monetary policy reports · July 17, 2001
Monetary Policy Report
For use at 10:00 a.m., EDT
Wednesday
July 18, 2001
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Monetary Policy Report to the Congress
Pursuant to section 2B of the Federal Reserve Act
July 18, 2001
Letter of Transmittal
BOARDOFGOVERNORSOFTHE
FEDERALRESERVESYSTEM
Washington,D.C.,July18,2001
THEPRESIDENTOFTHESENATE
THESPEAKEROFTHEHOUSEOFREPRESENTATIVES
TheBoardofGovernorsispleasedtosubmititsMonetaryPolicyReporttotheCongress
pursuanttosection2BoftheFederalReserveAct.
Sincerely,
AlanGreenspan,Chairman
Table of Contents
Page
Monetary Policy and the Economic Outlook 1
Economic and Financial Developments in 2001 4
Monetary Policy Report to the Congress
Report submitted to the Congress on July 18, 2001, contained, and prospects for inflation have become
pursuanttosection2BoftheFederalReserveAct less of a concern as rates of resource utilization have
declinedandenergypriceshaveshownsignsofturn-
ingdown.
MONETARY POLICY AND THE Theinformationavailableatmidyearfortherecent
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK performance of both the U.S. economy and some of
our key trading partners remains somewhat down-
When the Federal Reserve submitted its report on beat, on balance. Moreover, with inventories still
monetary policy in mid-February, the Federal Open excessive in some sectors, orders for capital goods
Market Committee (FOMC) had already reduced its verysoft,andtheeffectsoflowerstockpricesandthe
target for the federal funds rate twice to counter weakerjobmarketweighingonconsumers,theecon-
emerging weakness in the economy. As the year has omy may expand only slowly, if at all, for a while
unfolded, the weakness has become more persistent longer. Nonetheless, a number of factors are in place
and widespread than had seemed likely last autumn. thatshouldsetthestageforstrongergrowthlaterthis
The shakeout in the high-technology sector has been year and in 2002. In particular, interest rates have
especially severe, and with overall sales and profits declined since last fall; the lower rates have helped
continuing to disappoint, businesses are curtailing businesses and households strengthen their financial
purchasesofothertypesofcapitalequipmentaswell. positions and should show through to aggregate
The slump in demand for capital goods has also demandincomingquarters.Therecentlyenactedtax
worked against businesses’ efforts to correct the cutsandtheapparentcrestingofenergypricesshould
inventoryimbalancesthatemergedinthesecondhalf also bolster aggregate demand fairly soon. In addi-
oflastyearandhascontributedtosizabledeclinesin tion, as firms at some point become more satisfied
manufacturing output this year. At the same time, with their inventory holdings, the cessation of liqui-
foreign economies have slowed, limiting the demand dation will boost production and, in turn, provide a
forU.S.exports. lifttoemploymentandincomes;asubsequentshiftto
To foster financial conditions that will support inventory accumulation in association with the pro-
strengthening economic growth, the FOMC has low- jected strengthening in demand should provide addi-
ered its target for the federal funds rate four times tional impetus to production. Moreover, with no
since February, bringing the cumulative decline this apparent sign of abatement in the rapid pace of
year to 23⁄
4
percentage points. A number of factors technologicalinnovation,theoutlookforproductivity
spurred this unusually steep reduction in the federal growth over the longer run remains favorable. The
fundsrate.Inparticular,theslowdowningrowthwas efficiency gains made possible by these innovations
rapid and substantial and carried considerable risks should spur demand for the capital equipment that
that the sluggish performance of the economy in the embodies the new technologies once the overall eco-
first half of this year would persist. Among other nomic situation starts to improve and should support
things, the abruptness of the slowing, by jarring consumption by leading to solid increases in real
consumer and business confidence, raised the possi- incomesovertime.
bility of becoming increasingly self-reinforcing were Eventhoughanappreciablerecoveryinthegrowth
households and businesses to postpone spending of economic activity by early next year seems the
while reassessing their situations. In addition, other mostlikelyoutcome,thereisasyetnohardevidence
financial developments, including a higher foreign that this improvement is in train, and the situation
exchangevalueofthedollar,lowerequityprices,and remains very uncertain. In these circumstances, the
tighter lending terms and standards at banks, were FOMC continues to believe that the risks are
tending to restrain aggregate demand and thus were weighted toward conditions that may generate eco-
offsetting some of the influence of the lower federal nomic weakness in the foreseeable future. At the
funds rate. Finally, despite some worrisome readings same time, the FOMC recognizes the importance of
earlyintheyear,priceincreasesremainedfairlywell sustainingtheenvironmentoflowinflationandwell-
2 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
Selectedinterestrates
Percent
7.0
Intended federal funds rate
Ten-year Treasury 6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
Discount rate
4.5
Two-year Treasury 4.0
3.5
2/3 3/30 5/18 6/30 8/24 10/5 11/16 12/21 2/3 3/21 5/16 6/28 8/22 10/3 11/1512/191/3 1/31 3/20 4/185/15 6/27
1999 2000 2001
Note. ThedataaredailyandextendthroughJuly12,2001.Thedatesonthehorizontalaxis
arethoseofscheduledFOMCmeetingsandofanyintermeetingpolicyactions.
anchored inflation expectations that enabled the Fed- The timing and size of the cut in the target rate
eral Reserve to react rapidly and forcefully to the seemed to ease somewhat the concerns of financial
slowing in real GDP growth over the past several marketparticipantsaboutthelonger-termoutlookfor
quarters.When,astheFOMCexpects,activitybegins theeconomy.EquitypricesgenerallyroseinJanuary,
to firm, the Committee will continue to ensure that risk spreads on lower-rated corporate bonds nar-
financial conditions remain consistent with holding rowed significantly, and the yield curve steepened.
inflation in check, a key requirement for maximum However,incomingdataoverthemonthrevealedthat
sustainablegrowth. the slowing in consumer and business spending late
last year had been sizable. Furthermore, a sharp ero-
sion in survey measures of consumer confidence, a
Monetary Policy, Financial Markets, backupofinventories,andasteepdeclineincapacity
and the Economy over the First Half of 2001 utilization posed the risk that spending could remain
depressed for some time. In light of these develop-
By the time of the FOMC meeting on December 19, ments, the FOMC at its scheduled meeting on Janu-
2000, it had become evident that economic growth ary 30 and 31 cut its target for the federal funds rate
had downshifted considerably, but the extent of that another1⁄
2
percentagepoint,to51⁄
2
percent,andstated
slowing was only beginning to come into focus. At that it continued to judge the risks to be weighted
that meeting, the FOMC concluded that the risks to mainlytowardeconomicweakness.
