speeches · February 1, 2016
Regional President Speech
Esther L. George · President
The U.S. Outlook and Monetary Policy
Esther L. George
President and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
February 2, 2016
Central Exchange
Kansas City, Mo.
The views expressed by the author are her own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve System,
its governors, officers or representatives.
Thank you. It’s a pleasure to be here at the Central Exchange. The Kansas City Fed has
had a long and productive relationship with the Central Exchange and I always enjoy the
opportunity to join you.
Last week, I participated in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting where
the Committee decided to hold steady its target interest rate. I supported this decision and, in my
remarks this afternoon, I will share my views on the economic outlook and monetary policy.
Before we continue, I need to tell you that these comments represent my views and are
not necessarily reflective of others in the Federal Reserve System.
The U.S. Outlook
Since the end of the financial crisis, the U.S. economy has grown annually by about 2
percent and labor markets have made large strides toward healing. As a longer-term comparison,
we are now in the fifth-longest expansion in recorded U.S. history. Inflation has also remained
low and stable. While there are always uncertainties about how the economy will perform in the
future, it’s worth reflecting on the past and acknowledging the progress that has been made.
Right now, I view the economy as being in a good spot, but I will also discuss some risks I am
keeping in mind.
Turning first to recent data, economic growth slowed a bit toward the end of last year,
though overall growth in 2015 was not too different than the past few years. Some of the softness
reflected fewer exports and a modest step-down in the level of business investment in new
structures and equipment. Other factors, like inventory adjustments, also lowered the growth
estimate.
1
While a single quarter of slower growth is important to watch, I take reassurance that the
economy remains on track due to strong job gains. In fact, job gains actually picked up toward
the end of last year. Looking at longer trends, employment growth has been quite strong over the
past few years. More jobs were added in both 2014 and 2015 than in any year since the late
1990s.
At the same time, demographic changes are affecting the labor market outlook. For
example, U.S. population growth is slowing, which indicates not as many jobs need to be created
as in the past to absorb new entrants into the labor force. As a result, I expect to see employment
growth slow from its recent pace and would not interpret a modest slowdown as a sign of trouble
in the economy.
Overall, I see job gains as underpinning stronger consumer demand for goods and
services. Low gasoline prices and signs of faster wage growth should also add to consumers’
ability to increase spending. And although financial markets have been volatile, household
wealth remains at a high level, and house prices have been rising over the past four years.
Certainly, the gains in jobs, wages and wealth have not been equally shared across households
during the recovery, but overall, the general health of households’ financial situations is much
improved since the financial crisis.
Even as households and consumers are doing better, some sectors of the economy are
facing headwinds. I mentioned earlier low gasoline prices, which of course reflect low oil prices.
Because the energy sector is such an important part of the Kansas City Fed’s regional economy,
we monitor these developments closely. We know lower oil prices benefit consumers, but also
weigh on oil producers. We have certainly seen energy-intensive states affected. For example,
2
we are seeing more people every week filing claims for unemployment insurance in Oklahoma
than was the case a few years ago.
Just as developments in the energy sector bear watching, so do challenges facing the
manufacturing sector. The rise in the foreign exchange value of the U.S. dollar, for example, has
resulted in lower orders from abroad for many of our exporters. In addition, foreign growth in
some parts of the world has been uneven and slowing, which has affected foreign demand for
some U.S. goods. Despite these headwinds, the U.S. economy has proven itself to be resilient to
a wide range of shocks in recent years, including sluggish growth abroad.
Finally, inflation has remained muted as a result of lower oil prices and the strong U.S.
dollar. Recent movements in each of these have been quite large by historical standards. Yet,
despite these headwinds, core measures of inflation have recently risen on a year-over-year basis.
And although inflation rates over the past few years have hovered below the Fed’s goal of 2
percent, they have been positive and broadly consistent with price stability.
Risks to the Outlook
Outlooks are subject to change, and forecasts are imperfect predictions of the future. As
a result, those, like me, who rely on forecasts, must think about what could go wrong and how
incoming data might affect the outlook for the economy. Gauging whether a temporary
slowdown in growth, financial market volatility or foreign developments is a harbinger of
weaker growth or a reflection of temporary factors, can be difficult and often requires assessing
broader trends and risks.
