sep · September 16, 2015
Summary of Economic Projections
Embargoed for release at 2:00 p.m., EDT, September 17, 2015
Economic projections of Federal Reserve Board members and Federal Reserve Bank presidents under
their individual assessments of projected appropriate monetary policy, September 2015
Advance release of table 1 of the Summary of Economic Projections to be released with the FOMC minutes
Percent
Variable
Change in real GDP
June projection
Median1
Central tendency2
2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer 2015
2016
2017
2018
Longer
run
run
2.1
2.3
2.2
2.0
2.0
2.0 – 2.3 2.2 – 2.6 2.0 – 2.4 1.8 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.2
1.9
2.5
2.3 n.a.
2.0
1.8 – 2.0 2.4 – 2.7 2.1 – 2.5
n.a.
2.0 – 2.3
Range3
2017
2015
2016
2018
1.9 – 2.5
1.7 – 2.3
2.1 – 2.8
2.3 – 3.0
Longer
run
1.9 – 2.6 1.6 – 2.4 1.8 – 2.7
2.0 – 2.5
n.a.
1.8 – 2.5
Unemployment rate
June projection
5.0
5.3
4.8
5.1
4.8
5.0
4.8
n.a.
4.9
5.0
5.0 – 5.1 4.7 – 4.9 4.7 – 4.9 4.7 – 5.0 4.9 – 5.2
5.2 – 5.3 4.9 – 5.1 4.9 – 5.1
n.a.
5.0 – 5.2
4.9 – 5.2
5.0 – 5.3
4.5 – 5.0
4.6 – 5.2
4.5 – 5.0 4.6 – 5.3 4.7 – 5.8
4.8 – 5.5
n.a.
5.0 – 5.8
PCE inflation
June projection
0.4
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
n.a.
2.0
2.0
0.3 – 0.5 1.5 – 1.8 1.8 – 2.0
0.6 – 0.8 1.6 – 1.9 1.9 – 2.0
0.3 – 1.0
0.6 – 1.0
1.5 – 2.4
1.5 – 2.4
1.7 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.1
1.7 – 2.2
n.a.
Core PCE inflation4
June projection
1.4
1.3
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
n.a.
1.2 – 1.7
1.2 – 1.6
1.5 – 2.4
1.5 – 2.4
1.7 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.1
1.7 – 2.2
n.a.
0.4
0.6
1.4
1.6
2.6
2.9
3.4
n.a.
2.0
n.a.
1.3 – 1.4 1.5 – 1.8 1.8 – 2.0 1.9 – 2.0
1.3 – 1.4 1.6 – 1.9 1.9 – 2.0
n.a.
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Memo: Projected
appropriate policy path
Federal funds rate
June projection
3.5
3.8
0.1 – 0.6 1.1 – 2.1 2.1 – 3.4 3.0 – 3.6 3.3 – 3.8 -0.1 – 0.9 -0.1 – 2.9 1.0 – 3.9 2.9 – 3.9 3.0 – 4.0
0.4 – 0.9 1.4 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.8
n.a.
3.5 – 3.8 0.1 – 0.9 0.4 – 2.9 2.0 – 3.9
n.a.
3.3 – 4.3
Note: Projections of change in real gross domestic product (GDP) and projections for both measures of inflation are percent changes from the fourth quarter of the previous
year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated. PCE inflation and core PCE inflation are the percentage rates of change in, respectively, the price index for personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) and the price index for PCE excluding food and energy. Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth
quarter of the year indicated. Each participant’s projections are based on his or her assessment of appropriate monetary policy. Longer-run projections represent each participant’s
assessment of the rate to which each variable would be expected to converge under appropriate monetary policy and in the absence of further shocks to the economy. The projections
for the federal funds rate are the value (rounded to the nearest 1/8 percentage point) of the midpoint of the projected appropriate target range for the federal funds rate or the projected
appropriate target level for the federal funds rate at the end of the specified calendar year or over the longer run. The June projections were made in conjunction with the meeting of
the Federal Open Market Committee on June 16–17, 2015.
1. For each period, the median is the middle projection when the projections are arranged from lowest to highest. When the number of projections is even, the median is the
average of the two middle projections.
2. The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in each year.
3. The range for a variable in a given year includes all participants’ projections, from lowest to highest, for that variable in that year.
4. Longer-run projections for core PCE inflation are not collected.
Figure 1. Medians, central tendencies, and ranges of economic projections, 2015–18 and over the longer run
Percent
Change in real GDP
Median of projections
Central tendency of projections
Range of projections
4
3
2
1
Actual
+
0
-
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Longer
run
Percent
Unemployment rate
10
9
8
7
6
5
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Longer
run
Percent
PCE inflation
3
2
1
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Longer
run
Note: Definitions of variables are in the general note to the projections table. The data for the actual values of
the variables are annual.
