speeches · April 8, 1973
Regional President Speech
David P. Eastburn · President
by
David P. Eastburn, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
before the
PHILADELPHIA MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION
Union League, Philadelphia, Pa
April 9, 1973 - 5:30 p.m.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The economy is now in its third year of expansion following
the last recession. Recently the expansion has reached boom propor
tions. Retail sales are 14 percent above a year ago. Auto sales are
setting new records. Unfilled jobs are twice what they were a year ago.
Many industries, notably autos, rubber, paper, petroleum, and nonferrous
metals are operating near capacity. Inflationary fears are intensifying
and some forecasters are saying that what goes up must come down — the
boom of f73 will turn into the bust of f74. They insert between the words
"boom" and "bust11 the word "crunch".
We have a boom. The prospects of a crunch and bust strike me
as too pessimistic, but there are some arguments going for them. What
Ifd like to do tonight is look at these prospects and assess their prob
ability of occurring.
The Cyclical Setting
A business expansion can last months or years, depending on the
underlying forces at work in the economy. Is the current expansion about
spent or does it still have some life in it?
Once in motion, an expansion is a cumulative set of forces — *
each feeding into the other. Typically, an industry you1re close to —
housing — plays an early role. During a recession, funds usually flow
into thrift institutions because market interest rates are low and there
are ample funds around. Housing starts to accelerate. Also, usually,
Government gives the economy a boost by running large deficits.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Then the forces of expansion begin to spread out. Salesmen
find new orders are not quite as hard to get. Factory shipments pick
up and inventories begin to edge down. Production schedules are speeded
up. New workers are hired. Consumer confidence improves and retail cash
registers ring more frequently. Businessmen start thinking about expand
ing their plants and buying new equipment. And so on and on as the econ
omy gains still more momentum. Meanwhile, as credit demands increase with
the pace of economic activity, interest rates rise. Also, as demand picks
up, inflationary pressures intensify.
Then what happens? Does the expansion roar on and burn itself
out by its own momentum? Or, does the expansion settle down to a more
sustainable pace and last awhile? As I look ahead, I think this expansion
has a lot of life in it. Forces are at work that will slow the economy
down, a slowing that is welcome if the excesses that ultimately lead to a
recession are to be avoided.
Slowing, But No Recession f73-y74
Again, an industry you1re close to — housing — will play a
pivotal role. As interest rates rise, thrift institutions should become
less attractive to savers. The flow of funds into savings and loan asso
ciations and mutual savings banks will tend to slow. In fact, some net
drain could occur before this year is out. Thrift institutions, then, will
begin to cut back on mortgage commitments and in time construction should
slow. In effect, housing, which gave a shove to the economy when general
business activity was slack, should be providing a drag on the economy.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Some tempering in the torrid pace of retail sales also seems
likely during the next year. Consumers tend to spend in spurts on things
like automobiles and other hard goods. Then they try to catch their
breaths and pay down some of their debts. They get worried about over
spending and concerned about inflation. We are already seeing some signs
of consumer anxiety and we probably will see more as the year unfolds.
But itfs important to distinguish between a slowdown in the pace "Of spend
ing and the level of consumer spending. What Ifm talking about is a slow
down in pace, not the level.
Elsewhere in the economv, however, itfs difficult to forecast
much of a slowdown, at least this year. Business profits are heading for
new records and the outlook for capital spending is bullish. Corporations
are using their cash flow to finance expansion, acquire cost-saving equip
ment, and invest in plants that are less pollution-prone.
A particularly favorable aspect of the current cycle has been
the tendency for businessmen to watch their inventories more closely.
Businessmen often have overreacted to rising sales by overbuilding inven
tories. They then try to let sales run ahead of production to get inven
tories back into line. Production workers are laid off, spend less, sales
go down and so on. This sequence of events has frequently been enough to
trip the economy into a recession — a so-called "inventory recession."
During the current expansion, however, inventory accumulation has
not run ahead of sales. In fact, there has been some tendency for inven
tories not to keep up with sales. Managers, through better inventory
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
control, seem to have gone a long way in taming the inventory cycle. The
importance of this for the next year is that business probably will not
have to cut back inventory spending because of past excesses, and this
greatly reduces the risk of a recession.
As far as Government spending is concerned, the outlook is for
increases at both the state and local and the Federal level. I'm inclined
to think, however, that the President will succeed on the whole in holding
down Federal spending so that the high-employment budget will move from a
stimulating to a neutral or restraining position. This means that in total
the Government sector should be a much less dominant factor in the outlook
than it has been.
In summary, the shape of the economy looks like this for the
months ahead: a slowing in housing, some moderation in the pace of con
sumer spending, but considerable strength in business spending. On balance,
then, the booming economy of recent months should moderate to more sustain
able growth rates in the coming months. And the unemployment rate, now
around 5 percent, should drop into the 4.5 to 5.0 percent range during the
next year. In short, I don't see the ingredients for a bust in '74.
