speeches · May 8, 1978
Regional President Speech
Monroe Kimbrel · President
INSIDE THE FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE*
An Address Before the
Georgia Bankers Association
Annual Meeting
Montreal, Canada
May 9, 1978
by
Monroe Kimbrel, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
*Prepared for Mr. Kimbrel’s use by William N. Cox. This speech is loosely based
on "Come With Me to the FOMC!", by Edward A. Wayne, former President of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INSIDE THE FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE*
One Tuesday morning each month, eighteen policymakers gather around a
massive table in a large room overlooking Constitution Avenue in Washington.
Staff aides and secretaries line the perimeter. On the stroke of 9:30 a
nineteenth man— short-statured, smiling and determined-— emerges from a side
door and walks purposefully to a seat at the south side of the table.
Conversation stops. Seats are taken. Heads raise in anticipation. The
monthly Federal Open Market Committee meeting has begun.
The FOMC is the monetary policy forum of the Federal Reserve. Once each
month, all the resources of the Fed come to bear on the deliberations and
decisions about monetary policy. The FOMC exemplifies, in the finest kind of
way, the orderly and flexible evolution of a public institution in response to
*Prepared for Mr. Kimbrel's use by William N. Cox. This speech is loosely based
on "Come With Me to the FOMC!", by Edward A. Wayne, former President of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2
changing needs: From its inception in the Twenties to coordinate the actions
of twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, to its formal establishment in the
Banking Act of 1935, to the resumption of active postwar monetary policy in
1951, to the continuing small modifications of procedures and customs which
persists today. The FOMC has changed a lot in fifty years, all right. But
each of us, as we take our seats around that table, feels the unbroken chain
of tradition.
"Now let's hear from the Foreign Desk," begins Chairman Miller. A senior
official of the New York Fed, the Deputy Manager for Foreign Operations, de
scribes foreign exchange market developments, supplementing a stack of written
reports already furnished each member. The emphasis is on what it all means,
and on subtle indications, based on the official's daily conversations with his
counterparts, about financial attitudes— hopes and fears— around the world. It
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
3
is an impressive four or five minutes. The policymakers regard the Manager’s
summary with attentive respect and then proceed, in a friendly and admiring way,
to shred its conclusions. Several men with particular experience and responsi
bilities on the international side relate their own conversations with other
central banks and with U. S. Treasury officials, with whom the Fed shares re
sponsibility for exchange operations. Twenty minutes later, the Foreign Desk
official sits back. His operations have been okayed, and a couple of special
arrangements have been dealt with. The room is silent once again.
MAs we turn to the question of domestic policy today, we need to recognize
why this is a particularly important time...." Unlike some of his predecessors,
who rarely voiced an opinion until all others had been heard, the Chairman now
capsules his own concerns into two or three minutes of compelling philosophy and
economics. The Governors and Presidents listen carefully, because the Chairman
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
is first among equals, even if he does have only one vote. He must later
convey the System’s intentions to the Congress, administration, and general
public. His job has been described as the government’s most important, next
to the President’s. Each mind around the table weighs what the Chairman says,
mulling it, figuring out what is wrong with it.
Attention shifts to the end of the table, where a staff economist offers a
fifteen-minute summary of the U. S. economy and its prospects. The jargon of
the economist creeps in— savings rate, velocity, multiplier effect— but the
presentations are deceptively simple— the simplicity of painstaking preparation
over thousands of man-hours. The emphasis is not just on what prospects are
likely, but on what the risks are, on either side. As with the foreign report
earlier, the brief presentation highlights and supplements a massive pile of
written information the policymakers have already digested including, importantly,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
a thick compilation of economic intelligence coming in from Reserve Bank
directors and other contacts around the country.
As the presentations come crisply to an end, several members nod unobtrusively
at the secretary, who keeps a list so the Chairman knows who wants to speak.
The process of gentle, tough questioning continues. Disagreements emerge, and
are refined by cross-questioning. A President mentions detailed evidence from
his District contradicting the staff’s interpretation. Another tersely docu
ments the similarity of the current situation to others in the past thirty years;
still another provides reasons to show the situation really is not similar at
all. Polite and calm, with humor here and there, the discussion is quick and
crackling in its content. The nineteen men move in the next hour to probe and
complete their own thinking about the economy, to qualify the staff's assessment,
to provide a common base for the establishment of monetary policy.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The clock is now past 11. Tension subsides as the members move out in
the hall for coffee, clustered in a dozen conversations with other members and
staff assistants, usually talking about something else— administrative problems
personalities, the weather in Washington— as if to recharge their batteries
before they dive back.
Then the group gathers around the table again, and heads turn toward the
Deputy Manager for Domestic Operations, who describes domestic open market
operations during the past month. Like its predecessors, his report is concise
focusing on exceptions and problems rather than the routine. As before, each
member feels free to ask "Why?" It is a tough audience, and few people could
handle it. He can. He and his associates have that special quality, come
through it well, and are highly respected in their role on the front line of
monetary policy. These actions, too, are ratified.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Next another staff economist presents the financial outlook: The relation
ship between money growth and interest rates, movements of funds in and out of
financial institutions, why unusually sharp movements in this or that series
may be ominous... or unimportant.
Now, two hours into the meeting, the FOMC has reached the critical part.
It is time to make monetary policy. Each has been preparing for a month— with
the preceding economic analysis and discussion, and with countless consultations
with Reserve Bank directors and staff advisors, briefing notebooks, summaries,
oral briefings, and draft statements, right down to the loose ends each member
has discussed with his senior advisor over breakfast that morning.
