), direct and quantitative
central bank controls seem to have been successful in increasing
significantly the amount of credit extended to agriculture while
reducing the amount intended to finance imports.
The Bank of Israel has probably gone as far as any
institution in encouraging favorable terms for development lending.
Controlled credit is extended at about 9 per cent, whereas ordinary
bank credit costs about 17 per cent. In recent years, credit
controlled by the Bank of Israel has represented about 30 per cent
of all bank credit outstanding to the private sector. These
controlled credits include rediscounts, specified loans which
give the bank an exemption from liquidity requirements, and credits
granted on the basis of deposits received under approved savings
schemes.
In a number of instances, central banks have given
specific -- and in some cases quite detailed -- guidance with
respect to the desired composition of the commercial banks1 loan
portfolios. The Central Bank of the Philippines has followed
such a practice since April 1957. All bank loans are classified
into four priority categories, with those in the more essential
loan categories being given preference in central bank rediscount-
ing operations. In addition, maximum ceilings are imposed on
loans in the two lowest, less essential categories.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-17-
The conclusion reached on the basis of the foregoing
discussion seems clear: a few attempts to allocate credit for
development purposes seem to have been particularly successful.
But, on the whole, the results have been rather mixed.
The Central Bank as Development Adviser
Serving as adviser to governments is one of the oldest
and most widespread roles of central banking. In the context of
economic development, this role takes on special significance.
Advice is particularly needed in four areas: (1) policies for
domestic stability, with particular emphasis on appropriate fiscal
policies; (2) exchange rate policy, with the objective of main-
taining external balance; (3) the formulation of development plans
that are feasible in view of the country's economic and financial
resources; and (4) the broad range of policies affecting the cli-
mate for investment -- both domestic and foreign.
How a central bank performs as a development adviser
will turn on a variety of factors specific to particular countries.
However, a survey of central bank experiences in this regard
clearly suggests that the relative freedom from involvement in day-
to-day debates on economic policy has been crucial. In general,
where the central bank has been allowed to maintain a reasonable
degree of detachment, its advice has tended to be objective — and
respected -- even if not always received with enthusiasm. As a
rule, the central bank is likely to be a well-equipped institution --
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-18-
with respect to staff and financial resources -- to undertake the
research and analysis on which a well conceived development plan
must rest.
The opportunities open to a central bank to advise the
government will also depend on the type of overall organization
created to formulate and execute the plan. In countries with
strong planning commissions or development ministries, the scope
permitted to the central bank may not be very wide. But, on the
whole, the evidence suggests that in many countries the central
bank is a senior partner in the development enterprise.
Moreover, the particular role the central bank can play
will be influenced by the type of development plan adopted by the
government. Where, as in India, there is emphasis upon direct
channeling of economic resources from both the private and the
public sectors for the purpose of development, the central bank's
advice is critical in every respect. Where, as in Korea, the
development plan consists mainly of goals for the private sector
to achieve, operating under a relatively free market system, the
central bank's specific role may be focusing essentially on the
adoption of measures to encourage private investment.
In conclusion, the evidence suggests that central banks
have generally been a good source of advice to their governments
on problems of economic development. However, in some countries --
especially where the overall planning machinery is quite elaborate --
the central bank may share the advisory role with other institutions.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-19-
The method of sharing varies greatly from country to country, and
it is hard to make an assessment of the overall results.
Central Banking and Economic Development in the 1970fs
Having surveyed the role of central banks in developing
countries during recent years, we should now try to look ahead to
see what course they may be expected to follow in the current
decade. It is my impression that expectations about the avail-
ability of foreign assistance are much less optimistic today than
they were in 1960 when the General Assembly of the United Nations
proclaimed a "Decade of Development.11 The Assembly stated that:
" . .. the flow of international assistance
and capital should be increased substantially
so as to reach . . . approximately 1 per cent
of the combined national incomes of the eco-
nomically advanced countries.11
This was a target for the total flow of resources,
private and official. It was endorsed by the industrial nations
in 1964, through the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In the
five years before 1964, the target was exceeded. But in the con-
cluding five years of the decade, net disbursements of official
development aid by the DAC countries rose only slightly, in dollar
terms, from just over $6 billion in 1964 to $6.7 billion in 1969.
In terms of percentage of gross national product, this was a
decline -- from approximately 0.5 per cent in 1964 to just over
0.3 per cent in 1969.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-20-
In contrast, the flow of private resources rose substan-
tially. Net disbursements of private investors, together with
private export credits, nearly doubled in dollar terms -- rising
from $3.2 billion in 1964 to slightly more than $6 billion in 1969.
This was a rise, in terms of percentage of the aggregate gross
national product of DAC countries, from 0.26 per cent in 1964 to
about 0.33 per cent in 1969. This increase in the flow of private
investment from the DAC nations was almost large enough to offset
the shortfall in official transfers. Therefore, total financial
resources moving to developing countries, as a percentage of gross
national product, declined only slightly. Moreover, the rise in
private flows accounted for two-thirds of the absolute increase --
from $9.14 billion in 1964 to $13.30 billion in 1969.
The reasons for the shortfall in official development
assistance can be traced to a number of factors. Widespread
inflationary pressures created by excess demand in industrialized
countries -- while public resistance to higher taxes was becoming
stronger -- seriously limited the amount of budget resources that
could be made available. In addition, some of the principal donor
countries were also plagued by balance of payments deficits, and
reductions in foreign assistance were a visible means of registering
improvements.
