speeches · April 22, 1993
Regional President Speech
Silas Keehn · President
For release on delivery
9:30 a.m. EDT
April 23, 1993
Testimony on the Economic Conditions
in the Midwest Economy and the Opportunities
for Rural Development
Remarks of
Silas Keehn, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Before the Congress of the United States
Joint Economic Committee
April 23, 1993
New Albany, Indiana
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Congressman Hamilton and Members of the Joint Economic Committee:
I am pleased to have this opportunity to be with you today. You have asked
that I comment on the status of the Midwestern economy with some emphasis on the
rural challenges facing the region.
Condition of the Midwest Economy
For purposes of geographic definition, I define the Midwestern region to consist
of all of the States of Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Wisconsin which, for the
most part, comprise the Seventh Federal Reserve District.
These five states account for about 14 percent of the nation's GDP and
18 percent of U.S. manufacturing employment. This region produces some
45 percent of the nation's automobiles, 30 percent of the trucks, 38 percent of the
nation's steel and more than 40 percent of the country's farm machinery. Farmers in
this region account for nearly a fifth of the nation's annual sales of farm commodities
and half of the corn, soybeans and pork produced nationwide. Some of the largest
manufacturing, retailing and financial service firms in the United States are
headquartered in the region.
With the exception of defense activity and certain computer-related production,
given the size and diversity of the Midwest economy, it is not surprising that it mirrors
the economic challenges and opportunities in the U.S. economy as a whole. As in the
nation, recent Midwestern performance has improved, but the pace of improvement
continues to be impeded by further financial and industrial restructuring. Restructuring
problems are not a recent development in the Midwest. The recession of 1981-82 was
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
devastating to Midwestern industry. The Midwest lost nearly 1.5 million jobs during the
back-to-back recessions of the early 1980s, accounting for a sizable portion of the
nation's job loss of some 2.5 million workers over this period. Somewhat like our
recent experience, expectations that the cyclical downturn would be followed by the
usual rapid recovery in Midwestern employment were disappointed. A vigorous
recovery followed the 1981-82 recession and some of the cyclically sensitive jobs
returned, but many jobs were lost forever as a result of structural change. Intense
competition and changing markets, both domestic and international, have forced firms,
particularly those involved in the manufacture of durable goods, to put heavy
emphasis on productivity as a way of reducing manufacturing costs.
Midwest manufacturing firms have invested an average of 5 to 10 percent more
in equipment per production worker annually than firms in the rest of the nation.
Estimates of the relative improvement in Midwestern manufacturing suggest that
efficiency in the Midwest improved about 20 percent more than in the rest of the
nation. These improvements, brought about by the very painful process of
restructuring, have put these firms in a better position to compete in the domestic and
international markets.
Today, I am reasonably optimistic about the current outlook for the Midwest
economy. The level of economic activity in the Midwest has improved and the outlook
is positive. Auto and light truck production in the first quarter of this year was about
21 percent higher than last year and second quarter production schedules, while
somewhat reduced from initial levels, have been set about 10 percent ahead of last
year. This translates into a domestic automobile production level of about 6.2 million
- 2 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
cars and 4.6 million light trucks at an annual rate. We currently forecast that sales of
cars and light trucks this year will total about 13.5 million units, an increase of almost
4 percent from last year. The steel industry, very important to the Midwest and most
particularly Indiana, has shown improvement and mills in the Midwest are currently
operating at about 85 percent of capacity; industry forecasts suggest that some
85 to 86 million tons of steel on a nationwide basis will be shipped this year. The
machine tool and equipment industries, also important to the Midwest, have shown
signs of improvement with industry sources forecasting 8 percent growth for this year
with a 5 percent increase in exports and a 7 percent decline in imports.
Employment in the Midwest has increased from the low levels reached at the
bottom of the last recession and unemployment levels in Midwestern states, except
Illinois (as of March, the latest month for which data are available), were running under
the national average. The latest data available for Indiana (February 1993) shows that
its unemployment rate (6.1 %, saar) was almost 1 percent below the national average
(7.0%).