By now each has sorted out the whole situation several times, each time
differently. This is not one of those meetings where each participant listens
to himself. All listen carefully, adding to some concerns about questions,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
crossing others off the list. As each policymaker sketches his preferences
and conclusions about monetary growth and interest rates, the others are
hearing not only what he says, but the context from which he is saying it.
A lot of skills and experience are gathered around that table— economists,
bankers, lawyers, businessmen— each with a different perspective. These are
not nineteen strangers. They have spent many hours together, know each other
well. Each understands the peculiar style with which the others shoulder similar
responsibilities.
There is no order to the comments. Some like to get in early; others lay
back to digest the context. Sometimes the discussion ends quickly; sometimes it
lasts for several hours. Finally, after each has said his piece, the Chairman
guides the Committee, through informal soundings, to a consensus: a combination
of interest rates and monetary growth ranges which the Committee can support.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Out of this comes agreement, or substantially so, on instructions to the Open
Market Manager for the ensuing month.
Then the seven Governors, and the particular five Presidents who (except
for New York) cast votes for their twelve colleagues on a rotating basis, face
another decision. Everyone is not completely happy with the consensus. Each
of them must decide whether any disagreement he has is strong enough to vote
"no," and why. This happens fairly often: Many meetings culminate in the
registering of one or two dissents out of the twelve votes.
It is downhill from here. The secretary calls the roll of each voting
member, and the votes are cast formally. The tension lifts, a housekeeping
matter or two rolls by, and the meeting breaks up. Each member heads for an
afternoon of committee meetings, taking advantage of the time when all the
Presidents and Governors are together. The domestic and foreign managers head
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
10 -
for the telephone to implement their instructions, which will be watched and
discussed around the world each day in the coming month. Members drift out
of the room, each thinking of the work that has to be done between now and that
time next month, when those nineteen men will again gather around that massive
table overlooking Constitution Avenue.
For one of the Presidents, however, the activity is just beginning. It is
his turn to monitor the Fed's open market operations. Assisted by his own staff,
he will participate each day in a conference call with the Board staff and the Open
Market Account Management at the New York Fed, getting a full measure of the subtle
ties and details against which the Directive just approved by the FOMC will be exe
cuted. This experience adds a great deal to the perspective of each participant.
I hope I have been able to give you the flavor of how monetary policy gets
made, of the care and energy we devote to it, and of the work and excitement
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
11
which builds into a crescendo to that Tuesday morning each month. It is too
early to tell yet all the modifications the new Chairman will bring. There
have been few thus far. It will be interesting to see how our tradition
continues in its newest chapter.
* * * * * * *
That is what it’s like to be sitting around the FOMC table. Now let me
conclude by telling you what’s on my mind right now, as I look forward to the
next meeting.
What is on my mind, in a word, is inflation. As I look out over the rest
of this year and into the next, I see many elements pushing up prices and wages;
I see very few holding them down. First and foremost, the substantial progress
we have made on unemployment and economic growth is bringing us closer to bottle
necks in skilled labor and plant and equipment— closer to the time when production
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
12
costs will accelerate in response to those shortages. The disappointing rate of
business capital investment will hasten that reckoning.
Second, the recent depreciation of the dollar internationally cannot help
but add to inflation— by one-half to one percent, the experts tell us. We are
just beginning to see these effects on our imports— the Toyotas— and their
domestically-produced substitutes— the Fords.
Third, it is quite clear we have not adjusted yet to what energy will cost
in the future. When we do, some prices will go up as our producers and consumers
react by changing what they sell and what they buy. This kind of churning,
history tells us, is inevitably inflationary.
Fourth, we have to reckon with the Federal budget stimulus, and with what
ever additional tax cuts will emerge in this, an election year.
Finally, I am troubled by the "Ifm gonna get mine first" way of thinking
which, as always, accompanies widespread expectations of inflation. Next year
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
13 -
brings a heavy collective bargaining calendar, with more pressure on labor
costs in prospect. Businessmen are looking for ways to protect their profit
margins. Farmers need help. Everyone, it seems, is looking for Federal money
as an equalizer. This is the psychology inflation breeds, and I am troubled
to see it building up again.
I hope I am wrong. Weak economic growth around the world is restraining
international commodity prices, and that may offer a welcome, if temporary,
respite. Maybe the Administration will pull a rabbit out of the hat and imple
ment a workable and effective anti-inflation policy, but I cannot avoid being
skeptical. I am pleased, however, to see that the Administration has joined our
new Chairman, Mr. Miller, in declaring that inflation is our top-priority economic
problem.
One final note. It is sometimes fashionable to say that wealthier people
with jobs are always more concerned about inflation. That argument does not
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
14 -
mean much to me, for two reasons. First, our recent inflation has clearly hit
poorer people much harder than the general population, because our worst in
flation has been right where lower-income people spend most of their money:
health care, housing, transportation and food.
Secondly, our postwar experience tells us, equally clearly, that the only
way to get unemployment down and keep it down is to avoid recessions. Accelerating
inflation is the surest road I know back to a recession and rising unemployment.
So we all should be concerned about inflation, and that is the primary concern
I will carry with me next month as I take my seat around that table in Washington.
Thank you very much.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Monroe Kimbrel (1978, May 8). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19780509_monroe_kimbrel
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19780509_monroe_kimbrel,
author = {Monroe Kimbrel},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1978},
month = {May},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19780509_monroe_kimbrel},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}