speeches · September 25, 1994
Regional President Speech
Cathy E. Minehan · President
Remarks by Cathy Minehan
at BayBanks Regional (Merrimack & North Regional)
- Board Meeting
September 26, 1994
Good morning. I want to thank Giles Mosher for inviting me to be here with you
this morning. I plan to spend much of my time this morning discussing the
Massachusetts economy and putting those charts you have into context.
However, there are some other related issues I would like to discuss, on which I
am eager to hear your perspectives. I think that meetings such as these are
infinitely more interesting -- at least for me -- when I am able to find out what is on
people's minds, instead of only listening to myself talk. So I hope we can have a
lively exchange a little bit later.
I'd like to cover three main things:
Who am I and what do I see as important for the Boston Fed
What's the general state of the national and local economy as a
backdrop for
Where do I think I and Boston Fed can add value in the regional
community
II. I'm a thoroughly experienced policy and management specialist who through
dint of hard work and a lot of luck happen to have the best job in the world
Diverse responsibilities -
3 legged stool
Significant management challenge - employees, landlord
-2-
Chance to make a difference
within region
within Federal Reserve System
within national/international
In fact I believe there is no reason to have the Federal Reserve Bank
of Boston unless we as an organization and as individuals add value
Strategic Plan
policy
Fed as a resource to regional community--economic information,
publications and as corporate citizen
Ill. Now for a couple of minutes I'm going to be a resource for all of you on
economic data, because I think it will make you understand some areas of
local involvement I have in mind a little better
I'll very briefly touch on the national economy -- for contextual
purposes, and then get into what's happening in Massachusetts
National economy - doing okay - about 4 years or better into an
economic recovery - fairly old by historical standards, but also fairly
weak. Right now we're on the horns of a dilemma of how to balance
things to achieve what you could call economic perfection - nearly full
?_
)
ment, no major inflation evident, economic growth slowing to ft:!:
{1).1,i
poten ial, capacity utilization high, consumer sentiment high, etc. Sure there
ar roblems--the value of the dollar, the status of the U.S. as the largest
debtor nation, national budget deficits--but all in all the national scene is
looking pretty good. ~
Locally (charts) - Much the same - a solid recovery with some signs of
moderation.
Charts 1, 2, 3
Here in Massachusetts, the economic situation is quite similar to the nation's
- a solid recovery with some signs of moderation emerging. While much harder hit
in the recession than most of the rest of the country, Massachusetts been growing
at slightly better than the national pace since we began recovering about two years
ago. In the last twelve months, the number of payroll jobs has grown 2.8 percent
in Massachusetts and 2. 7 percent in the nation. (Employment growth is our basic
measure of economic performance at the state level.)
Chart 4
Unemployment in Massachusetts, similarly, has been running close to the
national rate: In July and August, the unemployment rate in Massachusetts was
5.9 percent as compared with the national rate of 6.1 percent .
-4-
Charts 5 & 6
Closer to home, the limited data on the Boston-area economy paint a slightly
brighter picture: employment in the area grew a little faster than the national pace
in the last year (3.0 percent from July 1993 to July 1994), and unemployment is
running even lower than in the state, at 5.2 percent in July. These data refer to
the Boston "Labor Market Area", a metropolitan-area concept that includes a good
deal of eastern Massachusetts. In the city of Boston itself, the unemployment rate
was 6. 1 percent in July not seasonally adjusted, which was down from a year
earlier and slightly above the unadjusted Massachusetts and U.S. rates in July.
Chart 7
The employment gains we're seeing - nationally as well as in the region, the
state, and the city of Boston - are concentrated in services industries. Services is
a hodgepodge category that runs the gamut from health services, legal services,
and education to auto repair; from software to personal and household services;
from high value-added consulting to washing windows. Services industries in
Massachusetts account for one-third of all jobs, but almost two-thirds of the net
job additions in the last 12 months. The fastest-growing services industries in
Massachusetts are business services (including software), health services,
engineering and management services, and private social services.
-5-
Aside from services, all the major industry groups other than manufacturing
and government have added jobs in Massachusetts in the last year. Construction
is growing the fastest, but the wholesale and retail trade industry, being bigger,
accounts for more of the new jobs (second only to services). Even manufacturing,
after almost a decade of decline, has actually added jobs in the last four months.
