speeches · June 1, 2014
Regional President Speech
Charles L. Evans · President
A Perspective on Unconventional
Monetary Policy
Macro Workshop 2014
Central Bank of Turkey
Istanbul, Turkey
June 2, 2014
Charles L. Evans
President and CEO
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
The views I express here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) or within the Federal Reserve System.
00
Three Big Events in Fed History
The Great Depression (1929-1938)
– “Inept monetary policy” failed to adequately combat
credit contraction, deflation, and depression
The Great Inflation (1965-1980)
– Monetary policy failed to recognize structural changes
and expectational dynamics that led to double-digit
inflation
The Treasury Accord (1951)
– An example highlighting the importance of central bank
independence
11
Academic Foundations of Modern Central Banking
Great Depression: Central banks must address nominal crises
– Friedman and Schwartz (1963)
– Bernanke (1983, 1985)
Great Inflation: Central banks must distinguish real
from nominal cycles
– Friedman (1968)
– Lucas (1972)
– Kydland and Prescott (1982)
Central bank independence: Central banks must be able to
act as necessary
– Kydland and Prescott (1977)
– Barro and Gordon (1983)
– Rogoff (1985)
22
Long-Run Strategy for Monetary Policy
(January 2012, reaffirmed thereafter every January)
𝝅 ∗ = 2% PCE inflation
𝒏
𝒖 ~ 5.2% – 5.6% time-varying
𝒕
– Central tendency of long-run sustainable level from the
Summary of Economic Projections (SEP)
Balanced approach to reducing deviations of inflation
and employment from long-run objectives
33
Persistently Low Inflation and Wage Growth
Total PCE Price Index
(level)
Dec. 2007
120
2% Price-Line from
December 2007
Average PCE Inflation
Path Implied by FOMC
(2000-2007): 2.3%
Inflation Forecasts
100
80
2000 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16
Wage and Compensation Growth
(percent change, year-over-year)
6
Average Hourly Earnings
3.5% = 1.5% productivity growth +
Employment Cost Index
2% inflation
3
0
2000 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16
Source: Inflation forecasts are from the March 19, 2014 FOMC Summary of Economic Projections
44
Inflation is Low Globally
Consumer Inflation
(year-over-year percent change, deviation from target)
2
1
Latest
2008-2013 avg.
2000-2007 avg.
0
-1
-2
-3
U.K. U.S. Eurozone Switzerland Sweden Denmark Norway Japan
Consumer inflation in the U.S. is as measured by the total price index for Personal Consumption Expenditures; in other
countries, it is measured by the Consumer Price Index. Latest data are year-over-year changes in the most recently
55
published monthly price index.
Bull’s-Eye Accountability for Fed’s Dual Mandate
Loss Function 𝑳 = 𝝅 − 𝝅∗ 𝟐 + 𝟎.𝟐𝟓 𝒚 − 𝒚∗ 𝟐
(percent)
𝑳 = 𝝅 − 𝟐 𝟐 + 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏 𝟐
𝝅 = 5.6%
Inflation
𝒖 = 9%
𝝅∗ 2015
2016 2014
September 2011
2012
Current 2013
Unemployment
𝒖𝒏
66
2014 – 2016 values are midpoints of FOMC participants’ Summary of Economic Projections as of March 19, 2014.
Bull’s-Eye Accountability for Fed’s Dual Mandate
Loss Function 𝑳 = 𝝅 − 𝟐 𝟐 + 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏 𝟐
(percent)
𝝅 = 3.8%
Inflation
𝒖 = 7.2%
2015
𝝅∗
2012
2016
2014
2013
Current
𝒖𝒏 Unemployment
77
2014 – 2016 values are midpoints of FOMC participants’ Summary of Economic Projections as of March 19, 2014.
