speeches · September 19, 1928
Speech
Roy A. Young · Chair
The Present Credit Situation
ROY A. YOUNG
Governor, Federal Reserve Board
Published by
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of PHILADELPHIA
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
Address delivered by
ROY A. YOUNG
Governor, Federal Reserve Board
before the
INDIANA BANKERS ASSOCIATION
at its
Annual Convention
at Gary, Indiana
September 20, 1928
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
REPRESENTATIVES of Federal reserve banks have
appeared before audiences so many times to describe
currency, discount and other operations of the System
that today I am going to digress somewhat and talk
about the present credit situation. This is a large
subject, but inasmuch as I am speaking to an audi-
ence that is quite familiar with banking practice, I
feel I will be able to get over to you a concise story
in the time that has been allotted to me.
In order to bring the picture up to date, it is neces-
sary to review what has happened during the past
eight years. Gold is the basis of our credit structure
and while the gold standard, perhaps, has some faults,
it is the best basis that has yet been devised and
public faith in its efficiency has been demonstrated
conclusively during the past five years by the willing-
ness and eagerness with which many countries have
returned to some form of gold standard. All that
has happened for the past eight years, therefore, can
best be reviewed by referring to gold movements.
Since September 1920 and up to December 1924,
gold flowed into the United States continuously, the
net import movement for the period aggregating
approximately $1,660,000,000. From September 1920
to the spring of 1922, the gold received from abroad
was used largely by member banks to reduce their
[3]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
borrowings from the Federal reserve banks and thus
improve the general condition of the member banks
and the reserve position of the reserve banks. Gener-
ally speaking, gold received during this period did
not, therefore, become a part of the reserves of mem-
ber banks and did not form the basis of credit expan-
sion.
Between 1922 and 1924 gold imports were sufficient
to meet the country's growing demand for currency,
and in addition, to increase the reserves of member
banks which were thus enabled to expand their loans
and investments without increasing their borrowings
at the Federal reserve banks. From 1924 to the
spring of 1927 the gold imports just about offset gold
exports, so that the total increase in gold holdings of
our country between September 1920 and the spring
of 1927 aggregated, as I have stated before, approx-
imately $1,660,000,000.
With this addition to the gold basis, through the
inverted pyramid principle of credit, banks were able
to expand tremendously. All of this growth, however,
could not go into the old-fashioned forms of credit
based upon production and distribution otherwise
known as eligible paper, and therefore the banks had
to seek other forms of credit. Naturally they turned
to the investment credit market. With this stimulus
and support from the banks throughout the country,
the investment bankers accepted the opportunity and
financed not only new enterprise by long-time credits,
[4]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
but old established enterprise as well, with the result
that the proportion of eligible paper diminished in the
portfolios of the banks while the proportion of invest-
ment credit held by the banks increased rapidly.
For all the banks of the United States as of June 30,
1928, the figures are approximately as follows:
U. S. Government bonds $ 6,000,000,000
Other stocks and bonds 12,000,000,000
Loans on securities (Of which amount
$3,000,000,000 is represented by so-called
brokers' loans) 13,000,000,000
Loans on real estate security 5,000,000,000
Loans to customers (Of which amount it is
estimated that approximately $5,000,000,000
is eligible paper held by member banks . 20,000,000,000
Total loans and investments $56,000,000,000
There has been some complaint of late that invest-
ment and speculative credit have not received their
proportion of the bank credit available, but it seems
to me from these figures—when you add the total
amount of bonds to the total amount lent on secur-
ities and arrive at the total of $31,000,000,000—
that these forms of credit have been treated liberally
by the banks.
All of this expansion of credit, up to May 1927,
was accomplished without increasing the amount of
Federal reserve credit, because the figures show that
except for seasonal and holiday currency require-
ments, the total assets of the Reserve System have
continued around $1,000,000,000 since 1922.
In May of 1927, however, something happened to
which the American business public and financial
[5]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
interests did not attach sufficient importance. This
was a reversal in the direction of gold movements.
From May until the early part of November the
Reserve System offset the exports of gold by pur-
chases of U. S. Government securities, feeling that
the time was not opportune to disturb our own
domestic situation when the regular seasonal agri-
cultural requirements were on and stabilization plans
for some of our foreign friends were not completed
—and stabilization of foreign currencies, indirectly,
was of great importance to our domestic situation.
During November and December, when gold con-
tinued to flow from this country, the System did not
offset the export movements. This should have had
the effect of retarding the rapid growth of credit, but
it did not, largely because any increase in Federal
reserve bank credit at that time was interpreted by
the banks and the public as being in response to
customary seasonal requirements, even though it had
gone $200,000,000 higher than the year before. The
return flow of holiday currency in the latter part of
December and early part of January was greater than
it had been in any year for five years and therefore
the System sold additional Government securities to
partly offset this return flow. Gold holdings changed
but little during the months of January and February
but credit expanded at more than the normal rate,
and certainly there was no evidence that this addi-
tional credit was required for business.