Other measures of economic activity in the region also show growth. Help
wanted advertising, usually a good indicator of business hiring plans, is rising in
Boston, June retail sales in Massachusetts were well above a year earlier, as was
total personal income and wage and salary income in Massachusetts in the first
quarter. With consumer prices in Boston rising more slowly than in the nation, real
income gains are even greater in relative terms.
Housing market activity in the region continues to expand, despite this
year's rise in interest rates. The commercial real estate market is also recovering.
Vacancy rates in the Boston office market have fallen from almost 18 percent to
12 percent in less than three years.
Thus, the current situation seems remarkably upbeat for a region and a state
that just over two years ago was at the low point of a downturn that was arguably
the worst (here) since the Great Depression. Looking forward, there are some
definite clouds on the horizon (indeed overhead), but the basic outlook is for a
slightly slower version of the current pace - not a return to the boom times of the
1980s and not a return to the bust of the early 1990s.
-6-
The clouds I'm referring to are sectoral problems - ongoing cutbacks in
defense spending and a potential slowing of growth in health services as a result
of health care reform. Both the defense industry and health services account for a
higher share of jobs here than is typical nationally. As a result, our economy is
more vulnerable than many other regions to policy changes in these two areas.
Chart 8
Even taking account of these two negatives, the New England Economic
Project, a local forecasting group, expects Massachusetts to grow at about the
national pace in the next few years [chart]. Services will continue to be the main
area of projected job growth, and NEEP sees manufacturing employment
continuing to decline, partly because of defense cutbacks and restructuring and
downsizing at computer firms.
Despite this enerally positive outlook, many people are not fully
participating in the r overy. A six percent unemployment rate means that 8
million people are unem oyed in the United States, and 190 thousand are
unemployed in Massachuse s. Nationally, an additional half million people are
discouraged workers - people o are not counted as unemployed because they've
given up looking for work because ey do not believe the jobs are there. A further
4 million people are working at part-ti jobs who would prefer full-time work. So
even when the economy's in pretty good ape, a fairly large pool of people would
like to be working, or working more, but aren
-7-
To further compound the problem, being out of work is not an affliction
borne proportiona ly by all groups.
nemployment rate for those age 16 to 19 was more than three
times the adult (20 ) rate - 17 .5 percent in August . While the teenage rate is
coming down as the verall rate declines, the recession's impact has lasted much
longer for teenagers th n for most workers, partly because the 1990-91 recession
hit retail trade - the maj r employer of teenagers - harder than is typical of most
recessions, and partly be ause the more general downsizing of firms and
conservative hiring practic of the early 1990s reduced employment opportunities
for young, inexperienced wo kers.
In addition, unemploym nt rates for minority workers are considerably higher
than for whites. The unemplo ent rate was more than twice as high in August
for blacks as for whites - 11.5 p rcent as compared with 5.3 percent [chart], and
the black teenage unemployment r te was 36.8 percent.
For both teenagers and black unemployment rates were much lower in
Massachusetts than in the United Sta es during the 1980s boom, but then the
state's much deeper and longer recessi n pushed their rates above the
corresponding national averages in 1991 nd 1992 . In 1993, unemployment
rates for teenagers and for blacks were sim" arly high in Massachusetts and the
nation.
-8-
Thus firms re hiring, but not everyone has benefited. Some individuals
lack the experience, education, skills, or training being sought, or they live far from
expanding job sites. ndeed, these problems have worsened in recent years
because the importanc of education in determining an individual's success in the
labor market has increa d. It used to be that high school graduates with work
experience could earn as uch as a college graduate. That is no longer true
nationally, and it is not tru in New England. With the steep decline in the number
of high-paying manufacturin jobs here, combined with services job growth (which
can be either very high wage r very low wage), we run the risk of widening the
gulf between the highly educat d and highly paid minority and the working but
.. -~~A
poor majority.
