speeches · September 28, 2010
Regional President Speech
Charles I. Plosser · President
Economic Outlook
Presented to The Greater Vineland Chamber of Commerce
Vineland, NJ
September 29, 2010
Charles I. Plosser
President and CEO
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
The views expressed today are my own and not necessarily
those of the Federal Reserve System or the FOMC.
Economic Outlook
Greater Vineland Chamber of Commerce
September 29, 2010
Merighi's Savoy Inn
Charles I. Plosser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Introduction
Thank you, David Kotok, Bob DeSanto, and Dawn Hunter for inviting me to speak this
afternoon at the Greater Vineland Chamber of Commerce. I know David is proud of this
part of South Jersey, and with this warm reception and turnout, I understand better why
he feels that way. Today, I would like to offer my perspectives on the economic
recovery in the U.S. and in the region, and the challenges that monetary policymakers
face in this economic environment. Before continuing, I should note that my views are
my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Board or my colleagues on the
Federal Open Market Committee.
My basic message is this: I believe we are in the midst of an economic recovery – a
modest one, but a recovery nonetheless. Over the last few months, we have
experienced something like the summer doldrums. The tail winds that helped propel
the economy earlier in the year have waned. Yet such a slowdown is not unusual in the
early phases of recovery, and we should not overreact to data that can be volatile and
may be revised over time. My assessment of the recent data leads me to expect that
the recovery will continue at a moderate pace over the next several quarters.
That the pace of the recovery is modest is disappointing but not that surprising. We are
emerging from one of the worst economic and financial crises in 70 years. Economists
have been saying for over a year now that this recovery would be a modest one and that
it would be a long climb out of a very deep hole. And as we are all painfully aware, the
economy continues to face some real challenges. Most troubling is the unemployment
rate, which remains high at 9.6 percent. Still, despite a downgrade in the outlook for
the second half of this year, I expect we will avoid slipping back into recession. And with
continued economic recovery, we will gradually return to healthier labor markets.
1
Overview of the Federal Reserve System
Before I elaborate on my views of the outlook, let me offer some background on the
Federal Reserve. The financial crisis and the resulting regulatory reform have put the
Fed in the spotlight. Yet many people still find our nation’s central bank a mystery.
Congress created the Federal Reserve System in 1913 with 12 individual Reserve Banks
rooted on Main Streets throughout our nation and overseen by a Board of Governors in
Washington, D.C. Ours is a uniquely American form of a central bank, with checks and
balances to protect and serve an economically and geographically diverse nation. As the
central bank, the Fed is charged by Congress with providing the nation with a stable
currency and supporting economic growth and employment. It seeks to achieve these
objectives by influencing the cost and availability of credit through its decisions about
interest rates and the supply of money. These decisions are the primary responsibility
of the FOMC — the Federal Open Market Committee — the group within the Fed
charged with setting monetary policy. The Fed also seeks to promote financial stability
by providing oversight of key parts of the banking and payment systems and providing
liquidity in times of crises.
The Fed has a unique public/private structure that operates independently within
government, but not independent of it. The seven-member Board of Governors,
appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, represents the public sector.1
The 12 regional Reserves Banks, each independently chartered with their nine-member
boards of directors drawn from citizens in their respective Districts, represent the
private sector.2 This structure imposes accountability while avoiding centralized
governmental control of banking and monetary policy.
This structure also ensures that a diverse range of views is present in policy discussions
and helps keep monetary policy decisions independent from short-term political
pressures. The independence of monetary policy decision-making from the day-to-day
political fray is an important governance principle. Good governance calls for a healthy
degree of separation between policymakers who are responsible for spending the
money and those policymakers responsible for printing it. History and economic theory
teach us that it is far too tempting for governments to print money as a substitute for
facing the hard choices of cutting spending or increasing taxes. The temptation is
1 As of September 27, 2010, there are four Governors serving, with three more nominees awaiting Senate
confirmation.
2 Under the Dodd-Frank Act, only the six nonbank directors on each board may vote to recommend a
Reserve Bank president, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C.
