speeches · February 11, 1935
Speech
Marriner S. Eccles · Chair
MONETARY PROBLEMS OF RECOVERY
ADDRESS OF
MARRINER S. ECCLES
GOVERNOR OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
BEFORE THE
ANNUAL MIDWINTER MEETING OF THE OHIO BANKERS
ASSOCIATION, AT COLUMBUS, OHIO
FEBRUARY 12, 1935
PRINTED IN THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD OF
FEBRUARY 14, 1935, BY REQUEST OF
HON. DUNCAN U. FLETCHER
OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1935
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ADDRESS OF MARRINER S. ECCLES
Mr. FLETCHER. Mr. President, on the 12th of February Mr. Marriner S. Eccles, Governor
of the Federal Reserve Board, delivered to the Ohio Bankers Association a very interesting
address bearing directly upon pending legislation. I ask to have it inserted in the Congressional
Record.
There being no objection, the address was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows:
Mr. ECCLES. I am grateful for this opportu for that on other occasions. I propose this
nity to address the members of the State afternoon, rather, to discuss the general
Bankers Association of Ohio and their friends philosophy underlying the bill as a whole. I
who have joined them on this occasion. have chosen this method of approach because I
In taking up my duties in Washington, believe that it will enable you to appreciate
first with the Treasury and then with the more fully the significance that we attach to
Federal Reserve Board, I was, of course, its various provisions, and the result that we
under the necessity of resigning my own hope to accomplish through their practical
banking connections. Nevertheless I have operation.
every reason to feel entirely at home in an Broadly speaking, there are four main objects
assembly of bankers, and I am genuinely glad which we seek to accomplish. In the first
to be here. This is, in fact, the first opportu place, we wish to make the banking system a
nity I have had to address a large number of more efficient instrument for the promotion of
bankers since I became Governor of the Federal stable business conditions in the future; sec
Reserve Board. ondly, various proposals in the bill are designed
When I accepted the invitation I received to bring our banking system into closer con
from your president in December, I was some formity with modern conditions and, more im
what at a loss to decide what subject to discuss mediately, to aid in business recovery; thirdly,
with you. Since then the banking bill of 1935 we seek to make certain rather fundamental
has been introduced and I feel sure that there changes in the law relating to deposit insurance
is no subject in which bankers will be more in order to make the system sounder and more
interested than the provisions of that bill. equitable; and, finally, we seek to correct
I am especially glad to be able to present to you various inequalities, ambiguities, and abuses
my conception of the objectives of this measure, that have developed in the banking system in
because I believe that all who are of the banking the course of time. In the limited time at my
fraternity, no less than those of us who are disposal I shall have to confine myself to a dis
identified with the administration in Washing cussion of the broad principles behind the pro
ton, have every reason of common interest posals which are designed to secure the first two
and common purpose to desire the solution of objectives mentioned, stability and recovery.
the monetary problems of recovery in the How may our banking system be so regulated
manner in which the banking bill of 1935 and adapted that it may become a more efficient
seeks to solve them. instrument for the promotion of business sta
But it is not my intention this afternoon to bility and the mitigation of industrial fluctua
go into a detailed discussion of each provision of tions? A complete answer to this question
the bill. There will be ample opportunity demands much fuller treatment that I can
117809—35 (
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
possibly give it here. Book after book has depression of the magnitude of the one from
been written on this subject. Because of the which we are just emerging.
need for brevity I fear the statement of my Proceeding, then, on the assumption that
views may appear to be dogmatic. I shall, business stability is a desirable, nay, a neces
however, have to run this risk, as I feel that sary objective which cannot be achieved with
in no other way can I indicate to you the sig out conscious effort, I wish to develop the thesis
nificance I attach to the various proposals. that the banking system can and should be one
The fundamental premise underlying the bill of our chief instruments for the promotion of
and underlying my discussion this afternoon is stability.
that business stability is a desirable objective. The first elementary principle which it is
I feel sure that no one will disagree with this essential to grasp and which it is not necessary
premise and to my way of thinking agreement for me to expand upon is that the bulk of our
on this one vital point alone will lead you to money supply today is composed of deposits
lend your whole-hearted support to the banking subject to check. Out of a total volume of
bill of 1935. $24,000,000,000 of money, or units of purchas
The second fundamental premise upon which ing power, nearly $19,000,000,000 is composed
I proceed is that business stability cannot be of checking accounts in commercial banks.
