speeches · November 14, 1967
Speech
William McChesney Martin, Jr. · Chair
For release on delivery,
10:30 a.m., Central Standard Time,
(11:30 E.S.T.)
Wednesday, November 15, 1967.
Summary of Remarks
by
Wm. McC. Martin, Jr., Chairman,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
before the
47th Annual Meeting
of the
American Petroleum Institute
Conrad Hilton Hotel
Chicago, Illinois
November 15, 1967
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The prime challenge we face today, as I see it,
is to prove that a free society can have enough wisdom, self-
discipline and cohesion to advance the common good in an
orderly, sustainable fashion.
What makes it so difficult is that advancement of
the welfare of our society as a whole often requires of us as
individuals the mutual forbearance of personal advantage and
sometimes the acceptance of a degree of personal sacrifice.
Nowhere is that challenge more pressing than in
our economic and financial affairs. For there, in the 81st month
of the longest period of expansion in our history, we are con-
fronted once more by the very problem that always seems hardest
for us to solve or even to face up to, precisely because of the
self-discipline, forbearance, and willingness to accept sacrifice
that solving it requires.
The problem is, of course, that of maintaining
growth by preventing unsustainable spurts, that of keeping
overall demand from outrunning our real economic and financial
supply capacities and thus generating further severe inflation
and its bitter aftermath of recession and unemployment.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-2-
In more immediate terms, it is the problem of
capping the inflationary pressures — and inflationary psychology—
that already have been exerting a disruptive influence in our
economy and in our financial markets,
I do not think there is any need for me to dwell
on these matters or the dangers involved, and I do not feel any
need to take you on another conducted tour of the latest data on
economic and financial developments. You are too familiar with
the facts for that. Suffice it to say that—even though the
visibility of the economy's strength has been partly clouded by
the effects of strikes—debate on the economy's course has moved
increasingly from whether it will expand further to how much and
how rapidly, and with what consequences.
How then, are we to restrain further inflation?
Bluntly, the answer is to be found in a moderation of borrowing
and spending, both governmental and private, and the most
effective and necessary means of accomplishing it is fiscal action
encompassing both reductions in Federal spending and a tax
increase across the board.
I want to make it clear at this point that the
Federal Reserve System intends now, as in the past, to contribute
all that it responsibly can toward conditions that will make for
an actively employed, productive, steadily growing economy with
sensibly stable prices and orderly functioning markets.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-3-
But I do not see how it could be any plainer than
it is now that those conditions cannot be provided by monetary
policy alone. Nor can I see how it could be any plainer that,
whatever course monetary policy may follow, there will still be
prospects for trouble unless and until our Government's finances
are brought into better control.
All of you know that monetary policy has many
times been applied to the exercise of restraint, as well as to
stimulus, when conditions made it necessary. The question being
posed in our economy and financial markets, to which an affirma-
tive answer seems to me long overdue, is when — if ever — is
overall fiscal restraint going to be tried?
When a temporary surcharge on income taxes was
first proposed last January as a part of the President's fiscal
1968 budget program, to be effective July 1, the amount thought
appropriate to the conditions then envisaged was 6 per cent.
Since then, it has been felt necessary to up the proposed sur-
charge to 10 per cent — the figure fixed by the President in his
message to Congress in August — largely in reflection of changes
in conditions that occurred in the meanwhile. I see nothing in
that progression that suggests that it pays us to wait. Yet we
are still waiting.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-4-
When the President's August message went to
Congress, the program set forth was one that aimed—though this
seems to have been overlooked or forgotten by many — not only at
increasing revenues through higher taxes but also at restraining,
cutting and controlling Government spending so as to reduce the
prospective deficit in fiscal 1968 and thereafter to more
manageable levels.
Since then, many members of Congress have likewise
expressed feeling that restraining, cutting and controlling appro-
priations and expenditures is an urgent necessity, and some have
gone beyond the President in setting targets. So at least on the
need to reduce Government expenditures we have a considerable area
of agreement among those with the power to bring that reduction
about, but of course the final returns are not in yet.
I realize that there is some sharp disagreement
among those involved — in the Congress and in the Administration—
over how much the spending reductions should be, or how they should
be accomplished. But I find it hard to believe that disagreement
of this kind could be allowed to stalemate any action to cut spending,
or to increase tax revenues. We need restraint on both sides of the
Federal ledger, and we need it as quickly as it is possible to get it.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-5-
This is the richest country that the world has
ever known, and it is only fitting and right that we devote
large sums to public endeavors. But in our governmental activities,
as elsewhere, we must recognize — especially at a time when we are
engaged in a major war effort — that our resources are not unlimited.
And we must recognize also that we cannot keep on calling upon our
governments — federal, state or local — to do things we are unwilling
to pay for. If we are to achieve in fact the public goals we feel
most useful and desirable, then we must, as a self-governing
people, be willing to accept and adhere to some sensible order of
priorities among them in accord with the national preferences.
There is no question in my mind about the ability
of the American people and their government, pulling together, to
overcome every danger that today threatens the continuance of the
economic advance that has been going forward now for just three
months short of seven years. The only question is whether there
is the will to do so.
If the will is there, and it is demonstrated con-
vincingly- -as I think it can be by actions of the kind I have been
discussing — it seems to me well within our capacities to continue
indefinitely on the path of prosperity, with pervasively spreading
improvement in the living standards of the entire populace.
But let us not, just because we have had it so long,
take prosperity for granted.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
William McChesney Martin, Jr. (1967, November 14). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19671115_jr.
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19671115_jr.,
author = {William McChesney Martin, Jr.},
title = {Speech},
year = {1967},
month = {Nov},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19671115_jr.},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}