speeches · December 7, 1965
Regional President Speech
W. Braddock Hickman · President
From: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Tel: 241-2800
"THE FEDERAL RESERVE -- ITS ROLE IN TODAY'S BANKING"
By W. Braddock Hickman, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
(Following is the complete text of a talk to be given
by Mr, Hickman at the annual Executive Bankers
Conference sponsored by the Ohio Bankers Association
at the Neil House, Columbus, Ohio, on Wednesday
afternoon, December 8, 1965. About 200 of the state's
leading bankers are expected to be in attendance)
RELEASE: WEDNESDAY PMs, and After, December 8, 1965
Today, perhaps more than ever before in its 51 years of operation, the
Federal Reserve System is subject to intense scrutiny and review. Let me assure
you that we in the System are fully aware of our responsibilities to you, the bankers,
as well as to the public in general. We welcome all fair-minded and objective
criticisms of our organization and its operations. At the same time, if you think
we are doing a good job, then we deserve your active support.
The basic purpose of the Federal Reserve System is to insure that the money
and credit needs of the economy are met in a stable, orderly manner.
As the fountainhead of bank credit, the System would like to have everyone
enj°y the benefits that flow from an efficient and effective banking system in current
with the tides of our economic life.
more
-2-
Some of these benefits are shared by all banks, whether they are members
of the Federal Reserve System or not. These include benefits derived from an
elastic currency, a well-developed money market, improved methods of handling
government funds, and nationwide facilities for check clearing and collection.
The benefits of membership in the Federal Reserve System are of two types
one, tangible or dollars-and-cents values, and two, intangible values. In my
opinion, the most important benefit of membership in the System is an intangible
one -- the sense of prestige and satisfaction derived from being a part of a public
service institution dedicated to the support and development of a sound banking
system responsive to the needs of the public.
Perhaps the most important tangible benefit of membership in the Federal
Reserve System is the privilege of borrowing at the discount window --to cover
emergency needs for credit. In using the discount window, member banks may
borrow on U. S. Government securities, may rediscount their commercial paper,
or may pledge practically any other sound collateral.
Most country banks, of course, have well-established correspondent
relationships with large city banks and look to them for normal credit needs (for
which, incidentally, they are required to maintain compensating balances). But in
the absence of a Federal Reserve System, what would happen should emergency
needs for cash arise?
more
-3-
I don't have to remind you of the situation prior to the establishment of the
Federal Reserve System, when seasonal loan demands often caused pressures to
pervade the banking system and individual banks were unable to obtain credit
accommodation --at any price, I might add. A parallel might be drawn from the
recent power "blackout" that occurred in the East: the "overload" of demand for
cash in rural areas cascaded into the big money market banks and the whole network
of banks had a "cash blackout. "
Right now, many city banks are pretty well loaned up. The loan-to-deposit
ratio in some larger banks is running as high as 70 percent. In a situation like
this, where can a bank borrow? The answer is that you can always get a loan from
the Federal Reserve if you are a member bank.
Thus, the availability of Federal Reserve credit in all kinds of economic
weather provides an additional source of funds when needed and an additional
measure of safety. And, as I have indicated, this accessibility of credit from
outside the commercial banking system virtually eliminates any "cascading" effect.
In addition to the privilege of borrowing, various other services are
rendered by the Federal Reserve to its member banks. Just as a reminder, let
me list a few of them:
Shipment of currency and coin to and from the Reserve banks --at the
expense of the Fed.
Wrapping of coin - -at cost. This is a popular service since about
97 percent of the coin the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland ships out is in wrapped
form.
more
-4-
Direct use of the System's check collection service. We pay all the costs
and carry a large volume of float at our own expense, providing free credit to member
banks.
Availability of a rapid nationwide system of transferring funds at no cost
for member banks and at telegram cost for others, and the transferring of Government
securities for a fee paid to the U. S. Treasury.
Safekeeping of securities owned by country member banks, at no charge.