achieved without real thought, real effort, and The second general principle in the theory of
real courage. To establish this point it is not monetary control is that variations in the com
necessary to accept and defend any one single munity's supply of money have an effect on the
explanation of the business cycle. It is merely state of business activity There is no general
necessary to call to mind that in the heyday of agreement as to the extent or nature of the
laissez faire, before any attempts at conscious effect such variations have on business condi
control were undertaken, business fluctuations tions. If I presume, as a layman, to enter this
on a disastrous scale occurred with distressing controversial field, it is because I feel that the
regularity. If we had a perfectly flexible cost question "What effect have variations in the
and price structure—which would have to supply of money on business conditions ?" can
include, I may remind you, an equally flexible not be answered in general terms or in a dog
wage and interest structure—our economy matic manner. The effect depends on a large
could probably adjust itself to rapid expansions number of circumstances. Thus, at certain
and contractions with little resultant unem times an increase or decrease of 5 percent in the
ployment. Without such flexibility, however, money supply may modify substantially the
expansion and contraction, instead of calling course of business. At other times the effect
into play forces that adjust and correct such of a variation of 20 percent may be barely dis
movements, tend to feed upon themselves and cernible. One point on which I think there is
for a considerable period to generate further general agreement, and the only point which it
expansions and contractions. is necessary for me to make here, is that in
It is not realistic, however, to say that all creases in the money supply tend to stimulate
that is necessary is to introduce more flexi business activity while decreases in the money
bility into our system. Numerous rigidities supply tend to restrict activity.
and inflexibilities have developed in our The third principle in my general thesis of
economy, and the trend in the recent past monetary control is that the operation of the
plainly points to more rather than less rigidity banking system left to itself with no conscious
in the future. If there is one thing that to me effort of control tends to intensify rather than
seems clear, it is that, unless conscious effort to counteract business fluctuations. The se
is made to prevent them, booms and collapses quence of events may be briefly outlined.
will continue to recur in capitalistic democ When business activity is increasing, there is
racies. It also seems evident to me that neither an increased demand for bank loans and a
capitalism nor democracy can survive another growing disposition among banks to loan
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
3
liberally. When banks lend more, thus increas completely nullified by those who control the
ing their assets, they also increase their deposits. money supply.
Consequently, at the very time when the The theory of a democratic state presupposes
community is increasing its expenditures, there that the will of the majority shall prevail. If
is a tendency for the supply of money to in minorities feel that the acts of the majority
crease. Similarly, when expenditures are de make life unbearable, they may try to change
creasing, the demand for bank loans falls off, the views of enough voters to change the com
bankers become more cautious, maturing loans plexion of the majority, or they may revolt and
are repaid, and deposits are extinguished. try to establish a rule of the minority. If they
Our banking system, therefore, not only fails succeed in the latter course, the State ceases
to act as a compensatory agent, but actually to be democratic. Majorities may, and some
intensifies fluctuations. For example, in the times do, abuse their power. It is necessary
period from 1929 to 1933, when expenditures to remind ourselves, however, that so long
were falling rapidly and the national income as we remain a democracy the will of the
was being cut in half, the supply of deposit majority is expected to prevail in monetary
money decreased by approximately one-third. policy as well as in other matters of national
Part of the decrease can be attributed to bank concern.
failures, accentuated by withdrawals of cash It is my personal conviction that our system
for hoarding, and part to the contraction of of broad political representation, faulty as it
loans and investments by surviving banks. may be, constitutes a better guarantee that the
No one person or body is responsible for this general interest will be served than would con
decline. The responsibility must be shared trol by a group of individuals chosen, let us
by the entire system. say, entirely by bankers or business leaders.
