speeches · May 5, 1959
Regional President Speech
Karl R. Bopp · President
FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY:
(Approximately 11:00 a.m., EDT,
Wednesday, May 6, 1959.)
THE ROLE OF MONETARY POLICY IN A GROWING ECONOMY
By Karl R. Bopp
President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Annual Meeting
Health Insurance Association of America
Morning Session, Wednesday, May 6, 1959
Bellevue-Stratford Hotel, Philadelphia, Pa.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THE ROLE OF MONETARY POLICY IN A GROWING ECONOMY
By Karl R. Bopp
That economic growth is desirable few would deny. Without growth our
increasing population would face rising unemployment and a declining standard of
living. The growth record of the United States has been remarkably good. It has
been growth — not our original endowment — that has provided the people of the
United States with the highest standard of living in the world. Until recently,
growth was taken for granted. It was not a specific objective of economic policy.
Interest in economic growth has been intensified by the recent announce
ment of Russia's progress and plans for the future and by the persistence of un
employment despite widespread recovery in business activity. The first is widely
interpreted as a threat to our security. The second arouses our sympathy for
those still unable to find jobs, and highlights the need for continued growth if
we are to maintain reasonably full employment. Before going into the role of
monetary policy, I want to make a few observations about growth and indicate some
of the principal factors influencing it.
Growth in what sense?
What kind of growth do we want? We can easily increase the dollar value
of goods and services by inflating the money supply and prices. But this does not
give us more goods and services to enjoy. We can have more to consume only by
producing a larger physical volume of goods and services. A rising standard of
living requires a more rapid increase in output than in population to provide more
goods and services per capita.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-2 -
In seeking growth, we are surely concerned with more than merely
increasing the aggregate of goods and services produced. We want the right mix —
the kinds and quantities of goods and services that people want. But this means
that as wants change, labor and other resources need to be shifted from producing
goods for vihich there is a decreasing demand to producing those for which there
is growing demand. A growing economy in uhich the consumer is king is one of
change. New products and services cause some industries to expand; obsolescence
and shrinking demand cause others to decline.
As a final observation, we should consider economic growth not in
isolation but in relation to the other things we want our economic system to
provide. For example, do we want growth at the expense of freedom? A totalitarian
state such as Russia can increase its rate of growth by diverting labor and other
resources to the production of plant, machinery, and equipment. Capital equipment
is increased at the expense of consumer goods. Its people are forced to save.
Undoubtedly, such forced saving will accelerate their rate of growth, at least for
a time. But I doubt that we would maintain the flexibility and incentives for
efficiency needed to sustain a high rate of growth if we adopted a controlled and
coerced system. Such a system may make a good showing in the hundred-yard dash
but fare badly in the marathon. I, for one, believe we should seek growth within
the framework of a free society.
Major factors influencing growth.
Economic growth is compounded of many ingredients. The rate of growth
is influenced significantly by the character of the people and by the economic
and social environment in which they live and work. Before attempting to appraise
the contribution that monetary or other economic policies can make, we should first
take a look at some of the fundamental forces influencing economic growth.
One that is often overlooked — perhaps because it is so simple — is
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
the intensity of people's desire for material goods and services: homes, auto
mobiles, clothing, refrigerators, education, a weekend at the shore, etc. An
official of the central bank in West Germany, asked for an explanation of his
country's remarkable economic progress in the postwar period, replied: "The
answer is simple* The people wanted goods they had been deprived of for years
and they were willing to work hard to get them." An intense desire for goods and
services in this country has been a powerful force stimulating demand and in providing
the resources necessary to produce them*
Research and technological advances have contributed much to our economic
progress* Research is the source of new products and new and improved methods of
production* In many of our newer industries, such as electronics, missiles,
plastics and synthetic fibers, a large part of current sales consists of products
not produced ten years ago* The productivity of labor has risen markedly mainly
because of the inceasing quantity and improved quality of plant and machinery used
in production*
Technological progress, however, requires an increasing volume of saving
and investment* We must abstain from consuming all of our current output in order
that a part of our productive resources may be employed in producing machinery and
equipment. A relatively high rate of saving and investment is thus essential for
sustained growth. This raises a basic question* As our material standard of living
rises, how much current consumption should we forego in order that we and our children
may have even more goods and services to consume in the future?
Mobility of resources is another factor influencing the rate of economic
growth. As already mentioned, a growing economy is dynamic. Consumer wants are
constantly changing, resulting in declining demand for some products and increasing
demand for others• Technological innovations create a demand for new machines but
render the old obsolete. The short-run effect may be reduced output, unemployment,
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
and a loss on investments in the old and declining industries. There is need
for more labor and more capital, however, to produce the products in greater
demand and the improved machines which render older ones obsolete. The temporary
losses suffered by workers and investors in declining industries are the price we
pay for the privilege of buying the goods of our choice, and the long-run gains
in productivity derived from improved machinery and technological advances.