the economy in the foreseeable future had shifted to The information reviewed by the FOMC at its
being weighted mainly toward conditions that may meetingonMarch20suggestedthateconomicactiv-
generate economic weakness and that economic and ity continued to expand, but slowly. Although con-
financial developments could warrant further close sumer spending seemed to be rising moderately and
review of the stance of policy well before the next housing had remained relatively firm, stock prices
scheduled meeting. Subsequent data indicated that had declined substantially in February and early
holiday retail sales had come in below expectations March, and reduced equity wealth and lower con-
and that conditions in the manufacturing sector had sumer confidence had the potential to damp house-
deteriorated. Corporate profit forecasts had also been holdspendinggoingforward.Moreover,manufactur-
marked down, and it seemed possible that the result- ing output had contracted further, as businesses
ing decline in equity values, along with the expense continued to work down their excess inventories and
of higher energy costs, could damp future business cut back on capital equipment expenditures. In addi-
investment and household spending. In response, the tion, economic softness abroad raised the likelihood
FOMC held a telephone conference on January 3, of a weakening in U.S. exports. Core inflation had
2001, and decided to reduce the target federal funds picked up a bit in January, but some of the increase
rate 1⁄
2
percentage point, to 6 percent, and indicated reflected the pass-through of a rise in energy prices
that the risks to the outlook remained weighted that was unlikely to continue, and the FOMC judged
towardeconomicweakness. thattheslowdowninthegrowthofaggregatedemand
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 3
would ease inflationary pressures on labor and other interest rates on longer-term Treasuries and on
resources.Accordingly,theFOMConMarch20low- higher-quality private securities declined, some risk
ered its target for the federal funds rate another spreads widened, and stock prices fell as financial
1⁄
2
percentage point, to 5 percent. The members also market participants trimmed their expectations for
continuedtoseetheriskstotheoutlookasremaining economic activity and profits. When the FOMC met
weighted mainly toward economic weakness. Fur- on June 26 and 27, conditions in manufacturing
thermore, the FOMC recognized that in a rapidly appeared to have worsened still more. It also seemed
evolvingeconomicsituation,itwouldneedtobealert likely that slower growth abroad would restrain
to the possibility that a conference call would be demandforexportsandthatweakeninglabormarkets
desirable during the relatively long interval before would hold down growth in consumer spending. In
the next scheduled meeting to discuss the possible light of these developments, but also taking into
needforafurtherpolicyadjustment. account the cumulative 250 basis points of easing
Capital markets continued to soften in late March already undertaken and the other forces likely to be
and early April, in part because corporate profits and stimulating spending in the future, the FOMC low-
economic activity remained quite weak. Although ered its target for the federal funds rate 1⁄
4
percent-
equity prices and bond yields began to rise in mid- age point, to 33⁄
4
percent, and continued to view the
Aprilasfinancialmarketinvestorsbecamemorecon- risks to the outlook as weighted toward economic
fident that a cumulative downward spiral in activity weakness.
could be avoided, reports continued to suggest flag- The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
ging economic performance and risks of extended System approved cuts in the discount rate in the first
weakness ahead. In particular, spending by consum- half of the year that matched the FOMC’s cuts in
ers had leveled out and their confidence had fallen thetargetfederalfundsrate.Asaresult,thediscount
further. The FOMC discussed economic develop- rate declined from 6 percent to 31⁄
4
percent over the
ments in conference calls on April 11 and April 18, period.
decidingonthelatteroccasiontoreduceitstargetfor
the federal funds rate another 1⁄
2
percentage point, to
41⁄
2
percent. The Committee again indicated that it Economic Projections for 2001 and 2002
judgedthebalanceofriskstotheoutlookasweighted
towardeconomicweakness. The members of the Board of Governors and the
WhentheFOMCmetonMay15,economiccondi- FederalReserveBankpresidents,allofwhompartici-
tionsremainedquitesluggish,especiallyinmanufac- pate in the deliberations of the FOMC, expect eco-
turing, where production and employment had nomicgrowthtoremainslowinthenearterm,though
declined further. Although members were concerned most anticipate that it will pick up later this year at
that some indicators of core inflation had moved up leastalittle.Thecentraltendencyoftheforecastsfor
in the early months of the year and that part of the the increase in real GDP over the four quarters of
recent backup in longer-term interest rates may have 2001 spans a range of 11⁄
4
percent to 2 percent, and
owed to increased inflation expectations, most saw the central tendency of the forecasts for real GDP
underlyingpriceincreasesaslikelytoremaindamped growth in 2002 is 3 percent to 31⁄
4
percent. The
as continued subpar growth relieved pressures on civilianunemploymentrate,whichaveraged41⁄
2
per-
resources.Inlightoftheprospectofcontinuedweak- cent in the second quarter of 2001, is expected to
ness in the economy and the significant risks to the moveuptotheareaof43⁄
4
percentto5percentbythe
economic expansion, the FOMC reduced its target endofthisyear.In2002,withtheeconomyprojected
for the federal funds rate an additional 1⁄
2
percentage to expand at closer to its trend rate, the unemploy-
point, to 4 percent. With the softening in aggregate ment rate is expected to hold steady or perhaps to
demand still of unknown persistence and dimension, edge higher. With pressures in labor and product
theFOMCcontinuedtoviewtheriskstotheoutlook markets abating and with energy prices no longer
as weighted toward economic weakness. Still, the soaring, inflation is expected to be well contained
FOMC recognized that it had eased policy substan- overthenextyearandahalf.
tially this year and that, in the absence of further DespitetheprojectedincreaseinrealGDPgrowth,
sizable adverse shocks to the economy, at future the uncertainty about the near-term outlook remains
meetings it might need to consider adopting a more considerable. This uncertainty arises not only from
cautiousapproachtofurtherpolicyactions. the difficulty of assessing when businesses will feel
Subsequent news on economic activity and cor- that conditions are sufficiently favorable to warrant a
porate profits failed to point to a rebound. In June, pickupincapitalspendingbutalsofromthedifficulty
4 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
Economicprojectionsfor2001and2002 benefit from a strengthening of the U.S. economy, a
Percent stabilization of the global high-tech sector, an easing
ofoilprices,andstimulativemacroeconomicpolicies
BoardofGovernors
andReserveBankpresidents insomecountries.
Indicator
Central The chain-type price index for personal consump-
Range
tendency
tionexpendituresrose21⁄
4
percentoverthefourquar-
2001 ters of 2000, and most FOMC participants expect
inflationtoremainaroundthatratethroughnextyear;
Change,fourthquarter
tofourthquarter1 indeed, the central tendency of their forecasts for the
NominalGDP .................... 31⁄4–5 31⁄2–41⁄4
RealGDP2 ....................... 1–2 11⁄4–2 increaseinthispricemeasureis2percentto21⁄ 2 per-
PCEprices ....................... 2–23⁄4 2–21⁄2
cent in 2001 and 13⁄
4
percent to 21⁄
2
percent in 2002.
Averagelevel, One favorable factor in the inflation outlook is the
fourthquarter
Civilianunemployment behaviorofenergyprices.Thosepriceshavedeclined
rate.......................... 43⁄4–5 43⁄4–5
recently after having increased rapidly in the past
2002 couple of years, and prospects are good that they
could stabilize or even fall further in coming quar-
Change,fourthquarter
tofourthquarter1 ters. In addition to their direct effects, lower energy
NominalGDP .................... 43⁄4–6 5–51⁄2
RealGDP2 ....................... 3–31⁄2 3–31⁄4 pricesshouldtendtolimitincreasesinotherpricesby
PCEprices ....................... 11⁄2–3 13⁄4–21⁄2
reducing input costs for a wide range of energy-
Averagelevel, intensive goods and services and by helping damp
fourthquarter
Civilianunemployment inflation expectations. More broadly, the competitive
rate.......................... 43⁄4–51⁄2 43⁄4–51⁄4
conditions that have restricted businesses’ ability to
1. Changefromaverageforfourthquarterofpreviousyeartoaveragefor
raise prices in recent years are likely to persist. And
fourthquarterofyearindicated.