The fact is that laissez faire in banking and The power to coin money and to regulate the
the attainment of business stability are incom value thereof has always been an attribute of a
patible. If variations in the supply of money sovereign power. It was one of the first powers
are to be compensatory and corrective rather given to the Federal Government by the Con
than inflammatory and intensifying, there stitutional Convention. The development of
must be conscious and deliberate control. deposit banking, however, introduced into the
The difficult and controversial question is, economy numerous private agencies which have
Who should do the controlling? I would the power to create and destroy money without
gladly follow the course of the worthy divine being aware of it themselves and without being
who looked a difficulty boldly in the face and recognized as creators or destroyers of money
passed it by, but that is not the kind of boldness by the Government or the people. The trend
that will lead us out of the wilderness. I shall since 1913 represents a gradual recognition of
state, therefore, as my fourth principle that this condition and a reassertion by the State
the controlling or regulatory body must be of a power which it always possessed.
one which represents the interests not of any The President stated the underlying princi
particular class or group of people but of the ples controlling the relation of the Government
Nation as a whole. and the banks last October in his speech before
There is no political or economic power more the American Bankers Association. He then
charged with the general or social interest than remarked that "the old fallacious notion of the
the power to increase or decrease the supply bankers on the one side and the Government on
of money. If the sovereign authority delegates the other as a more or less equal and independ
this power to a particular group or class in the ent units has passed away. Government by
community, as it has done in large part in this the necessity of things must be the leader, must
country, it divests itself of a part of its effective be the judge of the conflicting interests of all
sovereignty. The purposes of the Nation, as groups in the community, including bankers.
expressed in its national administration, can be The Government is the outward expression of
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
4
the common life of all citizens." That, I think, I should be left to the individual decisions of
expresses the matter very effectively. some 15 thousand local bankers. It is scarcely
I am here merely stating the broad principles more logical that the variations should reflect
involved. I shall not like to be understood uncoordinated decisions of the 12 Federal
as arguing for a highly centralized control of Reserve banks.
all banking activities. Local versus national It may be helpful if I here summarize the
control is not a subject on which one should various steps in my argument to this point.
take sides irrespective of the question at hand. My fundamental premise is that business
The administration of certain interests can stability is a desirable objective which it is
obviously be handled more efficiently locally. worth making every effort to achieve. Varia
Similarly, there are other things which can be tion in the supply of money, which in this
handled more efficiently on a national scale. country is furnished largely by our commercial
We should consider each case on its merits and banks in the form of checking accounts, in
provide for local control or national control, fluence business activity to an unknown degree
whichever is in the public interest. Let us but in a known direction. The banking sys
now apply this principle to banking. tem, left to itself, behaves in an intensifying
Banks in this country perform two main rather than a compensatory fashion. If it is
services. They act as middlemen for the invest to be made to behave in a compensatory
ment of a substantial portion of the communi fashion, there must be conscious and deliberate
ty's savings, and, through the provision of control, and this control must be exercised by
checking facilities, they supply the bulk of the a body which represents the Nation.
community's means of payment. So far as the Let us now examine the Federal Reserve
investment of savings is concerned, a large System in the light of the preceding discussion.
degree of local autonomy should be left with I propose, first, to discuss the development of
the individual bankers. The State should lay open-market policy.
down minimum standards to be observed in In 1913 the framers of the Federal Reserve
the interests of protecting savings of individ Act had certain definite purposes in mind which
uals, but these standards can only be minima, did not iuelude, as the bill was enacted, any
and chief reliance for the safe investment of reference to national monetary policy. They
the community's savings must rest on the wished to prevent the periodic suspension of
judgment and knowledge of the individual payments which occurred under the old na
banker. tional-banking system, and to provide an
When we come to the second function of agency where banks could rediscount commer
banks—namely, that of providing the com cial loans in order to supply temporary, sea
munity's money supply—a different range of sonal, and emergency needs of their customers
factors must be taken into consideration. The for credit and currency. Broadly speaking,
effect of variations in the supply of money is I think it is true to say that the Reserve banks
Nation-wide and cannot be localized. The were looked upon as emergency lending insti
Reserve administration may make conditions tutions. From this viewpoint it was proper
favorable for the creation of new deposits, but that the regional Reserve banks should have
it cannot insure that the new money will be almost complete autonomy, and that the Fed
used in any particular section of the country, eral Reserve Board should have only a limited
or spent on any particular kind of goods. amount of supervisory and coordinating power.