This service includes the clipping of coupons from Government and other securities
and collection and crediting of such coupons as well as maturing bonds to the member
bank's reserve account. We pass credit for coupons promptly on the coupon date and
carry the float until the proceeds are actually collected.
Purchase and sale of U. S. government securities through the Federal
Reserve banks --in this District through our three offices in Cleveland, Pittsburgh
and Cincinnati --at the best price obtainable and again at no charge.
Free informational, research and advisory services.
At the Cleveland bank, our newest service to member banks is the Functional
Cost Analysis Program. This program was introduced for two primary reasons:
one --to provide information needed by the central bank on commercial bank
behavior, and, two, to strengthen bank performance in the Fourth District through
lower costs and increased profits. Many small and intermediate banks have long
felt the need for such a program but, because of limited resources, could not put
it into effect.
more
-5-
At present, on a pilot basis, 119 of the 408 member banks in the District
with deposits of $3 million to $150 million, are participating in this program. The
end product will be an annual confidential cost analysis report for each participating
bank. It will provide information on costs and rates of return in areas such as
consumer credit, mortgage loans, municipal securities, time deposits and the like,
which will permit each bank to compare its income, expenses and earnings with
groups of banks of similar size and deposit structure.
Recently, one of my friends, the president of a large bank in eastern
Kentucky, told me, and I quote -- We think the Functional Cost Analysis Program
sponsored by the Cleveland Fed is wonderful, and we are cooperating fully. Costs
are the acutely critical area in banking today, and we believe this program will
result in substantial savings to our bank -- unquote.
Because this program has been so successful thus far, and because we're
convinced it's a worthwhile and needed service, the Cleveland bank will expand the
service to a larger number of member banks next year.
Speaking of member banks, it is interesting to note that in the Fourth
District, member banks outnumber nonmembers by 504 to 343, although in the
country as a whole nonmembers are in a slight majority. In Ohio, the boxscore
is: member banks, 352; and nonmember, 192.
more
-6-
Member banks hold 88 percent of the total banking resources in the District.
Of the 36 banks in the District with assets totaling more than $100 million, only-
one is a nonmember, and that bank is now considering membership. It is also
significant that a sizable majority of the District's banks with assets of $25 million
or under are members of the System. Of these, 407 are member banks, as
opposed to 323 that are not members.
From these figures it is evident that for a large bank membership in the
System is practically a must. They also more than suggest that membership for
most small banks is highly desirable.
Speaking of the smaller banks, let me cite here another reason why
membership in the Fed is particularly valuable to the country bank. To a very
large degree, membership provides the country bank the same services and
opportunities as the larger city bank, thereby making it equally well equipped to
serve its local trade area.
Now, there is no doubt that nonmember banks -- through their correspondents -
are often able to take advantage of many of the services I have referred to. The
Federal Reserve is, in effect, our largest correspondent bank -- with assets of
about $60 billion -- but nobody is out trying to sell it. We do not attempt to offer
our facilities in competition with commercial banks, and do not attempt to interfere
with correspondent bank relationships.
more
-7-
A state bank contemplating membership in the Federal Reserve System
should clearly understand that such membership does not remove the desirability
of maintaining correspondent bank relationships. And, indeed, the large
correspondent banks should recognize this fact -- that the Fed, rather than
competing with them, is constantly attempting to aid and complement their efforts.
The correspondent banking system is an important part of the independent
competitive banking system in the United States, and the Federal Reserve has no
desire or intention to alter it.
Looking at the other side of the coin, I will be the first to concede that
for some banks the cost of membership may exceed the immediate dollars-and-
cents benefits. Frequently mentioned in this respect are the reserves required
of member banks, in contrast to the nonmember bank reserves that are set by
state laws.
In Ohio, for example, the law provides that nonmember banks must maintain
15 percent of their total demand deposits and 10 percent of their total time and
savings deposits as reserves against those deposits.
Comparable reserve ratios for member banks are: for Reserve City
banks, 16-1/2 percent of net demand deposits and 4 percent of time and savings
deposits, and for country banks, 12 percent of net demand deposits and, again,
4 percent of time and savings deposits.
more
-8-
Nonmember banks, however, are not required to include so-called
hypothecated deposits as deposits against which reserves must be maintained.
