speeches · March 29, 2011
Regional President Speech
James Bullard · President
Search Site
Home > Newsroom >
St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses U.S. Monetary Policy and the Path
to Normalization
3/30/2011
LONDON, U.K. – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard addressed
members of various nancial institutions on Wednesday at the UBS Macro Dinner in
London. He delivered remarks titled “U.S. Monetary Policy and the Path to
Normalization.”
During his presentation, Bullard explained how the Fed’s second round of quantitative
easing was “a classic easing of monetary policy” and “an effective tool, even while the
policy rate is near zero.”
Bullard also discussed the situation in early 2011, stating that “U.S. growth prospects
remain reasonably good for 2011.” He added that recent global and domestic events
“present considerable uncertainty,” but he concluded that “the most likely scenario is
that these uncertainties are unwound in relatively benign ways.” He discussed such a
de-escalation scenario for each situation.
Finally, Bullard talked about the normalization of monetary policy and compared it to
previous tightening cycles. “Discussion of the normalization of U.S. policy will likely
return as the key issue in 2011,” he concluded.
Quantitative Easing as Classic Monetary Policy
Last November, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced that the Fed
would purchase Treasury securities at a pace of about $75 billion per month through
the rst half of 2011—the program commonly known as “QE2.” The Committee also
stated that it would regularly review the program in light of incoming information and
would adjust the program as needed.
Bullard noted that even before the November decision, monetary policy was extremely
accommodative. Regarding the motivation for QE2, Bullard noted last summer’s
“disin ation and declining in ation expectations,” adding that the “Japanese experience
with mild de ation and a near-zero nominal interest rate has been poor.” Given the
near-zero policy rate environment, Bullard said, “asset purchases can substitute for
ordinary (interest-rate targeting) monetary policy.”
Bullard stated that the policy change had been largely priced into markets ahead of the
November FOMC meeting and that the nancial market effects were conventional. “In
particular, real interest rates declined, in ation expectations rose, the dollar
depreciated, and equity prices rose,” he said. “These are the ‘classic’ nancial market
effects one might observe when the Fed eases monetary policy in ordinary times.”
“This experience shows that monetary policy can be eased aggressively even when the
policy rate is near zero,” Bullard said.
He noted that the effects of monetary policy on the real economy lag from six to 12
months. “Real effects are di cult to disentangle because other shocks hit the
economy in the meantime,” which, he added, is a standard problem in evaluating
monetary policy.
The Situation in 2011
Bullard stated that, relative to last summer, U.S. growth prospects improved by early
2011. “Private sector forecasters and the FOMC all marked up their forecasts,” he said.
“Anecdotal reports were more bullish,” showing “pro table businesses with
considerable cash and an improving outlook.” He added, “An improving economy 18
months post-recession is generally a strong positive.”
Noting the improved economic outlook since QE2 was implemented, “the natural
debate is how and when the exit should begin,” Bullard said. “However, additional
uncertainty has clouded this picture.”
Bullard said, “In recent weeks, macroeconomic uncertainty has been on the rise from
four key sources.” He noted that “all four situations contain potential for escalation.” If
escalation occurs, he added, how and when to begin normalizing monetary policy
would become less clear. “Still, the most likely prospect is that all four are resolved
without becoming global macroeconomic shocks,” he said.
Bullard discussed a de-escalation scenario for each of the four situations:
If further increases in world oil prices remain limited, the uncertainty premium in
oil prices associated with turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa will decline.
Bullard said that oil “prices would have to continue to increase substantially to
derail U.S. growth prospects signi cantly.”
If Japan contains the fallout at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, uncertainty
regarding the natural disaster and the damaged nuclear reactors there will be
reduced.
If the U.S. Congress funds the government through 2011 and makes some
progress on de cit reduction, uncertainty about the U.S. scal situation and the
possibility of a government shutdown will be lessened.
If European governments approve a plan to address continuing sovereign debt
concerns, the continued uncertainty regarding resolution of the European
sovereign debt crisis will be reduced.
Normalization of U.S. Monetary Policy
Bullard said that U.S. monetary policy cannot remain extremely accommodative
inde nitely. “Exit strategy was widely discussed in 2010, and that debate will likely
revive during 2011,” Bullard said.
“The process of normalizing policy, even once it begins, will still leave unprecedented
policy accommodation on the table,” he stated. “The FOMC may not be willing or able
to wait until all global uncertainties are resolved to begin normalizing policy.”
Bullard noted that normal monetary policy has two parts: “QE accommodation is
removed by returning the balance sheet to an ordinary size over time,” and “the policy
rate begins to approach levels associated with moderate expansion.” Bullard said that
normalization will take time and added that it is the most di cult part of the business
cycle for a central bank.
Bullard compared this normalization to previous tightening cycles. “Reversing QE
through balance sheet normalization will put upward pressure on interest rates,” which,
Bullard noted, is a complication that was not present previously. “The Committee can
sell assets as needed to begin tightening, without raising the policy rate.”
Bullard noted that the Fed pays interest on excess reserves (IOER), which also was not
present in previous tightening cycles. “With IOER, the policy rate could be increased
without changing the size of the balance sheet.” As an alternative to paying interest on
all those reserves, he said, “reserves can also be drained via term deposits and reverse
repos.”
Bullard then compared state-contingency in the previous two tightening cycles. “In
1994, the Fed tightened policy unexpectedly and in uneven amounts,” and the nancial
market effects were considered disorderly, he noted. Policy was then normalized, he
said, and the economy boomed for the rest of the decade. “In 2004, the Fed tightened
policy in perfectly even amounts,” and he noted that although the nancial markets
effects were considered orderly, the nancial crisis is sometimes blamed in part on this
excessively smooth approach.
Bullard said that the lessons of 1994 and 2004 will be instructive in developing the right
exit strategy.
GENERAL
Home
About Us
Bank Supervision
Careers
Community Development
Economic Education
Events
Inside the Economy Museum
Newsroom
On the Economy Blog
Open Vault Blog
OUR DISTRICT
Little Rock Branch
Louisville Branch
Memphis Branch
Agricultural Finance Monitor
Housing Market Conditions
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
Bridges
Economic Synopses
Housing Market Perspectives
In the Balance
Page One Economics
The Quarterly Debt Monitor
Review
Regional Economist
ST. LOUIS FED PRESIDENT
James Bullard's Website
INITIATIVES
Center for Household Financial Stability
Dialogue with the Fed
Federal Banking Regulations
FOMC Speak
In Plain English - Making Sense of the Federal Reserve
Timely Topics Podcasts and Videos
DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES
CASSIDI®
FRASER®
FRED®
FRED® Blog
GeoFRED®
IDEAS
FOLLOW THE FED
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
Google Plus
Email Subscriptions
RSS
CONTACT US
|
LEGAL INFORMATION
|
PRIVACY NOTICE & POLICY
|
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ONLINE
Cite this document
APA
James Bullard (2011, March 29). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20110330_james_bullard
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20110330_james_bullard,
author = {James Bullard},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2011},
month = {Mar},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20110330_james_bullard},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}