Unemployment compensation is a method of having society, which gains, bear part of
the costs of those displaced, who lose in the process. Short-run losses are less
and gains are greater the more promptly labor and capital are shifted from declining
to growing industries.
Progress requires mobility, but a desire for security inspires efforts
to maintain the status quo. To protect investments and jobs, those adversely
affected by changing wants and technological advances may resist the introduction
of new machines and improved technology. Often they appeal to government for
programs to support declining products and industries. For example, the farm
price-support program, although aimed at protecting farm income, has delayed the
shifting of some of our labor and other resources to the production of goods for
which there is a stronger demand. We should recognize that policies which tend
to postpone the shifting of resources from the production of goods in lesser demand
to those in greater demand retard our rate of economic growth.
In this connection, I would like to cite part of an editorial that
appeared in the May 1, 1959 issue of THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE;
"THE QUESTION is thus one of technological change. Much of the
present unemployment is the result of advances in technology, and the
problem of young workers in the mid-1960*s pointed out by Commissioner
Clague is also the result of the same causes.
"Where the approach to unemployment must come then is through
adjusting to our changing society. Federal programs aimed at retrain
ing workers so they can take the new jobs that advances in technology
are opening up are all to the good. Probably far more important are
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-5-
programs to extend the training of this rising group of young workers
so they will be able to fill the new jobs that are opening up. Other
wise the nation may be faced with a severe labor shortage in skilled
work categories coupled with substantial unemployment in the lower
ranks,
"Efforts that are directed at protecting workers' jobs through
restoring past conditions may be partially successful for a time,
but the basic problems they are meant to deal with will not disappear
that easily* The answers must be found in adjusting to technological
change rather than in resisting it, and Commissioner Clague points
out there will be millions of unemployed young people testifying to
the truth of this statement in the mid-1960»s if nothing is done about
it now."
Role of monetary policy.
It is obvious that monetary policy does not directly affect several of
the basic factors which determine our long-run rate of growth. An easy-money
policy, for example, does not increase the number of scientists or the flow of
discoveries emanating from their laboratories; stimulate technological advances;
or increase the willingness of laborers and entrepreneurs to shift from one indus
try to another. The principal contribution of monetary policy is indirect — in
helping maintain an economic environment favorable to growth.
History shows that our rate of economic growth has not been steady. It
has come in spurts — periods of expansion in total output and employment followed
by periods of stability or even decline. This has led many to characterize ours
as a "boom and bust economy." Our problem is to try to smooth out these fluctua
tions in order to achieve sustained instead of sporadic growth.
Avoiding booms and recessions is mainly a problem of keeping total spend
ing in balance with the amount of goods and services available for people to buy.
Too much spending and too few goods tend to push up prices and generate a boom;
too little demand and spending slow production and lead to recession.
One of the principal reasons that total money demand tends to get out
of balance with the total supply of goods and services is the use of credit.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-6-
Credit is a means of spending tomorrow's income for today's purchases.
A rise in business activity and employment is usually accompanied by
strong demands for credit. Businessmen, expecting sales to increase, borrow to
build up inventories and to expand their plant and equipment. Consumers, with
employment prospects bright, borrow to buy homes, automobiles, and other durable
goods. As production begins to press against capacity, however, credit expansion
tends to finance higher prices — not more production. Once prices begin to rise
there is an additional incentive to borrow and buy now in order to avoid paying
a higher price later* If unrestrained, credit expansion may create an inflation
ary boom which sooner or later ends in a recession.
Credit contraction also tends to intensify a slump in business activity
and employment. When times are bad, businessmen and consumers are reluctant to
borrow. Debt repayments usually exceed new borrowing. A part of current income
is used to pay for yesterday's purchases. Thus credit contraction tends to
reduce demand and bring a further decline in production and employment.
The Federal Reserve System, which is responsible for formulating and
implementing monetary policy, tries to regulate credit and the money supply in
such a way that they contribute neither to rising prices and an inflationary boom
nor to a recession and falling prices. Specifically, Federal Reserve policies and
actions are directed toward keeping the price level stable, and maintaining business
stability at high levels of production, employment and income. Policies and actions
designed to achieve these objectives are generally consistent with fostering sus
tained economic growth.
Reasonable price stability, although not sufficient, is essential for
sustained economic growth. Rising prices induce waste and inefficiency, and divert
energy and resources from production to speculation. Entrepreneurs strive to in
crease output* There is little inducement to increase efficiency and cut costs*
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
There is an incentive to buy before prices rise further — to accumulate inven
tories and expand plant capacity. Time and energy are diverted from production
to speculation. An inflationary boom creates distortions and maladjustments
which undermine growth. The inevitable result is a slump in business activity
and employment while excesses such as top-heavy inventories and excess plant
capacity are corrected.
Palling prices, until recently characteristic of recessions, tend to
aggravate the decline in production and employment. Businessmen and consumers,
expecting lower prices, tend to defer purchases. Reduced demand brings a further
drop in production, employment, and incomes, so that the decline tends to feed
on itself.
