speeches · March 22, 2021
Regional President Speech
Tom Barkin · President
Home / News / Speeches / Thomas I Barkin / 2021
United Way of Greenville County Webinar
•
A year ago, the economy was on the edge of a cli�. With the help of �scal and
monetary support, we are moving toward recovery.
•
As we look toward better days, it’s important we don’t lose sight of the long-standing
disparities the pandemic has exposed, including in education, connection to jobs,
addiction and racial inequity.
•
It is well worth exploring targeted support for primary caregivers to return to work or
to job retraining programs, and the large number of displaced personal contact
service workers need help transitioning to new occupations. Community colleges
have an important role to play.
•
We have to invest further in K-12 education, particularly in providing extra instruction
and tutoring to students who have fallen behind in the virtual environment.
•
Investments in education, employment and connectivity should be made with an
equity lens.
•
The Fed is trying to do its part to limit the increase in disparities from this pandemic
through its new long-run policy framework.
Thank you very much for inviting me to speak with you today. It has been quite a year. Had
I been with you a year ago, we would have been in the midst of an unprecedented
economic shutdown. Equity markets had just dropped 30 percent. Bond markets were in
trouble. Even investment grade credits were struggling to rollover their commercial paper.
More than 700,000 people lost their jobs last March, followed by another 20 million in April.
Our economy was on the edge of a cli�, and no one knew what was on the other side.
Fiscal and monetary policy responded with overwhelming force. The Fed stepped up early
and powerfully. We took our policy rates to zero in mid-March and worked to repair
�nancial markets through our balance sheet, purchasing $1.7 trillion of Treasurys and
mortgage-backed securities in March and April. We also relaunched a number of Great
Recession-era emergency lending facilities to backstop speci�c bond markets.
Congress acted decisively as well. Through multiple �scal packages, it supported those who
lost their jobs as well as small businesses and industries at risk. To put the magnitude of
this �scal response in perspective, the $5.6 trillion in federal relief spending during this
crisis is roughly seven times the size of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
With this support, the economy has come most of the way back. GDP was down 2.4 percent
in the fourth quarter compared to a year ago. Our recovery has outpaced the rest of the
world with the exception of Asia. Despite 9.5 million job losses, the impact of policy on the
economy is quite visible:
•
Aggregate disposable income has gone up, not down.
•
Households have increased their savings and paid down their credit cards.
•
Bank portfolios have remained healthy, given all the support to individuals and
businesses.
•
The housing market has been strong, in part thanks to low interest rates.
•
Increased savings have fueled a shift in spending from services to goods, which has
helped manufacturers.
•
And the worse o� have bene�tted from stimulus checks, enhanced unemployment
bene�ts and forbearance.
That said, spending has come back faster than employment. Until recently, job losses on a
percentage basis exceeded those seen at the depths of the Great Recession. The economy
still has 6.2 percent fewer jobs than in February 2020.
Still, I am hopeful that we are on the brink of completing the recovery. Vaccines are rolling
out, and case rates and hospitalizations are falling. If I could o�er an analogy, this recovery
is a roller coaster. Every roller coaster has a pause before the �nal plunge into the
unknown. For our economy, winter was the pause, and the �nal stretch should be
something as excess savings and �scal stimulus fund pent-up demand from consumers
exhausted from isolation and freed by vaccines and warmer weather.
But as we look toward better days, it’s important we don’t lose sight of the long-standing
disparities the pandemic has exposed and the opportunities we now to have to invest to
address them. Before I say more, I have to note that the views I express are my own and
not necessarily those of my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee or in the
Federal Reserve System.
In the rest of my remarks today, I want to talk about three ideas. The �rst is how this
pandemic has disrupted multiple stories we’ve been telling about the economy for the past
few decades. The second is how it has exacerbated many of the core challenges our
country faces. And �nally, I’ll share some ideas about where we can invest to help address
those challenges.
So which stories have been upended? The �rst is a trend you might have heard called
“hollowing out,” which refers to growth in high- and low-income jobs at the expense of
those in the middle. But the pandemic targeted the low-end this time: It wiped out 37
percent of low-wage jobs between February and April. There's been some recovery, but the
lowest-wage jobs were still down 14 percent at the end of December, while higher income
jobs were actually up.
