speeches · June 3, 1983
Regional President Speech
John J. Balles · President
READING COPY
MAY 24, 1983
REGULATION: A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
REMARKS OF
JOHN J. BALLES, PRESIDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
MEETING OF
ALASKA BANKERS ASSOCIATION
FAIRBANKS, ALASKA
JUNE 4, 1983
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1
- -
REGULATION IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS ARE UNDERGOING MAJOR CHANGES. THE
RECENT INTRODUCTION OF MONEY MARKET DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS HAS FINALLY
ENABLED THESE INSTITUTIONS TO COMPETE WITH THE MONEY MARKET
FUNDS. THE NEW ACCOUNTS HAVE SWELLED TO ABOUT $350 BILLION, WITH
A SURPRISINGLY LARGE SHARE COMING FROM OUTSIDE THE BANKING
SYSTEM. THIS GROWTH DEMONSTRATES THE ADVANTAGE THAT BANKS HAVE
IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM SO LONG AS THEY ARE ALLOWED TO COMPETE
FREELY.
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO TODAY IS BRIEFLY TO OUTLINE HOW THE
CHANGING REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IS AFFECTING DEPOSITORY
INSTITUTIONS AND, CONVERSELY, HOW THE CHANGING FINANCIAL
ENVIRONMENT IS AFFECTING REGULATION. AT THE END OF MY REMARKS, I
WILL DISCUSS HOW I PERCEIVE REGULATION AND THE FINANCIAL
STRUCTURE EVOLVING IN THE 1980'S.
BANKING REGULATIONS
FEW INDUSTRIES ARE AS THOROUGHLY REGULATED AS BANKING. AN
ENCOMPASSING LEGAL AND REGULATORY NET HAS CIRCUMSCRIBED DEPOSIT
RATES, PRODUCT LINES, AND GEOGRAPHIC MARKETS OF BANKS AND OTHER
DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.
MANY OF THESE RESTRICTIONS WERE A RESPONSE TO THE FINANCIAL
COLLAPSE AND BANKING PANICS OF THE EARLY 1930'S ASSOCIATED WITH
THE GREAT DEPRESSION. WITH THE INTENTION OF "ESTABLISHING A
SOUND FINANCIAL SYSTEM," CONGRESS PASSED THE BANKING ACT OF 1933
(GLASS-STEAGALL ACT), THE BANKING ACT OF 1935, AND THE SECURITIES
ACTS OF 1933 AND 1934. TAKEN TOGETHER, THESE LAWS PLACED BANKING
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
AND SECURITIES MARKETS UNDER A COMPREHENSIVE REGULATORY UMBRELLA,
WHICH (AMONG OTHER THINGS) PROHIBITED EXPLICIT INTEREST ON DEMAND
DEPOSITS, CREATED THE AUTHORITY FOR REGULATION Q INTEREST-RATE
CEILINGS ON TIME DEPOSITS, AND DREW A DISTINCT LINE BETWEEN
COMMERCIAL BANKING AND INVESTMENT BANKING. (RESTRICTIONS ON
INTERSTATE BANKING ALREADY WERE IN PLACE IN THE FORM OF STATE
LAWS THAT WERE FEDERALLY SANCTIONED BY THE MCFADDEN ACT OF 1927.)
REGARDLESS OF THE LEGISLATORS' ORIGINAL INTENT, THIS LEGISLATIVE
AMALGAM IN PRACTICE HAS TENDED TO LIMIT COMPETITION AND IN SO
DOING OFTEN INTERFERE IN THE EFFICIENT OPERATION OF THE FINANCIAL
SYSTEM.