Since, therefore, the effect of monetary policy In the post-war period our concept of the
is Nation-wide, the formulation of monetary functions of the Reserve administration gradu
policy should be by a body which represents ally changed. It became evident that through
the Nation, and which is activated by national the control of the reserves of member banks
considerations. It is inconceivable that varia the Reserve administration could influence the
tions in the community's money supply volume of deposits, and hence the volume of
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5
loanable funds of commercial banks. The Governors of the 12 Federal Reserve banks.
trend away from autonomous regional action These Governors are independent of the Fed
to a more coordinated and centralized control eral Reserve Board. After the Open Market
was evidenced by a significant development in Committee has formulated its policy, its rec
1922 and 1923. In 1922 certain of the Re ommendations may be adopted or rejected by
serve banks began to buy securities, mainly the Federal Reserve Board. Even after the
for the purpose of increasing their earning assets. policy has been formulated by the committee
The purchase of these securities, however, took and approved by the Board, any Federal Re
place in New York and gave deposits and re serve bank, through its board of directors, is
serves to New York commercial banks. These free to decline to participate in the policy.
banks utilized these increased reserves to re Since you are all administrators, I do not think
duce their borrowings from the New York that I need spend much time in pointing out to
Federal Reserve Bank. It appeared, there you how bad this set-up is from an adminis
fore, that the attempt of other Reserve Banks trative point of view. The body which is ulti
to increase their earning assets resulted in a mately responsible for policy—the Federal
decrease in the earning assets of the New York Reserve Board—legally can take no part in
Reserve Bank. It also became evident that the formulation of the policy. The body
increased or decreased purchases of securities which formulates policy, on the other hand,
by the Reserve banks affected member banks' legally has no power to bring the policy into
reserves, and in this way member banks' de operation. The boards of directors of the indi
posits, and loans and investments. A small vidual Reserve banks, who take no part in
committee of Governors was thereupon set up the formulation of policy, have the power to
to coordinate purchases and sales. In 1923 obstruct its operation. It is a well-known fact
this committee became the open-market com that the more people there are who share a
mittee, composed of the Governors of the Fed responsibility for policy, the less keenly does
eral Reserve Banks of New York, Boston, any one of those people feel his own personal
Philadelphia, Chicago, and Cleveland. Its responsibility.
stated duty was to formulate open-market The theory, therefore, back of the open-
policy, subject to the approval of the Federal market provision in the recent banking bill
Reserve Board, with primary regard to the becomes clear. The bill provides for a small,
accommodation of commerce and business, and responsive body which is charged with the duty
to the effect of such purchases or sales on the of acting in the national interest in formulating
general credit situation. This marked a step open-market policy and in accepting respon
toward the theory of conscious and continuous sibility for its consummation and results.
control. From this date onward the volume of You will observe next that we propose to
money in the United States was influenced leave the essentially regional organization of
greatly by actions of the open-market com the Federal Reserve System virtually un
mittee and the Federal Reserve Board. changed. I feel that in a country the size of
It appears, therefore, that the System itself ours the regional system of Federal Reserve
by virtue of necessity has developed a large banks must always play an important and
measure of coordinated activity in regard to necessary role in our banking system. They
open-market operations, the single most im afford, for one thing, an essential link between
portant instrument of Reserve control. This the thousands of individual member banks, on
coordination, while it represented a great ad the one hand, and the Federal Reserve Board,
vance over the situation which prevailed up to on the other. Besides keeping in close touch
1923, nevertheless leaves much to be desired. with member banks the Reserve banks examine
The body which is charged with the formula member banks, admit banks to membership,
tion of open-market policy is the Federal Open provide check-clearing facilities, make loans to
Market Committee, which is composed of the individual member banks, carry the reserves of
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
6
member banks, and supply the currency needs I turn now to proposed changes in the oper
of their localities. ation of the Federal Reserve banks.
Hiere is but one change in the internal or Two of the proposed changes now in the bill
ganization of the Reserve banks which, in the have been widely commented upon and have
interests of economy, efficiency, and coordina been as widely misunderstood. I refer to the
tion, I think it is necessary at this time to provision that the type of paper eligible for re-
effect. Officially the Federal Reserve Board discounting at Federal Reserve banks shall not
has no relations with the governors of the be defined in the law, but shall be subject to
Reserve banks. In their dealings with the the regulation of the Federal Reserve Board:
Reserve banks the Board is supposed to work and to the provision that segregation of collat
through the chairmen, who are not the chief eral for Federal Reserve notes shall be repealed.