But significantly, the employment increases in the District have been more
modest than the overall increase in economic activity. This dichotomy results from the
enormous productivity efforts on the part of Midwestern companies to retain the
competitive positions obtained at such great cost. While this has very beneficial
effects in an overall economic context, it raises in my mind the question of the
sustainability of this expansion; personal expenditures have been moving ahead at
rates higher than the increases in disposable income. Unless there is a
commensurate increase in employment and a resulting increase in disposable income,
- 3 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
it will be very hard to maintain this higher level of personal consumption that has been
so fundamental to the growth in the economy over the last few quarters.
My remarks about the restructuring of the Midwest industrial sector also apply
to the region's agricultural sector. While the financial condition of the farm sector
today is vastly improved from that of the mid-1980s, it exhibits a cautious approach to
spending and continues to go through considerable restructuring to achieve greater
production efficiencies.
The agricultural sector in the Midwest still operates with a vivid awareness of the
devastating setbacks suffered by farmers and agri-business firms as the "agricultural
credit crises" of the 1980s washed out the excesses that developed during the "boom"
of the 1970s. The subsequent improvement in farm earnings and the level and quality
of farm debt has been substantial, placing the industry on much more solid footing for
the 1990s. Yet the actions of farmers and agri-business firms reveal a mood of
uncertainty and caution. This mood is tied in part to the painful memories of the
1980s. It also reflects the continuing focus on trimming the federal budget deficit and
the implications for the safety net provided in farm income and price support
programs. The cautious mood of farmers is also related to concerns about the longer
run prospects of export markets which are vital to U.S. agriculture.
Banking and Credit Conditions and the Midwest
Midwestern banks in general and Indiana banks in particular continue to show
improving earnings and capital. In 1992, the average return on equity for commercial
banks in the Midwest was up slightly from the level in 1991 but slightly below the
- 4 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
national averages. The average return on assets last year was also higher but, again,
slightly below the national average. But in a longer context, Indiana banks, on
average, over the last five years have consistently exceeded the national averages with
respect to returns on assets.
The improving health of Midwest banks is further attested to by the fact that
there has been a 70 percent decline in the number of lower rated banks in the
Midwest since the end of 1986. A key factor in the improving condition of banks in the
Midwest has been the gradual winding down of their asset quality problems.
Nonperforming loans first stabilized and then declined, reflecting the improving
economic conditions and further chargeoffs of the worst loans. Indiana banks have
done even better than those in other states of the Midwest. Over the past five years,
nonperforming loans for commercial banks in Indiana never exceeded 2 percent of
total loans and as of the end of 1992 stood at only 1.4 percent of loans. I would note
further that banks in the southern part of the state as of year-end 1992 had an even
better record with only about one-half of one percent of their loan portfolio
nonperforming.
The somewhat better condition of Midwestern banks led to relatively better
credit availability during the past three years. This health not only meant that fewer
banks were forced to reduce their lending, it also eased the adjustment for borrowers
at banks that were facing capital and asset quality problems.
At a recent meeting of our Small Business and Agriculture Advisory Councils,
I again carefully reviewed the question of the adequate availability of credit for these
very important economic sectors with the Council members. The view continues to be
- 5 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
that banks have become much more careful in the loan extension process; that credit
standards have been raised, documentation requirements have been made more
demanding, and spreads and fees have risen. But, most importantly, our Council
members almost universally felt that adequate credit was generally available for
borrowers with good credit qualifications. Indeed, some members reported that banks
in their areas are aggressively seeking loans.
On the other hand, many Council members were concerned that environmental
regulations are making certain types of transactions unbankable. Leery of the
potential liability, some banks have shied away from a credit whenever an
environmental issue is even a remote possibility. Those banks that are willing to
proceed are very demanding in their requirements for complete and costly
environmental studies. Both our Agriculture and Small Business Advisory Councils feel
strongly that environmental regulations are and will continue to impede the extension
of credit to these key sectors.
