speeches · September 3, 2014
Regional President Speech
Narayana Kocherlakota · President
Opening Remarks
Town Hall Forum
Carroll College
Helena, Montana
September 4, 2014
Narayana Kocherlakota
President
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Thanks for the introduction, Tom. It’s a pleasure to be back in Helena—the site of the only
branch office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
I’ll kick things off with some basics about the Federal Reserve System and some thoughts about
Fed history. But the plan is for us to spend the bulk of our evening on your questions. One key
point before I proceed: The views I express today are my own and are not necessarily those of
others in the Federal Reserve System, including my colleagues on the FOMC.
In terms of basics about the Fed: I like to tell people that the Fed is a uniquely American
institution. What do I mean by that? Well, relative to its counterparts around the world, the U.S.
central bank is highly decentralized. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis is one of 12
regional Reserve Banks that, along with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., make up
the Federal Reserve System. Our bank represents the ninth of the 12 Federal Reserve districts
and includes Montana, the Dakotas, Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin and the Upper
Peninsula of Michigan.
Eight times per year, the Federal Open Market Committee—the FOMC—meets to set monetary
policy over the next six to seven weeks. All 12 presidents of the various regional Federal
Reserve banks—including me—and the governors of the Federal Reserve Board contribute to
these deliberations. However, the Committee itself consists only of the governors, the president
of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a rotating group of four other presidents. I’m one
of those four presidents this year. In this way, the structure of the FOMC mirrors the federalist
structure of our government, because representatives from different regions of the country—the
various presidents—have input into FOMC deliberations.
This basic federalist structure has a long history. In fact, this year is the centennial of the opening
of the 12 Reserve Banks and the start of the work undertaken by the Federal Reserve System. It’s
been a fascinating hundred years, with many twists and turns along the way. I’m sure that many
of you have questions about that journey. The answers to all of your questions—and probably
more—are on a website that the Fed has created at federalreservehistory.org. I encourage you to
visit this site to learn more about the people, places and events that have shaped Federal Reserve
history. I’d especially encourage you to look up Norman Holter. Mr. Holter was one of the
original directors of the Minneapolis Reserve Bank, and he played the key role in a branch office
being established here in Helena in 1921.
I’ve always enjoyed reading and studying history. And I strongly believe that history can help
inform policymakers’ decisions in the current day. But, at the same time, I do think that
policymakers need to be careful in how they use history. The monetary history of the 1970s is a
great example of this need for care. I’m sure that some of you in this room remember that
inflation—the rate of growth of prices—rose to disturbingly high levels in the 1970s. Faced with
this challenge, President Ford launched a national campaign to “Whip Inflation Now”—WIN for
short. The famous Broadway composer Meredith Willson wrote a song for the WIN campaign in
which he summarized the economic situation in these catchy lyrics: “Who needs inflation? Not
this nation! Who’s going to pass it by? You are and so am I!”
Mr. Willson’s pithy characterization was spot on in 1974. But 40 years later, I would suggest that
it’s exactly backward. Right now, this nation needs more inflation. The Federal Reserve aims to
keep the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) inflation rate at 2 percent. But since the start
of the recession almost seven years ago, the PCE inflation rate has averaged 1.5 percent. Over
the past year, it has averaged 1.6 percent. And I expect it to remain below 2 percent until 2018.
The persistently below-target inflation rate is a signal that the U.S. economy is not taking
advantage of all of its available resources. If demand were sufficiently high to generate 2
percent, then demand would be sufficiently high to allow the economy to make use of the
underutilized resources. And the most important of those resources is the American people.
There are many people in this country who want to work more hours, and our society is deprived
of their production.
So, it’s fun and educational to read about the 1970s on the Fed history gateway. I encourage you
to do so. But it’s critical for monetary policymakers like myself to realize that the times, and
challenges, that we face are different from the ones that Mr. Willson wrote about back in 1974.
Thanks again for coming tonight. And now let’s turn to your questions.
Cite this document
APA
Narayana Kocherlakota (2014, September 3). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20140904_narayana_kocherlakota
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20140904_narayana_kocherlakota,
author = {Narayana Kocherlakota},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2014},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20140904_narayana_kocherlakota},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}