~•i-1'~-~~v\
f"
'7~ ~ _;\ ~ i,v:
School o Work C,..,
Boston - 1.2 million/5 objectives - 5 schools, expand Protech, work with
y schools, revise curriculum, coordinate all programs involving
Piedad Rob rtson/Spring
-9-
Boston
3 others - artford, Providence, Bridgeport
17 Empowe ment Communities
Lot of planning - sha e to see it wasted if don't win grant - money largely
for social services - ec nomic development part coming from local Bank
contributions and small siness growth within the zone
I'd like to see us leverage e plan regardless of what happens into a
roadmap for collaboration be ween business and the city on economic
development in Boston
Ask them questions --
'H I lave a-re.gio.nal erople'(me,,t beerd?
J
2) How are they finding the labor market
} 3) Are they finding the skills they need in the labor force?
~) See a discontinuity between data and your experience re: the strength
of the recovery?
..... 0 'g'
)JC
n
DC
n
)lC
-o
.»...I.
)I'C C"
DC
3
r:::
+-c
)"(
C"
<-
3 )I'C
.....
»I
m .
-g
DC
~
)I'C
.C
<-
S""
::s:
N '°
)"(
D::
·5
.. .'."
",::
DC
m
3
r : D : C :
0\
........
0\
..
»I
»I
~
~
)U
~ "C <-
. ) s Q I : ( :
. . 0 a a . . . .
0 . , a ,c ..
0 . 0 a..
0 o ,, c c
0 D >=
< !
) a 0 C JC
<J
..c
m
!I!
C
0 )II
I
.' \
.'
·'
00
C
T:
I
'
00
>y
1$
I '
'
..c
m
cc
C
'
s):I:I
lii
0 s::
00
)II
iu
'
D<
. C ...
m
0
3
..c
r
0"
C
)II
0 <'
D 0 < 0
" - ,0 C .
- 3
)-JC
)I(
..c
s::
)II
-)II
z
s::
"iii
D'"
- 0 s ; ::
" ) )I I ( I
D 0 <
· I ; J c !
II
..c
.a..
C
I"" 3
!'
D< 0
j,·
O""
.:'. I
..c
)Q
• ;, I
~
~I' , • : ,·: . 'I
s):I:I
I""
j .,! -;
D<
0
; I
I
.a..
\ • •f;If( • I
I
m
r.t • ::
..c
~'1 , .' i:
.£
3
·~
-
._.\\ ... I. ::
D .a < ..
0
C"
•. !....
r:::
0
I · : ~ ••: ~.'
I
..c
. . a a )Q
: .. :
. s 3 ~ D . : . ( :
. , . · · · , ' :' : \ : , .. . . 1\ I \ \ r , ; . _ • . , I . ~ , ,
/ 1 I 1 ~ \
D N s ) < I : I :
I ~\
11
..c
" ~ C
' , ,: : 1 \ · ·< / I I . ' I I
,
~ I : / \
D N C <
0 , s D u : ( :
\ I I I .· I I ,• \
. . ~ . \ . . • ' ' . \ \ .--: . . . . . r , I1 d ,\ · .\
( I
, \ 1 : I 1
.. s) c :I:I
C
I I '
\ :.·., I t
D ,. < c
,u
'
1,'
'i I
\I
0 D :: (
'
, ' ,: I \ 1 1\ \
' ' I I
i : ', I / 1 I I I
. D . C < c
·Q-(
1\
f1
,.c
.
0
d
\;;I1
s::
1,
.
\ :I
. ) . I c I
1.·
•I
s::
' I I I
... . , ' ~
.
\ I : : 'I I I I
D .: < ,.
m-
-~·,
\
: : I 1
..c
\
l ) l I I I
~ I
\
... I
C
· : a s 0 C ) 3 II
) 0 - / . ? ) s C . I : ( .:
) i- l / ? C lI i- z l ? l I
; - , · ) ) n l ; " 3 : , l ( : lI I 1 1 1 1 1 ) r e "- . / 0 : i 5 C i ; : i
z m- l ? ) l ' I I I ; J ·n ) ; ) t " : I " : ( I
" : . : > - 0 3 a i ) i
~ ~ ' C iS
z m s ) ~ 0 I : ( 1 :
. D . ) : s . , < I c : . I :
~
0- ) s I : ( : 0- s )I : ( :
0 111 1 1 ·n s::
0- ) s I : ( :
"- s i : i : i
. " s 0 ii : i :
D ,, < c
>):
·n
~
~~
I
.....