Expressed differently, there has emerged a worldwide
shortage of capital, arising from a strong drive for economic and
social advancement. The pressure for the use of capital to
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-21-
finance these improvements has become as intense in the industrialized
countries as it is in the developing nations. This shortage of
funds cannot be expected to disappear at any time soon, and it is
forcing nearly all countries to reexamine priorities in the harsh
light of political realities. In this light, home needs increas-
ingly are registering the first -- and strongest -- claims on
resources.
Against this background, the Pearson Commission, sponsored
by the World Bank, recommended that the DAC governments nearly
double their official assistance during the 1970fs. Many countries
have already pledged to do so. If the goal is achieved, it would
raise official flows of development finance to the developing
countries to 0.7 per cent of their GNP, and the increase would
take place gradually during the decade ahead. Consequently,
countries expecting a flow of development resources in the 1970fs
that exceeds the amounts obtained in the 1960fs may have to do more
to attract private capital.
If developing countries do concentrate more directly on
efforts to attract private investment, their central banks will
have an enlarged opportunity to contribute to the development
process. The more influential they are with their governments,
the more successful they will be in supporting this effort. The
task of attracting scarce private capital to the developing
countries requires an investment climate that both domestic and
foreign investors find compatible. Here it must be emphasized
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-22-
that it is necessary to create conditions conducive to domestic
investors as well as to owners of foreign capital. Undoubtedly,
developing countries will want their own citizens to own a sub-
stantial share of privately financed enterprises. This means that
domestic investors will have to provide a sizable proportion of
the required resources.
Attracting scarce -- and expensive -- private capital
to developing countries also requires that the firms and indus-
tries financed must be able to survive under the pressure of
international competition. This means they must not be overly
sheltered from the winds of competition behind excessively high
tariff or other protective walls. To the extent that the indus-
tries of developing countries are able to export products that
are competitive in price and quality, they will have a better
chance of penetrating foreign markets.
As stressed earlier, efforts to attract private capital
also call for the careful building of capital markets. This
includes increasing the flow of savings to financial institutions --
as well as building institutions that provide liquidity to investment.
All of these -- the economic stability that provides a
good climate for investment, policies that avoid oversheltering
of industries and which make them fit to compete and earn in
foreign trade, the building of capital markets -- all are the
results of policies which central banks are particularly capable
of influencing through their own actions and through their advice
to governments.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-23-
Concluding Observations
The answers to the series of questions posed at the
outset have been given at several points in the discussion.
However, the conclusions can be summarized briefly for greater
emphasis:
Central banks in developing countries, while experiment-
ing with innovations to promote economic development, have not
neglected the main functions traditionally associated with central
banking. In particular, they have tried to maintain domestic
price stability and equilibrium in the balance of payments. While
many of them have been fairly successful in pursuing this objec-
tive, a number of them have also found the results of their efforts
disappointing.
Central banks have adopted a variety of innovative steps
to encourage economic development. The mobilization of domestic
savings has been of primary concern. Where measures were taken
(such as lifting low interest rate ceilings) to assure that savers
received a realistic rate of return in the face of sometimes
serious inflation, the results were generally satisfactory.
Numerous arrangements to enhance the liquidity of financial invest-
ment have been fostered -- including the organization of stock
exchanges and the development of other capital market institutions.
In some countries, central banks were also authorized to
conduct a commercial banking business, and some of them were given
specific development assignments as well. However, most of these
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-24-
institutions have found such added functions to be incompatible
with their basic missions.
Instead, a number of central banks have provided strong
support to the formation of separate institutions to provide
development finance. Some of them supplied capital for agricul-
tural and industrial development banks; others extended credit to
them, purchased their securities, or helped to create a market
for their obligations, in general, it appears that most countries
have recognized the inflationary potential of heavy reliance on
central bank funds to finance development institutions, but in a
few instances this apparently was not the case.
Perhaps the greatest amount of innovative effort by
central banks has been concentrated on measures to influence the
flow of commerical bank credit away from traditional uses (such
as the finance of foreign trade and domestic commerce) and toward
development projects. In pursuit of this objective, a wide range
of instruments has been brought to bear. The most popular ones
have included preferential discount rates, differential reserve
requirements, guidelines on the composition of loan portfolios,
and ceilings on specific kinds of credit. A few attempts to allo-
cate credit seem to have been particularly successful -- but on
the whole results have been rather mixed.
Central banks have generally been a good source of advice
to their governments on problems of economic development. However,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-25-
in some countries, the advisory role has been shared with other
institutions. Since the method of sharing varies greatly from
country to country, it is difficult to make an assessment of the
overall results.
Looking ahead to the 1970fs, it appears that the devel-
oping countries can expect a considerable expansion in the volume
of official resources received from the industrial nations.
However, it also seems evident that they will have to concentrate
on attracting a substantial amount of private capital. Thus, they
will have to create an investment climate that both domestic and
foreign investors find compatible. If they adopt this course,
central banks will have an excellent opportunity to enlarge their
contribution to the development process.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Andrew F. Brimmer (1970, October 9). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19701010_brimmer
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19701010_brimmer,
author = {Andrew F. Brimmer},
title = {Speech},
year = {1970},
month = {Oct},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19701010_brimmer},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}