speeches · June 8, 1976
Regional President Speech
David P. Eastburn · President
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PHONE 215-574-3810
For Immediate Release June 9, 1976
David P. Eastburn, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, to
day called for the creation of a new department within City government, the Office
of Economic Affairs, to help Philadelphia deal more effectively with its economic
and financial problems. The new department, he said, would be responsible for
developing long-range solutions to the economic problems facing the City through
a combination of professional and community expertise.
Speaking before the Economic Advisory Committee of the Greater Philadelphia
Chamber of Commerce and the PENJERDEL Corporation in Philadelphia today, Eastburn
stated that a more comprehensive and analytical approach to dealing with the
City's financial dilemma is long overdue.
I
! We have the technology, resources and ability to make significant progress to-
j
| ward solving these problems through the application of improved management and
i
i budget techniques and increasing the productivity of available tax dollars. More
efficient management of resources is not necessarily a panacea, Eastburn said,
but it will do much to help and is a positive step we can take now.
Outlining some of the functions of this new department, Eastburn said it
would seek ways of applying new management techniques to city problems, evaluate
benefits and costs of programs requiring city resources, and analyze the cost-
effectiveness of producing municipal services. Each of these functions would im
prove the City's productivity in providing services.
-more-
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouFisEfedD.oErgR/ AL RESERVE BANK of PHILADELPHIA ■ PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 10105
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The department would be staffed with professionals whose job requirements
are defined in terms of professional skills and achievements rather than party
allegiances, and would be sufficiently independent of city control to be criti
cal when needed. It could take a long-run view of City problems and thus help
to avoid recurring fiscal crises.
According to Eastburn, the City’s current fiscal dilemma has taken a long
time to develop and it won't be solved by any quick cure, even a heavy tax hike.
A primary cause of the City's fiscal woes is the "mismatch" between the City's
growing need for funds and the lagging growth in its tax base. It is this
fundamental shortfall that City officials must face up to now, Eastburn said.
Socio-economic changes in our urban centers have created demands for more
and more municipal services such as police protection, schools, aid for dis
advantaged groups, cultural opportunities and the like. These are services few
citizens want to see eliminated or cut back.
Local tax revenues needed to pay for these growing demands have failed to
keep pace, Eastburn noted. Property taxes in Philadelphia, for example, have
been rising about one and a half per cent annually in recent years mainly be
cause of the lag in reassessments. The ratio of assessed value to market value
of property in the City has fallen from about 60 per cent to 40 per cent in the
last decade.
Eastburn stated that large-scale injections of Federal and state funds have
helped mask a major portion of this shortfall between expenditures and revenues.
Between 1965 and 1974, for example, property taxes rose 87 per cent nationally
while intergovernmental revenues (such as revenue sharing) went up 370 per cent.
In the same period, revenue from state and Federal sources jumped from 38 cents
to 85 cents of every local revenue dollar.
-more-
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
In Philadelphia such revenues increased nearly sevenfold in just five years,
climbing from $51 million in Fiscal Year 1971 to a projected $379 million in
Fiscal 1976.
While logic may favor even greater use of intergovernmental revenue trans
fers, Eastburn said he doubts whether cities can continue to count on still more
state and Federal help in the future to cover still greater demands for municipal
services. Both state and Federal governments are having budget problems of their
own, he noted, and are not likely to go on financing an increasingly higher pro
portion of city expenditures.
The revenue/expense shortfall Eastburn said, has been exacerbated by the
twin developments of recession and inflation that racked the economy in recent
years. High unemployment brought on by the worst recession since the 1930s
caused not only a decline in revenues from wage taxes but a simultaneous in
crease in the demand for social services. Rising prices meanwhile were re
flected in rapid increases in the City's operating and financing costs.
These aspects of the fiscal dilemma are improving with the business re
covery, but the fundamental problem remains, Eastburn said, and it can't be
solved without some basic changes in the way city services are financed and
managed.
With worthy objectives far outstripping available funds, Eastburn said,
city officials must devote more energy to improving the effectiveness and ef
ficiency with which they deliver services, and allocate resources where they will
generate the most good.
# # #
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
David P. Eastburn (1976, June 8). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19760609_david_p_eastburn
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19760609_david_p_eastburn,
author = {David P. Eastburn},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1976},
month = {Jun},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19760609_david_p_eastburn},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}