[6]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
There is an impression in the minds of many people,
including some bankers, that a member bank deliber-
ately borrows from its reserve bank at a low rate to
enable it to lend at a higher rate solely for the profit
in the transaction. I have been associated with the
System for ten years and I can say without fear of
contradiction that this seldom happens. What does
happen generally, however, is this:
A member bank accumulates deposits in the ordi-
nary course of its business and, if it expects to con-
tinue its business at a profit, it must employ those
funds almost instantaneously in the credit field that
offers the best rates consistent with safety. Later it
has a reduction in deposits and must replenish its
reserve in one of two ways. One is by borrowing from
the Federal reserve bank and the other is by selling
some of its readily marketable assets. In the great
majority of cases the member bank which has wide
fluctuations in its deposits borrows from the reserve
bank. By doing this the bank avoids disturbing its
portfolio and uses the reserve bank for the legitimate
purpose of bridging over a temporary shortage in
reserves. Naturally, when the rediscount rate is low
and the open market rate high, there is an incentive
for the banker to continue to borrow rather than to
curtail his investments. When this practice becomes
simultaneously general it furnishes one reason, but
only one, for raising the rediscount rates.
There was evidence of this in February, with the
[7)
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
result that a 4% rate was initiated by the directors
of the various Federal reserve banks. However,
credit continued to expand and the banks continued
to borrow from the Federal reserve banks on redis-
counts to make up the loss in gold and the sale of
Government securities. No one particular bank was
in debt any great length of time; in fact, the informa-
tion we have in Washington is that the bank that
borrowed to cover a loss of deposits got out of debt
by liquidating some of its ineligible assets. When
it did so, however, directly or indirectly, it made it
necessary for some other bank to borrow and so the
borrowings of member banks were passed around from
one bank to another without reducing the total in-
debtedness of the member banks to the Federal re-
serve banks, but on the contrary, increasing it.
Again, in April, the directors of one of the Federal
reserve banks initiated a rediscount rate of
This was eventually followed by all of the other
reserve banks. By June the member banks owed the
System approximately $1,000,000,000 upon redis-
counts and were in a position where they could not
get out of debt so readily by shifting the load from
one bank to another; in fact, the load centered
mostly in the larger cities. There was a rapid increase
in discounts in the latter part of June and also in
July, some of which, of course, represented currency
requirements, but the increase had the earmarks of
further pyramiding of credit and not of being the old-
[8]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
fashioned credit based upon production and distri-
bution, with the result that some of the Federal
reserve banks, where many of their member banks
were heavy borrowers, initiated a rediscount rate of
5%. This action, however, was not taken in the
four strictly agricultural districts west of the Miss-
issippi River where a 4}/2% rate is still maintained,
largely because the member banks were not heavy
borrowers and because it was at the time of the year
when legitimate seasonal agricultural requirements
had to be met.
From June up to the present time there has been
but little change in the gold holdings of the United
States. The System has not sold additional Govern-
ment securities since that time and has undertaken
no open market operations, except of a temporary
nature.
To summarize, the banking system of America
built up a credit structure by resorting to the inverted
pyramid principle of credit on $4,600,000,000 of
gold which we held in May 1927, and today, on
$4,100,000,000, it is not only supporting that credit
structure but a much larger one. This is shown by
the June 30 reports of member banks which indicate
an increase above last year of $2,500,000,000 in
loans and investments. To support this credit struc-
ture, member banks have found it necessary to in-
crease their borrowings at the Federal reserve banks
approximately $500,000,000. From this it seems to
[9]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
me that the reserve banks are functioning just as the
law intended that they should function. Miscalcu-
lations as to the future always have and perhaps
always will occur with the banks and the business
public and that is one of the reasons why we need
reserve banks, in other words, institutions which
enable the public to adjust their miscalculations in an
orderly and systematic way. So many factors have
an influence on banking that it is a mistake to arrive
at the conclusion that the Federal Reserve System
alone, through its policies, makes credit situations.
It is reasonable to believe from what I have cited
that conditions, over many of which the System has
no control, form the basis of reserve bank credit
policies and rates.
Many people in America seem to be more concerned
about the present situation than the Federal Reserve
System is. If unsound credit practices have devel-
oped, these practices will in time correct themselves,
and if some of the over-indulgent get "burnt" during
the period of correction, they will have to shoulder
the blame themselves and not attempt to shift it to
someone else. Great concern is expressed over the
mystery of Federal reserve policies. Dissatisfaction
is expressed because the Federal Reserve System
refrains from prediction and can not always antici-
pate. I have stated to you that conditions, to a large
extent, bring about Federal reserve policies rather
than that Federal reserve policies bring about con-
rlO]
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Present Credit Situation
ditions. That is just the position of the System at
the moment. If past experience means anything, we
know that the additional reserve credit needed be-
tween now and December 31 will aggregate approx-
imately $300,000,000. This will come from the usual
seasonal requirements of agriculture and business.
It is the expectation of the System that this additional
credit will be secured by the member banks redis-
counting without hesitancy to take care of these re-
quirements and that they will lend to their customers
at reasonable rates. It further expects that this addi-
tional reserve credit will not be used in further ex-
panding a bank credit situation that grew up when
our gold reserves were $500,000,000 larger than they
are now and which has continued to grow while the
reserves have been shrinking. If after January 1929
following the return flow of holiday currency, the
banks still owe the System approximately $1,000,-
000,000 in rediscounts, I, personally, will feel that the
situation has been handled admirably and I shall
have no cause for concern, because with the tradition
which the member banks have about borrowing con-
tinually from the Federal Reserve System, a debt to
the System of $1,000,000,000 will have a more
moderating effect upon the too rapid growth of bank
credit than any other single condition that I know of.
uu
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Roy A. Young (1928, September 19). Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19280920_young
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_speech_19280920_young,
author = {Roy A. Young},
title = {Speech},
year = {1928},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/speech_19280920_young},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}