In the postwar period, prices have risen in periods of expansion but
have not declined during periods of recession. These recurring periods of rising
prices not offset by declines during recession had led many to believe that the
long-run trend of prices is upward — that creeping inflation is inevitable.
Some advocate slowly rising prices as a means of stimulating fuller use of our
resources. Others think creeping inflation is a necessary and relatively small
price to pay for a more rapid rate of growth.
I cannot accept these views. Creeping inflation is inimical to sustained
economic growth. History clearly demonstrates that depreciation in the purchasing
power of money, if long continued, becomes a strong deterrent to saving. Vihy
should one abstain from consumption in order to accumulate savings deposits, savings
and loan shares, savings bonds, or any other fixed-income obligation which is expected
to shrink gradually in real value. An increase in the price level of 3 per cent
annually would reduce the buying power of the dollar by one-half in less than
25 years. This shrinkage in the value of savings, pensions, life insurance, and
other fixed-income obligations is not only inequitable, it dries up one of the
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-8-
principal sources of financing the improved plants and machinery so essential for
increased productivity and real growth
Gradual erosion in the buying power of money also stimuletes efforts to
hedge against its adverse effects. Workers demand escalator clauses in wage con
tracts providing for automatic wage increases as prices rise* Investors favor
common stocks, real estate, raw materials ,— investments vhich tend to appreciate
in value as the value of money declines* Widespread efforts to hedge against the
ravages of inflation accelerate the rate of price increase. History offers no
hope that creeping inflation, once widely accepted and expected, could long be
held to a creep.
The objective of keeping the total volume of business activity stable
at high levels of production and employment is also consistent with maintaining
a high average rate of growth. Attempts to maintain production and employment at
maximum levels without regard to price stability may stimulate a higher rate of
growth for a short time; but the resulting boom and distortions will eventually
bring recession and a lower volume of production and employment. For the long
pull, policies designed to prevent both unsustainable booms and recessions will
result in a higher average rate of growth.
Limitations of monetary policy.
Recent developments illustrate the complex forces that limit the achieve
ments of monetary policy. A year ago prices were still rising even though business
activity and employment had declined. Today we have a vigorous, widespread rise in
business activity, with total output and income already veil above their prerecession
peaks; but unemployment has remained sticky and remains relatively high.
These developments, as you probably know, have led to renewed discussions of
Federal Reserve policy. As the System observed the vigor and breadth of the
expansion in business Activity, it shifted gradually from the policy of ease that
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-9-
had been appropriate during the recession. Some critics have felt that the
policy of ease should have been continued until output was near capacity and
unemployment reduced to a "normal" level.
Before I analyze these two views, I should like to clear up a misunder
standing. The misunderstanding is that Federal Reserve officials are less concerned
about the unemployed than are their critics. Actually, the two views do not reflect
differing degrees of concern over the unemployed. They reflect differences of opinion
as to what monetary policy can do about it. Unemployment is concentrated in a few
of the heavy durable goods industries, such as automobiles and primary metals,
and in mining. The coal regions, for example, have long had a serious unemployment
problem because of the declining demand for ccal and increasing productivity result
ing from mechanization. These pockets of unemployment are largely structural,
reflecting the difficulties of certain industries instead of a deficiency of total
purchasing power. The fact that personal income is at an all-time record is some
evidence that the weak demand for the products of these industries is not caused
by a shortage of money. Furthermore, the sharp increase in productivity which has
accompanied the rise in business activity has retarded absorption of the unemployed.
An easier money policy is not a remedy for such structural unemployment
problems. There is little reason to believe that it would accelerate significantly
the reemployment of those now idle. Adoption of an easy money policy would, however,
involve the risk of sowing the seeds of an inflationary boom which would end in
another recession and more unemployment.
I cite these developments to indicate that monetary policy is only one
of many policies that influence our rate of growth. It is unrealistic to expect
a free economy to operate continually at full capacity and with uninterrupted
growth to ever higher levels of production and employment. Changing wants
inevitably result in some temporary unemployment and idle plant capacity while
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-10-
resources are being shifted. Temporary slumps in business activity arising from
misjudged market prospects — too much inventory, excess plant capacity — are
to be expected. Those responsible for monetary policy can only strive to minimize
and shorten the duration of these temporary interruptions to economic growth.
Concluding remarks.
Monetary policy plays a significant but not a dominant role in determining
our rate of economic growth. Its main contribution is in helping to maintain an
economic environment that is conducive to growth.
Far more important in determining our growth are the choices we the
people make between such alternatives as consumption or saving, work or leisure,
and progress or security.
# # # # #
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Karl R. Bopp (1959, May 5). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19590506_karl_r_bopp
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19590506_karl_r_bopp,
author = {Karl R. Bopp},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1959},
month = {May},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19590506_karl_r_bopp},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}