speeches · June 12, 1991
Regional President Speech
Robert T. Parry · President
ECONOMIC PROSPECTS AND POLICY ISSUES
AT THE TURNING POINT
by
Robert T. Parry
President
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Community Leaders Luncheon
Anchorage, Alaska
June 13, 1991
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ECONOMIC PROSPECTS AND POLICY ISSUES AT THE TURNING POINT
Today I'd like to talk to you about the economic outlook.
Basically, I'm optimistic. My best guess is that we've hit the
bottom of the business cycle. I expect to see moderate growth
resume in the second half of this year, with inflation moving on
a downward trend over the longer term. That's the good news.
But I also have some concerns. Though I'm usually pretty
fearless about making a forecast, business cycle turning points
can be tricky. We're likely to see conflicting signals about the
direction the economy is taking. This uncertainty raises special
problems in determining the appropriate monetary policy. I'll
have more to say about that later.
Recent Developments in the Nation and the Pacific Northwest
Let me begin my comments with a brief look at the
~ecent
course of the national and Pacific Northwest economies. After
eight years of robust growth in this country percent annual
(3~
rate, on average), the economy officially entered a recession in
July of last year. In fact, the economy began to slow down
somewhat earlier--in 1989. The slowdown continued into the third
quarter of 1990. And in the next two quarters, it turned into an
outright contraction.
Of course, some regions have been hit worse than others.
1
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
And some, like the Northwest, have performed relatively well.
During the past year, employment grew by almost 2 percent in
Alaska, and by almost 3 percent in Washington. These growth
rates look good in comparison with the job losses seen
nationally.
In Alaska, the important energy sector has continued to show
robust growth. And construction employment in the state grew
during most of the last two years, following a dismal period in
the middle of the 1980s. In addition, a good fish harvest, and
the food processing activity that goes with it, have kept
manufacturing employment above its year-earlier level. Still,
Alaska's growth rate has slowed considerably during the past
year, and the slower growth is affecting a broad range of
sectors. For example, employment in the state's large service
sector grew only 2.8 percent in the past twelve months, compared
to almost 10 percent in the previous twelve-month period. The
large state and local government sector also saw employment
growth slow, to less than 1 percent in the last twelve months,
compared to over 3 percent for the year earlier.
Other areas of the Northwest have felt the effects of the
national weakness as well. In Washington, for example, slower
demand and reduced defense spending have contributed to cutbacks
in manufacturing employment. But the manufacturing job losses
continue to be modest compared with those in other parts of the
country-- Washington lost 1.8 percent of its manufacturing jobs
during the last year, compared with percent nationwide. And,
4~
2
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
while total job growth has slowed substantially from the 6
percent pace seen a year or two ago, employment is still a
healthy percent above its year-ago level. In fact, employment
2~
in the service sector is a robust 6 percent above the level of a
year ago.
Factors Behind the National Recession
Now let me turn back to the national picture. The key
question on everyone's mind is, when will the recession be over?
The first step in finding an answer is understanding how we got
into the recession in the first place.
One important factor that was apparent to everyone was the
oil price shock following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait--oil
prices nearly doubled in a matter of months. But fortunately,
prices began to settle down fairly quickly, and now are around
their pre-invasion levels. Thus th1s factor should not interfere
with an economic turnaround.
Consumer and business confidence also played an important
role. We had some indication of a decline in consumer sentiment
as early as the beginning of 1990. After the invasion of Kuwait,
the surveys showed consumer confidence plummeting. It's no
wonder, given the political and economic uncertainties at the
time. I'll name just a few: the war and the oil supply; the
trouble in the financial and real estate industries; the
climbing unemployment rate; and, the federal budget deficit.
These uncertainties may go a long way toward accounting for the
3
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
weakness we've seen since last fall in consumer spending and
business investment.
Right after the war consumer confidence survey results
rebounded, reflecting the general euphoria of a quick victory.
But since then, confidence has backed off a bit, and remains
below 1989 levels. We expect that it will improve only gradually
over the next year or so.
There also has been concern that a "credit crunch"-
reflected in slow growth in bank loans--made a major contribution
to the downturn, and may stall the pace of recovery. But I'm not
convinced of this. Declining bank loans may be more a symptom of
the downturn than a cause of it. In addition, other credit
markets have been growing, enough at least to provide some offset
against the slowdown in bank loans. Therefore, though banks'
share of overall credit market activity has shrunk, I'm doubtful
that this is a major obstacle to recovery in the national
economy.
Other Forces for Recovery
In addition to relatively low oil prices and a likely
improvement in confidence, two other indicators bode well for the
economy in the latter half of this year and in 1992--business
inventories and interest rates.
