speeches · June 14, 1977
Regional President Speech
Mark H. Willes · President
LABOR STATISTICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY
Remarks by
MARK H. WILLES
President
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
at the
North American Conference on Labor Statistics
Radisson South Hotel
Bloomington, Minnesota
June 15, 1977
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LABOR STATISTICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY
I. INTRODUCTION
I WAS DELIGHTED TO GET, AND ACCEPT, THE INVITATION
FROM JULIUS SHISKIN TO SPEAK BEFORE THIS ASSEMBLY ON THE CON
NECTION BETWEEN LABOR STATISTICS AND MONETARY POLICY, FOR IT
IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO A WELL-
INFORMED AUDIENCE ON A MATTER OF GREAT INTEREST AND SIGNIFICANCE.
USUALLY AN AFTER-DINNER SPEECH SHOULD BE LIGHT AND
SHORT. AND THAT WAS MY ORIGINAL INTENTION, AND PERHAPS YOUR
HOPE. HOWEVER, THE MORE I THOUGHT ABOUT THE IMPRESSIVE CRE
DENTIALS OF THIS GROUP, THE MOPE IT SEEMED TO MAKE SENSE TO
TAKE THE RISK OF WORKING YOU A LITTLE HARDER THAN USUAL,
BECAUSE I MEED YOUR HELP TO RESOLVE SOME VERY DISTURBING
QUESTIONS IN MY MIND. SPECIFICALLY, SINCE CONGRESS (IN
PL 94-444) HAS PROVIDED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NATIONAL
COMMISSION ON EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS TO GIVE
US THE FIRST THOROUGH REVIEW OF LABOR STATISTICS SINCE THE
GORDON COMMITTEE IN 1962. I WANT TO TAKE THIS UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY
TO DISCUSS SOME OF THE ISSUES I HOPE THE MEW COMMISSION -- AND
ALL OF YOU WHO ARE INVOLVED IN ITS WORK -- WILL CONSIDER AS IT
GOES ABOUT ITS TASK.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
II. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLICY, DATA AND THEORIES
LET ME BEGIN BY INDICATING THAT THROUGH MY EXPERIENCE
IN MANAGEMENT, I'VE DEVELOPED A PHILOSOPHY ABOUT HOW YOU BEST
GET THINGS DOME, AND IT GOES LIKE THIS:
FIRST, REQUIRE THE MANAGER, OR POLICYMAKER, TO DETERMINE
WHAT OBJECTIVES ARE TO BE ACHIEVED.
THEN, GIVEN THE OBJECTIVES, HAVE THE TECHNICAL SPECIAL
IST DETERMINE WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW AND DO TO ACCOMPLISH THOSE
OBJECTIVES. THIS VIEW DOES MOT IN ANY WAY DOWN-GRADE THE QUALI
FICATIONS OR THE ROLE OF TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS (WHETHER THEY BE
COMPUTER EXPERTS, STATISTICIANS, ECONOMISTS, OR OTHERS). IT
SIMPLY MEANS THAT THE ONLY LOGICAL WAY TO PROCEED IS TO FIRST
SPECIFY THE OBJECTIVES OR END-RESULTS THAT ARE TO BE ACCOMPLISHED,
AMD THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF POLICYMAKERS OR MANAGERS, NOT
THE STAFF SPECIALISTS.
TO APPLY THIS LINE OF REASONING TO THE ISSUE AT HAND
MEANS THAT BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMMISSION CAN REALLY DO ITS WORK,
IT MUST FIRST FIND OUT FROM POLICYMAKERS WHAT OBJECTIVES THEY
DESIRE TO ACHIEVE. BUT THERE IS THE RUB, FOR MANY POLICYMAKERS
WOULD, I'M SURE, PROVIDE MANY DIFFERENT VIEWS. FOR EXAMPLE,
FVERYONE WOULD PROBABLY AGREE THAT THE PURPOSE OF ECONOMIC POLICY
IS TO ATTAIN THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF WELL-BEING FOR SOCIETY AS A
WHOLE -- OR AS ECONOMISTS MIGHT PUT IT, TO MAXIMIZE SOCIAL WELFARE.