REGULATIONS AND INNOVATION
QUITE NATURALLY, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OVER TIME HAVE
INNOVATED IN AN ATTEMPT TO AVOID SUCH RESTRICTIONS. FOR EXAMPLE,
AS A CONSEQUENCE OF RESTRICTIONS ON GEOGRAPHIC MARKETS (MCFADDEN
ACT AND STATE LAWS), PRODUCT LINES (GLASS-STEAGALL) AND MAXIMUM
DEPOSIT RATES (BANKING ACT OF 1935 AND REG. Q), BANKS HAVE
UTILIZED THE HOLDING COMPANY AS A DEVICE FOR GETTING AROUND THESE
BARRIERS AND IN THAT WAY COMPETE MORE EFFICIENTLY. BUT CONGRESS
ACTED TO LIMIT THIS AVENUE BY PASSING THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY
ACT OF 1956, INCLUDING THE INTERSTATE BANKING RESTRICTIONS OF THE
DOUGLAS AMENDMENT, AND ADDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ACT IN 1966 AND
1970. TO SUPPLEMENT AND ENFORCE THESE LAWS REGULATORS ADDED A
COMPLEX REGULATORY STRUCTURE. THE SITUATION HAS BEEN SIMILAR
WITH DEPOSIT RATE CEILINGS: REGULATIONS HAVE PROLIFERATED IN
BELATED RESPONSE TO THE INNOVATIONS INTRODUCED BY DEPOSITORY
INSTITUTIONS TO GET AROUND THESE CEILINGS.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
MCA AND DEREGULATION
IN ADDITION TO ITS EFFECTS ON MONETARY CONTROL AND THE FED'S
OPERATING ENVIRONMENT, THE DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION
AND MONETARY CONTROL ACT OF 1980 REPRESENTED A SIGNIFICANT STEP
IN DISMANTLING THE MASSIVE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
THAT ENVELOPED BANKING. PERHAPS MOST IMPORTANTLY, IT ESTABLISHED
THE DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION COMMITTEE (DIDC) TO
OVERSEE THE PHASEOUT OF REG. Q DEPOSIT-RATE CEILINGS OVER A SIX-
YEAR PERIOD ENDING APRIL 1986.
THE ACT ALSO ALLOWED BANKS AND THRIFTS TO OFFER INTEREST-
BEARING NOW ACCOUNTS NATIONWIDE, PRE-EMPTED STATE MORTGAGE USURY
CEILINGS (SUBJECT TO STATE OVER-RIDE WITHIN THREE YEARS) AND
EXPANDED SOMEWHAT THE LENDING POWER OF THRIFT INSTITUTIONS.
DESPITE MANY OTHER SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE ACT (E.G., FED
MEMBERSHIP, PRICING, MONETARY CONTROL), PERHAPS ITS MOST PROFOUND
CONSEQUENCES CAME FROM THE EXTENSION OF CHECKING PRIVILEGES TO
THRIFTS AND FROM THE ULTIMATE PROMISE OF MARKET-DETERMINED RATES
OF INTEREST ON ALL BANK AND THRIFT DEPOSITS.
GARN-ST. GERMAIN ACT
IN RESPONSE TO CONTINUING CONCERN OVER DEPOSITORY
INSTITUTIONS' COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE COMPARED TO UNREGULATED
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES LIKE MONEY MARKET FUNDS, AND TO THE
PROBLEM OF FAILING BANKS AND THRIFTS, CONGRESS PASSED THE GARN-
ST. GERMAIN DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS ACT LAST OCTOBER. ALTHOUGH
THERE ARE MANY COMPONENTS OF THIS IMPORTANT PIECE OF LEGISLATION,
IT HAS BECOME BEST KNOWN FOR ITS KEY PROVISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING
THREE AREAS: 1) THE ACT REQUIRED THE DIDC TO CREATE WITHIN 60
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
DAYS A DEPOSIT INSTRUMENT FOR BANKS AND THRIFTS THAT WOULD BE
COMPETITIVE WITH MONEY MARKET FUNDS; 2) IT RESTRUCTURED AND
EXPANDED THE POWERS OF THRIFT INSTITUTIONS; AND 3) IT GAVE THE
REGULATORS EXPANDED FLEXIBILITY IN ARRANGING FOR EMERGENCY
TAKEOVERS OF FAILED OR FAILING DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, AND IN
PROVIDING CAPITAL ASSISTANCE TO TROUBLED INSTITUTIONS.
UNDER THE SECOND SET OF PROVISIONS, THE GARN-ST. GERMAIN ACT
EXPANDED THE POWERS OF THE FEDERAL THRIFTS BY ALLOWING THEM TO
OFFER DEMAND DEPOSITS TO PERSONS HAVING A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP,
PERMITTING OVERDRAFT LOANS ON ALL TRANSACTION ACCOUNTS, ALLOWING
LOANS ON NONRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY UP TO 40 PERCENT OF ASSETS, AND
ALLOWING FEDERAL THRIFTS TO PUT A LARGER PORTION OF THEIR ASSETS
INTO INVESTMENTS IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS, AND
TO PLACE UP TO 10 PERCENT OF THEIR ASSETS IN COMMERCIAL AND
AGRICULTURAL LOANS.