....
. I C D : 'C :
0 ,0
) 0 .(
0 0 ,iI..
0 D D C C
D ~ ,0 C
Dw >= C !
0 0 DC
0 D 0
C 0
) 0 : a J : C r
<i: 'I;i
. : . : ( r
D'C C
"- 0 I::
) D X C C
>I!
)JC
Jll
)II
..t
::r
DI
)II
lic
z
-1/1
I::
)II
m
DC
::r
DC
a
0
3
s::: r . o ..
0 0-
. . :: ( r
r )II
<'
"C
3
- 3 D'C
D D C C
- 0 ~
I::
)JC
Jt'"
'S
..(
.)Q..
~
)II
i
<'
)II
I::
"
DC
0
0
.. I . I ..
0
II!
m
,,,,
. : . : ( r
3
DC
-
0
C"
..(
~
..
) I I : I :
3 ...
.D..C..
)I( s:::
/1
:1
..(
i· •
::r
r 0 :
:
z s:::
I I '
·:
.
.D..C..
)Q
;
~
I
..(
I I
)II
)\I
m
I ·' ."
'
I::
1I;' .
';
l
DC
- Q s:: C :
I I I! . . I .
", , ..-... / ·I
1 I
. N .(
)Q
I ;
,.'I
::r
s:::
1.· -;
\ I :•.~I
.C
.·'i
I ,:
I
N DC
..
\"
I
)Q
:
I
. .s C .::.:
'
I . ·,
I
'
.' I , .(...-· : .•I
I
. ) I . I : ( I :
\
DC
r::
I
,I ·••
~
).(
)I(
I
'
.-'1
'
I
\
t I·
:1
'
..(
:.C..
1·
,
,l( '
::r
·-s:::
I
:
.
DC
I
\
w
,r
)I( ..C..
; ,L I
..(
n .. .c .
1:
'• ~ • ....f I '
) I I : I :
.i'
)Q
'
I
. . .
,\ , .. : I
•'
~ DC
n )I e (
\
.ZI I
..(
: C -. I ; ) C : : I ; ( :
< , 3 )I( 1 1 I I
· : ) s s I .. I
'
\ = ~ s r . i 0 ) C t : I ; : ( ;>:
.· · o -5 0 )I(
1 I
. D a : : : C :, r ,
)-JC
01
~ iii'
)"(
» l ) l I I I (
+ , . : .I I I
)I(
r ·; l : l c ; I . i , C i : i :
'-i :: ( r
. D ) I . C I : ( I : IO
Chart 3
Nonfarm Payroll Employment
Index, 1989 Q1 = 1
1.10
1.05
1.00
0.95 '·. Massachusetts
.
,
•,. ... ....
0.90 ~ '· . ....... ,
........................... ,. .. ,. .. · .....
0.85
Jan 88 Jan 89 Jan 90 Jan 91 Jan 92 Jan 93 Jan 94
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Chart 4
Unemployment Rate
Percent
10.0
9.0
8.0
Massachusetts
7.0
.... ..
. I . •
: !.'
United States
6.0
5.0
4.0 . .. . . I ... . .
: \.. . ...
•
·
., / ........ ,,/ ......
~
3.0 · .... :
2.0
Jan 88 Jan 89 Jan 90 Jan 91 Jan 92 Jan 93 Jan 94
Note: Data beginning January 1994 reflect the redesigned CPS survey and are not strictly
comparable to data for 1993 and earlier years.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
,:
.a..
.a..
0
0
?
?
)JC
.Q
0
0
DC
DC
00
00
0
D(
,.c
0
00
0
00
I'JC
aC
<J
...c
.a..
)IS
!t!
0(
,:
00
C
0(
00 0(
~
D .a..
DC
II
...c
C Jii
.a..
• •
·.-,.:
· , !
C
)IS
"t
· .
,
00
C
0(
....
1••·--::.~-
0
z
.••
' 1I
••
r
0
...
...c
)IS
,:::
--••
• ;- , l "•
• • • .. • -
, )I : S
" ,0 0 .
r; ,..
I
:
1 . ::. . .