2. Chain-weighted. although labor costs could come under upward pres-
sure as wages tend to catch up to previous increases
of gauging where businesses stand in the inventory in productivity, the slackening in resource utilization
cycle. Nonetheless, all the FOMC participants fore- thisyearisexpectedtocontributetoreducedinflation
see a return to solid growth by 2002. By then, the pressuresgoingforward.
inventory correction should have run its course, and
themonetarypolicyactionstakenthisyear,aswellas
therecentlyenactedtaxreductions,shouldbeprovid- ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
ingappreciablesupporttofinaldemand. IN 2001
In part because of lower interest rates, many firms
have been able to shore up their balance sheets. And Economicgrowthremainedveryslowinthefirsthalf
although some lower-rated firms, especially in of 2001 after having downshifted in the second half
telecommunications and other sectors with gloomy of 2000. Real gross domestic product rose at an
near-term prospects, may continue to find it difficult annual rate of just 11⁄
4
percent in the first quarter,
to obtain financing, businesses generally are fairly about the same as in the fourth quarter, and appears
wellpositionedtostepuptheircapitalspendingonce to have posted at best a meager gain in the second
the outlook for sales and profits improves. By all quarter. Businesses have been working to correct the
accounts,technologicalinnovationisstillproceeding inventoryimbalancesthatemergedinthesecondhalf
rapidly, and these advances should eventually revive of last year, which has led to sizable declines in
high-tech investment, especially with the price of manufacturingoutput,andcapitalspendinghasweak-
computingpowercontinuingtodropsharply. ened appreciably. In contrast, household spending—
Inaddition,consumerspendingisexpectedtogeta especially for motor vehicles and houses—has held
boost from the tax cuts and from falling energy up well. Employment increased only modestly over
prices, which should help offset the effects of the the first three months of the year and turned down in
weaker job market and the decline over the past year the spring; the unemployment rate in June stood at
in stock market wealth. Housing activity, which has 41⁄
2
percent, 1⁄
2
percentage point higher than in the
been buoyed in recent quarters by low mortgage fourthquarteroflastyear.
interest rates, is likely to remain firm into 2002. The inflation news early this year was not very
Significant concerns remain about the foreign eco- favorable, as energy prices continued to soar and as
nomic outlook and the prospects for U.S. exports. measures of core inflation—which exclude food and
Nevertheless,economicactivityabroadisexpectedto energy—registered some pickup. More recently,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 5
ChangeinrealGDP Consumer Spending
Percent, annual rate
Real consumer spending grew at an annual rate of
31⁄
2
percent in the first quarter. Some of the increase
reflected a rebound in purchases of light motor vehi-
6 cles, which were boosted by a substantial expansion
of incentives and rose to just a tad below the record
pace of 2000 as a whole. In addition, outlays for
4 non-auto goods posted a solid gain, and spending on
servicesrosemodestlydespiteaweather-relateddrop
in outlays for energy services. In the second quarter,
2 however, the rise in consumer spending seems to
Q1
havelessenedassalesoflightmotorvehiclesdropped
a bit, on average, and purchases of other goods
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 apparently did not grow as fast in real terms as they
Note. Hereandinthesubsequentcharts,exceptasnoted,changeismea- hadinthefirstquarter.
suredtothefinalquarteroftheindicatedperiodfromthefinalquarterofthe The rise in real consumption so far this year has
precedingperiod.
been considerably smaller than the outsized gains in
the second half of the 1990s and into 2000. But the
however, energy prices have moved lower, and the
increase in spending still outstripped the growth in
monthly readings on core inflation have returned to
real disposable personal income (DPI), which has
more moderate rates. Moreover, apart from energy,
been restrained this year by further big increases in
pricesatearlierstagesofprocessinghavebeenquies-
consumer energy prices and by the deterioration in
centthisyear.
the job market; between the fourth quarter of 2000
and May, real DPI increased just about 2 percent at
an annual rate, well below the average pace of the
The Household Sector
preceding few years. In addition, the net worth of
households fell again in the first quarter, to a level
Growthinhouseholdspendinghasslowednoticeably
8 percent below the high reached in the first quarter
fromtherapidpaceofthepastfewyears.Still,itwas
of 2000. On net, the ratio of household net worth to
fairlywellmaintainedinthefirsthalfof2001despite
DPI has returned to about the level reached in 1997,
the weaker tenor of income, wealth, and consumer
significantly below the recent peak but still high by
confidence, and the personal saving rate declined a
historical standards. In addition, consumer sentiment
bit further. A greater number of households encoun-
indexes, which had risen to extraordinary levels in
tered problems servicing debt, but widespread diffi-
the late 1990s and remained there through last fall,
culties or restrictions on the availability of credit did
fell sharply around the turn of the year. However,
notemerge.
these indexes have not deteriorated further, on net,
ChangeinPCEchain-typepriceindex
Changeinrealincomeandconsumption
Percent, annual rate
Percent, annual rate
Total
Excludingfoodandenergy Disposablepersonalincome
4 Personalconsumptionexpenditures
8
Q1
3 6
Q1 4
2
2
1
+
0
–
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Note. Dataareforpersonalconsumptionexpenditures(PCE).
6 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
since the winter and are still at reasonably favorable have offset the effect of the decline in wealth on the
levels when compared with the readings for the pre- savingrate.
1997period.
Rising household wealth almost certainly was a
key factor behind the surge in consumer spending Residential Investment
between the mid-1990s and last year, and thus helps
to explain the sharp fall in the personal saving rate Housing activity remained buoyant in the first half
overthatperiod.Thesavingratehascontinuedtofall of this year as lower mortgage interest rates appear
this year—from −0.7 percent in the fourth quarter of to have offset the restraint from smaller gains in
2000 to −1.1 percent in May—even though the boost employment and income and from lower levels of
to spending growth from the earlier run-up in stock wealth.Inthesingle-familysector,startsaveragedan
prices has likely run its course and the effects of annual rate of 1.28 million units over the first five
lower wealth should be starting to feed through to months of the year—4 percent greater than the hefty
spending. The apparent decline in the saving rate pace for 2000 as a whole. Sales of new and existing
may simply reflect noisiness in the data or a slower homes strengthened noticeably around the turn of
response of spending to wealth than average histori- the year and were near record levels in March; they
calexperiencemightsuggest.Inaddition,consumers fell back in April but reversed some of that drop in
probably base their spending decisions on income May. Inventories of new homes for sale are excep-
prospects over a longer time span than just a few tionally low; builders’ backlogs are sizable; and,
quarters. Thus, to the extent that consumers do not accordingtotheMichigansurvey,consumers’assess-
expectthecurrentsluggishnessinrealincomegrowth ments of homebuying conditions remain favorable,
to persist, the tendency to maintain spending for a mainlybecauseofperceptionsthatmortgageratesare
time by dipping into savings or by borrowing may low.
Likelybecauseofthesustainedstrengthofhousing
demand, home prices have continued to rise faster
Wealthandsaving than overall inflation, although the various measures
that attempt to control for shifts in the regional com-
Ratio
position of sales and in the characteristics of houses
Wealth-to-incomeratio soldprovidedifferingsignalsonthemagnitudeofthe
price increases. Notably, over the year ending in the
6 first quarter, the constant-quality price index for new
homes rose 4 percent, while the repeat-sales price
index for existing homes was up nearly 9 percent.