THIS, HOWEVER, IS NOT A VERY USEFUL STATEMENT, BECAUSE, TO BE
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
OPERATIONAL, OBJECTIVES MUST BE STATED IN QUANTIFIABLE TERMS.
WE NEED NUMERICAL INDICATORS OF WELFARE IN ORDER TO DETERMINE
HOW SUCCESSFUL DIFFERENT GOVERNMENT POLICIES ARE IN ATTAINING
OUR OBJECTIVES. AND THE SELECTION OF THESE INDICATORS IS A
VERY DIFFICULT PROBLEM, BECAUSE WHAT WE DECIDE TO USE AS INDI
CATORS OF WELFARE DEPENDS ON OUR VIEWS OF THE ECONOMIC WORLD.
IF, FOR EXAMPLE, WE BELIEVE THAT AMY UNEMPLOYMENT WHICH OCCURS
IS A RESULT OF MARKET FAILURE AND THAT IT CAN BE ELIMINATED BY
APPROPRIATE AGGREGATE DEMAND POLICIES, A MEASURE OF UNEMPLOYMENT
IS A VERY USEFUL INDICATOR OF WELFARE. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF WE
BELIEVE ALL UNEMPLOYMENT IS IN SOME SENSE VOLUNTARY AMD CANNOT
BE AFFECTED BY AGGREGATE DEMAND POLICIES, WE THEN HAVE LITTLE USE
FOR UNEMPLOYMENT MEASURES.
MY POINT IS THAT THE PRIMARY USE OF DATA WE COLLECT
SHOULD BE TO AID IN MAKING PUBLIC POLICY, AND THE KINDS OF DATA
WE COLLECT SHOULD THEN BE PREDICATED ON OUR VIEWS OF WHAT MAKES
THE ECONOMY TICK. AND IF THERE. ARE CONFLICTING VIEWS, AS THERE
ARE, THEN IT IS ESSENTIAL TO HAVE DATA THAT HELP US TO DETERMINE
WHICH VIEW OF THE WORLD IS CORRECT.
m . VIEWS HAVE CHANGED SINCE 1962
IF YOU BUY WHAT I HAVE SAID SO FAR, THEN I CAM EASILY
STATE MY MAIN POINT. SOME SHARPLY DIVERGENT VIEWS ON THE ECONOMY
AND ON THE LABOR MARKET, IN PARTICULAR, HAVE EMERGED SINCE LABOR
STATISTICS WERE LAST REVIEWED IN 1962. CONSEQUENTLY, THE KINDS
OF STATISTICS WE COLLECT MUST BE CHANGED TO HELP US EVALUATE THE
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
MEW VERSUS THE OLD VIEW. AT THE RISK OF WORKING YOU A LITTLE BIT,
LET HE EXPLAIN WHAT I MEAN.
BACK IN 1962 WHEN THE GORDON COMMITTEE WAS AT WORK,
THERE WAS ESSENTIALLY ONLY ONE VIEW OF UNEMPLOYMENT. WE MIGHT
CALL THIS VIEW THE STATIC KEYNESIAN VIEW, AND ITS STORY GOES
SOMETHING LIKE THIS: EMPLOYEES ENTER WITH THEIR EMPLOYERS INTO
CONTRACTS WHICH PROMISE IN RETURN FOR WORK PERFORMED SOME
SCHEDULE OF WAGES STATED IN DOLLAR TERMS AND COVERING A NUMBER
OF PERIODS.
IF SOME UNFORESEEN EVENT OCCURS WHICH RESULTS IN A FALL
IN AGGREGATE DEMAND -- FOR EXAMPLE, A SURPRISE DECLINE IN BUSINESS
INVESTMENT -- FIRMS ARE NOT ABLE TO SELL ENOUGH GOODS AT THE PRICE
THEY REQUIRE TO KEEP THEIR EMPLOYEES FULLY EMPLOYED. EMPLOYEES
ARE LAID OFF, AND THEY AND NEW JOB SEEKERS ARE NOT ABLE TO FIND
WORK AT THE CURRENT MARKET WAGE. THE GOVERNMENT, HOWEVER, CAN
STEP IN AND OFFSET THIS UNFORESEEN FALL IN AGGREGATE DEMAND, AND
THE SUBSEQUENT RISE IN UNEMPLOYMENT, WITH STIMULATIVE POLICIES.
