speeches · May 30, 2018
Regional President Speech
James Bullard · President
T HE C ASE OF THE D ISAPPEARING
P HILLIPS C URVE
James Bullard
President and CEO
2018 BOJ-IMES Conference
Central Banking in a Changing World
May 31, 2018
Tokyo, Japan
Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the FOMC.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
Introduction
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
The slope of estimated Phillips curves in G-7 economies was
negative in the 1980s but has been drifting toward zero in the
inflation targeting era since 1995.
This is an empirical phenomenon often referred to as a
“flattening Phillips curve.”
Monetary authorities have generally improved policy during the
inflation targeting era—inflation has generally been lower, less
volatile and closer to stated inflation targets.
I will argue that the improved monetary policy has led to the
flatter empirical Phillips curve.
I will draw out the implications for monetary policy after
making my core argument.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
Empirical Evidence of
a Flatter Phillips Curve
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
E MPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON THE P HILLIPS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
CURVE
In the past 30 years, the empirical Phillips curve has flattened in
advanced economies.
The following chart shows the coefficient on a measure of
resource slack (unemployment) in a regression of price inflation
on resource utilization.
The analysis is contained in the latest BIS annual report.
The data are for a panel of G-7 economies.
The coefficient is estimated for rolling 15-year samples, from the
1980s to the present.
The point estimate is a weighted average across economies.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
F LATTENING OF THE P HILLIPS CURVE IN G-7 ECONOMIES
F IGURE : Source: Bank for International Settlements (2017).
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
A Simple Model
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
A
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
SIMPLE AND STANDARD MODEL
I will use a simple and standard model to state the argument.
This model is a version of more complicated models that
underlie much of the analysis in modern central banking.
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
T HE STANDARD N EW K EYNESIAN MODEL
Dynamic IS equation:
yt = Et ( yt + 1 )
1
[it
σ
( ρ + et )
Et (π t+1 )]
(1)
A structural, New Keynesian Phillips curve:
π t = κyt + βEt (π t+1 ) + ut
(2)
Monetary policy conducted using a Taylor-type monetary policy
rule:
it = ρ + ϕπ π t + ϕy yt
(3)
Notation:
y, π, i, ρ + e: the output gap, inflation gap, short-term nominal
interest rate and natural real rate of interest, respectively.
e, u: the natural rate shock and the cost push shock, respectively.
σ, κ, β: structural parameters, all positive.
ϕπ , ϕy : policy parameters, with ϕπ > 1 and ϕy > 0.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
M ODEL EQUILIBRIUM
The equilibrium has the output gap and the inflation gap
evolving as linear functions of the shocks:
yt
=
πt
=
et ϕπ ut
,
σ + ϕy + κϕπ
κet + σ + ϕy ut
σ + ϕy + κϕπ
(4)
.
(5)
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
Monetary Policy
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
C ONSTRAINED OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY
We look for optimal monetary policy within the set of
Taylor-type rules in the model.
Fix ϕy to any positive value, and then choose the optimal value
of ϕπ by minimizing a quadratic:
∞
ϕπ = arg min (1
β) ∑ βt απ 2t + y2t ,
(6)
t=0
where α > 0 represents the relative weight on the desirability of
inflation stabilization compared to output stabilization.
Regardless of the value of α, the solution to this problem is to set
a large coefficient on the inflation gap, technically, ϕπ ! ∞.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTERPRETATION AS BETTER INFLATION TARGETING
Interpretation of the solution: “The policymaker should promise to
react aggressively to deviations of inflation from target in conducting
monetary policy.”
The idea that policymakers put more weight on inflation
deviations during the post-1995 period could be related, in part,
to quantitative easing and other unconventional policy measures
during years when inflation has been below target.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
Empirical Phillips Curves
from Model Data
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
T HE P HILLIPS
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
CURVE SLOPE IN THEORY
Now let’s regress the inflation gap on the output gap inside the
model and call the estimated coefficient “the slope of the
empirical Phillips curve.”
The slope can be calculated exactly as
κσ2e
Cov (π t , yt )
γ=
=
Var (yt )
ϕπ σ + ϕy σ2u
σ2e + ϕ2π σ2u
.
(7)
σ2e , σ2u : variance of the natural rate shock and cost push shock,
respectively.
Main result: Under the optimal monetary policy defined above,
the empirical Phillips curve becomes flat, that is,
lim γ = 0.
ϕπ !∞
(8)
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
Empirical Relevance
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
E MPIRICAL RELEVANCE
Would this Lucas critique effect be large enough to importantly
affect estimated Phillips curve coefficients?
I consider a similar model, estimated by Lubik and Schorfheide
(2004, American Economic Review).
I use mean estimates for post-1982 data from their Table 3, p. 206
to generate artificial data and regress inflation on the output gap.
I use Okun’s law with a coefficient of 2.3 to translate the
Phillips curve slope in terms of unemployment.
The following chart suggests that, at these parameter values, the
slope of the estimated Phillips curve would attenuate
significantly as ϕπ increases.
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
E MPIRICAL RELEVANCE
Coefficient
0.05
0
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-0.25
10
F IGURE : Phillips curve slope as a function of the interest rate response to
inflation.
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
Implications for
Today’s Monetary Policymakers
I MPLICATIONS
I NTRODUCTION
F LATTENING
M ODEL
M ONETARY POLICY
I MPLICATIONS FOR TODAY ’ S
R EGRESSIONS
R ELEVANCE
I MPLICATIONS
MONETARY POLICYMAKERS
Ultimately, successful monetary policy can push the empirical
Phillips curve slope all the way to zero.
The model economy in this talk still has a structural Phillips
curve; it is only the empirical Phillips curve that is
“disappearing.”
Today’s G-7 monetary policymakers are unlikely to glean a
reliable signal for monetary policy based on empirical Phillips
curve slope estimates—they have to look elsewhere.
Cite this document
APA
James Bullard (2018, May 30). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20180531_james_bullard
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20180531_james_bullard,
author = {James Bullard},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2018},
month = {May},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20180531_james_bullard},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}