2
particularly acute in times when governments are running large budget deficits. The
consequences of using the printing press to finance government spending are almost
always bad – higher inflation, higher interest rates, a weaker currency, and often more
economic instability. Congress also chose to insulate monetary policymaking from
short-term political pressures by making the Fed self-funding. That is, it receives no
government appropriations from Congress. In fact, the System turns over any excess
earnings above the cost of its operations to the U.S. Treasury. In 2009, this amounted to
about $46 billion.
The individual Reserve Banks play an integral role in their region’s economies. For
example, the Philadelphia Fed provides currency and other basic payment services to
banks and depository institutions in eastern Pennsylvania, southern New Jersey, and
Delaware. We support community development activities. We help the U.S. Treasury
manage its cash balances. We also supervise numerous banks and bank holding
companies in our District under delegated authority of the Board of Governors.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 made many
changes to the regulatory landscape. Under this new legislation, the Fed will continue
to supervise many banks, a responsibility it shares with the OCC (Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency), the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), and
state banking regulators. The Fed will also continue to be the sole supervisor of bank
holding companies and now has the added responsibility of supervising thrift holding
companies.
Here in the Third District, this means that the Philadelphia Fed will soon supervise 38
thrift holding companies in addition to retaining supervision of more than 100 bank
holding companies and 22 state-chartered member banks. As bank supervisors, we also
will retain a role in consumer protection compliance for firms with less than $10 billion
in assets. But the act requires the Board of Governors to transfer its responsibility for
rule-making and enforcement for the largest banks and nonbanks to a new,
independent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Dodd-Frank is a massively complex piece of legislation, and many details remain to be
worked out in the rule-writing underway to implement the act. It is also highly likely
there will be many unintended consequences. It is too early to assess all of its
ramifications or whether it can achieve all of the lofty goals that people have assigned to
it. Only time will tell.
3
Economic Outlook
Now, let me turn to the national and regional economic outlook. As I suggested at the
start of my remarks, I believe our nation’s economic recovery continues on a sustainable
path, with moderate growth and subdued inflation. All of us would like to see faster
improvement in the job market. But the recession was very deep. Unfortunately, it will
take some time to regain the ground the economy has lost. However, I believe the
outlook remains positive.
The recovery officially began in June 2009 and is now in its second year. Yet, after
averaging almost 3½ percent over the first three quarters of the recovery, growth
slowed in the second quarter of this year to an estimated 1.6 percent.
Our monthly Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Survey indicates that manufacturing
activity weakened over the summer, and in August, the general activity index turned
negative for the first time since July 2009. The September value increased but remained
negative, just under zero. We should not read too much into monthly movements. The
current activity index has, after all, dipped below zero in the midst of expansions before,
notably in 2002 and 2003 as we were coming out of the last recession. On the national
level, manufacturing continues to expand. However, the data suggest that the pace of
activity remained sluggish over the course of the summer.
We saw the same kind of mixed signals in our quarterly South Jersey Business Survey.
Overall, economic conditions have improved slightly in recent months, but many firms
reported declines in employment.
And while firms responding to both our Business Outlook Survey and our South Jersey
Business Survey remain optimistic about economic prospects six months from now, they
are less optimistic than they were earlier this year.
Three temporary factors contributed to this slowdown. First, the temporary homebuyer
tax credits pulled homes sales forward into the spring and so what followed in the
summer was a dramatic decline in home sales. Second, the U.S. Census Bureau hired
hundreds of thousands of temporary workers but let them go in the latter part of the
summer, which distorted the employment picture. Third, the sovereign debt crisis in
Europe damaged the fragile confidence of financial markets. The lingering effects of
these factors all contributed to our summer doldrums.
4
In reaction to the recent data, many forecasters have scaled back their growth forecast
for the second half of the year. Yet they have made relatively minor changes in their
outlook for 2011 and beyond. So, despite the media alarm, these professional
forecasters see a soft patch in the economy but a relatively small probability of slipping
back into recession. Still, the pace of this recovery is slow relative to recoveries after
other deep recessions – resembling instead the so-called jobless recoveries of 2001 and
the early 1990s.