I CANNOT CLAIM TO BE CERTAIN THAT OUR UNEMPLOYMENT
STATISTICS ARE PREDICATED ON THAT VIEW OF THE LABOR MARKET, BUT
I THINK I CAN BUILD A STRONG CASE THAT THEY ARE.
FOR EXAMPLE, SINCE 1940 NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS
HAVE BEEN COLLECTED ON AN ONGOING BASIS. AND, FROM THE OUTSET,
THE ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO COUNT UP ALL THOSE "ABLE, WILLING, AND
SEFKING TO WORK." THE QUESTIONS ASKED IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHO
4.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
IS EMPLOYED, AND WHO IS NOT, HAVE A DEFINITE KEYNESIAN FLAVOR,
SINCE THEY SEEK TO MEASURE PEOPLE'S DESIRE TO WORK AND WILLING
NESS TO WORK WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE QUESTION, "AT WHAT WAGE?"
AND AT THE TIME OF THE GORDON COMMITTEE, THE PREVAILING VIEW OF
THE WORLD WAS A KEYNESIAN ONE: FOR EXAMPLE, DURING THE GORDON
COMMITTEE DELIBERATIONS, THE JEC HELD HEARINGS ON THE UNEMPLOY
MENT ISSUE AND IN ONE STUDY CONCLUDED THAT "THE BULK OF THE
INCREASE [IN UNEMPLOYMENT] IN RECENT YEARS REFLECTS A FAILURE
OF DEMAND FORCES TO KEEP PACE WITH THE RISE IN THE NATION'S
POTENTIAL OUTPUT AT FULL EMPLOYMENT."
THE JEC WENT ON TO OBSERVE THAT, "INCREASES IN GOVERNMENT
AND PRIVATE OUTLAYS BOTH TEND TO INCREASE EMPLOYMENT. WHEN UNEM
PLOYMENT IS HIGH, THESE OUTLAYS HAVE LITTLE IF ANY INFLATIONARY
TENDENCIES."
THIS KEYNESIAN VIEW OF THE WORLD MAY EXPLAIN WHY THE
GORDON COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF GATHERING DATA ON WAGE
RATES THAT WOULD BE "ACCEPTABLE" TO THE UNEMPLOYED, BUT THEN
DISMISSED IT.
THIS STATIC KEYNESIAN VIEW OF THE LABOR MARKET, WHICH
SEEMS TO UNDERLIE OUR LABOR STATISTICS, HAS SOME DEFINITE IMPLI
CATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY. TWO OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ARE:
-- LESS UNEMPLOYMENT IS ALWAYS PREFERRED TO MORE.
-- GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH INCREASE AGGREGATE DEMAND
SHOULD LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT.
5.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
AS WE ARE ALL PAINFULLY AWARE, THE KEYNESIAN POLICY
PRESCRIPTION HAS NOT SEEMED TO LIVE UP TO ITS PROMISE. POLICIES
DESIGNED TO STIMULATE AGGREGATE DEMAND SEEM TO HAVE A MUCH
LARGER EFFECT ON PRICES THAN ON UNEMPLOYMENT.
MOREOVER, THE EMPLOYMENT PROCESS IS DYNAMIC AND UNFOLDS
IN A VERY UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT. WHERE THERE IS UNCERTAINTY AS
THERE IS IN LABOR MARKETS, QUEUES AND INVENTORIES PLAY AN IMPOR
TANT ROLE IN THE EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES. SO UNEMPLOY
MENT NEED NOT BE INTERPRETED AS MARKET FAILURE, BECAUSE LABOR
MARKETS COULD BE OPERATING EFFICIENTLY AND STILL PRODUCE UNEMPLOY
MENT.
DUE TO DISSATISFACTION WITH THE STATIC KEYNESIAN THEORY
OF THE LABOR MARKET AND TO ITS APPARENTLY INVALID IMPLICATIONS
FOR POLICY, NEW THEORIES OF THE LABOR MARKET WERE DEVELOPED AND
APPEARED IN THE LATE 1960's. TWO IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THESE
NEW THEORIES ARE THAT THEY ARE DYNAMIC AND THAT THEY ASSUME
DECISIONS ARE MADE IN AN UNCERTAIN SETTING. THE STORY THESE
MEW THEORIES TELL GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS:
EACH EMPLOYER WHO HAS A VACANCY MUST DETERMINE A WAGE
TO OFFER PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES. IF THAT WAGE IS TOO LOW, HE
WILL HAVE TROUBLE ATTRACTING THE QUALITY OF EMPLOYEE HE DESIRES.