Bull’s-Eye Accountability for Fed’s Dual Mandate
Loss Function 𝑳 = 𝝅 − 𝟐 𝟐 + 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏 𝟐
(percent)
𝑳 = 𝟐 𝝅 − 𝟐 𝟐 + 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏 𝟐
Inflation
𝝅 = 3.0%
2015
𝒖 = 7.3%
𝝅∗
2012
2016
2014
2013
Current
𝒖𝒏 Unemployment
88
2014 – 2016 values are midpoints of FOMC participants’ Summary of Economic Projections as of March 19, 2014.
Why Has Achieving Dual Mandate Been So Hard?
Deleveraging in the aftermath of the financial crisis
Global risks
Unusually restrictive fiscal policy
Monetary policy constrained by zero lower bound
99
Policy Rate Constrained by Zero Lower Bound
Fed Funds Rate
(percent)
8
6
4
History
2
Q1-2014
0
Taylor Rule (1999) based on CBO output gap
-2
-4
-6
1999 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13
In the period prior to the explicit inflation target set by the FOMC, the Taylor Rule is constructed using long-run inflation
111000
forecasts from the Survey of Professional Forecasters, or when available, from the Summary of Economic Projections.
After 2012, the Taylor Rule is constructed using the FOMC’s 2 percent long-run inflation target.
Policy Tools at the Zero Lower Bound
Constrained optimal policy approach (Taylor 1979)
Three ways to approximate optimal policy at the ZLB
– State-contingent price level targeting
– LSAPs
– Forward guidance and inertial policy rule
1111
Alternative Policy Prescriptions – Yellen (2012)
Federal Funds Rate
(percent)
6
Taylor Rules:
5
𝑹 = 𝟐.𝟎+ 𝝅 +𝟎.𝟓 𝝅 −𝟐 +𝜶𝒈𝒂𝒑
𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕
Taylor 1999: 𝜶 = 𝟏.𝟎
Taylor 1993: 𝜶 = 𝟎.𝟓
4
Optimal Control:
Min 𝝅 −𝟐 𝟐 + 𝒖 −𝒖𝒏 𝟐 +𝚫𝑹𝟐
𝒕 𝒕 𝒕
3
2
Optimal Control
Taylor 1993
1
Taylor 1999
0
2011 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Source: Janet L. Yellen, “Perspectives on Monetary Policy.” Boston. June 6, 2012
111222
Progress toward the Dual Mandate Goals with
Alternative Policies– Yellen (2012)
Unemployment Rate PCE Inflation
(percent) (4-quarter percent change)
10.0 3.5
9.0 3.0
Optimal Control
Taylor 1999
Peak: 2.3%
Taylor 1993
8.0 2.5
7.0 2.0
6.0 1.5
Optimal Control
Taylor 1999
Taylor 1993
5.0 1.0
4.0 0.5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: Janet L. Yellen, “Perspectives on Monetary Policy.” Boston. June 6, 2012
111333
State Contingent Price Level Targeting –
Evans (2010)
Core PCE Price Index
(Index, 2005 = 100)
Dec. 2007
130 10
120 8
2% Price Level Target
110 6
FOMC Inflation
Forecasts
100 4
90 2
80 0
20072007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014
Source: Core PCE data are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Inflation forecasts are from the June 2010 FOMC 111444
Summary of Economic Projections.
State Contingent Price Level Targeting –
Evans (2010) (cont.)
Core PCE Price Index and Inflation
(Index, 2005 = 100, Q4/Q4 inflation)
Dec. 2007
130 10
Price Level
120 8
2% Price Level Target
110 6
FOMC Inflation
Forecasts Y/Y Inflation
100 44
Example Inflation Path Consistent
with Price Level Target
90 22
2% Inflation Target
80 00
20072007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014
Source: Core PCE data are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Inflation forecasts are from the June 2010 FOMC 111555
Summary of Economic Projections.