THESE NEW POWERS GIVEN TO THRIFTS, TOGETHER WITH GREATLY
EXPANDED THRIFT HOLDING COMPANY POWERS AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL
HOME LOAN BANK, HAVE DONE A GREAT DEAL TO MAKE THRIFTS MUCH MORE
LIKE BANKS. MOREOVER, THE BRANCHING RESTRICTIONS OF THE MCFADDEN
ACT DO NOT APPLY TO THRIFTS, AND EXISTING RESTRICTIONS ON THRIFT
HOLDING COMPANIES ARE CONSIDERABLY LESS STRINGENT THAN THOSE
PLACED ON BANK HOLDING COMPANIES BY THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT.
FEDERAL REGULATORY STRUCTURE
THE GROWTH OF MONEY MARKET FUNDS, THE SCHEDULED REMOVAL OF
DEPOSIT RATE CEILINGS, EXPANDED POWERS OF THRIFT INSTITUTIONS,
AND ENCROACHMENT OF BROKERAGE HOUSES AND RETAIL FIRMS INTO
ACTIVITIES LIKE PROVIDING LIQUID FORMS OF SAVINGS INSTRUMENTS
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5
- -
HAVE RAISED SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RELEVANCE OF EXISTING
PRODUCT-LINE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTIONS IMPOSED BY
REGULATIONS. MOREOVER, INTERSTATE ACTIVITIES ARE EXPANDING
RAPIDLY THROUGH BANK AND THRIFT HOLDING COMPANIES AND THROUGH THE
EXPANSION OF BANK-LIKE SERVICES PROVIDED BY BROKERAGE HOUSES,
INSURANCE COMPANIES, AND RETAIL OUTLETS.
AS A RESULT, THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF FEDERAL REGULATION OF
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MAY NOT BE WELL SUITED TO THIS NEW
ENVIRONMENT. EACH ELEMENT OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM WAS CREATED IN
RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC PROBLEMS OR NEEDS, BUT RECENT TRENDS IN THE
FINANCIAL SYSTEM AS A WHOLE HAVE CHALLENGED THE ABILITY OF THIS
SYSTEM OF PIECEMEAL REGULATION TO FUNCTION EFFICIENTLY OR
EQUITABLY. AS A RESULT, BOTH POLICYMAKERS AND REGULATORS ARE
REVIEWING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND
PROCEDURES.
VICE PRESIDENT BUSH IS HEADING A TASK GROUP ON REGULATION OF
FINANCIAL SERVICES WHICH IS UNDERTAKING A STUDY OF THE PROBLEMS
OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL REGULATION. AT THIS
POINT, THE TASK GROUP HAS ONLY IDENTIFIED THE MAJOR PROBLEMS THAT
IT WISHES TO ADDRESS. THESE INCLUDE THE OVERALL SCALE OF
REGULATORY CONTROL, AGENCY RESPONSIVENESS, AND THE QUESTION OF
JURISDICTIONAL OVERLAPS, EITHER AMONG VARIOUS FEDERAL AGENCIES OR
BETWEEN THE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THEIR STATE COUNTERPARTS.
THE BUSH TASK GROUP INTENDS TO COMPLETE ITS REVIEW OF THE
CURRENT REGULATORY SYSTEM BY THIS FALL AND TO REPORT TO THE
PRESIDENT CONCERNING AREAS FOR CHANGE. THE TASK GROUP AS YET HAS
NOT DISCLOSED ALL THE ALTERNATIVES IT WILL CONSIDER, BUT IT SEEMS
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LIKELY SOME CONSOLIDATION OF SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS WILL BE ON
THEIR AGENDA OF RECOMMENDATIONS. AS YOU KNOW, SUCH
CONSOLIDATIONS HAVE BEEN RECOMMENDED BY SEVERAL REGULATORY-REFORM
COMMISSIONS IN THE PAST THIRTY YEARS, INCLUDING THE HOOVER
COMMISSION OF 1949, THE HUNT COMMISSION OF 1972, AND A STUDY BY
THE HOUSE BANKING COMMITTEE IN 1975.