5 Despite the higher prices, the share of income
required to finance a home purchase—one measure
ofaffordability—hasfalleninrecentquartersasmort-
4
Privatehousingstarts
Millions of units, annual rate
Percent
Personalsavingrate
14
Single-family
12 1.2
10
8
.8
6
4 Multifamily
.4
2
+
0
–
1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2001 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Note. Thedataextendthrough2001:Q1.Thewealth-to-incomeratioisthe Note. Thedataextendthrough2001:Q2;thedataforthatquarterarethe
ratioofhouseholdnetworthtodisposablepersonalincome. averagesforAprilandMay.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 7
Mortgagerates Householddebtserviceburden
Percent Percent
8.5
Fixedrate
14
8.0
7.5
13
7.0
Adjustablerate 6.5 12
6.0
1999 2000 2001 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Note. The data, which are monthly and extend through June 2001, are Note. Thedataarequarterlyandextendthrough2001:Q1.Debtburdenisan
contractratesonthirty-yearmortgagesfromtheFederalHomeLoanMortgage estimate of the ratio of debt payments to disposable income; debt payments
Corporation. consistoftheestimatedrequiredpaymentsonoutstandingmortgageandcon-
sumerdebt.
gage rates have dropped back after last year’s bulge,
andthatsharecurrentlyisaboutaslowasithasbeen The household debt service burden—the ratio of
at any time in the past decade. Rates on thirty-year minimumscheduledpaymentsonmortgageandcon-
conventional fixed-rate loans now stand around sumer debt to disposable personal income—rose to
71⁄
4
percent,andARMratesareattheirlowestlevels more than 14 percent at the end of the first quarter, a
inacoupleofyears. twenty-yearhigh,andavailabledatasuggestasimilar
In the multifamily sector, housing starts averaged reading for the second quarter. In part because of the
343,000 units at an annual rate over the first five elevated debt burden, some measures of household
monthsoftheyear,matchingtherobustpacethathas loan performance have deteriorated a bit in recent
beenevidentsince1997.Moreover,conditionsinthe quarters. The delinquency rate on home mortgage
marketformultifamilyhousingcontinuetobecondu- loans has edged up but remains low, while the delin-
civetonewconstruction.Thevacancyrateformulti- quency rate on credit card loans has risen noticeably
family rental units in the first quarter held near its and is in the middle part of its range over the past
low year-earlier level, and rents and property values decade. Personal bankruptcies jumped to record lev-
continuedtoriserapidly. els in the spring, but some of the spurt was probably
the result of a rush to file before Congress passed
bankruptcyreformlegislation.
Household Finance
Delinquencyratesonhouseholdloans
The growth of household debt is estimated to have
slowedsomewhatinthefirsthalfofthisyeartoastill Percent
fairlyhefty71⁄
2
percentannualrate—aboutapercent-
age point below its average pace over the previous Credit card accounts at banks 5
two years. Households have increased both their
home mortgage debt and their consumer credit (debt 4
not secured by real estate) substantially this year,
althoughinbothcasesthegrowthhasmoderatedabit 3
recently. The relatively low mortgage interest rates
have boosted mortgage borrowing both by stimulat- Auto loans at domestic auto finance companies 2
ing home purchases and by making it attractive to
refinance existing mortgages and extract some of the Mortgages 1
buildup in home equity. The rapid growth in con-
sumer credit has been concentrated in credit card 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
debt,perhapsreflectinghouseholds’effortstosustain Note. Thedataarequarterlyandextendthrough2001:Q1.Dataoncredit
their consumption in the face of weaker income carddelinquenciesarefrombankCallReports;dataonautoloandelinquencies
arefromtheBigThreeautomakers;dataonmortgagedelinquenciesarefrom
growth. theMortgageBankersAssociation.
8 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
Netpercentageoflargecommercialbankstightening Fixed Investment
standardsforconsumerloans
Real spending on equipment and software (E&S)
Percent
began to soften in the second half of last year, and
it posted small declines in both the fourth quarter
50
of 2000 and the first quarter of 2001. Much of the
Credit cards 40 weakness in the first quarter was in spending on
high-tech equipment and software; such spending,
30 which now accounts for about half of E&S outlays
when measured in nominal terms, declined at an
20
annual rate of about 12 percent in real terms—the
10 first real quarterly drop since the 1990 recession. An
Other consumer loans + especially sharp decrease in outlays for communica-
0
– tionsequipmentreflectedtheexcesscapacitythathad
emerged as a result of the earlier surge in spending,
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 the subsequent re-evaluation of profitability, and the
Note. The data extend through May 2001 and are based on the Federal accompanying financing difficulties faced by some
Reserve’s Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices,
firms. In addition, real spending on computers and
whichisgenerallyconductedfourtimesperyear.Netpercentageispercentage
reportingatighteninglesspercentagereportinganeasing. peripheral equipment, which rose more than 40 per-
centperyearinthesecondhalfofthe1990s,showed
Lenders have tightened up somewhat in response
little growth, on net, between the third quarter of
tothedeteriorationofhouseholdfinancialconditions.
2000 and the first quarter of 2001. The leveling in
In the May Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on
real computer spending reportedly reflects some
Bank Lending Practices, about a fifth of the banks
stretching out of businesses’ replacement cycles for
indicated that they had tightened the standards for
personal computers as well as a reduced demand for
approving applications for consumer loans over the
servers. Outside the high-tech area, spending rose in
preceding three months, and about a fourth said that
the first quarter as purchases of motor vehicles
theyhadtightenedthetermsonloanstheyarewilling
reversed some of the decline recorded over the sec-
to make, substantial increases from the November
ond half of 2000 and as outlays for industrial equip-
survey.Ofthosethathadtightened,mostcitedactual
ment picked up after having been flat in the fourth
or anticipated increases in delinquency rates as a
quarter.
reason.
Real E&S spending likely dropped further in the
secondquarter.Inadditiontotheongoingcontraction
The Business Sector inoutlaysonhigh-techequipment,theincomingdata
for orders and shipments point to a decline in invest-
Theboomincapitalspendingthathashelpedfuelthe ment in non-high-tech equipment, largely reflecting
economic expansion came to a halt late last year. theweaknessinthemanufacturingsectorthisyear.
After having risen at double-digit rates over the pre-
ceding five years, real business fixed investment flat-
tened out in the fourth quarter of 2000 and rose only Changeinrealbusinessfixedinvestment
alittleinthefirstquarterof2001.Demandforcapital
Percent, annual rate
equipment has slackened appreciably, reflecting the
sluggish economy, sharply lower corporate profits Structures
Equipmentandsoftware
and cash flow, earlier overinvestment in some sec-
tors,andtightfinancingconditionsfacingsomefirms. 20
Q1
Inaddition,inventoryinvestmentfellsubstantiallyin
the first quarter as businesses moved to address the
10
overhangs that began to develop late last year. With
investment spending weakening, businesses have
cut back on new borrowing. Following the drop in +
0
longer-term interest rates in the last few months of –
2000, credit demands have been concentrated in
longer-term markets, though cautious investors have
requiredhighspreadsfrommarginalborrowers. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 9
Outlays on nonresidential construction posted Firms outside the motor vehicles industry also
another sizable advance in early 2001 after having moved aggressively to address inventory imbalances
expandednearly13percentinrealtermsin2000,but in the first half of the year, and this showed through
theincomingmonthlyconstructiondataimplyasharp to manufacturing output, which, excluding motor
retrenchment in the second quarter. The downturn in vehicles,fellatanannualrateof71⁄
2
percentoverthis
spending comes on the heels of an increase in period. These production adjustments—along with a
vacancy rates for office and industrial space in many sharp reduction in the flow of imports—contributed
cities. Moreover, while financing generally remains to a small decline in real non-auto stocks in the first
available for projects with viable tenants, lenders are quarter, and book-value data for the manufacturing
now showing greater caution. Not surprisingly, one andtradesectorpointtoafurtherdecrease,onnet,in
bright spot is the energy sector, where expenditures April and May. As of May, stocks generally seemed
for drilling and mining have been on a steep uptrend in line with sales at retail trade establishments, but
sinceearly1999(mainlybecauseofincreasedexplo- there were still some notable overhangs in wholesale
ration for natural gas) and the construction of facili- trade and especially in manufacturing, where
tiesforelectricpowergenerationremainsverystrong. inventory–shipments ratios for producers of comput-
ers and electronic products, primary and fabricated
metals,andchemicalsremainedveryhigh.