From the perspective of the Midwest's banks, the restructuring of credit markets
is now largely complete. Credit terms have ceased to tighten, asset quality is on the
rebound, and most District banking organizations have now built up their capital
positions to a level that they can now focus more of their attention on the business of
lending.
Rural Development in the Midwest
One of the key themes of your hearing today is that of rural development. The
research program at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago has made a special effort
- 6 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
to recognize the key importance of agricultural and rural issues in the Midwest
economy. For example, we publish an Agricultural Newsletter and a recent article in
our Economic Perspectives publication examined the issue of trends and prospects for
rural manufacturing.
As I see it, one of the primary challenges for rural areas during the post-World
War II era has been to replace jobs lost by the declining labor force needs of natural
resource intensive industries. As productivity has increased in farming and mining, or
as natural resources are exhausted in forests and fisheries, the movement of labor into
other activities or the outright loss of jobs has been the result.
Our research has found that manufacturing has become the primary economic
base for many rural counties in both the Midwest and in the rest of the nation. At the
same time, service firms, retailers, and other industries are abandoning remote
counties and are centralizing their operations in urban areas. While, as I have noted,
the farm sector's economic condition has stabilized following the correction of the
1980s, farm jobs -- especially those as a full-time occupation -- continue to disappear
as smaller farms consolidate into larger units. In sum, as one writer has put it, "many
small rural towns . . . have been transformed from farm service centers into minor
cogs in the national manufacturing system."
I think that rural communities can benefit from this trend toward enhanced
manufacturing employment. First, we have passed through the 1980s when both
agricultural and natural resource-based industries fell on hard times. Second, the
process of decentralization of manufacturing has enabled rural areas to replace part of
their lost job base. One statistic I feel illustrates this point rather strikingly -- that is,
- 7 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
that over the last twenty years, rural counties in the Midwest have had a rate of
manufacturing job growth greater than that of the metropolitan counties and that
manufacturing has become the element of stability of the employment composition in
several rural counties. Over this twenty-year period, metropolitan manufacturing jobs
have declined by 20 percent, while rural counties have seen their manufacturing
employment rise by about 15 percent. Currently, it is estimated that about one-fourth
of all manufacturing jobs in the Midwest are located in rural counties. This compares
with just under 20 percent in the late 1960s.
This is not to imply that all rural counties have fared well in the 1980s with
regard to manufacturing job growth. There are still a significant number of rural
counties that have not been able to benefit from this relocation of industrial activity.
Southern Indiana provides an example of this diversity in rural performance.
For example, the three counties of Dubois, Jackson and Jennings all experienced
rates of personal income growth over the decade of the 1980s in excess of the
Indiana average growth rate. In contrast, Jefferson and Union counties experienced
more difficult times and benefitted less from the decentralization of manufacturing.
It is likely that the trend in the movement in manufacturing activity toward rural
areas established over the latter part of the 1980s will continue into the 1990s as
export markets grow and in a relative sense, the region suffers less from the reduction
in the nation's defense industries. The experience of the 1980s shows widely
divergent shifts in the Midwest in terms of the shift of manufacturing activity toward
rural counties. Questions remain regarding the reasons why some counties have
prospered and others not. Answers to many of these questions are limited by the lack
- 8 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
of sufficient information on the relative cost and productivity of individual industries in
urban versus rural locations.
The dilemma for the rural policy maker is to establish policies and programs
that will be of benefit to those rural areas that have been unable to attract and benefit
from the industrial development. This program delivery will be constrained by the ever
scarce resources at the state and federal level. But the trends that I have reviewed
indicate that there are opportunities to enhance the prospects of these areas.
I thank you for your time and attention and will be pleased to respond to
questions from the panel.
- 9 -
Digitized for FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Silas Keehn (1993, April 22). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19930423_silas_keehn
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19930423_silas_keehn,
author = {Silas Keehn},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1993},
month = {Apr},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19930423_silas_keehn},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}