I know many in your community feel the pains of high unemployment. Vineland,
Atlantic City, and Ocean City share the unfortunate distinction of having the highest
unemployment rates in our region. Vineland’s unemployment rate is 13.5 percent,
significantly higher than the 9.6 percent rate in both New Jersey and the nation.
Changes in the unemployment rate, however, are typically lagging indicators of
economic activity. The reality is that businesses must be comfortable that the recovery
will continue before they start hiring in earnest. I also hear from many business leaders
that tax and regulatory uncertainty has dampened both their confidence and hiring
plans. These concerns can be particularly detrimental to growth at this point in the
cycle.
But other factors are also contributing to a tepid recovery. We entered this recession
with an economy over-invested in residential housing and to a lesser degree commercial
construction. We were also over-invested in the financial sector. In addition, many
financial institutions and households were over-leveraged.
So when home prices collapsed, there was severe damage to household wealth. The
typical response to such a decline in wealth is that households consume less and save
more to strengthen their balance sheets. Given the oversupply of homes and the
decline in home prices, it is unlikely that home values will provide a significant boost to
household wealth any time soon. This suggests that consumption growth will remain
modest compared to past recoveries and savings will be higher. Ultimately, the higher
savings and investment will benefit the economy, even though the short-term
adjustments are painful.
I also believe that construction activity will be a much smaller share of the economy
going forward compared to the real estate boom years. Other sectors that are closely
related to the residential construction industry, such as mortgage brokers, may also
need to shrink. As a share of total employment, these sectors will likely be smaller than
5
they were before the recession. So many workers in these sectors will likely need to
find jobs in other industries. Such adjustments are painful for workers and their families
and they take time.
Other structural factors may also be weighing on the labor market and retarding the
return to full employment. During this downturn, companies shed workers at an
unusually rapid pace. Yet, companies also increased productivity, enabling them to
produce more goods and services with fewer, but more highly skilled workers. As
activity picks up, companies are likely to look for more highly skilled, perhaps specialized
workers. This means there may be a skill mismatch between job opportunities and the
current pool of the unemployed. This skill gap may further explain the sluggish job
growth.
Some of the unemployed, who may have the skills to find a job in another state, may
not be able to move because they cannot afford to take the financial losses associated
with selling their current home. This limitation in geographic mobility is consistent with
the observation that unemployment rates are typically above the national average in
states where home prices have fallen the most.
Certainly not all of the 9.6 percent unemployment rate can be explained by these
painful structural adjustments, but these factors do suggest that it will likely take some
time for the labor market to heal.
Can monetary policy help speed up such adjustments? It may be tempting to think so,
but monetary policy is not a magic elixir that can solve every economic ill. Doctors must
diagnose the disease correctly if they are to prescribe the correct medicine. Otherwise,
they could do the patient more harm than good.
While the Fed’s actions can help encourage spending and borrowing, monetary policy is
not designed to fine tune employment nor can it solve the sorts of geographic, sectoral,
or skill mismatches I have just discussed. The Fed has already reduced the federal
funds rate to near zero and provided $1.7 trillion in added liquidity by buying mortgage-
backed securities and agency debt. And recall that while we were dropping the federal
funds rate by 5 percentage points to near zero, monetary policy was unable to stop the
rise in the unemployment rate from 5 to 10 percent. This suggests that very precise
management of unemployment rates over the short- term is simply not something for
which monetary policy is particularly well suited.
6
Thus, it is difficult, in my view, to see how additional asset purchases by the Fed, even if
they move interest rates on long-term bonds down by 10 or 20 basis points, will have
much impact on the near-term outlook for employment. Sending a signal that monetary
policymakers are taking actions in an attempt to directly affect the near-term path of
the unemployment rate, and then for those actions to have no demonstrable effects,
would hurt the Fed’s credibility and possibly erode the effectiveness of our future
actions to ensure price stability. It also risks leading the public to believe that the Fed is
seeking to monetize the deficit and make it more difficult to return to normal policy
when the time comes.