First, it's a good sign that inventories have been kept to
relatively low levels. Even in the face of last quarter's
decline in overall demand, nonfarm inventories dropped by $27
4
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
billion. While recently we've seen increases in inventory-to
sales ratios, they are still low in manufacturing, especially in
the auto industry. This is good news, since it means that as
soon as sales start to pick up firms will need to increase
production to rebuild stocks.
Second, since July short-term interest rates have dropped
more than 2 percentage points, due in part to a series of easing
moves by the Federal Reserve. And since mid-December, we have
reduced the discount rate by percentage points, with the
1~
latest cut coming April 30th. Lower interest rates should add
strength to economic activity, especially in housing and consumer
durables. We estimate that the decline in interest rates will
add nearly 2 percent to real GNP growth in the second half of
this year, and around 1 percent in 1992.
We may be getting a glimpse of the effects of these factors
in the data. Economic statistics available over the past month
have raised the chance that the recession ended this quarter.
Most significantly, employment at nonfarm businesses roee in May
for the first time in ten months. Overall, my best guess is that
the level of economic output should be flat in the current
quarter instead of declining, as it has over the previous two
quarters. Economic growth should resume, although at a moderate
rate, in the second half of this year. In fact, I wouldn't be
surprised if the economy came back even stronger than expected.
Forecasts of recovery are often too pessimistic at this stage of
the business cycle.
5
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Uncertainties
I must admit, though, that so far we don't have enough data
to say for sure that the recovery has already begun. Troughs in
the business cycle are always times when uncertainties about the
outlook intensify. This turning point is no exception. I want
to highlight a few uncertainties that seem especially important.
As I indicated, the recovery depends on an improvement in
consumer and business confidence, and on a pickup in spending for
inventories. But confidence is notorlously fickle and difficult
to forecast. And, the inventory numbers, though promising, could
be misleading. The fact is that inventory management has
changed. With advances in computer technology and business know
how, firms are managing inventories more efficiently. The result
is that we could be dealing with a new inventory cycle, which
will also be difficult to predict.
Finally, the dollar raises concerns. Through the end of
last year, the dollar was on a downward trend. We expected this
depreciation to lead to an improvement in the nation's trade
balance this year and next, and therefore to stimulate economic
growth. However, the dollar unexpectedly began to rise early
this year. Since February, it is up by over 15 percent.
The result? Instead of being a major source of growth for
our economy, as we thought only a few months ago, the dollar may
become a drag on the recovery. Given the difficulty in
forecasting the dollar, and its powerful effects on the economy,
this factor is an important ''wild card" in the outlook.
6
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Inflation
Now let me move on to inflation. We have seen noticeable
improvement in this area in recent months, and I'll focus on
three factors that help explain it. First of all, the turnaround
in oil prices has been pulling our inflation indexes down. Since
oil prices peaked last October, the producer price index actually
has declined somewhat, and the consumer price index has risen at
only a percent rate.
2~
Second, the run-up in the dollar also should help hold
inflation down, mainly next year, as price increases for imported
goods are restrained.
And finally, there are reasons to believe that underlying
inflation has peaked, and may be on a downward trend. Labor
markets have slackened, as the unemployment rate has risen by
1~
percentage points since early 1990. This should restrain growth
in labor compensation over the next year or two.
Overall, I would not be surprised to see consumer inflation
of to 4 percent. this year, and closer to 3 percent in 1992.
3~
This would represent significant progress from the 4 to
4~
percent underlying rate of inflation that has prevailed in recent
years.
Mgnetary Policy
With inflation trending downward and some uncertainty about
whether the economy is now ''out of the woods," what is the
appropriate direction for monetary policy? It's tempting to
7
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
think that the Fed should give the benefit of the doubt toward a
policy of making absolutely sure that the recession is over soon.
Certainly, maintaining sustainable economic growth is one of the
Fed's most important concerns.
But turning points in the business cycle are especially
risky times for monetary policy. For one thing, they're a time
when signals often are quite mixed. For another thing, they're
never clearly identified until after they're over. This may
explain why there have been too many times when policy has eased
well after the trough has passed. These instances typically were
followed by unsustainable growth and eventually painful struggles
with inflation.
In the present environment, we don't want to over-react to
the downturn, and thereby lose or even reverse the hard-won gains
on underlying inflation. Given the lags in monetary policy, the
series of actions the Fed has already taken should boost the
economy in the second half of this year and in 1992.
Thus, although we must be careful to facilitate
th~
recovery, we cannot lose sight of our longer-term goal, which is
to control, and ultimately eliminate, inflation.
8
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Robert T. Parry (1991, June 12). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19910613_robert_t_parry
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19910613_robert_t_parry,
author = {Robert T. Parry},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1991},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19910613_robert_t_parry},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}