Figure 2. Overview of FOMC participants’ assessments of appropriate monetary policy
Number of participants
Appropriate timing of policy firming
14
13
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
3
2
1
2015
2016
1
2017
Percent
Appropriate pace of policy firming: Midpoint of target range or target level for the federal funds rate
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
+
0
0.5
2015
2016
2017
2018
Longer run
Note: In the upper panel, the height of each bar denotes the number of FOMC participants who judge that, under
appropriate monetary policy, the first increase in the target range for the federal funds rate from its current range of 0 to
1/4 percent will occur in the specified calendar year. In June 2015, the numbers of FOMC participants who judged that
the first increase in the target federal funds rate would occur in 2015, 2016, and 2017 were, respectively, 15, 2, and 0.
In the lower panel, each shaded circle indicates the value (rounded to the nearest 1/8 percentage point) of an individual
participant’s judgment of the midpoint of the appropriate target range for the federal funds rate or the appropriate
target level for the federal funds rate at the end of the specified calendar year or over the longer run.
Note on Modifications to Summary of Economic Projections Materials
As announced in the minutes of the Committee’s July meeting, the Summary of
Economic Projections (SEP) materials for this meeting incorporate two modifications:
In table 1, a new left-hand panel shows the median SEP responses for each of the
economic variables. In addition, the table now provides information on
participants’ projections of the appropriate level of the federal funds rate as a
memo item.
In figure 1, the median values of the projections for each variable are shown by
red lines.
The inclusion of medians in the SEP materials is intended to provide an additional
useful summary statistic of Committee participants’ perspectives; however, the medians
do not represent a collective view or Committee forecast.
Explanation of Economic Projections Charts
The charts show actual values and projections for three economic variables, based on
FOMC participants’ individual assessments of appropriate monetary policy:
Change in Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—as measured from the fourth
quarter of the previous year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated, with
values plotted at the end of each year.
Unemployment Rate—the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth
quarter of each year, with values plotted at the end of each year.
PCE Inflation—as measured by the change in the personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) price index from the fourth quarter of the previous year to
the fourth quarter of the year indicated, with values plotted at the end of each
year.
Information for these variables is shown for each year from 2010 to 2018, and for the
longer run.
The solid black line, labeled “Actual,” shows the historical values for each variable.
The lightly shaded areas represent the ranges of the projections of policymakers. The
bottom of the range for each variable is the lowest of all of the projections for that year or
period. Likewise, the top of the range is the highest of all of the projections for that year
or period.
The dark shaded areas represent the central tendency, which is a narrower version of the
range that excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in each
year or period.
The solid red line depicts the median projection in each period for each variable. The
median value in each period is the middle projection when the projections are arranged
from lowest to highest. When the number of projections is even, the median is the average
of the two middle projections.
The longer-run projections, which are shown on the far right side of the charts, are the
rates of growth, unemployment, and inflation to which a policymaker expects the economy
to converge over time—maybe in five or six years—in the absence of further shocks and
under appropriate monetary policy. Because appropriate monetary policy, by definition, is
aimed at achieving the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of maximum employment and price
stability in the longer run, policymakers’ longer-run projections for economic growth and
unemployment may be interpreted, respectively, as estimates of the economy’s normal or
trend rate of growth and its normal unemployment rate over the longer run. The longerrun projection shown for inflation is the rate of inflation judged to be most consistent with
the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate.
Explanation of Policy Path Charts
These charts are based on policymakers’ assessments of appropriate monetary policy,
which, by definition, is the future path of policy that each participant deems most
likely to foster outcomes for economic activity and inflation that best satisfy his or her
interpretation of the Federal Reserve’s dual objectives of maximum employment and
stable prices.
In the upper panel, the height of each bar denotes the number of FOMC
participants who judge that, under appropriate monetary policy, the first
increase in the target range for the federal funds rate from its current range of 0
to ¼ percent will occur in the specified calendar year.
In the lower panel, each shaded circle indicates the value (rounded to the
nearest ⅛ percentage point) of an individual participant’s judgment of the
midpoint of the appropriate target range for the federal funds rate or the
appropriate target level for the federal funds rate at the end of the specified
calendar year or over the longer run.
These assessments of the timing of the first increase of the target range for the federal
funds rate and for the path of policy are the ones that policymakers view as
compatible with their individual economic projections.
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (2015, September 16). Summary of Economic Projections. Sep, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/sep_20150917
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_sep_20150917,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Summary of Economic Projections},
year = {2015},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Sep, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/sep_20150917},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}