speeches · April 1, 1954
Regional President Speech
Karl R. Bopp · President
before the Annual Conference of Trust Division.
P.B.A.. Penn Harris Hotel. Harrisburg. Pa.
CURRENT ECONOMIC PICTURE APi£l 2t 1954
by Karl R. Bopp
INTRODUCTION
1. Necessity for looking ahead
2. Impossibility of accurate prediction in human affairs
a. Population
(1) N.S. Pritchett - Washington University mathematician
and astronomer
Method - 3° parabola to census data 1790-1890 -
excellent fit
Forecast - by 2900 U.S. population would = 41 billion
Three errors -
(a) Population growth can be expressed
in mathematical formula
(b) Population function of time only
(c) That shape of formula revealed by
experience 1790-1890
(2) Population projections of 1930’s and 1940’s
Woytinsky’s judgment: "Their projections deserve
a place of honor in the history of statistical
methodology as specimens of unsurpassed skill and
patience. Their only weak point is that they
proved to be false."
Highest estimates for 1952
1937 projection............... 146.8
1943 " ............... 147.3
1947 " ............... 149.3
Actual July 1, 1952 Bur. of Census. 157.0
1947 projection gave "probable1* of 160.6
in 1975- Reached in Sept. 1953
Extrapolated decline in natality in 1920’ s
and 1930’s is permanent.
b. Business prospects
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 2 *
I. Some rough relationships
G.N.P. - all time high of 2nd quar. 1953 $371.4 billion
Consumed (roughly 60%)................... 230.4
Gov‘t (60% of remaining 40% = 23%) . . . . 85.0
Private investment remainder (17%) . . . . 58.5
Net foreign investment ................... - 2.5
II. What has happened in the past year?
A. Method of approach; Systematic
Go from the over-all to the components
B. G.N.P. has declined not over 5%
C. Which major sectors?
1. Last three quarters of 1953 in Private Investment
2. First quarter 1954 in Government Purchases
This may surprise you: You may ask what about the consumer?
D. Personal consumption expenditures
1. Three-fold division
Durables Non-durables Services-Jokers
$30 Ml. $120 bil. $80 bil.
2. vhat has happened to each
Durables down 7-8 % but it is relatively small
Nbn-durabies down 1-2% but it is large
Services up £-9%
3. Total has not changed much - yet.
E. Gross private investment - the big decline in last
three quarters of 1953
1. Three-fold division
New construction Equipment Inventories
2. What has happened to each?
New construction - holding up remarkably well
New durable equipment - also holding up remarkably well
INVENTORIES! from +6.7 to -3*4- A turnaround of $9-10
billion with G.N.P. down $8 billion! in last three ^
quarters of 1953
That is why it has been called an inventory adjustment.
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
3
- -
II. F. Government purchases of goods and services
1 • Two-fold breakdown
Federal State and local
2. Federal gradually getting reductions in military expenditures
At first offset by other expenditures
In first quarter of 1954- & $4-5 billion reduction in total
3. State and local have been increasing at a rate of
$2 billion a year since end of the war
G. Conclusions on where we have come
1. Roughly one can say we have had a decline of roughly
% in over-all level of activity. Quantitatively
one can say this decline is equal roughly to the
turnaround in inventories and to the decline in
defense spending
2. Actually, the picture is more complicated
We have had declines especially in durable consumers
, goods, but also in non-durables, though this has been
almost offset ty the increase in services
Declines in employment and in output have been
widespread through industry
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 4 -
XII. Where do we go from here?
Everyone looking for something
DECISIVE one vay or the other
e.g. Pres. Eisenhower said March is the critical month
March is now over - and the evidence is still inconclusive
Industrial production probably down a bit but rate of decline
less than February down 1 pt.
Non-durables picked up (largely seasonal)
Durables down
especially steel (this week 68%) but probably overdid earlier;
e.g. steel companies lessened inventories but no definite
signs of pick-up in orders
producers* goods
military equipment
New construction
1st two months 1954 highest ever recorded
Inventories
Purchasing agents report substantially larger number of
films have completed their adjustments and 44% are down
Exceptions
Autos - in anticipation of spring pick-up in sales
Unemployment
No labor market now has a shortage
23% of areas have substantial surplus
old estimate up 1.0 to 3*4
new estimate up.0.6 to 3«7
Spending intentions
Plant and equipment (Feb.-Mar. estimate) 27.2
only 4% less than *53
Manufacturers ( Durable goods expect. down 8% from 1953
Expectations ( - to present rate
( Non-durables expect. somewhat higher than
present rate
Consumers Intentions
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 5 -
III. Where do we go from here? (continued)
A. No crystal ball
B. How can we ascertain probable behavior of
consumers, businessmen, and Government?
C. Consumer Finances Survey
1. Plans versus behavior
2. Plans for 1954
3. Plans for 1954-1955
D. Capital Investment Survey
D. of C. 8nd S.E.C.
Plant and equipment in 1954 within 4% of last year -
and most recent more optimistic than earlier
Inventories
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- 6 -
TTI. E. Government - have left till last -
shift from Product to Finance
Eisenhower consolidated cash budget
1953 Estimated
Fiscal years Actual 1954 1955
Receipts 71.3 74-9 70.8
Expenditures 76.6 75.2 70.7
- 5.2 - .2 + .1
Conventional - 9*4 - 3.3 - 2.9
Based on assumption that level of economic
activity will continue as in 1953
Effects of reduced level of activity
1. On income
2. On expenditures
Fiscal 1953
Federal Revenue structure Income taxes
Indiv. income . 33.4 )
55.0
Corp. ........21.6 3
Excise...... 10.0
S.S. & other... 9-5
71
Reduction of, say, $15 in G.N.P.
J in corp. profits = 7.5 i of that in corp. tux 3.75
Personal income tax liability 1.50
S.S. Receipts down - payments up over-all 1.50
Other factors: other Fed.estate taxes down
expenses; support up 1.50
Total........................................... ...8.25
Also Jan. 1 tax reductions..........................4*50
New excise bill.............................. ...1.00
F. Conclusions:
1. It doesn’t seem to me we have yet reached the low point
2. We shall not establish any over-all records in 1954
3. Still 1954 is likely to be our second best year
- somewhere between *52 and *53
4* Some underlying long er—teim strength
Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Cite this document
APA
Karl R. Bopp (1954, April 1). Regional President Speech. Speeches, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19540402_karl_r_bopp
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_regional_speeche_19540402_karl_r_bopp,
author = {Karl R. Bopp},
title = {Regional President Speech},
year = {1954},
month = {Apr},
howpublished = {Speeches, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/regional_speeche_19540402_karl_r_bopp},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}