IF IT IS TOO HIGH, HE WILL FIND PLENTY OF QUALITY PEOPLE AT HIS
DOOR, BUT HE WILL BE OVERPAYING THEM. ONCE THE EMPLOYER SETS THE
WAGE, HE MUST THEN ENGAGE IN A COSTLY SEARCH OF APPLICANTS TO
DECIDE -- BASED ON LIMITED DATA -- WHETHER ANY GIVEN INDIVIDUAL
HAS THE NECESSARY QUALIFICATIONS. THESE THEORIES TELL US
6.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
EMPLOYERS WILL BASE THEIR OFFERING WAGE ON THEIR PERCEPTION OF
MARKET WAGES, AND GIVEN THIS OFFERING WAGE THEY WILL SEARCH UNTIL
THEY CAN HIRE SOMEONE QUALIFIED AT THAT WAGE OR UNTIL THEY DE
TERMINE THEY MUST CHANGE THE OFFERING WAGE.
PEOPLE LOOKING FOR WORK ARE SIMILARLY ASSUMED TO ENGAGE
IN A PROCESS OF SEARCH. BASED ON THE COSTS OF SEARCH (I.E., ON
THE LEISURE AND INCOME HE MUST GIVE UP), HIS LEVEL OF TRANSFER
PAYMENTS, AMD ON BELIEFS ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAGES EMPLOYERS
ARE OFFERING, EACH INDIVIDUAL LOOKING FOR WORK DEVELOPS AN OPTIMAL
STOPPING RULE. HE SETS, WHAT ECONOMISTS CALL, A RESERVATION
WAGE -- THE WAGE FOR WHICH HE FEELS IT PAYS HIM TO WORK -- AND
SEARCHES UNTIL HE GETS AN OFFER AT OR ABOVE HIS RESERVATION WAGE.
SOME ARGUE THAT THESE NEW THEORIES OF SEARCH CAN AT MOST
GIVE US A HANDLE ON VOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT. THEY BELIEVE THAT
THE EXISTENCE OF INVOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT, LAYOFFS, AND OTHER
SEEMINGLY NONCOMPETITIVE ASPECTS OF LABOR MARKETS ARE AT ODDS
WITH THE NEW THEORIES.
THE ADVOCATES OF THE NEW THEORIES, HOWEVER, DO NOT BELIEVE
SO. CERTAIN FEATURES OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, THEY ARGUE, CAN BE
INTERPRETED AS DESIRABLE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE SHARING OF RISK
AMONG EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS. RISK-SHARING ARRANGEMENTS ALMOST
ALWAYS CALL FOR SOME INVOLUNTARY ACTION -- AFTER. THE FACT. NO ONE,
FOR EXAMPLE, REALLY WANTS TO PAY UP AFTER LOSING A BET. INVOLUN
TARY UNEMPLOYMENT MIGHT THEM BE A NATURAL OUTCOME OF THE WAY PEOPLE
7.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
BARGAIN FOR JOBS IN A MARKET ECONOMY OPERATING IN AN UNCERTAIN
ENVIRONMENT, AND THE CONCEPT OF INVOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT THEN
DISAPPEARS.
THF NEW THEORIES ARE STILL IN AN EARLY STAGE OF DEVELOP
MENT, BUT THEY ALREADY HAVE SOME IMPORTANT POLICY IMPLICATIONS
WHICH ARE JUST THE OPPOSITE OF THOSE FOR THE KEYNESIAN VIEW:
-- LESS UNEMPLOYMENT NEED NOT BE PREFERRED TO MORE.
THE NEW THEORIES SUGGEST, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT A POLICY
CHANGE WHICH INCREASES THE COST OF SEARCHING FOR A
JOB WILL LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT BUT WILL MAKE PEOPLE
WORSE OFF. SINCE THE POLICY CHANGE MAKES IT MORE
COSTLY TO SEARCH, PEOPLE ACCEPT JOBS FASTER THAN THEY
OTHERWISE WOULD. BUT THEY ARE WORSE OFF BECAUSE THEY
ACCEPT THE JOBS AT A LOWER WAGE THAN THEY OTHERWISE
WOULD.
-- GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH RAISE AGGREGATE DEMAND MAY
NOT LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT.
IV. AM UNRESOLVED ISSUE
TO UNDERSTAND THIS LAST IMPLICATION, SUPPOSE THAT THE
WAGES OF BOTH WORKERS AMD EMPLOYERS ARE SET IN NOMINAL DOLLAR
TERMS. SINCE IN FACT BOTH EMPLOYERS AMD JOB SEEKERS CARE ABOUT
REAL WAGES (THAT IS, DOLLAR WAGES DEFLATED BY PRICES), THEY MUST
PREDICT WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO PRICES IN THE PERIOD OF THE WAGE
CONTRACT. THE ISSUE THEN IS WHETHER EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES BASE
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THEIR PREDICTIONS OF PRICE IN PART ON WHAT THEY EXPECT GOVERNMENT
POLICY TO BE.
TO ILLUSTRATE, SUPPOSE THAT WE AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE
WERE TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY IN EVERYBODY'S POCKETS.
PEOPLE WOULD SPEND AT LEAST PART OF THE INCREASE. FIRMS WOULD
NOTICE AN INCREASED DEMAND FOR THEIR PRODUCTS, WOULD RAISE THEIR
PRICES, AND WOULD OFFER HIGHER WAGES TO ATTRACT NEW EMPLOYEES.
BASED ON A VIEW THAT JOB SEEKERS FORECAST PRICES BASED ONLY ON
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST, WORKERS' REQUIRED WAGES INITIALLY
WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED. CONSEQUENTLY, THE INCREASED DEMAND FOR
LABOR WITH AN UNCHANGED SUPPLY WOULD LEAD TO A FALL IN UNEMPLOY
MENT.
BUT AS I INDICATED, THERE IS ANOTHER VIEW OF HOW PEOPLE
FORECAST, AND IT IS CALLED RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS. MUCH OF THIS
THEORY WAS DEVELOPED AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS.
BASICALLY, IT SAYS THAT PEOPLE USE THE INFORMATION THEY HAVE ON
HAND TO PREDICT IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE. AND TO PREDICT PRICES,
PEOPLE WOULD CERTAINLY WANT TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT WHAT POLICY --
ESPECIALLY MONETARY POLICY -- IS GOING TO BE.
IF JOB SEEKERS IN OUR EXAMPLE ANTICIPATE THAT THE FEDERAL
RESERVE IS GOING TO INCREASE THE MONEY SUPPLY, THEY IMMEDIATELY
WILL RAISE THEIR PRICE PREDICTIONS AND THEN RAISE THEIR WAGE
EXPECTATIONS ACCORDINGLY. THUS, ACCORDING TO THE RATIONAL
EXPECTATIONS VIEW, AN ANTICIPATED INCREASE IN MONEY WILL RAISE
PRICES AND WAGES, BUT KEEP UNEMPLOYMENT UNCHANGED.
9.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE IN THESE VIEWS IS THEIR IMPLICA
TION OF HOW THE WAGES REQUIRED BY JOB SEEKERS WILL CHANGE WHEN
THERE IS AN ANTICIPATED SHIFT IN POLICY. THE FIRST VIEW PREDICTS
THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE, WHILE THE RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS VIEW
PREDICTS A CHANGE IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE POLICY SHIFT.
AS A DIGRESSION FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED, BOTH VIEWS
IMPLY THAT RESERVATION WAGES WILL NOT CHANGE WHEN THERE IS AN
UNANTICIPATED SHIFT IN POLICY. UNDER EITHER VIEW, AN UNEXPECTED
SURGE IN THE MONEY SUPPLY, FOR EXAMPLE, WILL LEAD TO A RISE IN
OFFER WAGES, WHICH WITH UNCHANGED RESERVATION WAGES, LEADS TO A
DECLINE IN UNEMPLOYMENT.
IN FACT, THE RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS VIEW ATTRIBUTES THE
STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS WE OBSERVE BETWEEN UNEMPLOYMENT AND
GOVERNMENT POLICIES TO THE UNPREDICTABILITY OF OUR POLICIES OVER
THE PAST.