The second story is the triumph of cities: In recent decades, metro areas have seen higher
population and employment growth than nonmetro areas. But the pandemic hit urban
employment harder, especially early on, since higher population density necessitated
earlier and longer shutdowns, and because rural employment is more likely to be in
essential industries like agriculture and food production. Now we’re also seeing rising
vacancy rates. People are relocating to less expensive cities, or buying homes outside the
center city, and they’re not being replaced by the typical in�ux of college students and
young families. And what happens to the businesses and employees that depend on
downtown o�ce workers if those people keep working from home?
The third story that’s been turned on its head is the disparate e�ect of recessions on men.
In the previous three recessions, especially the Great Recession, men su�ered higher
unemployment than women, as they were disproportionately represented in industries like
manufacturing and construction. But the COVID-19 recession hit women’s employment
harder, both in job loss and in labor force participation, given their industry mix and the
challenges of schools, child care and elder care.
The pandemic has also exposed — and exacerbated — some core challenges our country
has been struggling to address. The �rst is education. For decades, a college degree has
been a dividing line: College graduates tend to earn more money, accumulate more wealth
and have better health. And during the pandemic, it’s been the line between having a job or
not.
During the worst of the downturn last spring, employment for people without a college
degree fell almost 20 percent, compared to about 6 percent for people with a degree. And
today, the unemployment rate is 7.2 percent for workers with only a high school diploma
versus 3.8 percent for those with a bachelor’s degree. The latter are back at full
employment.
Looking toward tomorrow, I think there is a real risk it will get worse. Virtual learning is
leaving students behind, especially those who were already vulnerable. We see it in the
data, particularly in math, and it might be even worse than it seems because many
students are missing from the data due to declining public school enrollment. Research
tells us it's hard to get back the bene�ts of early education once it's lost. Back of the
envelope, our economists estimate that we could see a decline of 3.8 percent in the share
of children with a high school degree and 2.7 percent in the share with a college degree —
which adds up to huge losses in the future. We already see lower community college
enrollment, which is especially concerning because that is often the pathway back into the
job market.
In short, I’m worried about losing a generation of students and what that means not only
for them, but also for our society as a whole. On our website, you can watch a series of
dialogues we are having with educators from around our district. The stories are
heartbreaking.
The next issue that’s been underscored is the di�culty many people have connecting to
jobs. One challenge, of course, is broadband. The crisis has illustrated just how critical
broadband is for school, work, e-commerce and telehealth. As recently as 2019, nearly one-
third of households still had no strong broadband connection.
Another is transportation. The less fortunate often don’t have a reliable way to get to work,
whether that's because public transit doesn't connect to the available jobs or because they
don’t have access to a car. And now, of course, mass transit and car-sharing present health
risks, so even if you could take a bus to work, maybe the risk just seems too great. Declining
ridership is already leading many major transit agencies to cut service, which suggests
connection could be even more di�cult in the future.
A third issue is addiction. The opioid epidemic has been a crisis for years, and the pandemic
is making things worse, as people struggling with addiction have been cut o� from family,
friends, support networks and medical providers. According to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, drug overdose deaths from June 2019 to May 2020 were the most
ever recorded in a 12-month period.
And there’s the issue that underpins so many others: racial inequity. The causes are
numerous and can be traced to our country’s painful history. The e�ects are numerous as
well, including higher unemployment and worse job losses during downturns, lower
educational attainment, lower incomes, less wealth and poorer health. These have all been
exacerbated by this crisis in ways that I fear will have long-term repercussions. For
example, blacks have died of COVID-19 at 1.4 times the rate of whites, and we see gaps in
vaccinations too. Here in South Carolina, blacks make up about 26 percent of the
population but only 15 percent of vaccinations. This disproportionate impact of the virus
has made many families of color reluctant to send their children back to in-person learning.
That’s a choice any parent understands, but it also means those children are at greater risk
of falling behind.
