speeches · January 20, 1992
Regional President Speech
Robert T. Parry · President
1992: PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY
Robert T. Parry
President
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Delivered to
Coimnonwealth Club of California, Sonoma County Chapter
Santa Rosa, California
January 21, 1992
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1992: PROSPECTS FOR RECOVERY
Now that we have started the new year, it is a good time to
sura up what has happened in the past twelve months, and peer
ahead into the next twelve. Of course, the big economic story of
1991 was the recession. And the big question for many people is
whether we will have a recovery in 1992.
The Regional Recession
Let me start with a regional look at this recession. At the
San Francisco Fed, our focus is on the nine western states that
comprise the Twelfth Federal Reserve District. A number of
District states have done reasonably well during the last year.
But California has been hurt more than usual in this recession.
One reason is that defense cutbacks already had weakened the
state's economy when the recession came along. California
defense contractors have not been hit any harder than defense
contractors elsewhere. But the concentration of defense work in
California— especially Southern California— has magnified the
effects of those cuts on our economy.
Another reason is the commercial real estate glut that was
developing in some parts of the state just as the economy
weakened. This knocked the pins out from under the construction
industry, and reduced property values in some areas, which has
just added to the general economic weakness.
A third sector that has had unusual problems is agriculture.
In the past couple of years, it has been hit by a triple whammy:
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
the drought, the freeze, and the white fly invasion.
But some people have been saying that California— the Golden
State— is beginning to show some tarnish. They think that
California will end up struggling through the nineties the way
Texas and New England struggled through the eighties. Their
reasoning is that the state faces serious long-term, structural
problems, such as an inadequate infrastructure, especially the
transportation system, and stringent air quality controls— ■
particularly in the southern part of the state— that restrict the
activities of businesses and individuals. And finally, our state
and local governments seem to find it increasingly difficult to
fund the services people expect within the existing tax
structure.
While these are serious issues, my own view is that what we
are seeing now is essentially a business cycle— although a more
severe business cycle than we are used to in California. Why?
Just look at the timing. California employment did not start to
fall until the national recession began in July of 1990. This is
after the declines in employment in the defense industry, which
began at the start of 1990.
Moreover, the concerns about the structural problems— the
infrastructure, air quality restrictions, and state and local
budget crunches--have been with us for quite some time. So the
chronology suggests that it was primarily the national recession
that brought us down, not the litany of California-specific
factors.
2
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
If I am right, then the recovery in the national economy
should pull California out of its own recession. This means, we
will see California growing again, although the rate of growth
will be constrained by the structural factors I mentioned.
The National Outlook
Turning to the national picture, it looked like the
recession was coming to a halt this summer. In the second and
third quarters, the contraction in output turned to a modest
expansion, at a 1% to 2 percent pace. The problem is: Much of
that growth— especially in the third quarter— was driven by
changes in inventories, not by growth in domestic demand for
goods and services.
The data we have so far on the fourth quarter have not been
very encouraging about demand. The November level of real
consumer spending, by far the largest component of overall
demand, was barely above its average of the third quarter. The
real durable goods component, which includes autos, furniture,
and appliances, for example, was actually down.
As a result of weak demand, the economy appears to have
slowed again in the fourth quarter. Although employment grew a
little in December, this did not come close to offsetting the
large decline in November. And industrial production fell for
the third straight month in December.
3
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
But there is a fundamental factor working to stimulate
underlying demand. Since July of 1990, the federal funds rate
has dropped by more than 4 percentage points— 1% percentage
points since August alone— due in part to a series of easing
moves by the Federal Reserve. And other short-term interest
rates have dropped by almost as much. The discount rate now
stands at 3% percent, its lowest level since 1964, although long
term rates have fallen by only about a third to a half as nvuch as
short-term rates.
Does Monetary Policy Still Work?
Some people, though, shrug their shoulders at the interest
rate cuts and say, "So what? The Fed has been cutting rates for
months. Where's the recovery?" Let me try to answer that.
Lower interest rates will stimulate the economy through
several channels. First, the interest-sensitive sectors—
housing, consumer durables, and business equipment— all will
begin to respond to lower borrowing costs when confidence turns
around. Residential construction already appears to have picked
up recently.
Second, lower U.S. interest rates create a lower foreign
exchange value of the dollar. While turmoil in the Middle East,
Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Republics caused the dollar to
rise for an extended period, it has fallen sharply since last
summer. The lower dollar will stimulate demand for our exports,
and cause buyers here at home to shift from imported to U.S.-
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
produced goods.
