speeches · November 11, 2024

Regional President Speech

Tom Barkin · President
Home / News / Speeches / Thomas I Barkin / 2024 How Did the Economy Get Here? Nov. 12, 2024 Tom Barkin President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Baltimore Together Summit Baltimore Center Stage Baltimore, Md. Highlights: A strong but choosier consumer, coupled with a more productive and better valued workforce has landed the economy in a good place. As a consequence, the FOMC has started the process of recalibrating rates to somewhat less restrictive levels. Tomorrow looks dierent based on whether you take more signal from levels or trends. With the economy now in a good place and interest rates o their recent peak but also o their historic lows, the Fed is in position to respond appropriately regardless of how the economy evolves. Thank you for that kind introduction. I thought I’d use my time to share how I see the economy today and where we may be headed. I caution you these are my thoughts alone and not necessarily those of anyone else on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) or in the Federal Reserve System. I want to start by calling out the strength of the overall data. Twelve-month headline PCE ination has come all the way down to 2.1 percent. GDP growth for the third quarter was 2.8 percent, well above its trend rate of just under 2 percent. The unemployment rate is 4.1 percent, near estimates of its natural rate. I don’t want to jinx things, but you have to acknowledge that — as of today — the economy looks pretty good. I think it is fair to say: No one predicted this. When the FOMC raised rates aggressively in 2022 and 2023, a recession was in pretty much everybody’s forecast. The traditional recession indicators were ashing. The yield curve inverted in 2022 and stayed that way for over two years. The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index has been negative for 2 1/2 years. Shocks like the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and the conict in the Middle East looked like they would complicate the outlook further. Yet here we are. How did we get here? I’d, of course, love to give the FOMC full credit, and I hope you think our eorts to quiet ination have been of value. But there are multiple contributors. I want to discuss four of them today. The U.S. economy has returned to its pre-pandemic GDP First: the strength of the consumer. trend, a feat we never achieved after the Great Recession and one that I don’t think any other advanced economy can claim. While scal spending and the data center growth sparked by articial intelligence (AI) have played a part, it’s consumers that are the story. They represent almost 70 percent of GDP. Those with higher incomes have seen their asset valuations rise. Those with lower incomes have largely held on to jobs and have seen their real wages grow. Both segments are spending more and don’t seem to be slowing down. Early improvement on ination came from the supply side, Second: increased price sensitivity. with supply chains healing and the labor supply recovering. But now, we’re getting help on the demand side: Consumers have become increasingly price conscious. Frustrated by high prices, they are trading down from beef to chicken, from sit-down restaurants to fast casual, from brand names to private label. They’re waiting for promotions, or shopping at lower-priced outlets. The old saying is that the cure for high prices is high prices, and that’s what we’re seeing. Price-setters are learning their ability to raise prices is now limited by consumer responses. I call that price elasticity in action. Coming out of the pandemic, employers across the economy Third: a shortage of workers. found themselves short-staed. Part of the shortage was temporary, as workers stayed home due to illness or lack of child care. But part of it has persisted, especially in the skilled trades. Five years of the huge baby-boom generation retired and labor force participation of those 65 and over dropped. The percentage of our population that is employed is a full point below pre-pandemic levels. The pain of being without enough workers has been hard to forget, and employers tell me they don’t want to get caught short again. As a result, they have been slow to reduce sta — the layo rate remains historically low and initial jobless claims have been quite muted. Job gains have moderated, but cautious employers share they are just allowing headcount to drift downward through attrition and reduced hiring. A low hiring, low ring labor market is still a resilient one. If we take a step back, all of this is pretty remarkable. How is Fourth: a surge in productivity. ination coming down to target amid strong growth? How are we growing so robustly even as job gains have slowed? The answer seems to be a healthy step up in productivity. In the 2010s, productivity grew at a 1.2 percent annualized rate; in 2023 and 2024, it has grown at 2.3 percent. What’s driving stronger productivity growth? Everyone’s thoughts immediately jump to AI, and perhaps that will be the case in time, but I believe the more likely story behind this most recent surge is our most recent experience: Firms, unable to nd workers two years ago, invested heavily in automation and more ecient processes and are now reaping the benets. Also, more recently, as the labor market has normalized, turnover has come down and, as you all know, experienced workers tend to get more done. A strong but choosier consumer, coupled with a more productive and better valued workforce has landed the economy in a good place. As a consequence, the FOMC has started the process of recalibrating rates to somewhat less restrictive levels. With ination close to target and unemployment near its natural rate, the fed funds rate seemed like the one number out of sync. In our last two meetings, we have cut the fed funds rate 75 basis points. I’ve been talking a lot about where we are today. But you’re probably more interested in tomorrow. Tomorrow looks dierent based on whether you take more signal from levels or trends. What do I mean by that? The level of the unemployment rate is solid, as I’ve said. But the rate has moved up from its low of 3.4 percent. Similarly, job gains have averaged 104,000 over the last three months, a level consistent with longer-run estimates of the breakeven pace of growth. But job growth has slowed from an average of 251,000 per month last year. So, the labor market might be ne, or it might continue to weaken. On the ination side, the trend has been great with core ination down to 2.7 percent from its peak of 5.6 percent in February 2022. But the level is still above our 2 percent target. So, ination might be coming under control, or the level of core might give a signal that it risks getting stuck above target. Let me paint two potential scenarios. The rst is positive for demand with the challenge being ination. As rates come down and the election moves into the rearview mirror, we see employers start to feel more comfortable investing in the future. After having their recession playbooks open for two years, they nally place them back on the shelf. They trust the solid demand they keep seeing and they hire to ensure they can meet it. Real wages stay healthy. Workers stay employed and continue to spend. The Fed’s focus would be more on upside ination risks. The more pessimistic demand story has businesses keeping their recession playbooks out and turning the pages. With pricing power limited, rms decide they need to cut costs more to maintain margins. They turn to layos. Workers who lose their jobs, as well as those who fear for their jobs, pull back. Spending suers. The net is likely disinationary, so the Fed’s focus would turn more to downside employment risks. Of course, there are more extreme scenarios. In particular, we remain attuned to the potential for nancial market turmoil, supply side positive and negative shocks, geopolitical discontinuities and the like. Where does that leave us? If I had told you two years ago that we would be where we are today, you wouldn’t have believed me. And to be fair, I didn’t predict it either. So, I am going to resist giving you a forecast today and instead say that — with the economy now in a good place and interest rates o their recent peak but also o their historic lows, the Fed is in position to respond appropriately regardless of how the economy evolves. After the challenges of the last several years, that’s a good place to be. Topics Business Cycles Economic Growth Ination Monetary Policy Subscribe to News Receive an email notication when News is posted online: By submitting this form you agree to the Bank's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Notice. Email Address Subscribe Contact Us Jim Strader © 1997-2025 Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Cite this document
APA
Tom Barkin (2024, November 11). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin,
  author = {Tom Barkin},
  title = {Regional President Speech},
  year = {2024},
  month = {Nov},
  howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20241112_tom_barkin},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}