executive officers of the banks. It is proposed In order to understand our reasons for wish
to end the dual administration of the Reserve ing to modify the present requirements in the
banks under the chairman of the Board, who law relating to eligibility, it is necessary to
is appointed by the Federal Reserve Board, recount briefly certain developments that have
and the Governor, who is appointed by the occurred in the history of the Federal Reserve
local board of directors, to give the governors System. Apparently it was the theory of the
a legal status and to combine their position framers of the Federal Reserve Act that bor
with that of chairmen of their boards of direc rowings on commercial paper from the Reserve
tors. Inasmuch as the Federal Reserve Board banks and the issue of Federal Reserve notes
is surrendering the appointment of the chair would be closely connected. It was provided,
man, it is obviously desirable in the interests therefore, that Federal Reserve notes issued by
of coordination and harmony that the appoint Federal Reserve agents should be secured by
ment of governors by the local boards be 100-percent collateral in gold or eligible paper
subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve and that Federal Reserve notes in actual cir
Board. culation shall have a 40-percent reserve in
In laying down a guiding principle for the gold. It was apparently believed that the
President in his selection of future members of demand for notes arose from commercial bor
the Board, it seemed desirable to substitute for rowers, that the collateral requirements would
the somewhat meaningless phrases in the law restrict the issue of notes to such borrowers,
the unequivocal requirement that the members and that this would afford elasticity and pre
should be persons qualified by education and vent the danger of overissue.
experience to take part in the formulation of This line of reasoning did not take cognizance
national economic and monetary policies. of a profound change in our monetary habits.
This is a recognition in the law of the principal In a deposit-using country such as the United
function of the Federal Reserve Board. States, currency is seldom borrowed from a
In view of the enormous difficulty of the bank. Borrowers normally receive deposit
task of the Federal Reserve Board, the bill credits and pay their bills with checks. The
attempts to make a position on that Board as demand for currency arises chiefly from indi
attractive as possible for the purpose of secur viduals and businesses who for the sake of con
ing and retaining the services of the best talent venience desire to convert a portion of their
in the country. The attractiveness of a posi checking accounts into currency. The volume
tion on the Board will be increased by the of money in circulation fluctuates with changes
added powers granted to it and by providing in the volume of those activities which employ
that its members shall be relieved as far as the largest amount of cash, namely, retail trade
possible from financial worries. A position on and factory pay rolls. A consequence of this
the Board is one of the most important posts development is that the Reserve banks play a
in the Nation, and recognition of this fact is passive role in supplying Federal Reserve notes
accorded in the bill. for circulation. If they issued Federal Reserve
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
7
notes in payment for securities purchased, the expires this year unless extended by the Presi
sellers of the securities would immediately dent for a maximum of 2 more years.
deposit the notes in the member banks and It is realistic and desirable at this time to
the member banks would send them in to the do away with the collateral requirements
Reserve banks. If they sold securities for altogether. They add nothing to the safety
Federal Reserve notes, the buyers of the of the Federal Reserve notes since these notes
securities would get the notes from their are an obligation of the United States Govern
member banks and these banks in turn would ment and have a prior lien on the assets of the
get them from the Reserve banks. Federal Reserve banks. This does not mean
Thus, it will be seen that the framers of the that notes will be issued without adequate
Federal Reserve Act were mistaken in two of backing. Any increase in the note issue
their expectations regarding note issue. Notes must be counterbalanced by a corresponding
are not associated in any direct or immediate increase in Federal Reserve bank assets. It
way with the needs of business for commercial makes no change in the requirement for a 40-
loans. Neither is there any need to place percent reserve in gold certificates or lawful
restrictions on the issue of Federal Reserve money. It is merely a proposal to get rid of
notes since, as we have just seen, the volume an antiquated feature in the Federal Reserve
outstanding is not susceptible to control in a Act which has never served a useful purpose
predominantly deposit-using country. and has in the past at times prevented the
Although the requirements that Federal timely launching of an essential monetary
Reserve notes be secured by eligible paper or policy.