Finally, lower interest rates raise the net wealth position
of the private sector (by raising the present value of capital
and land). We see confirmation of the wealth effect because
easier monetary policy generally boosts the stock market. Efforts
to measure the wealth effect indicate that it is important, but
its impact on spending is quantitatively smaller than the effects
of lower borrowing costs or lower exchange rates. Lower interest
rates also raise the values of long-term (fixed-rate) assets and
debts such as CDs, mortgages, and bonds— and lower the cash
flows of short-term assets and debts. However, while the
distributional effects of these changes across borrowers can be
very large, the net wealth effects tend to be small since there
are individuals on each side of debt instruments.
The three channels — lower borrowing costs, a lower dollar,
and higher net wealth — will combine to stimulate U.S. demand
this year. Our model of the economy indicates that— on average—
for every 1 percentage point decline in the real short-term
interest rate, real output growth is boosted roughly % percentage
point in the first year following the decline, and almost \
percentage point in the second year. However, this output
response can vary considerably, depending on other factors, and
for several reasons, the strength of this year's expansion is
open to question.
A Moderate Expansion
5
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
My own view is that the expansion will probably begin by
about the second quarter, and it is likely to be moderate.
First, federal and state budget deficits are leading to cutbacks
in government spending and, in many cases, to higher taxes. More
balanced budgets may be good for the economy in the long run, but
they also present some short-run adjustment problems. Second, we
have a huge commercial real estate "overhang." It may take years
before high vacancy rates are worked down far enough to stimulate
spending in this sector.
Moreover, the unusual weakness in credit flows in the
economy could be a drag on the recovery, though it is hard to say
exactly how big a problem this might be or how long it might
persist. Weak credit flows cannot be pinned simply on the crisis
in the S&L industry. In fact, home mortgage lending— the "bread
and butter" of savings and loans— is not unusual when you compare
it to other recessions. Commercial and mortgage banks are
picking up the slack.
Instead, the problem seems to be with business lending,
which has been unusually weak at commercial banks. Part of the
weakness is due to the recession itself. But part is also due to
shocks to the banking system. For example, stiffer regulation
has constrained lending as banks try to build their capital to
meet new requirements. And sectoral problems have played a role-
-that is, problems in industries, such as commercial real estate,
where banks normally lend. These developments raise banks'
fundamental cost of channeling funds between lenders and
6
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
borrowers, which could lead to a prolonged reduction in the flow
of credit.
I realize I have painted a somewhat fuzzy picture. I do
expect lower interest rates to provide a strong stimulus for
recovery this year. But the three factors I have mentioned—
federal and state fiscal restraints, the commercial real-estate
overhang, and reduced credit flows— suggest to me that the
recovery will be modest.
Good News on the Inflation Front
Now let me focus on a very clear bright spot in the picture-
-the downward trend in inflation. We are beginning to see
meaningful reductions in underlying inflation, which are key to
long-term control of inflation.
During 1991, labor and product markets slackened, and this
restrained growth in labor compensation and product prices. For
example, labor costs, including benefits, for the total private
and state and local government sectors rose Ah, percent over the
12 months ending in September, a full percentage point below the
rise over the prior 12-month period. During 1991, consumer
prices inreased only 3 percent. Of course, this included the
effects of the dramatic fall in oil prices. But, even excluding
food and energy, the CPI rose only 4% percent over the 12 months
ending in December, compared with 5\ percent over the prior 12-
month period. With the economy expected to pick up only
gradually this year, downward pressure on underlying inflation
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
most likely will continue for some time to come.
Overall, then, I would not be surprised to see consumer
inflation stay at around 3 percent this year. This would mark
significant progress from the 4^ to 5\ percent core rate of
consumer inflation only two years ago.
The Role of Monetary Policy
As we deliberate about monetary policy, the progress against
inflation plays a pivotal role. Of course, the Fed's main
longer-term goal is to control, and ultimately eliminate,
inflation. Such a policy is crucial to achieving a maximum
economic growth trend in the long run.
Because inflation is on a downward trend, we have greater
latitude to react to weakness in the economy. As I hope our
policies over the past year and a half have demonstrated, we are
working hard to help the economy move into a recovery phase. I
believe our efforts ultimately will pay off.
8
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Robert T. Parry (1992, January 20). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19920121_robert_t_parry
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19920121_robert_t_parry,
author = {Robert T. Parry},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1992},
month = {Jan},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19920121_robert_t_parry},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}