THE BUSH TASK GROUP IS WELL AWARE, OF COURSE, OF THE
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST EXTREME CONSOLIDATION OF RESPONSIBILITY
-- AND, IN FACT, ALREADY HAS COME OUT AGAINST THE CONCEPT OF A
"SUPER-AGENCY." A MAJOR CONSIDERATION FOR THE COMMISSION AS IT
CONSIDERS ALTERNATIVES PRESUMABLY WOULD BE TO REDUCE DUPLICATION
WHILE AVOIDING ARBITRARY OR INFLEXIBLE BEHAVIOR (THAT MIGHT
RESULT, FOR EXAMPLE, FROM AN ALL-POWERFUL AGENCY). IN ESSENCE,
THE CHALLENGE TO THE TASK GROUP IS TO FIND A PATH THAT YIELDS THE
ADVANTAGES OF AGENCY PLURALISM WITHOUT PERPETUATING THE COMPLEX
STRUCTURE OF REGULATION THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS.
IN MY VIEW, IT WOULD BE UNWISE TO CONTEMPLATE A MAJOR
RESTRUCTURING OF REGULATORY OR SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY AT THIS
TIME. WE ARE AT A CROSSROAD WHERE THE PRIVATE FINANCIAL SYSTEM
IS CHANGING VERY RAPIDLY, AND DEREGULATION IN SOME IMPORTANT
AREAS SUCH AS DEPOSIT-RATE CEILINGS IS MAPPING OUT YET-UNKNOWN
COURSES. IN MY OPINION, IT WOULD BE BEST TO ALLOW THE EFFECTS OF
DEREGULATION TO UNFOLD MORE FULLY BEFORE RESTRUCTURING OUR
REGULATORY AND SUPERVISORY INSTITUTIONS.
ANY CONSIDERATION OF ULTIMATE REFORM RAISES THE ISSUE OF THE
APPROPRIATE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IN SUPERVISION AND
REGULATION. MY POSITION IS THAT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FEDERAL RESERVE AS THE NATION'S ARCHITECT OF MONETARY POLICY,
ALONG WITH ITS KEY ROLE AS LENDER OF LAST RESORT TO DEPOSITORY
INSTITUTIONS, AUTOMATICALLY IMPLIES A CONCERN FOR THE STABILITY
AND SOUNDNESS OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MARKETS. BANKING
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION SERVE AS SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND
EXPERTISE CONCERNING THE LIKELY INSTITUTIONAL IMPACT OF MONETARY
POLICY. REGULATORY AND SUPERVISORY POLICIES CAN INFLUENCE THE
CHANNELS OF TRANSMISSION OF MONETARY POLICY, THE MEANING OF THE
FINANCIAL AGGREGATES, AND THE SOUNDNESS OF THE INSTITUTIONS THAT
MAKE UP THE MONETARY SECTOR.
THUS, ANY RESTRUCTURING OF REGULATORY AUTHORITY IDEALLY
WOULD RETAIN SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO
CONDUCT MONETARY POLICY AND PROMOTE FINANCIAL STABILITY. CHANGES
IN REGULATORY AUTHORITY PROBABLY WOULD BE BEST STRUCTURED ALONG
FUNCTIONAL OR PRODUCT LINES, WHEREAS SUPERVISION IS MOST
EFFECTIVE WHEN IT HAS A SELECTIVE, INSTITUTIONAL FOCUS. THIS
MIGHT IMPLY A BROADER ROLE FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN REGULATION,
AND A NARROWER ROLE IN SUPERVISION, IN WHICH THE FEDERAL RESERVE
WOULD FOCUS ONLY ON INSTITUTIONS THAT PLAY KEY ROLES IN THE
FINANCIAL MARKETS. THESE INSTITUTIONS COULD BE IDENTIFIED BY
THEIR HOLDING COMPANY AFFILIATION, OR BY THE EXTENT OF INTERSTATE
BANKING ACTIVITY, OR SIMPLY BY THEIR SIZE AS MEASURED BY
AGGREGATE ASSETS.
EMERGING TRENDS IN THE 80'S
THE 1980'S BEGAN A NEW ERA FOR BANKING. IN THE 1980'S,
BANKS WILL NOT ENJOY THE "QUIET LIFE" ASSOCIATED WITH PAST
REGULATIONS. THEIR UNIQUENESS IN BEING ABLE TO OFFER CHECKING
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8
- -
ACCOUNTS, AND THE PROTECTION FROM COMPETITION OFFERED BY
INTEREST-RATE CEILINGS, HAVE BOTH DISAPPEARED, WHILE GEOGRAPHIC
AND PRODUCT-LINE DISTINCTIONS ARE RAPIDLY ERODING.