So far I’ve talked about the problems. What about solutions? Where can we invest to make
things better? The �rst, and obvious, step is to get the virus under control. Pandemic
damage should be much less in a world that is able to return to normal (or something
resembling normal) quickly rather than one in which we are still afraid to get into an
elevator. The priority now is getting vaccines distributed and safely reopening the economy.
Then we need to address employment. It is well worth exploring targeted support for
primary caregivers to return to work or to job retraining programs. This includes support
for child care, elder care and safely reopening schools. Employers can play a greater role,
and we’ve seen some creative examples, like a hospital in West Virginia that’s o�ering a
proctoring service for its employees’ children.
In addition, the large number of displaced personal contact service workers need help
transitioning to new occupations. States can open up licensing and add instructors for in-
demand occupations such as nursing or commercial trucking. Funding from Pell Grants and
state lotteries could be freed for community college certi�cate programs. Community
colleges can help students access wraparound services to address barriers such as housing
and food insecurity, transportation, technology, child care and mental health.
We have to invest further in K-12 education. Many students need extra instruction and
tutoring. Schools need the resources to safely teach in person so that parents feel
con�dent allowing their kids to return. Perhaps they need to �nd a way to leverage this
summer to catch up, as we heard from many educators during the second session of our
District Dialogues series.
And this crisis has made it crystal clear that we need more investment in broadband. No
one should have to do their schoolwork in the parking lot of a McDonald’s, as I heard tell in
one small town. But more money isn’t the only answer. Our research has found that
upwards of $20 billion has been allocated and not yet spent. The process is complicated
and bureaucratic. I’m intrigued by the potential for navigational support to have a big
impact.
I’ve left equity for last. In part, that’s because it is hardest to address, and in part it’s
because investments in education, employment and connectivity should help us make
progress toward this goal. But we need to make these investments with an equity lens.
Take vaccines, for example, a critical health lever. An equity perspective has reoriented
localities toward marketing e�orts to overcome a historic lack of trust in many
communities. It has led them to reexamine distribution points to ensure equal access. It
has led to models to reduce price as a barrier. Perhaps this method will be relevant in
multiple other settings.
The Fed is trying to do its part to limit the increase in disparities from this pandemic as well,
through our new long-run policy framework. In our Fed Listens session, we heard from
countless people who let us know the least fortunate bene�ted from the historically strong
labor market in 2019. We hope to support bringing more people in from the sidelines by
maintaining accommodative monetary policy so long as in�ation stays moderated.
To close, I would reiterate that we will see damage from this downturn, as always. But we
have in our control the ability to limit the unique damage of this one. I hope we will.
Thanks, and now I look forward to your reactions and questions.
Thank you to Abigail Crockett and Tim Sablik for assistance preparing these remarks.
Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz, “Some Workers Have Been Hit Much Harder than Others by
the Pandemic,” New York Fed Liberty Street Economics blog, Feb. 9, 2021.
Tom Barkin, “A Silver Lining for Smaller Towns,” June 22, 2020; and “The Future ‘Hybrid’
O�ce,” Feb. 1, 2021.
Between February 2020 and April 2020.
See https://tracktherecovery.org.
Abigail Crockett and Hailey Phelps, “Breaking Down the Decline in Public School Enrollment,”
Richmond Fed Regional Matters, March 4, 2021.
Santiago Pinto and John Bailey Jones, “The Long-Term E�ects of Educational Disruptions,”
Richmond Fed Economic Impact of COVID-19, May 22, 2020.
Tom Barkin, “Building the Post-COVID Pipeline: Invigorating Community Colleges,” Nov. 10,
2020.
Including households who rely on a cellular or satellite connection.
Tom Barkin, “Enabling Women to Work,” Speech to West Virginia Women Moving Forward,
Sept. 14, 2020.
Economic Inequality and Poverty Employment and Labor Markets
Receive an email noti�cation when News is posted online:
By submitting this form you agree to the
Email Address
Subscribe
(804) 697-8956
(804) 332-0207 (mobile)
© 1997-2024 Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Cite this document
APA
Tom Barkin (2021, March 22). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20210323_tom_barkin
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20210323_tom_barkin,
author = {Tom Barkin},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2021},
month = {Mar},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20210323_tom_barkin},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}