Inventory Investment
Asharpreductioninthepaceofinventoryinvestment Business Finance
was a major damping influence on real GDP growth
inthefirstquarterof2001.Theswinginrealnonfarm The economic profits of U.S. corporations fell at a
inventory investment from an accumulation of 19 percent annual rate in the first quarter after a
$51 billion at an annual rate in the fourth quarter of similar decline in the fourth quarter of 2000. As a
2000toaliquidationof$25billioninthefirstquarter result,theratioofprofitstoGDPdeclined1percent-
of 2001 subtracted 3 percentage points from the age point over the two quarters, to 8.5 percent;
growthinrealGDPinthefirstquarter.Nearlyhalfof the ratio of the profits of nonfinancial corp-
the negative contribution to GDP growth came from orationstosectoroutputfell2percentagepointsover
the motor vehicle sector, where a sizable cut in the interval, to 10 percent. Investment spending has
assemblies(addedtothereductionalreadyinplacein declined by more than profits, however, reducing
the fourth quarter) brought the overall days’ supply somewhat the still-elevated need of nonfinancial
down to comfortable levels by the end of the first corporations for external funds to finance capital
quarter.Ariseintruckassembliesearlyinthesecond expenditures. Corporations have husbanded their
quarter led to some backup of inventories in that increasingly scarce internal funds by cutting back on
segmentofthemarket,buttruckstockswerebackin cash-financedmergersandequityrepurchases.While
an acceptable range by June; automobile assemblies
wereuponlyalittleinthesecondquarter,andstocks Before-taxprofitsofnonfinancialcorporations
remainedlean. asapercentofsectorGDP
Percent
Changeinrealnonfarmbusinessinventories
Billions of chained 1996 dollars, annual rate
12
75
10
50
25
8
+
0
–
25 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001
Q1
Note. Dataextendthrough2001:Q1.Profitsarefromdomesticoperations
ofnonfinancialcorporations,withinventoryvaluationandcapitalconsumption
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
adjustments,dividedbygrossdomesticproductofnonfinancialcorporatesector.
10 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
Financinggapandnetequityretirement Spreadoflow-tierCPrateoverhigh-tierCPrate
atnonfarmnonfinancialcorporations
Basis points
Billions of dollars
125
250
Netequityretirement
100
200
150 75
100
Financinggap 50
50
25
+
0
–
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 Note. ThedataaredailyandextendthroughJuly12,2001.Theseriesshown
Note.Thedatathrough2000areannual;thefinalobservationisfor2001:Q1 isthedifferencebetweentherateonA2/P2nonfinancialcommercialpaperand
andisatanannualrate.Thefinancinggapisthedifferencebetweencapital theAArate.
expendituresandinternallygeneratedfunds.Netequityretirementisthediffer-
encebetweenequityretiredthroughsharerepurchases,domesticcash-financed only by highly rated corporations, and default is
mergers,orforeigntakeoversofU.S.firmsandequityissuedinpublicorprivate extremelyrare.Thedefaults,alongwithsomedown-
markets,includingfundsinvestedbyventurecapitalpartnerships.
grades, led investors in commercial paper to pull
equity retirements have therefore fallen, so has gross back and reevaluate the riskiness of issuers. For a
equity issuance, though by less. Inflows of venture while, issuance by all but top-rated names became
equity capital, in particular, have been reduced sub- very difficult and quality spreads widened signifi-
stantially. Businesses have met their financing needs cantly,pushingsomeissuersintotheshortestmaturi-
by borrowing heavily in the bond market while pay- ties and inducing others to exit the market entirely.
ingdownbothcommercialandindustrial(C&I)loans As a consequence, the amount of commercial paper
at banks and commercial paper. In total, after having outstanding plummeted. In the second quarter, risk
increased 91⁄ 2 percent last year, the debt of nonfinan- spreadsreturnedtomoretypicallevelsandtherunoff
cial businesses rose at a 5 percent annual rate in the moderated. By the end of June, the amount of non-
firstquarterofthisyearandisestimatedtohaverisen financial commercial paper outstanding was nearly
ataboutthesamepaceinthesecondquarter. 30 percent below its level at the end of 2000, with
The decline in C&I loans and commercial paper manyfirmsstillnothavingreturnedtothemarket.
owes,inpart,tolesshospitableconditionsinshorter- Even though banks’ C&I loans were boosted in
term funding markets. The commercial paper market JanuaryandFebruarybyborrowerssubstitutingaway
was rattled in mid-January by the defaults of two
Netpercentageofdomesticbankstighteningstandards
large California utilities. Commercial paper is issued
forcommercialandindustrialloans,bysizeofborrower
Majorcomponentsofnetbusinessfinancing
Percent
Billions of dollars
Commercial paper Sum of components 60
Bonds 500
Bank loans 400 Largeandmedium 40
300
20
200
Small +
100 0
–
+
0
– 20
100
200
Q1 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Q2
1999 2000 2001 Note. The data are based on the Federal Reserve’s Senior Loan Officer
OpinionSurveyonBankLendingPractices,whichisgenerallyconductedfour
Note. Seasonally adjusted annual rate for nonfarm nonfinancial corporate timesperyear.ThedataextendthroughMay2001.Smallfirmsarethosewith
businesses.Thedatafor2001:Q2areestimated. annualsalesoflessthan$50million.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 11
from the commercial paper market, loans declined, Liabilitiesoffailedbusinesses
on net, over the first half of the year, in part because asaproportionoftotalliabilities
borrowers paid down their bank loans with proceeds
Percent
from bond issues. Many banks reported on the Fed-
Nonfinancialfirms
eral Reserve’s Bank Lending Practices surveys this
year that they had tightened standards and terms—
including the premiums charged on riskier loans, the .9
cost of credit lines, and loan covenants—on C&I
loans. Loan officers cited a worsened economic out-
look,industry-specificproblems,andareducedtoler- June .6
ance for risk as the reasons for having tightened.
Despite these adjustments to banks’ lending stance,
credit appears to remain amply available for sound .3
borrowers, and recent surveys of small businesses
indicate that they have not found credit significantly
moredifficulttoobtain.
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Meanwhile, the issuance of corporate bonds this
Note. Annual average. Value for June 2001 is a twelve-month trailing
year has proceeded at about double the pace of the average.
Source. Dun&Bradstreet.
preceding two years. With the yields on high-grade
bonds back down to their levels in the first half of elevated spreads reflect the deterioration in business
1999andwithfuturesquotessuggestinginterestrates credit quality that has occurred as the economy has
will be rising next year, corporations apparently slowed. While declines in interest rates have held
judged it to be a relatively opportune time to issue. aggregateinterestexpenseatarelativelylowpercent-
Although investors remain somewhat selective, they age of cash flow, many individual firms are feeling
have been willing to absorb the large volume of the pinch of decreases in earnings. Over the twelve
issuanceastheyhavebecomemoreconfidentthatthe months ending in May, 11 percent of speculative-
economy would recover and a prolonged disruption grade bonds, by dollar volume, have defaulted—the
to earnings would be avoided. The heavy pace of highestpercentagesince1991andasubstantialjump
issuance has been supported, in part, by inflows into from 1998, when less than 2 percent defaulted. This
bond mutual funds, which may have come at the deterioration reflects not only the unusually large
expenseofequityfunds. defaults by the California utilities, but also stress in
The flows are forthcoming at relatively high risk the telecommunications sector and elsewhere. How-
spreads, however. Spreads of most grades of corpo- ever, some other measures of credit performance
ratedebtrelativetoratesonswapshavefallenalittle have shown a more moderate worsening. The ratio
thisyear,butspreadsremainunusuallyhighforlower of the liabilities of failed businesses to those of all
investment-grade and speculative-grade credits. The nonfinancial businesses and the delinquency rate on
C&I loans at banks have risen noticeably from their
Netinterestpaymentsofnonfinancialcorporations lows in 1998, but both remain well below levels
relativetocashflow postedintheearly1990s.