Inflation and Monetary Policy
On the inflation front, recent data indicate some deceleration, which has led some
observers to voice concerns about sustained deflation – that is, a prolonged decline in
the level of prices. In my view, inflation will remain subdued in the near term, but I do
not see a significant risk of sustained deflation. I anticipate that inflation expectations
will remain relatively stable and core inflation will run in the 1 to 1-1/2 percent range
this year and accelerate toward 2 percent in 2011.
Inflation in this range is not a problem – indeed, low inflation is desirable. Most people
forget, or are too young to know, that from 1953 to 1965, the average inflation rate
measured by the consumer price index (CPI) was just 1.3 percent. For the last 15 years,
Switzerland’s average inflation rate has been less than 1 percent. In neither of these
episodes did low inflation lead to economic stagnation or fears of deflation.
So I am not particularly concerned about low inflation per se, and brief periods of lower
than desired inflation or even deflation are unlikely to materially affect economic
outcomes. Yet it is important that monetary policymakers remain vigilant to ensure that
neither disinflationary trends nor inflationary trends lead to an unanchoring of inflation
expectations, which would undermine the return to price stability in the medium to long
run. The stability of those expectations requires the public to believe that the Fed will
act to keep inflation stable as the recovery continues.
Were deflationary expectations to materialize – and let me repeat, I do not see much
risk of this – I would support appropriate steps to raise expectations of inflation,
including, perhaps, aggressive asset purchases coupled with clear communication that
our goal is to combat deflationary expectations. But for such a strategy to be successful,
the public must believe that the Fed can and will act to combat those expectations. The
Fed must be credible. Protecting that credibility is why, based on my current outlook, I
7
do not support further asset purchases of any size at this time. As I said earlier, asset
purchases in our current economic environment can do little if anything to speed up the
return to full employment. But if the public believes that they can and is disappointed,
it may have less confidence that the Fed will act to raise inflationary expectations if
needed. Because I see little gain at this point, and some costs, I would prefer not to
engage in further asset purchases at this time.
Similarly, if the economic recovery unfolds as I expect, the Fed will need to begin
normalizing monetary policy from its current very accommodative stance. That will
mean selling assets to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet and raising the level of short-term
interest rates. The challenge for the Fed is recognizing the proper timing to ensure that
the economy remains on a sustainable path toward price stability and full employment.
Conclusion
To conclude, after the worst financial and economic crisis that most of us have ever
experienced, a slow but sustainable economic recovery is now underway in our region
and in the nation. While the near-term outlook has softened a bit, I expect growth in
the national economy to be around 3 to 3½ percent over the next two years, with
stronger business spending on equipment and software, moderate growth of consumer
spending, and gradual improvement in household balance sheets.
The unemployment rate continues to be one of the biggest challenges our economy
faces. Although unemployment will begin to decline gradually, it will take some time for
it to return to its long-run level. As the economy strengthens and firms become
convinced that the recovery is sustainable, hiring will pick up over the rest of this year
and in 2011. But it may take even longer to address the sectoral, geographic, and skill
imbalances that seem to plague the labor markets.
I expect inflation to remain subdued. As long as inflation expectations remain well
anchored, I see little risk of a period of sustained deflation. Over time, I see the Fed
conducting policy in a prudent fashion so that inflation gradually stabilizes in the 1.5 to
2.0 percent range.
This has been a painful episode in our nation’s economic history, and many policy
challenges remain to be faced. Yet, I believe that, over time, our economy can and will
return to an environment of sustainable growth and low and stable inflation.
8
Cite this document
APA
Charles I. Plosser (2010, September 28). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20100929_charles_i_plosser
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_20100929_charles_i_plosser,
author = {Charles I. Plosser},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {2010},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_20100929_charles_i_plosser},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}