THE NEW WORLD OF BANKING IS ILLUSTRATED BY THF, RECENT RASH
OF APPLICATIONS FOR "NONBANK BANKS.” ALTHOUGH THE COMPTROLLER OF
THE CURRENCY HAS RECENTLY IMPOSED A MORATORIUM ON APPLICATIONS
FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF DE NOVO NON-BANK BANKS, ONE APPLICATION
RECEIVED IN EARLY MARCH BY THE COMPTROLLER ILLUSTRATES THE TREND.
DIMENSION FINANCIAL CORPORATION OF KANSAS APPLIED TO SET UP 31
"NONBANK BANKS" IN 2 5 STATES AROUND THE COUNTRY. DIMENSION
"BANKS" INITIALLY WOULD HAVE CONCENTRATED ON PROVIDING TRUST
SERVICES AND LINES OF CREDIT TO PREFERRED CUSTOMERS. BUT
DIMENSION ALSO WAS CONSIDERING ULTIMATELY A FULL RANGE OF
SERVICES THAT WOULD HAVE INCLUDED A DISCOUNT BROKERAGE, SWEEP
ACCOUNTS, INSURANCE PRODUCTS, TAX PLANNING AND PREPARATION, AND
FINANCIAL PLANNING. THE "BANKS" DID NOT PLAN TO ENGAGE IN
COMMERCIAL LENDING ACTIVITIES, AND SO WOULD NOT HAVE MET THE
DEFINITION OF A BANK CONTAINED IN THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT.
THE DIMENSION APPLICATION ILLUSTRATES THAT THE FUTURE IS
ALREADY UPON US. IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE WILL NEED TO BE FURTHER
BANKING DEREGULATION IF BANKS ARE TO COMPETE WITH SUCH "NEAR
BANKS" IN THE MARKET FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES.
CHANGING TECHNOLOGY IS ALSO A MAJOR FORCE PROMOTING
DEREGULATION TODAY. AUTOMATIC-TELLER MACHINES (ATMS) AND POINT-
OF-SALE TERMINALS ALREADY ARE ECONOMICALLY VIABLE, AND ARE
PROVING INCREASINGLY POPULAR WITH CONSUMERS. SUCH TECHNOLOGY
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
WILL EXERT FURTHER PRESSURE ON INTERSTATE RESTRICTIONS, AND ON
BRANCHING LAWS--AT LEAST WITHIN METROPOLITAN AREAS.
MOREOVER, THRIFT INSTITUTIONS ALSO ARE BECOMING AWARE OF THE
MERITS OF ATMS AND SHARED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, AND THEY WILL
EXPAND THEIR CONSUMER SERVICES ACROSS STATE LINES THROUGH THESE
MEANS. DEREGULATION OF GEOGRAPHIC LIMITATIONS ON BANKS WILL HAVE
TO COME EVENTUALLY, IF THE BANKING INDUSTRY IS TO BE ABLE TO
COMPETE WITH OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT CAN EXPAND
NATIONALLY WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE WILL INTENSIFY COMPETITION FOR
COMPREHENSIVE PERSONAL CASH-MANAGEMENT SERVICES. MONEY-MARKET
FUNDS, BROKERAGE HOUSES, AND LARGE RETAILERS ALL WILL BE
PROVIDING PERSONAL CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES. EVEN IF DESIRED,
FURTHER REGULATIONS OR LAWS PROBABLY COULD NOT HALT THIS TREND,
BECAUSE SUCH SERVICES PROBABLY COULD TAKE AN ALMOST INFINITE
VARIETY OF FORMS. THE TRENDS I HAVE MENTIONED WILL WILL OCCUR
WHETHER OR NOT BANKING REGULATIONS ARE RELAXED. IN THIS
ENVIRONMENT, OUR BANKING SYSTEM WILL BEST BE ABLE TO SURVIVE IF
THE DIRECTION OF DEREGULATION CONTINUES.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
John J. Balles (1983, June 3). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19830604_john_j_balles
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19830604_john_j_balles,
author = {John J. Balles},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1983},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19830604_john_j_balles},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}