0 0 (
-!r
I
3
!!
~ ' ••,
1~I.
...c
J1'
'
C
·;c
)Q
I !
..
0(
IY
,<..'
I ••
. . .
0
.
--0
....
...c
:
)IS
m
_,
,:
,,-•,.
I
- 3
·-·~
,
,
0 .a ( ..
C'
I
"•
. ... .
0
, ...
...c
<'
,
C
3
:":
'• · :I~
0 .a ( ..
)1(
0
.,.:.:.:,
. . .
1,·
T::
I
•
I
• .
...c
)Q
,:::
I I
:-•••
. I
I 1.....
, )I : S
.I:;
ne
I\
0(
I I(
-
1I~:•·
I
,1 I
N
)1(
•I
..
)1(
1,
•I
...c
. ) . " .. ( ,
. .
,1
C
·:
!
.I r
0(
)1(
-·
t
N
.C
... .....
• I
-r
. . .
... 1 1 ·
...c
)Q
.. .
1'
,.
, )I : S
TC 0,..
......
. •
....
. . -
··'
0 ,.c (
:s
.~
-,
.
1, •
I
...c
) , Q ..
. . . •
I
\
C
" . " . : . , , :
. . . •
I
I
0 ,.c (
)1(
•.
>,.).
I,
...c
I
,
)IS
•
I
,:
) ) ' 1 Q " (
. . ..
I
' " I I
0 .,: ( ,.
..
I
...
r,l
...c
!
.,"
I
I,.•'
C
'i
';;(1
m..
0(
~:
0
.,:,.
)lC
n D ,:
C I 1
, 0 :
.. ) . I c S
)111
,:
I
0( I'JC
Chart 6
Unemployment Rates in July 1994
Seasonally Adjusted
Boston
Brockton
Fitchburg
Lawrence
Lowell
New Bedford 10.2
Springfield
Worcester
Massachusetts
United States
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0
Percent
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and New England Economic Indicators, Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston.
. " ~ a
3a
1 . J , . . . < - _ . i ..,._
, a o . . - - . i .
.....,._
. ~ 1 _ J_<
_
. . .. a~ o., .. . . --
._
_
1 oa J .. < .
ao o . - .. -..-
o 1 0 J-< i
-~
o o 0
i ~
. " . .~ a S ..
, o ~ . , - . i .......,-
~ o ~ --..-
-.
~ o o ~-....-
. o 0 0
i --.-
- .. 0 0 o . l . i --
i 0 0 . - .:
-..- - . > 0 0 ~ a -....-
- o ? 1 . J< ~
) .0 J : . C C .
,::
~
.
=,::
0
=
DC
=
~
'
=
.0...
:C
.I.I..
. l . l t I
.I.I..
'·
,
)JC
,::
uc
~ =
. : . C . DC )0
..t
..t
:C
' , .
~ l , l : I :
~ l , l : I :
.. 0 ..
'
0
,
0
»I
,
..t
' •,,.
..t
". 0 C..
llI
llI
,::
,::
.~...
-,
.~...
)JC
..t
.
..t
llI
llI
0...
~ ,::
,
~ ,::
C
N
N
)'(
'
)"(
,
0
. . ) D . i C . t
)J ) . l C C .
: . .: : I : Q s
. ~ , l . l : t I :
.,. ) . / :.. (
... ..,
. ~ l , . l : t I :
0
-~
., ' ••
• •
1 1 IQ / / ( (
,.c
-~ n :C
. .......
,.c
m
) )l " C (
..
- ~ ),':(
. l . l t I
0
3
)/(
,::
,:
. . ' .
DC
i
+:;
..2"
·'
1/(
~
'
)"C~ -,:
3
>D
DC
~
+ J - :: ,
. " a S
o~
o~
o 0 i
o 0 i
0 oli
0 oli
. " a 5
o~
o~
o 0
i
o 0
i
0 oli
o 0 li
~ 0
J.-
).C..
~-
1J<
0
1J<
0
1J<
O..t
DI
1J<
0
1J(
0
1J<
0
1U..t
....
-------------...--------...111
.~...
~-,--ri--r--r--,--.--.----r---..-.---....--.111
~
=,::
i
~ ,::
0
~
=
e:
DC
:
-
0....
