Regional President Speech

Search Site Home > Newsroom > St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses Fiscal Approaches to Stabilization Policy 1/7/2012 CHICAGO – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard previewed a new research paper he will release next week, titled “Death of a Theory,” at an event sponsored by the Korea-America Economic Association on Saturday. The event was held during the annual meeting of the American Economic Association/Allied Social Science Associations. In his remarks, Bullard discussed business cycle stabilization using scal rather than monetary policy. The former attempts to react to aggregate shocks to the economy through changes in taxes and spending, while the latter reacts to aggregate shocks by targeting the nominal interest rate or by in uencing in ation and in ation expectations through quantitative easing when the interest rate is at the zero lower bound. Bullard noted that over the two decades leading up to the nancial crisis, the conventional wisdom concerning macroeconomic stabilization was that scal policy was in fact not a good tool. Shorter-run stabilization issues should be handled by the monetary authority while scal authorities should focus on a stable taxing and spending regime to achieve economic and political goals over the medium and long run. In late 2008, the Federal Open Market Committee set the policy rate at 0 to 25 basis points, effectively at the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates. This led many to conclude, erroneously in Bullard’s view, that the burden for short-term macroeconomic stabilization had shifted to scal policy. Thus, the last three years have detoured from the conventional wisdom. There has been a very active literature on when the scal approach to business cycle stabilization would be useful and effective. Bullard cited a paper by Michael Woodford[1] in which Woodford notes that “while a case for aggressive scal stimulus can be made under certain circumstances, such policy must be designed with care if it is to have the desired effect.” The literature assumes that monetary business cycle stabilization policy is ineffective once the zero lower bound is encountered. In addition, the types of policy experiments considered in this literature involve extra government spending and taxation only during the period when the zero bound is a binding constraint and nancial markets are in considerable turmoil. Given current conditions, Bullard pointed out three caveats related to the assumptions in Woodford’s paper: 1. The political process is ill-suited to make the types of timely and subtle decisions that are called for based on the literature. 2. Bullard emphasized that, in fact, “monetary policy has been quite effective, even while the policy rate has been at the zero lower bound.” Thus, he said, “it is not necessary or desirable to turn to scal stabilization policy.” 3. While the literature says that taxes should be collected simultaneously with the increase in government spending, the actual policy for many countries involved heavy reliance on government borrowing. Increased debt would be interpreted in the literature as delayed taxes. Bullard also discussed issues related to debt sustainability and argued that low interest rates may not be a good indicator of the probability of a debt crisis. Bullard concluded that “the turn toward scal approaches to stabilization policy has run its course, and that the conventional wisdom that existed in the decades prior to 2007 is being re-established in the U.S.” Therefore, “stabilization policy should be left to the monetary authority, which can operate effectively even at the zero lower bound,” Bullard said. And, scal authorities should set the tax and spending programs in a way that makes economic and political sense for the medium to longer term. In particular, “a stable tax code aligned with a stable plan of government spending would allow businesses and households to plan for the future in the most effective way,” Bullard noted. [1] Woodford, M. 2011 “Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3: 1-35. GENERAL Home About Us Bank Supervision Careers Community Development Economic Education Events Inside the Economy Museum Newsroom On the Economy Blog Open Vault Blog OUR DISTRICT Little Rock Branch Louisville Branch Memphis Branch Agricultural Finance Monitor Housing Market Conditions SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Bridges Economic Synopses Housing Market Perspectives In the Balance Page One Economics The Quarterly Debt Monitor Review Regional Economist ST. LOUIS FED PRESIDENT James Bullard's Website INITIATIVES Center for Household Financial Stability Dialogue with the Fed Federal Banking Regulations FOMC Speak In Plain English - Making Sense of the Federal Reserve Timely Topics Podcasts and Videos DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES CASSIDI® FRASER® FRED® FRED® Blog GeoFRED® IDEAS FOLLOW THE FED Twitter Facebook YouTube Google Plus Email Subscriptions RSS CONTACT US | LEGAL INFORMATION | PRIVACY NOTICE & POLICY | FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ONLINE 

James Bullard (2012, January 6). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20120107_james_bullard

@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20120107_james_bullard,
  author = {James Bullard},
  title = {Regional President Speech},
  year = {2012},
  month = {Jan},
  howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20120107_james_bullard},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}