On the other hand, member banks must include hypothecated deposits in calculating
reserves because of a longstanding rule of the Board of Governors. I am well aware
that this ruling is controversial and am happy to report to you today that the matter
is under active consideration.
The Ohio law also provides that three-fifths of the 10 percent reserve
against the time and savings deposits of nonmember banks may consist of bonds of
other obligations issued, or guaranteed as to principal and interest, by the United
States government. This, in effect, reduces the non-earning portion of reserves
against time and savings deposits to 4 percent -- exactly the same as the ratio
required of member banks.
The question of competitive inequities between member and nonmember
banks appears to revolve largely around the variety, volume and value of the
services provided by the Federal Reserve as compared with those provided by the
correspondent bank. Any consideration of this problem must take into account the
fact that additional compensating balances may be called for by the correspondent
city bank in rough proportion to cover any increased cost of services to the country
bank. Also to be taken into account are the many services rendered by the Federal
Reserve at no cost to its member banks.
more
-9-
It is sometimes assumed that membership in the System involves additional
costs to banks, particularly smaller ones, but the proof of the pudding is in the
eating. Since most nonmember banks are small rural banks, we should compare
the performance of country member banks with nonmember banks. And here, the
advantage has clearly been with member banks. Country member banks since
1961 have shown a higher ratio of after tax income to capital accounts than their
nonmember counterparts. This, despite the well-known efforts of the Federal
Reserve System to strengthen capital accounts. The same is also true for most
recent years of the ratio of net after tax income to assets, and of net current
earnings to capital accounts and assets.
The figures thus indicate that member banks have fared well in comparison
with nonmembers. But, again, let me remind you that there is more than just the
dollars-and-cents side of the picture.
There are, as I indicated earlier, many intangible elements of prestige
attached to membership in the Federal Reserve System. For one thing,
depositors in a member bank derive a sense of security from the fact that their
funds are being held by a well organized, soundly administered bank, which is
under regular and constant supervision. For another, stockholders, directors
and management should realize that, through System membership, they are a
vital and integral link in a coordinated system working for the furtherance of
sound and effective banking practices in a dynamic economy.
more
-10-
Many bankers believe -- and I am one of them -- that it is only right and
proper for banks to belong to a system dedicated to the economic well-being of
the nation. To those who say, "I have only one bank, so what difference does it
make if I'm not a member of the Federal Reserve System?," we reply: "You
sound like the man who doesn't vote on Election Day because he only has one vote. "
In conclusion, then, the role of the Federal Reserve in our economy
remains essentially what it has been over the years: to provide money and credit
conditions that will help achieve the nation's basic goals -- economic growth, full
employment, stable prices, and equilibrium in the balance of payments. In this
task, we need the help of a vigorous commercial banking system, which, with
the aid of the Federal Reserve, can satisfactorily discharge its responsibilities
and obligations to the general public.
No one, and certainly not I, will claim that the Federal Reserve System
has been, or is now, perfect. However, as an institution manned by fallible
individuals who carry very heavy responsibilities, I think the System on balance
has done a commendable job.
Let me just add parenthetically that the Federal Reserve's role is not
always a popular one, to say the least, particularly in the area of monetary
policy. As William McChesney Martin, Jr. , chairman of our Board of Governors,
once put it: "The Fed is always the one who takes away the punch just when the
party's getting good."
more
-11-
Be that as it may, we try to do our job in the best way that we know how.
With your support --as well as that of all the banks -- small, medium, and
large -- member and nonmember -- we will continue to work towards achieving
the type of monetary policy and the type of banking system that are most
consistent with the nation's economic goals.
# # #
Cite this document
APA
W. Braddock Hickman (1965, December 7). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19651208_w_braddock_hickman
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19651208_w_braddock_hickman,
author = {W. Braddock Hickman},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1965},
month = {Dec},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19651208_w_braddock_hickman},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}