gold does not serve as a restriction on the The restriction of the rediscounting privilege
issue of Federal Reserve notes, it may in the to a particular and narrowly restricted type of
future, as it has in the past, severely restrict bank loan is in accordance with a theory of
the ability of the Reserve administration to reserve banking which I think we have now
increase the volume of deposits through open- outgrown. The major task of the Reserve
market operations. Thus, in 1931 there oc Administration is not to encourage the exten
curred simultaneously a demand for gold for sion of a particular type of loan. The re
export and for notes to hoard. Owing to the striction of the borrowing privilege to com
shortage of eligible paper held by the Reserve mercial loans has no connection with regula
banks, more than a billion dollars in gold in tion of the volume of bank credit or of the
excess of the 40-percent gold requirement had access to the Reserve banks. The aggregate
to be earmarked for the account of Federal amount of paper eligible for rediscounting has
Reserve notes. Had the Reserve banks bought been at all times greatly in excess of the vol
securities in order to build up member banks ume of rediscounts. Moreover, banks have
reserves, the rediscounts would have decreased been permitted to rediscount their own notes
and more gold would have had to be pledged secured by Government obligations. To con
against Federal Reserve notes. The Reserve trol the amount of borrowing from Reserve
administration felt at that time that its hands banks the Reserve Administration relies upon
were tied and that it could take no action to the rediscount rate and the general policy,
stem the course of deflation so long as the note- amounting to unwritten law, that borrowing
issue provisions remained in the law. The should not be continuous and should be for
Glass-Steagall Act of 1932, by making Govern emergency and seasonal purposes only.
ment securities bought in the open market Hence, the elimination of technical restric
eligible as collateral for Federal Reserve notes, tions on eligibility does not involve any danger
permitted the Reserve Administration to buy of excessive use of Reserve bank facilities.
securities, get member banks out of debt, and But it does enable the Reserve banks to come
thus stem the process of deflation. This act to the assistance of banks who may have
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8
sound assets but may be devoid of eligible j short-dated commercial loans and investments.
paper. For the emergency such a provision [ But I need not tell you that, if this suggestion
was made by the Glass-Steagall Act, but not were acted upon, the result would be fatal to
until great harm had resulted from the ina the banks.
bility of the member banks to receive help In October 1934 the eligible paper of member
from the Reserve banks in the emergency. banks, within the meaning of the Federal
The bill provides for admission of nonmem- Reserve Act, amounted to only slightly more
ber banks into the Federal Reserve System than $2,000,000,000. No doubt, based upon
prior to 1937 without regard to the size of your past experience, you would find that a
their capital. This will enable small banks, much smaller amount would be acceptable if it
which would otherwise be confronted with the were offered to the Reserve banks. Even in
dilemma of either foregoing the protection of 1929 this paper amounted to only 4% billion
deposit insurance or promptly raising addi dollars. Banks cannot live on the interest of
tional capital, to join the Federal Reserve such a small volume of loans and an attempt to
System with their present capital, and thus to confine themselves to these loans would greatly
become eligible for admission to the insurance curtail the scope of banking. The more busi
system. The resultant unification of banking ness the banks refuse the more will be handled
under the Federal Reserve System and the by other agencies, including the Government,
provision in the bill giving the Federal Re and the less room will remain for the operations
serve Board power to change member bank of the private banking system.
reserve requirements will contribute to the I am fully aware of the fear with which bank
Board's ability to exercise effective monetary ers view the extension of other lending agencies
control. and the uneasiness they feel at having to rely
Let us now consider the proposals in the bill more and more on holdings of Government
that are designed more specifically to aid in obligations to keep up their income. I might
business recovery. I shall confine my dis point out, however, that these developments
cussion chiefly to the one proposal which I are a consequence of the failure of the banking
regard as the most important in this respect system to perform its functions adequately.
and at the same time the one most susceptible If the banking system would utilize in real-
to misunderstanding. I refer to the provision estate loans and other long-term investments
permitting banks to make loans on improved the savings and excess funds that it now pos
real estate up to 75 percent of its appraised sesses, bank business activity would be greatly
value and on an amortization basis for a 20- stimulated, and the Government would then
year period and an aggregate amount up to be able to withdraw rapidly from the lending
60 percent of their time deposits. field.