Commercial mortgage debt increased at about an
Percent
83⁄
4
percent annual rate in the first half of this year,
and the issuance of commercial-mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS) maintained its robust pace of the
20 past several years. While spreads of the yields on
investment- and speculative-grade CMBS over swap
rates have changed little this year, significant frac-
15 tions of banks reported on the Bank Lending Prac-
tices survey that they have tightened terms and stan-
dards on commercial real estate loans. Although the
10 delinquency rates on CMBS and commercial real
estate loans at banks edged up in the first quarter,
they remained near record lows. Nevertheless, those
1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 commercial banks that reported taking a more cau-
Note. Thedataarequarterlyandextendthrough2001:Q1. tiousapproachtowardcommercialrealestatelending
12 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
statedthattheyaredoingso,inpart,becauseofaless NationalsavingasapercentofnominalGDP
favorableeconomicoutlookingeneralandaworsen-
Percent
ingoftheoutlookforcommercialrealestate.
The Government Sector
Excludingfederalsaving
20
The fiscal 2001 surplus in the federal unified budget
is likely to be smaller than the surplus in fiscal 2000
becauseoftheslowergrowthintheeconomyandthe
recently enacted tax legislation. Nonetheless, the 16
unified surplus will remain large, and the paydown
Total
of the federal debt is continuing at a rapid clip. As a
consequence, the Treasury has taken a number of
steps to preserve liquidity in a shrinking market. The
1985 1989 1993 1997 2001
weaker economy is also reducing revenues at the
Note. The data extend through 2001:Q1. National saving comprises the
stateandlocallevel,butthesegovernmentsremainin grosssavingofhouseholds,businesses,andgovernments.
reasonably good fiscal shape overall and are taking
advantage of historically low interest rates to refund
Federal receipts in the first eight months of the
existingdebtandtoissuenewdebt.
current fiscal year were just 41⁄
2
percent higher than
during the first eight months of fiscal 2000—a much
Federal Government smaller gain than those posted, on average, over the
preceding several years. Much of the slowing was in
The fiscal 2001 surplus in the federal government’s corporate receipts, which dropped below year-earlier
unified budget is likely to come in below the fiscal levels,reflectingtherecentdeteriorationinprofits.In
2000 surplus of $236 billion. Over the first eight addition, individual income tax payments rose less
monthsofthefiscalyear—OctobertoMay—theuni- rapidly than over the preceding few years, mainly
fied budget recorded a surplus of $137 billion, because of slower growth in withheld tax payments.
$16billionhigherthanduringthecomparableperiod This spring’s nonwithheld payments of individual
last year. But over the balance of the fiscal year, taxes, which are largely payments on the previous
receipts will continue to be restrained by this year’s year’s liability, were relatively strong. Indeed,
slow pace of economic growth and the associated although there was no appreciable ‘‘April surprise’’
decline in corporate profits. Receipts will also be this year—that is, these payments were about in line
reducedsignificantlyoverthenextfewmonthsbythe with expectations—liabilities again appear to have
payout of tax rebates and the shift of some corporate risen faster than the NIPA tax base in 2000. One
payments into fiscal 2002, provisions included in the factor that has lifted liabilities relative to income in
EconomicGrowthandTaxReliefReconciliationAct recent years is that rising levels of income and a
of2001. changing distribution have shifted more taxpayers
Federal saving, which is basically the unified bud- into higher tax brackets. Higher capital gains reali-
get surplus adjusted to conform to the accounting zations also have helped raise liabilities relative to
practicesfollowedinthenationalincomeandproduct the NIPA tax base over this period. (Capital gains
accounts (NIPA), has risen dramatically since hitting arenotincludedintheNIPAincomemeasure,which,
a low of −31⁄
2
percent of GDP in 1992 and stood at by design, includes only income from current
33⁄
4
percent of GDP in the first quarter—a swing of production.)
more than 7 percentage points. Reflecting the high The faster growth in outlays that emerged in fiscal
level of federal saving, national saving, which com- 2000 has extended into fiscal 2001. Smoothing
prisessavingbyhouseholds,businesses,andgovern- through some timing anomalies at the start of the
ments,hasbeenrunningatahigherratesincethelate fiscal year, nominal spending during the first eight
1990s than it did over most of the preceding decade, monthsoffiscal2001wasmorethan4percenthigher
even as the personal saving rate has plummeted. The than during the same period last year; excluding the
deeper pool of national saving, along with large sizabledropinnetinterestoutlaysthathasaccompa-
inflows of foreign capital, has provided resources for nied the paydown of the federal debt, the increase in
the technology-driven boom in domestic investment spendingsofarthisyearwasnearly6percent.Spend-
inrecentyears. ing in the past couple of years has been boosted by
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 13
sizable increases in discretionary appropriations as with a four-week maturity to provide it with greater
well as by faster growth in outlays for the major flexibility and cost efficiency in managing its cash
health programs. The especially rapid increase in balances, which, in part because new securities are
Medicaid outlays reflects the higher cost and utiliza- now issued less frequently, have become more vola-
tion of medical care (including prescription drugs), tile. Finally, also in May, the Treasury announced it
growing enrollments, and a rise in the share of would in the next few months seek public comment
expenses picked up by the federal government. Out- on a plan to ease the ‘‘35 percent rule,’’ which limits
lays for Medicare have been lifted, in part, by the the bidding at auctions by those holding claims on
higherreimbursementstoprovidersthatwereenacted large amounts of an issue. With reopenings increas-
lastyear. ingly being used to maintain liquidity in individual
Real federal expenditures for consumption and issues,thisrulewasconstrainingmanypotentialbid-
gross investment, the part of government spending ders. As discussed below, the reduced issuance of
that is included in GDP, rose at a 5 percent annual Treasury securities has also led the Federal Reserve
rateinthefirstquarter.Overthepastcoupleofyears, tomodifyitsproceduresforacquiringsuchsecurities
real nondefense purchases have remained on the andtostudypossiblefuturestepsforitsportfolio.