COMING BACK. TO THE MAIN POINT, ONE OF THE BIGGEST
CHALLENGES MONETARY POLICY FACES TODAY IS TO ANSWER THE QUESTION
POSED BY THE NEW RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS VIEW -- NAMELY, CAN
MONETARY POLICY DO ANYTHING AT ALL TO SYSTEMATICALLY REDUCE
UNEMPLOYMENT. IF THE ANSWER IS YES, THEN WE SHOULD KEEP ON
TRYING, AS WE DO, TO ACCOMPLISH WHATEVER REDUCTIONS WE CAN. ON
THE OTHER HAND, IF MONETARY POLICY REALLY CAN'T SYSTEMATICALLY
REDUCE THE CYCLICAL INCREASES IN UNEMPLOYMENT, THEN WE SHOULD
FOCUS SOLELY ON REDUCING INFLATION AND OTHER OBJECTIVES.
10.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THAT'S WHY I PERSONALLY PLACE HIGH ON THE POLICYMAKERS'
AGENDA THE CHALLENGE TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN THE TWO COMPETING
VIEWS OF THE WORLD I'VE DESCRIBED IN ORDER TO SELECT WHICH BETTER
REPRESENTS REALITY FOR THE POLICYMAKER. THE VERY ESSENCE OF WHAT
WE DO IS AT STAKE.
THAT WILL BE A DIFFICULT TASK. YET, THE RIGHT SORT OF
EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS COULD CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING
TOWARD HELPING US MAKE THAT DECISION.
THE NEW COMMISSION HAS BEEN GIVEN A CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE
TO CONSIDER: "THE METHODOLOGY OF ANALYSIS OF SUCH DATA, INCLUDING
ITS RELEVANCE AND APPLICATION," AND "THE EXTENT TO WHICH EMPLOYMENT
AND EARNINGS DATA ASSIST IN DETERMINING THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC PRO
GRAMS AND POLICIES UPON PERSONS WHO ARE ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED,
UNEMPLOYED, OR UNDEREMPLOYED."
CRUCIAL TESTS BETWEEN THE TWO COMPETING VIEWS -- THE
KEYNESIAN VIEW AND THE "RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS" VIEW -- MAY WELL
HINGE ON EMPLOYMENT-UNEMPLOYMENT DATA. WE NEED TO LEARN A LOT
MORE ABOUT HOW JOB SEEKERS DECIDE WHAT WAGE THEY WILL ACCEPT,
AND HOW THAT DECISION CHANGES OVER TIME. AND AN UNDERSTANDING
OF THAT IS CRUCIAL TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT, IF ANYTHING, MONETARY
POLICY CAN DO TO REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT.
CONSEQUENTLY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMMISSION MIGHT
WANT TO RECONSIDER THE IDEA (REJECTED BY THE GORDON COMMITTEE) OF
COLLECTING DATA THAT WOULD INDICATE THE WAGE RATES AT WHICH THE
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
UNEMPLOYED ARE WILLING TO WORK. THIS MEASURE OF A LABOR SUPPLY
SCHEDULE COULD PROVE EXTREMELY USEFUL IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND
TESTING OF NEW THEORIES OF LABOR MARKET BEHAVIOR. OF COURSE,
WAGE RATE INFORMATION OF THIS KIND COULD ALSO PROVE USEFUL IN THE
ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS POLICY ISSUES, SUCH AS THE IMPACT OF THE
MINIMUM WAGE AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS ON THE LEVEL
OF UNEMPLOYMENT, ISSUES WHICH ARE CRITICAL BUT BEYOND THE SCOPE
OF MY TALK TONIGHT.
IN SUM, A REDESIGNED SET OF LABOR STATISTICS IS URGENTLY
NEEDED TO HELP US RESOLVE SOME VERY BASIC POLICY ISSUES. I WISH
THE COMMISSION WELL AS IT SETS OUT ON SUCH A CRUCIAL TASK.
12.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Mark H. Willes (1977, June 14). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19770615_mark_h_willes
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19770615_mark_h_willes,
author = {Mark H. Willes},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1977},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19770615_mark_h_willes},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}