It has been asserted that this is an invitation The bankers also feel a deep concern about
to banks to make loans of a character that does the constant growth of the Government's
not conform to sound banking principles or deficit and of the public debt, and yet a
standards. The collapse of real-estate values considerable part of this debt is incurred in
is cited as an illustration of the dangers asso refinancing mortgages and in undertaking
ciated with such loans. It is constantly stated other functions which the banks have failed to
that the troubles of our banking system were perform. Release of banking funds in these
due entirely to the acquisition of long-term fields would enable the Government to diminish
assets by the banks. It is suggested that banks its expenditures and to reduce the rate of
in the future should confine themselves to growth of the public debt.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
I am, you will carefully note, criticizing the consist of super-liquid open-market paper.
banking system and not the bankers as What we want to accomplish is to make it
individuals. I do not see how you as individ possible for banks, without abandoning pru
ual bankers, having to secure liquidity alone dence or care, to meet local needs both for
and unaided, could safely have followed a short- and for long-time funds. We want to
different lending policy than you did. make all sound assets liquid by making them
This, then, is the dilemma that faces the rediscountable at the Reserve banks, and then
banks. If they go into the longer-term lending to use the powers of monetary control in an
business, they run the risk of depreciation and attempt to prevent the recurrence of national
of inability to realize quickly upon their assets conditions which result in radical declines of
in case of need. If they do not go into this national income, in the freezing of all bank
business, they cannot find an outlet for their assets whether they are technically in liquid
funds. Their earnings will suffer and the form or not, and in general unemployment and
justification for their existence diminishes. destitution. If we can bring this about, then
How can this dilemma be solved? It is pro the banks, as well as all other enterprises, will
posed in the bill to solve it by removing the be safer than they can ever be under a policy
problem of liquidity as such from the concern of each for himself and the devil take the
of the banks, by bestowing liquidity on all hindmost.
sound assets through making them eligible as In conclusion, let me make myself clear that
a basis of borrowing at the Reserve banks in I do not expect the passage of the banking bill
case of need. This will enable the banks to of 1935 to solve the problem of the business
concentrate their effort on keeping their assets cycle. What I do expect is that its passage will
sound and to pay less attention to their form make conditions more favorable for its eventual
and maturity. solution. My own view is that, while through
Reliance on the form of paper as a guide to the compensatory action of the banking sys
soundness and eligibility has not protected the tem much can be done to moderate fluctuations,
banking system from disaster. We wish to it will be necessary for the Government also to
divert bankers' attention from the semblance help in offsetting and counteracting rapid
of paper to its substance; to emphasize sound expansion and contraction of expenditures on
ness, rather than liquidity. To require that a the part of the community at large. It can
real-estate loan shall be repaid in 5 years, as do this by varying its expenditures and by the
the present law requires, does not even improve use of the taxing power in securing a better
liquidity but rather, through the excessive distribution of income so as to insure employ
strain it places on the borrower, acts to promote ment, thus maintaining the necessary distribu
foreclosures and insolvency. tion of wealth production as currently produced.
What we are proposing is that the problem One thing is certain: We will not obtain
of liquidity shall cease to be an individual con stability unless we work for it. A policy of
cern and shall become the collective concern of laissez faire presupposes an economy possessing
the banking system. A single bank which a flexibility which I think it is hopeless for us to
adopts a policy calculated to pay off all of its expect to achieve. Therefore it is absolutely
deposits at a moment's notice, even though the essential to develop agencies which by con
national income is cut in two, cannot adequately scious and deliberate compensatory action will
perform its duty of serving its community. obviate the necessity of drastic downward or
Since good local loans go bad when a depres upward adjustments of costs and prices, wages,
sion sets in, the bank's portfolio would have to and capital structures. If we do not develop
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
10
such agencies, our present economy, and, per I have outlined to you, and, what is even more
haps, our present form of government cannot important, by cooperating with the policies for
long survive. the promotion of which the changes in our bank
For this reason it behooves all of us, who are ing structure are proposed, the bankers of the
charged with the responsibility of managing our country will be working not only in their own
money and credit mechanism, to devote our best interests but also in the interests of
best thought and greatest effort to promote an recovery and the establishment, within our
intelligent understanding of the monetary and economic and political framework, of a more
economic problems confronting the Nation. stable and equitable national economy.
By supporting the proposed legislation which
o
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Marriner S. Eccles (1935, February 11). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19350212_eccles
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19350212_eccles,
author = {Marriner S. Eccles},
title = {Speech},
year = {1935},
month = {Feb},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19350212_eccles},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}