speeches · November 11, 2024
Regional President Speech
Tom Barkin · President
Home / News / Speeches / Thomas I Barkin / 2024
How Did the Economy Get Here?
Nov. 12, 2024
Tom Barkin
President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Baltimore Together Summit
Baltimore Center Stage
Baltimore, Md.
Highlights:
A strong but choosier consumer, coupled with a more productive and better valued
workforce has landed the economy in a good place.
As a consequence, the FOMC has started the process of recalibrating rates to
somewhat less restrictive levels.
Tomorrow looks di erent based on whether you take more signal from levels or
trends.
With the economy now in a good place and interest rates o their recent peak but
also o their historic lows, the Fed is in position to respond appropriately regardless
of how the economy evolves.
Thank you for that kind introduction. I thought I’d use my time to share how I see the
economy today and where we may be headed. I caution you these are my thoughts alone
and not necessarily those of anyone else on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) or
in the Federal Reserve System.
I want to start by calling out the strength of the overall data. Twelve-month headline PCE
in ation has come all the way down to 2.1 percent. GDP growth for the third quarter was
2.8 percent, well above its trend rate of just under 2 percent. The unemployment rate is 4.1
percent, near estimates of its natural rate. I don’t want to jinx things, but you have to
acknowledge that — as of today — the economy looks pretty good.
I think it is fair to say: No one predicted this. When the FOMC raised rates aggressively in
2022 and 2023, a recession was in pretty much everybody’s forecast. The traditional
recession indicators were ashing. The yield curve inverted in 2022 and stayed that way for
over two years. The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index has been negative for 2
1/2 years. Shocks like the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and the con ict in the Middle East
looked like they would complicate the outlook further. Yet here we are.
How did we get here? I’d, of course, love to give the FOMC full credit, and I hope you think
our e orts to quiet in ation have been of value. But there are multiple contributors. I want
to discuss four of them today.
The U.S. economy has returned to its pre-pandemic GDP
First: the strength of the consumer.
trend, a feat we never achieved after the Great Recession and one that I don’t think any
other advanced economy can claim. While scal spending and the data center growth
sparked by arti cial intelligence (AI) have played a part, it’s consumers that are the story.
They represent almost 70 percent of GDP. Those with higher incomes have seen their asset
valuations rise. Those with lower incomes have largely held on to jobs and have seen their
real wages grow. Both segments are spending more and don’t seem to be slowing down.
Early improvement on in ation came from the supply side,
Second: increased price sensitivity.
with supply chains healing and the labor supply recovering. But now, we’re getting help on
the demand side: Consumers have become increasingly price conscious. Frustrated by high
prices, they are trading down from beef to chicken, from sit-down restaurants to fast
casual, from brand names to private label. They’re waiting for promotions, or shopping at
lower-priced outlets. The old saying is that the cure for high prices is high prices, and that’s
what we’re seeing. Price-setters are learning their ability to raise prices is now limited by
consumer responses. I call that price elasticity in action.
Coming out of the pandemic, employers across the economy
Third: a shortage of workers.
found themselves short-sta ed. Part of the shortage was temporary, as workers stayed
home due to illness or lack of child care. But part of it has persisted, especially in the skilled
trades. Five years of the huge baby-boom generation retired and labor force participation
of those 65 and over dropped. The percentage of our population that is employed is a full
point below pre-pandemic levels.
The pain of being without enough workers has been hard to forget, and employers tell me
they don’t want to get caught short again. As a result, they have been slow to reduce sta
— the layo rate remains historically low and initial jobless claims have been quite muted.
Job gains have moderated, but cautious employers share they are just allowing headcount
to drift downward through attrition and reduced hiring. A low hiring, low ring labor market
is still a resilient one.
If we take a step back, all of this is pretty remarkable. How is
Fourth: a surge in productivity.
in ation coming down to target amid strong growth? How are we growing so robustly even
as job gains have slowed? The answer seems to be a healthy step up in productivity. In the
2010s, productivity grew at a 1.2 percent annualized rate; in 2023 and 2024, it has grown at
2.3 percent.
What’s driving stronger productivity growth? Everyone’s thoughts immediately jump to AI,
and perhaps that will be the case in time, but I believe the more likely story behind this
most recent surge is our most recent experience: Firms, unable to nd workers two years
ago, invested heavily in automation and more e cient processes and are now reaping the
bene ts. Also, more recently, as the labor market has normalized, turnover has come down
and, as you all know, experienced workers tend to get more done.
A strong but choosier consumer, coupled with a more productive and better valued
workforce has landed the economy in a good place. As a consequence, the FOMC has
started the process of recalibrating rates to somewhat less restrictive levels. With in ation
close to target and unemployment near its natural rate, the fed funds rate seemed like the
one number out of sync. In our last two meetings, we have cut the fed funds rate 75 basis
points.
I’ve been talking a lot about where we are today. But you’re probably more interested in
tomorrow.
Tomorrow looks di erent based on whether you take more signal from levels or trends.
What do I mean by that? The level of the unemployment rate is solid, as I’ve said. But the
rate has moved up from its low of 3.4 percent. Similarly, job gains have averaged 104,000
over the last three months, a level consistent with longer-run estimates of the breakeven
pace of growth. But job growth has slowed from an average of 251,000 per month last year.
So, the labor market might be ne, or it might continue to weaken. On the in ation side, the
trend has been great with core in ation down to 2.7 percent from its peak of 5.6 percent in
February 2022. But the level is still above our 2 percent target. So, in ation might be coming
under control, or the level of core might give a signal that it risks getting stuck above target.
Let me paint two potential scenarios.
The rst is positive for demand with the challenge being in ation. As rates come down and
the election moves into the rearview mirror, we see employers start to feel more
comfortable investing in the future. After having their recession playbooks open for two
years, they nally place them back on the shelf. They trust the solid demand they keep
seeing and they hire to ensure they can meet it. Real wages stay healthy. Workers stay
employed and continue to spend. The Fed’s focus would be more on upside in ation risks.
The more pessimistic demand story has businesses keeping their recession playbooks out
and turning the pages. With pricing power limited, rms decide they need to cut costs more
to maintain margins. They turn to layo s. Workers who lose their jobs, as well as those who
fear for their jobs, pull back. Spending su ers. The net is likely disin ationary, so the Fed’s
focus would turn more to downside employment risks.
Of course, there are more extreme scenarios. In particular, we remain attuned to the
potential for nancial market turmoil, supply side positive and negative shocks, geopolitical
discontinuities and the like.
Where does that leave us? If I had told you two years ago that we would be where we are
today, you wouldn’t have believed me. And to be fair, I didn’t predict it either. So, I am going
to resist giving you a forecast today and instead say that — with the economy now in a
good place and interest rates o their recent peak but also o their historic lows, the Fed is
in position to respond appropriately regardless of how the economy evolves. After the
challenges of the last several years, that’s a good place to be.
Topics
Business Cycles Economic Growth In ation Monetary Policy
Subscribe to News
Receive an email noti cation when News is posted online:
By submitting this form you agree to the Bank's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Notice.
Email Address
Subscribe
Contact Us
Jim Strader
© 1997-2025 Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Cite this document
APA
Tom Barkin (2024, November 11). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin,
author = {Tom Barkin},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2024},
month = {Nov},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}