LSAP Effects on Long-Term Interest Rates
Wide range of estimates regarding the effect of LSAP
on Treasury rates through
– Portfolio balance effect on term premia
Reasonable estimate is $500 billion of LSAP worth
about 25 bps on 10-year Treasury rates
– Signaling effect on expected future short-term rates
1166
Forward Guidance – Numerical Thresholds
(December 2012)
Unemployment Rate PCE Inflation
(percent) (4-quarter percent change)
10.0 3.5
9.0 3.0
Optimal Control
Taylor 1999
FOMC Threshold Peak: 2.3%
Taylor 1993
8.0 2.5
7.0 2.0
FOMC Threshold
2017Q1
2015Q1
6.0 1.5
Optimal Control
2016Q1
Taylor 1999
Taylor 1993
5.0 1.0
4.0 0.5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: Janet L. Yellen, “Perspectives on Monetary Policy.” Boston. June 6, 2012
1177
2013 Taper Tantrum - Forward Guidance,
LSAPs, and Signaling
Fed Funds Rate
(percent)
4
Central Tendency of FOMC Long-Run Projections
3
Key Events:
Sep. 10
May 22: Chairman Bernanke’s testimony before the Joint
Economic Committee, U.S. Congress
June 18-19: FOMC meeting & press conference
September 17-18: FOMC meeting & press conference Sep. 19
2
June 18
1
May 21
History
0
2012 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17
111888
Balance Sheet Normalization
Projected SOMA Holdings
2016 Q4 (FOMC SEP):
(Billions of dollars) 𝝅 = 𝟏.𝟖𝟓%
𝒖 = 𝟓.𝟒%
5,000
4,000
Updated Baseline (2013)
3,000
Buy-and-Hold
Realized
(2012)
2,000
Counterfactual (2013)
1,000
0
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. LibertyStreetEconomics.NewYorkFed.org.
Baseline SOMA projections based on primary dealer expectations. Counterfactual scenario assumes the use of only
1199
conventional monetary policy tools (Treasury bond purchases at roughly the rate of growth of currency in circulation).
Buy-and-Hold scenario assumes no asset sales. Date of projection given in parentheses (end of year).
FG and FOMC “Appropriate” Policy Rates
6
Taylor '93:
𝟐+𝛑 +𝟎.𝟓 𝝅 −𝟐 +(𝒖𝒏−𝒖 )
5 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕
Inertial Taylor '99:
𝟎.𝟖𝑰 +𝟎.𝟐[𝟐+𝝅 +𝟎.𝟓 𝝅 −𝟐 +𝟐 𝒖𝒏−𝒖 ]
𝒕−𝟏 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕
4
Market Expectations
3
2
1
0
2014 2015 2016 Long-Run
Source: Interest rate forecasts are from the March 19, 2014 FOMC Summary of Economic Projections.
Market expectations are from OIS futures as of May 29, 2014
2200
Additional Topics
Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Risks
Exit Principles
2211
MP and Financial Stability: Mandates and Tools
Tensions from low interest rates
– Highly accommodative MP appropriate at ZLB to
obtain (𝒖 𝒏, 𝝅 ∗).
– But such policy can encourage additional risk
taking
Degrading MP tools to mitigate financial instability
risks would lead to inflation below target and
additional resource slack
In order to avoid excess risk-taking, use
combination of supervisory oversight, macro-
prudential tools (separate from MP tools), and
market discipline
2222
Looking Ahead: Policy Normalization
At some point, achievement of bulls-eye (𝒖 𝒏, 𝝅 ∗) will
dictate higher interest rates
Need to make sure we can raise short-term market
interest rates in the presence of a large balance sheet
New tools to tighten linkages to market rates
– IOER, ON RRP, TDF
These are operational issues the in first stages of
monetary policy transmission mechanism
– No change in transmission from short rates to long
rates, asset prices, etc.
2233
Cite this document
APA
Charles L. Evans (2014, June 1). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20140602_charles_l_evans
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20140602_charles_l_evans,
author = {Charles L. Evans},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2014},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20140602_charles_l_evans},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}