moderate uptrend that has been evident since the Inearly2000,asinvestorsfocusedonthepossibil-
mid-1990s,whilerealdefensepurchaseshavestarted ity that Treasury securities were going to become
to rise slowly after having bottomed out in the late increasingly scarce, they became willing to pay a
1990s. premium for longer-dated securities, pushing down
The Treasury has used the substantial federal bud- their yields. However, these premiums appear to
getsurplusestopaydownitsdebtfurther.Attheend have largely unwound later in the year as market
of June, the outstanding Treasury debt held by the participants made adjustments to the new environ-
public had fallen nearly $600 billion, or 15 percent, ment. These adjustments include the substitution of
from its peak in 1997. Relative to nominal GDP, alternative instruments for hedging and pricing, such
publicly held debt has dropped from nearly 50 per- as interest rate swaps, prominent high-grade cor-
centinthemid-1990stobelow33percentinthefirst porate bonds, and securities issued by government-
quarter,thelowestithasbeensince1984. sponsoredenterprises(GSEs).Tobenefitfromadjust-
Declinesinoutstandingfederaldebtandtheassoci- ments by market participants, in 1998, Fannie Mae
atedreductionsinthesizesandfrequencyofauctions and Freddie Mac initiated programs to issue securi-
of new issues have diminished the liquidity of the ties that share some characteristics with Treasury
Treasury market over the past few years. Bid–asked securities, such as regular issuance calendars and
spreads are somewhat wider, quote sizes are smaller, large issue sizes; in the first half of this year they
andthedifferencebetweenyieldsonseasonedversus issued $88 billion of coupon securities and $502 bil-
most-recentlyissuedsecuritieshasincreased.Inpart, lion of bills under these programs. The GSEs have
however,thesedevelopmentsmayalsoreflectamore also this year begun buying back older securities to
cautious attitude among securities dealers following boost the size of their new issues. Nevertheless, the
themarketturmoilinthefallof1998. market for Treasury securities remains considerably
The Treasury has taken a number of steps to limit more liquid than markets for GSE and other fixed-
the deterioration in the liquidity of its securities. In incomesecurities.
recent years, it has concentrated its issuance into
fewer securities, so that the auction sizes of the
remaining securities are larger. Last year, in order to State and Local Governments
enable issuance of a larger volume of new securities,
the Treasury began buying back less-liquid older State and local governments saw an enormous
securities, and it also made every second auction of improvement in their budget positions between the
its5-and10-yearnotesand30-yearbondareopening mid-1990s and last year as revenues soared and
of the previously issued security. In February, the spending generally was held in check; accordingly,
Treasury put limits on the noncompetitive bids that thesegovernmentswereablebothtolowertaxesand
foreign central banks and governmental monetary tomakesubstantialallocationstoreservefunds.More
entities may make, so as to leave a larger and more recently, however, revenue growth has slowed in
predictable pool of securities available for competi- many states, and reports of fiscal strains have
tive bidding, helping to maintain the liquidity and increased. Nonetheless, the sector remains in rela-
efficiency of the market. In May, the Treasury tively good fiscal shape overall, and most govern-
announced that it would begin issuing Treasury bills ments facing revenue shortfalls have managed to
14 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
adopt balanced budgets for fiscal 2002 with only U.S.currentaccount
minoradjustmentstotaxesandspending.
Billions of dollars, annual rate
Real consumption and investment spending by
stateandlocalgovernmentsroseatnearlya5percent
+
annualrateinthefirstquarterandapparentlyposteda 0
–
sizable increase in the second quarter as well. Much
of the strength this year has been in construction 100
spending, which has rebounded sharply after a
reported decline in 2000 that was hard to reconcile 200
withthesector’songoinginfrastructureneedsandthe
good financial condition of most governments. Hir- 300
ing also remained fairly brisk during the first half of
the year; on average, employment rose 30,000 per 400
month, about the same as the average monthly Q1
increaseovertheprecedingthreeyears. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Although interest rates on municipal debt have
edged up this year, they remain low by historical
standards. State and local governments have taken inAprilcontinuedataboutthesamepace.Netinvest-
advantage of the low interest rates to refund existing ment income payments were a bit less in the first
debt and to raise new capital. Credit quality has quarter than the average for last year primarily
remained quite high in the municipal sector even as because of a sizable decrease in earnings by U.S.
tax receipts have softened, with credit upgrades out- affiliatesofforeignfirms.
pacingdowngradesinthefirsthalfofthisyear.Most As U.S. economic growth slowed in the second
notable among the downgrades was that of Califor- half of last year and early this year, real imports of
nia’s general obligation bonds. Standard and Poor’s goods and services, which had grown very rapidly in
lowered California’s debt two notches from AA to thefirstthreequartersof2000,expandedmoreslowly
A+, citing the financial pressures from the electricity in the fourth quarter and then contracted 5 percent at
crisis and the likely adverse effects of the crisis on anannualrateinthefirstquarter.Thelargestdeclines
thestate’seconomy. were in high-tech products (computers, semiconduc-
tors, and telecommunications equipment) and auto-
motive products. In contrast, imports of petroleum
The External Sector andpetroleumproductsincreasedmoderately.Atem-
porary surge in the price of imported natural gas
The deficits in U.S. external balances narrowed pushed the increase of the average price of non-oil
sharply in the first quarter of this year, largely imports above an annual rate of 1 percent in the first
because of a smaller deficit in trade in goods and quarter, slightly higher than the rate of increase
services. Most of the financial flows into the United recordedin2000.
States continued to come from private foreign U.S.realexportswerehitbyslowergrowthabroad,
sources. the strength of the dollar, and plunging global
demandforhigh-techproducts.Realexportsofgoods
and services, which had grown strongly in the first
Trade and Current Account three quarters of 2000, fell 61⁄
2
percent at an annual
rate in the fourth quarter of last year and declined
After widening continuously during the past four another1percentinthefirstquarterofthisyear.The
years, the deficits in U.S. external balances narrowed largest declines in both quarters were in high-tech
in the first quarter of 2001. The current account capital goods and automotive products (primarily in
deficit in the first quarter was $438 billion at an intra-firmtradewithCanada).Bymarketdestination,
annual rate, or 4.3 percent of GDP, compared with thelargestincreasesinU.S.goodsexportsduringthe
$465billioninthefourthquarterof2000.Mostofthe first three quarters of 2000 had been to Mexico and
reduction of the current account deficit can be traced countries in Asia; the recent declines were mainly in
to changes in U.S. trade in goods and services; exportstoAsiaandLatinAmerica.Incontrast,goods
the trade deficit narrowed from an annual rate of exports to Western Europe increased steadily
$401billioninthefourthquarterof2000to$380bil- throughout the entire period. About 45 percent of
lion in the first quarter of this year. The trade deficit U.S. goods exports in the first quarter of 2001 were
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 15
Changeinrealimportsandexportsofgoodsandservices U.S.internationalsecuritiestransactions
Percent, annual rate Billions of dollars
Imports Private foreign purchases of U.S. securities
Exports 20 Net foreign purchases of U.S. bonds 150
Net foreign purchases of U.S. equities
15
125
10
100
5
+ 75
0
–
50
5
Q1
25
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Note. Changeforthehalf-yearindicatedismeasuredfromthepreceding
half-year,andthechangefor2001:Q1isfrom2000:Q4.Importsandexportsfor
eachhalf-yeararetheaverageofthelevelsforcomponentquarters. Private U.S. purchases of foreign securities
Net U.S. purchases of foreign bonds 125
capital equipment; 20 percent were industrial sup-
Net U.S. purchases of foreign equities
plies; and 5 to 10 percent each were agricultural,
100
automotive,consumer,andothergoods.
After increasing through much of 2000, the spot 75
price of West Texas intermediate (WTI) crude oil
50
reached a peak above $37 per barrel in September,
the highest level since the Gulf War. As world eco- 25
nomic growth slowed in the latter part of 2000, oil
+
pricedeclinesreversedmuchoftheyear’spricegain. 0
–
In response, OPEC reduced its official production
targetsinJanuaryofthisyearandagaininMarch.As 1999 2000 2001
a result, oil prices have remained relatively high in Source. DepartmentofCommerce,SurveyofCurrentBusiness.
