speeches · October 15, 1968
Regional President Speech
W. Braddock Hickman · President
LIBRARY-FEDERAL Lexington, Kentucky
RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND October 16, 1968
W. BraddocklHickman
Business Roundup
I have been asked -- I suppose "told" would be the more descrip
tive word -- to be the leadoff man in this evening's program. In prepar
ing my remarks, I was reminded of the story about a leadoff speaker who
had a similar assignment. As the story goes, the speaker was told that
his remarks should be designed to serve the function of a lamp post for a
drunkard: the speech should provide support but not illumination. In the
few minutes available to me, I shall attempt to provide some support for
the distinguished speakers scheduled to follow me. And if I'm successful,
perhaps I'll provide a little bit of illumination, too.
Since the middle of the year, many of us have waited impatiently
for signs that the economy was slowing down from the frenetic pace of
the recent past. As you all know, at midyear, in response to President
Johnson's repeated requests, the Congress passed legislation that imposed
a surtax on personal and corporate incomes and a ceiling on Federal
spending. The fiscal restraint program was specifically designed to
"cool off" the economy, which had been expanding at an excessive and
inflationary pace over the previous year or so. Thus far, the effects of
fiscal restraint have been modest at best. Nevertheless, I think there
are now clear cut indications that fiscal restraint is beginning to take hold.
In the third quarter of this year, which ended just two weeks ago,
$18 billion,
xxxssiiriaxkeotksi C-NP increased by/£SB0^&Kx>&KS^^s^x^:$4:5§q5:¥x$}<&
Page 2
WKSKx at a seasonally adjusted annual rate. The implications of this
amount of increase should be considered very carefully. For one thing,
an $18 billion
taken by itself, ao$i^®£4^iiiN5SK quarterly gain in GNP represents a
very healthy rate of advance. Moreover, the gain was considerably larger
than most of us had generally expected earlier. Only a month or so ago,
for example, most competent observers were predicting a third quarter
increase in GNP in the order of $10 to $12 billion. The unpredictable
behavior of the consumer is the major reason that the economy was
stronger than expected. Confronted with higher taxes, consumers
reduced their rate of saving and took on additional debt to finance an
exceptionally high volume of spending.
Nonetheless, viewed against the earlier inflationary pace, the $iS $18
7§xx$:krf billion increase in GNP in the third quarter was 3i<grdxx3sntiy below
the $22 billion increase recorded in the second quarter. More importantly,
there was evidence that the economy was less ebullient as the third
quarter came to a close than it was when the quarter opened at midyear,
thus suggesting the moderating tendencies that I referred to earlier. At
our bank, we expect the slower pace of economic activity now in train to
continue through the rest of this year and into early 1969. To be more
.-specific, we expect that GNP will increase less in the fourth quarter
$18
($11 billion) than in the third quarter ($:>§x$^ billion), and still less in
the first quarter of 1969 ($7 billion) than in the fourth quarter of 1968.
We then anticipate renewed strength in the economy, and expect that in
-Page 3
the second half of 1969, the economy once again will be moving smartly
and vigorously upward.
Given this expected pattern, I am less concerned about recession
than inflation: The real threat to our economy seems to me to be "underkill"
rather than overkill". That is, the primary concern is whether the
economy will slow down sufficiently to allow us to achieve the objectives
of the fiscal package enacted in June, namely, to curtail inflation and
restore balanced and sustainable economic growth.
In view of the great uncertainties that lie ahead, it will not be an
easy task to achieve balanced and sustainable economic growth. These
uncertainties include, among other things: the results and implications
of the national election; the uncertainty of the outcome in Vietnam; the
uncertainty about international developments in Eastern Europe, the
Middle East, and elsewhere; and the recurring uncertainties about the
actual course of Federal government spending, in view of all of the other
uncertainties on the domestic and international fronts. In an environment
of such monumental uncertainties, it is difficult’-- in fact, it is foolhardy_
to attempt to project with great precision the expected path and performance
of the economy or to attempt to fine tune the economy through minor
adjustments in the monetary-fiscal policy mix.
One thing, however, seems to me to be very clear: our most
important economic task in the period ahead is to arrest the inflationary
forces that have run roughshod in the economy in the past year or so.
Page 4
The international position of the United States --in particular, our foreign
trade situation -- demands that we curb these inflationary forces; and our
domestic economy requires it, in order to prevent the emergence of
additional inequities, distortions, and imbalances in the economy.
If we fail to stop the inflation, and fail to anesthetize the inflationary
psychology now deeply imbedded in the thinking of consumers and business
men generally, then we run the serious risk of returning to a "boom and
bust" cycle at home and a complete deterioration of the dollar in world
markets. The cost of failure is far greater than the price of a moderate
dose of preventive medicine to counter inflation.
For this reason, I would hope that the Federal Reserve will keep a
moderately firm rein on monetary policy, that the Federal government
will continue to seek ways to reduce unnecessary expenditures, and that
the mix of fiscal and monetary policy will not be eased until the back of
inflation is finally broken. For the same reason, I would hope, also, that
the new Administration and the new Congress will exercise prudent restraint
in designing programs for the years ahead. In addition to all of this, we
will need the cooperation of leaders, like yourselves, to hold the line
within reasonable bounds in the matter of prices and wages, wherever and
whenever possible. A major effort of everyone -- in the Federal Reserve,
in Government, in business, in agriculture, and elsewhere -- will be
required to eradicate inflation from our economic life, and to restore
moderate, balanced, and sustainable economic growth. The job can be
done, provided we all cooperate.in the task.
Cite this document
APA
W. Braddock Hickman (1968, October 15). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19681016_w_braddock_hickman
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19681016_w_braddock_hickman,
author = {W. Braddock Hickman},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1968},
month = {Oct},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19681016_w_braddock_hickman},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}