.0...
r + = -,
.I.I..
. l , . l : t I :
.I.I..
. l . , l : t I :
=
"C
·•,
..
~
~
<
,
) J D C C
•,
. g l . , l : t : I :
•,
,,
,.
. g l . , l : t : I :
)'(
,.x.:.:
,
+ 0 ..-.,
-~)lC
'
..t
..t
.,
l , l : I :
l , l : I :
) , Q :
·r
.~...
,
.~...
.C
, .
,
..t
. .
..t
l , l : I :
l , l : I :
,
N ~
s
.
N ~
-) , Q :
.
.. · . ' '
. , ~ l . . , l : c t I :
.) n : .Q C .
. , ~ l , . . l : c t I :
.
/ .
:C .!:::: ,:
..t
........
cc
l , l : I : i
·'
'
.,...
.,...
.,...
"5
.,...
.,...
,iI..
0
0
?
)JC
.Q
b
b
D<
D<
00
0
DC
,0
0
,0
0
,0
0
,0
.,...
Ca
<!: .,...
DC
?I!
00
DC
~
z
00 DC
0
i
0.,...
.a..
m
.,...
.,I.I..
_ , g :: <
0( DC
llI
0
,::
0
.Q
,iI..
m 0
.,...
0 ,::
D D.,. C C..
3 0
m
,·5,
0.,...
3
,.
- C"
'
!/
.,...
.2.
z
0
, . 1 1,
DC
.D 0 ..C.
D e C :
3 <'
. ' · I 1 i
)
. • ' . , f f . '· 1 1 I I
0 D . N ,. C ..
. , l Q : lI :
m
. D s . : . C : . :
.'
I
.: I
.,...
C
- Q ) s: Q :: (
·- s:::
r r: u :
\
\
. ' I,.'
. . . . / ,• I I I
w D D C C
m > C y
s: ::
z
\
0.,...
m
. m C
) e tc :
+ 0 ,
\
.,...
.. C ..
~
'
I
'
0
)'(
m
l.
DC
-r
'
DC
0 T::
s 0 :::::
- Q s::: (
I I I
0 ~
T 0, ll . t I
. ) a Q :;
·-3 0
)Q
I \
.a..
)aJC
s:::
.·I
\
.a..
00
)'(
.C
\ I I
\1 I
D D C C
'iic
J . , . 2 ) I D. , t " . ' ' C . " " ( . '
. T . s ) C. : Q : : . : : : . :
', D o. C .
' ·'
' . , I 1 I I I I I \ ' .
\
\ I
.
'
0 D . . , , , 0 . . C . . . .
: 1 ! 0 : / ! f
DC
l'(
I
\
.
n D e <
:C
> n D t
'
1 I \ ••
\
0
0
s:::::
+,
'
I.'
,iI..
D I" C "
=s
.·'
'
\
I 1\
.'
. ) ) , .Q u . '( .
, . . C .u..
I . . '
_ ' I '
\ .' 1 I I I \
\
.r ~ I,'
D . . 0 a . C . . ( . .
....
I I · .\ . \
,• \ I 1
0.,...
)Q
, · . r I,
.
I \
\
I
, ) u tc
•:'I
I \
.
.a..
' I
D<
"
~
D<
'
.
~
·'
\ I
i
.
0.,...
'.·
\
''
.
\
.,...
z
'.'
. -n C . : l Q s ) . ; l .e : : l I . f ; :
r c 3 l ) E C ) : / l l : 1 : I f : "
~ - § 0 s::
. : ! s ) :3 l : e f :
i i . r i x s Q 0 ) i i : : l i i : : f :
I 1 : r - - : n C l l ) ) ) : 3 / l l / / 1 : 1 1 I I
l : s n 0 s s ) ) ! ' " : ( : : l C ! f : :
0 N 0 D D ~ .a C C ..
) )/ l 1 f
i:
.Q
)lf
~ 0
)/1
0.,...
Cite this document
APA
Cathy E. Minehan (1994, September 25). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19940926_cathy_e_minehan
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19940926_cathy_e_minehan,
author = {Cathy E. Minehan},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1994},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19940926_cathy_e_minehan},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}