Right now, I view the U.S. economy as in a generally good position. However, a few
developments bear watching. I mentioned the energy sector. We are certainly paying attention to
3
any spillovers that energy job losses may have on the broader economy. Elevated inventories in
some sectors also pose a risk to the extent that manufacturing production slows further to better
align current inventory levels with final sales and shipments of goods. Finally, global growth is
commonly pointed to as a risk. While I wouldn’t discount recent developments abroad, I also
note that many forecasts point to a modestly stronger foreign outlook this year than in 2015. Still,
some emerging markets carry substantial debt, so a crisis in one area can transmit to others. But
despite these concerns, the fundamentals of the U.S. economy currently appear strong enough to
sustain positive growth going forward.
The Path for Monetary Policy
Turning to monetary policy, for seven years, the FOMC maintained near-zero interest
rates and undertook a series of large-scale asset purchase programs — a policy stance responding
to a historic financial and economic emergency in 2008. Accordingly, the FOMC’s decision to
alter that policy stance in December garnered a great deal of attention when the benchmark
interest rate was increased by 25 basis points. I supported this decision, although I viewed it as a
late start to what is likely to be a gradual path toward normalizing interest rates.
After such a prolonged period of low rates, the FOMC is understandably cautious.
Moving rates gradually may avoid unnecessarily jolting the economy or causing excessive
financial market volatility. Even looking at developments so far this year, financial markets have
been quite volatile. While taking a signal from such volatility is warranted, monetary policy
cannot respond to every blip in financial markets. Instead, a focus on economic fundamentals,
such as labor markets and inflation, can help guard against monetary policy over- or under-
reacting to swings in financial conditions. To a great extent, the recent bout of volatility is not all
4
that unexpected, nor necessarily worrisome, given that the Fed’s low interest rate and bond-
buying policies focused on boosting asset prices as a means of stimulating the real economy. As
asset prices adjust to the shift in monetary policy, it is to be expected that the pricing of risk will
realign to this different rate environment.
Overall, it is important to remember that even after this first rate hike, monetary policy
remains highly accommodative. Real interest rates continue to be negative and the Federal
Reserve’s large portfolio of Treasury and mortgage-backed securities keeps downward pressure
on longer-term rates.
In communicating its intentions for further rate increases, the Committee has noted that it
expects economic conditions will warrant only gradual increases in the fed funds rate, although
adjustments ultimately depend on the incoming data. My own view is that a pickup in economic
growth, steady job gains and modestly higher core rates of inflation will warrant further
increases.
The exact timing of each move, however, is subject to the economic environment.
Because monetary policy affects the economy with lags, decisions must necessarily rely on
forecasts and their associated risks — not waiting until desired objectives are realized.
If we wait for the data to provide complete confirmation before making a policy decision,
we may well have waited too long. Likewise, policy may be faced with altering its trajectory if
the economy’s progress points to a different outlook. But in the absence of any substantial shift
in the outlook, my view is that the Committee should continue the gradual adjustment of moving
rates higher to keep them aligned with economic activity and inflation. These actions are often
difficult, but also necessary to keep growth in line with the economy’s long-run potential and to
foster price stability.
5
Institutional Challenges
As the Federal Reserve contemplates the appropriate path of normalizing its monetary
policy, it naturally does so with considerable public attention. One source of this attention
comes from Congress itself. Calls for legislative reforms of the Federal Reserve have persisted
over the past five years, ranging from its structure and governance to its monetary policy
approach and decision making. Additionally, Congress has shown its willingness to tap the
Federal Reserve to fund fiscal activities ranging from new government agencies to highway
construction.
I understand that Fed actions during the crisis have raised a number of questions about
the institution and its scope. When Congress established the Federal Reserve more than a century
ago, it designed the institution to be apolitical but with accountability to Congress. This construct
was designed to protect the stewards of the nation’s money supply from the vulnerabilities
associated with short-term political agendas. It includes important checks and balances that are
often misunderstood, but nonetheless critical to the functioning of the institution.
During my 33 years at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, the primary focus of
thousands of dedicated Federal Reserve employees has been the health of the economy,
supported by an efficient and accessible banking and payments system. To the extent that there is
any doubt in the minds of Congress or the public about this, it is incumbent on the Federal
Reserve to work with Congress in a direct and transparent way until we satisfy any remaining
questions about the execution of our mission. Such dialogue would provide the highest
probability for outcomes that best serve the public interest.
In that spirit, I look forward to 2016 and the promise it holds.
6
Cite this document
APA
Esther L. George (2016, February 1). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20160202_esther_l_george
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20160202_esther_l_george,
author = {Esther L. George},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2016},
month = {Feb},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20160202_esther_l_george},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}