speeches · August 29, 1968
Speech
Darryl R. Francis · President
Madison, Wisconsin - August 30, 1968
Mr. Francis' 15-minute presentation
Fractional Reserves, Monetary Policy Tools and the Role of Money,
A. Fundamentals of a Fractional Reserve Banking System
1. In the United States, commercial banks operate on a
fractional reserve system. National and other Federal
are required by law to
Reserve member banks/hold a certain percentage of
their deposits as vault cash or deposits at the Fed.
2. Under this system, the volume of loans and investments
that commercial banks can extend is determined by the
availability of cash resources to provide the required
reserves against the deposits that result from such
loans and investments.
B. The "Tools" of Monetary Policy.
1. The Federal Reserve System has three principal "tools'
at its disposal to influence both the reserve base of the
banking structure and the volume of bank credit and
deposits:
a) The establishment of a relation between amount of
deposits and legal reserves, e. g. , now from 7 to 22
per cent demand 3 to 10 per cent timtime. e.
b) Control of the amount of reserves ehiofly by means
... "7
amount of Treasury securities
of determining the amount of Treasury securities, e.g. , about 51 billion.
B) (Holdings of Treasury obligations can be changed
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
HJ/ak
8/8/68
v-
from day-to-day and provide great flexibility.
When the Federal Reserve wants to expand the
cont'd. Money Supply, it provides additional reserves to
the banking system by buying U. S. Government
securities in the open market. When this occurs,
the Federal Reserve pays for the securities with
a check drawn on itself that is given to the seller
of the securities. The check finds its way to a
commercial bank and then comes to the Reserve
Bank as a credit to the reserve account of a mem
ber bank. Since no other member bank's reserve
account is reduced with the process, there is an
increase in both total bank reserves and the capacity
of the banking system to expand loans and invest
ments and thereby deposits. The money supply is
increased and, presumably, the volume of money influences total spending, production and prices.
The Relationship Between the Supply of Money and Total Spending.
1. In general, most bankers and businessmen would readily
agree that monetary policy does have an effect on total
spending. Overall, increases in the amount of money and
credit are associated with increased total spending. Con
versely, restrictions on money operating with a lag
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
C. 1. (cont'd)
are generally thought to be restraining influences on
consumption, and investment.
2. We should be somewhat more analytical in our appraisal
of the relationship between money and spending. There
are three questions that seem appropriate in making
our appraisal:
a) What is money ?
b) How should the supply of money or changes in the
money supply influence economic activity?
c) What evidence do we have to support these claims
of such a relationship?
3. Money is a common word in everyday usage. Yet there
is some controversy over which assets are, and, which
are not, money.
a) Ordinarily, money is defined as those financial assets
that serve as a medium of exchange;
- M1 vs. M2
- Credit vs. Money
- Interest rates
b) In the U. S. the money supply is normally taken to in
clude demand deposits at commercial banks and cur
rency and coin;
- Amount 198 billion (4£ billion currency I
- M2 380 billion ( 196 billion deposits)
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
cont'd.
c) There are some economists who would include all
very liquid assets - those that are convertible on
an immediate basis into demand deposits or cash
- such as savings - deposit type balances at com-
commercial banka-or thrift institutions;
d) On balance, there is still lack of uniformity regard
ing the definition of money.
4. One of the central unresolved questions in monetary economics
centers on the transmission path over which the growth of
money has its effect on the ultimate economic policy goals
of full employment, maximum production, stable prices,
sustainable growth and equilibrium in international trans
actions •
5. To put the discussion in perspective, we recall that:
a) Federal Reserve monetary actions have their primary
effect on the reserves of the commercial banks
±1
(26 billion).
b) That the volume of commercial bank credit (loans
and investments) and the principle component of the
money supply - demand deposits - are largely
determined by the volume of commercial bank reserves.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5
C. cont'd.
6. As a first approximation, therefore, it seems reasonable
to assume that the initial impact of monetary policy changes
are felt by the member commercial banks; first in the
amount of their reserves and then on their loans, invest
ments and deposits.
7. Many economists assume that aggregate income is the
preferred ultimate target on which monetary policy has
its effect since income influences consumption and busi
ness investment to a considerable degree and these in turn
have an impact on employment, production, prices and so on.
8. A most debated question is whether total spending is most
influenced through bank credit or through the quantity of
money.
a) Some economists argue that there is a direct relation
ship between bank reserves, money holdings, spend
ing and income;
b) Others argue that the principal path is: Changes in
the quantity of money lead to changes in interest rates
or the "cost of capital," which is one determinant of
business investment - the unstable component of income.
c) Still others argue that changes in quantity of money
lead to changes in interest rates and asset prices and
all other prices, which have an impact on both consump
Digitized for FRASER tion and investment and, ultimately, on income.
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
6
The lack of a uniform view extends inside of the Federal
Reserve System also. Some of us hold strongly to the
view that the System's role is to bring about changes in
the money supply and that free market forces will lead
to the proper change in total spending (income). Others
argue that monetary policy formulation should encompass
changes in a range of interest rates and asset prices to
influence spending (income).
Most of the empirical research bearing upon the problem
indicates that there is a consistent relationship between
changes in the money supply and changes in spending (income
but that increases and decreases in money are not, in a
statistical sense, the strongest factor influencing similar
movements in spending (income). Further, many economists
and financial analysts claim to have proof of a six month
average) lag between changes in policy and the effect on
spending (income).
There are many who argue that lack of really substantive
evidence related to the theoretical concepts of the mone
tary policy mechanism and empirical support for the idea
of a fixed lagged relationship between monetary policy
actions and changes in (income) means that the judgment
of policy makers is still superior to the concept of mone-
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
7
cont'd.
tary policy as setting and seeking measurable monetary
objectives. This analysis seems to conclude that the
System's primary focus should be on attempting to
create appropriate conditions in money and capital mar
kets as each developing situation unfolds. We certainly
learned during 1966 that, in a restrictive situation,
monetary policy can cause a "Credit crunch" in the
money and capital markets and have a restraining impact
on spending in a number of sectors of the economy. Of
course, the reaction time of each sector varies in time
and magnitude - but this is due, in some measure, to
structural arrangements in the economy.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Darryl R. Francis (1968, August 29). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19680830_francis
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19680830_francis,
author = {Darryl R. Francis},
title = {Speech},
year = {1968},
month = {Aug},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19680830_francis},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}