Inflation - A Major Threat
I haven't talked about inflation yet, not because it isn't a prob
lem, but because I wanted to get the good news out first. The outlook for
inflation is discomforting. Food prices, of course, have risen in giant
leaps. Agricultural experts predict some relief during the second half of
the year, and any relief would be welcome. But more fundamentally, we're
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
heading into the part of the business cycle which is inflation-prone.
For one thing, productivity gains will tend to taper off. For another,
wage rates will tend to go up as skilled labor becomes harder to get.
And businesses always find it easier to mark up prices when sales are
strong and productive capacity is running full steam. Add to these
"normal" reasons for price pressures the fact that most people have come
to regard inflation as a way of life — something inevitable. Phase III
is supposed to counter these inflationary expectations, and it may still
succeed in doing this. But at least for the moment the public still has
to be convinced that Phase III will be successful. The danger is that
they will build their inflationary expectations into wage contracts,
lending contracts, real estate contracts, and so on across the economic
spectrum.
So, the threat of inflation is a dark cloud on the horizon. Both
demand-pull pressures of economic expansion and cost-push forces stemming
from inflationary expectations will be with us during the coming months.
Interest Rates, Credit Crunch, and Monetary Policy
With inflation becoming the major threat to the domestic economy,
the Federal Reserve has adjusted its policies. Typically, the Fed is more
generous with funds during the early phases of a business expansion an 1 less
generous with funds when the economy is growing rapidly and nearing capacity.
So, in recent months the Fed has tried to slow the growth in the money supply
from the fairly rapid growth rate of last year. In addition to the Fedfs
"snugging up", businesses and consumers have increased their demands for
funds and the result has been rising interest rates, particularly short-term
rates.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Rising interest rates are a normal outgrowth of a business ex
pansion. If the Federal Reserve pumped enough credit into the economy
to keep interest rates from rising, the result could be an inflationary
explosion in 1974 and 1975. At the same time, however, the Fed has to be
careful not to be overly restrictive in supplying funds to the economy,
Being too stingy, too fast, could precipitate a credit crunch.
One of the major ingredients of past crunches has been a fairly
abrupt and extreme tightening of monetary policy. A more gradual and less
drastic tightening of monetary policy considerably reduces the risks of a
crunch. But a gradual tightening requires more foresight. My reading of
monetary policy is that the tightening was started early enough to avoid
very severe restriction later on.
This pattern of policy reflects lessons learned in the 1960’s.
That period demonstrated that the Fed cannot counteract all the inflationary
pressures that may be at work. If it tries to do so, it has to pull back on
the money reins so sharply that a crunch and recession may result. In my
judgment, this is unlikely to happen in 1973.
There could still be tightness in the mortgage market, however.
As market interest rates rise, funds are diverted away from thrift institu
tions to higher yields elsewhere. How much disintermediation occurs depends
partly on the level of interest rate ceilings on deposits. It is ironical
that although interest ceilings have often been designed to help housing,
if they make it more difficult for thrift institutions to attract funds,
they end up by depressing housing.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
A recent Staff Study by the Federal Reserve System has succinct
ly summed up the issue:
These ceiling rates have adverse effects on
economic efficiency and they result in an inequitable
treatment of small savers who do not have the finan
cial sophistication, or the amounts of funds neces
sary, to invest directly in market securities. These
ceilings have outlived their usefulness. Steps should
be taken to permit free competition in the markets for
consumer savings.^
A similar argument can also be made for the ceiling on mortgages
in Pennsylvania. If mortgage lenders can’t attract funds because they can't
afford to pay savers the going rate, there won’t be many mortgages. A
citizen might well ask: What good is a low mortgage rate on a loan I can’t
get?
The outlook for housing, therefore, will depend, once more,
partly on what is done with interest ceilings on savings. If these are
held at restrictive levels we may again see a phenomenon of recent years -
efforts of the Federally sponsored credit agencies to support the flow of
mortgage money. For example, according to the Federal Reserve Staff Study
”... the Federal Credit agencies were supplying directly or indirectly
through FHLB advances, more than 40 percent of the net funds borrowed to
finance housing in 1969 and 35 percent in 1970.”^ Here is another factor
that can modify an impending squeeze in the mortgage market.
^"Federal Reserve Staff Study: Ways to Moderate Fluctuation in Housing
Construction, p. 36.
2Ibid, p. 13.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Conclusion
To sum up, I see a continuation of the business expansion into
*74, but at a slower and healthier pace. Chances of a recession seem to
me to be on the small sidee But continued prosperity brings with it its
own set of problems — rising interest rates and rising prices. It also
raises the spectre of credit crunches. This time around, however, I
think we have a leg up on avoiding a credit crunch generally, and in
mitigating to soiua extent the effects of a restrictive monetary policy
on housing in particular.
4/9/73
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
David P. Eastburn (1973, April 8). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19730409_david_p_eastburn
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19730409_david_p_eastburn,
author = {David P. Eastburn},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1973},
month = {Apr},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19730409_david_p_eastburn},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}