2001 despite weaker global economic growth and a
substantial increase in U.S. oil inventories. Oil prices chases of U.S. bonds, as foreign purchases of both
have also been elevated by the volatility of Iraqi oil corporate and agency bonds accelerated and private
exports arising from tense relations between Iraq foreignsalesofTreasuriespaused.Foreignpurchases
andtheUnitedNations.Duringthefirstsixmonthsof of U.S. equities are only slightly below their 2000
this year, the spot price of WTI has fluctuated, with pace despite the apparent decline in expected returns
only brief exceptions, between $27 and $30 per toholdingU.S.equities.
barrel. The pace at which U.S. residents acquired foreign
securities changed little between the second half
of last year and the first quarter of this year. As
Financial Account in previous years, most of the foreign securities
acquiredwereequities.
Inthefirstquarterof2001,aswasthecasein2000as Net financial inflows associated with direct invest-
a whole, nearly all of the net financial flows into the ment slowed a good bit in the first quarter, as there
United States came from private foreign sources. were significantly fewer large foreign takeovers of
Foreign official inflows were less than $5 billion and U.S. firms and U.S. direct investment abroad
were composed primarily of the reinvestment of remainedrobust.
accumulated interest earnings. Reported foreign
exchange intervention purchases of dollars were
modest. The Labor Market
Inflows arising from private foreign purchases of
U.S. securities accelerated further in the first quarter Labor demand weakened in the first half of 2001,
and are on a pace to exceed last year’s record. All of especially in manufacturing, and the unemployment
the pickup is attributable to larger net foreign pur- rate rose. Increases in hourly compensation have
16 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
continued to trend up in recent quarters, while mea- Measuresoflaborutilization
sured labor productivity has been depressed by the
Percent
slowergrowthofoutput.
15
Employment and Unemployment
Augmented unemployment rate
12
After having risen an average of 149,000 per month
in 2000, private payroll employment increased an 9
average of only 63,000 per month in the first quarter
6
of 2001, and it declined an average of 117,000 per
month in the second quarter. The unemployment rate Civilian unemployment rate
3
moved up over the first half of the year and in June
stood at 41⁄
2
percent, 1⁄
2
percentage point higher than
inthefourthquarteroflastyear. 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Much of the weakness in employment in the first Note. ThedataextendthroughJune2001.Theaugmentedunemployment
rateisthenumberofunemployedplusthosewhoarenotinthelaborforceand
half of the year was in the manufacturing sector,
wantajob,dividedbythecivilianlaborforceplusthosewhoarenotinthelabor
where job losses averaged 78,000 per month in the forceandwantajob.InJanuary1994,aredesignedsurveywasintroduced;data
fromthatpointonarenotdirectlycomparablewiththoseofearlierperiods.
first quarter and 116,000 per month in the second
quarter. Since last July, manufacturing employment help-supply firms) also slowed markedly in the sec-
has fallen nearly 800,000. Factory job losses were ond quarter. Employment in retail trade remained on
widespread in the first half of the year, with some of amoderateuptrendoverthefirsthalfoftheyear,and
the biggest cutbacks at industries struggling with employment in finance, insurance, and real estate
sizable inventory overhangs, including metals and increased modestly after having been unchanged, on
industrial and electronic equipment. The weakness net,lastyear.
in manufacturing also cut into employment at help-
supplyfirmsandatwholesaletradeestablishments.
Apart from manufacturing and the closely related Labor Costs and Productivity
help-supply and wholesale trade industries, employ-
ment growth held up fairly well in the first quarter Through the first quarter, compensation growth
but began to slip noticeably in the second quarter. remained quite strong—indeed, trending higher by
Someoftheslowinginthesecondquarterreflecteda somemeasures.Thesegainslikelyreflectedtheinflu-
drop in construction employment after a strong first ence of earlier tight labor markets, higher consumer
quarter that likely absorbed a portion of the hiring price inflation—largely due to soaring energy
that normally takes place in the spring; on average, prices—and the greater real wage gains made pos-
construction employment rose a fairly brisk 15,000 sible by faster structural productivity growth. The
per month over the first half, about the same as upward pressures on labor costs could abate in com-
in 2000. Hiring in the services industry (other than ing quarters if pressures in labor markets ease and
energypricesfallback.
Netchangeinprivatenonfarmpayrollemployment Hourlycompensation,asmeasuredbytheemploy-
ment cost index (ECI) for private nonfarm busi-
Thousands of jobs, monthly average
nesses, moved up in the first quarter to a level about
41⁄
4
percent above its level of a year earlier; this
compares with increases of about 41⁄
2
percent over
400 theprecedingyearand3percentovertheyearbefore
that. The slight deceleration in the most recent
twelve-monthchangeintheECIisaccountedforbya
200
slowdown in the growth of compensation for sales
workers relative to the elevated rates that had pre-
+ vailed in early 2000; these workers’ pay includes a
0
– substantial commission component and thus is espe-
cially sensitive to cyclical developments. Compensa-
Q2
tionperhourinthenonfarmbusinesssector—amea-
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 sure that picks up some forms of compensation that
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 17
Measuresofchangeinhourlycompensation Changeinoutputperhour,nonfarmbusinesses
Percent Percent
6
6
4
4 Q1
2
Employmentcostindex
2 +
0
–
Nonfarmcompensationperhour
1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Note. The data extend through 2001:Q1. The ECI is for private industry Note. ChangesareQ4toQ4exceptthechangefor2001:Q1,whichisfrom
excludingfarmandhouseholdworkers.Nonfarmcompensationperhourisfor 2000:Q1.
thenonfarmbusinesssector.
Measured labor productivity in the nonfarm busi-
ness sector has been bounced around in recent quar-
the ECI omits but that sometimes has been revised
ters by erratic swings in hours worked by self-
substantially once the data go through the annual
employed individuals, but on balance, it has barely
revision process—shows a steady uptrend over the
risen since the third quarter of last year after having
past couple of years; it rose 6 percent over the year
increased about 3 percent per year, on average, over
ending in the first quarter after having risen 41⁄
2
per-
theprecedingthreeyears.Thisdecelerationcoincides
centovertheprecedingyear.
with a marked slowing in output growth and seems
AccordingtotheECI,wagesandsalariesroseatan
broadly in line with the experience of past busi-
annual rate of about 41⁄
2
percent in the first quarter.
ness cycles; these readings remain consistent with a
Excluding sales workers, wages rose 5 percent
noticeableaccelerationinstructuralproductivityhav-
(annual rate) in the first quarter and 41⁄
4
percent over
ingoccurredinthesecondhalfofthe1990s.Reflect-
the year ending in March; this compares with an
ing the movements in hourly compensation and in
increaseof33⁄
4
percentovertheyearendinginMarch
actual productivity, unit labor costs in the nonfarm
2000. Separate data on average hourly earnings of
business sector jumped in the first quarter and have
production or nonsupervisory workers also show a
discernableaccelerationofwages:Thetwelve-month
risen31⁄
2
percentoverthepastyear.
Looking ahead, prospects for favorable productiv-
change in this series was 41⁄
4
percent in June, 1⁄
2
per-
ity performance will hinge on a continuation of the
centage point above the reading for the preceding
rapid technological advances of recent years and on
twelvemonths.
Benefit costs as measured in the ECI have risen
Changeinunitlaborcosts,nonfarmbusinesses
fasterthanwagesoverthepastyear,withtheincrease
over the twelve months ending in March totaling Percent
5percent.Muchofthepressureonbenefitsiscoming
Q1
from health insurance, where employer payments
have accelerated steadily since bottoming out in the
3
mid-1990sandarenowgoingupabout8percentper
year. The surge in spending on prescription drugs
accounts for some of the rise in health insurance 2
costs, but demand for other types of medical care is
increasing rapidly as well. Moreover, although there
hasbeensomerevampingofdrugcoveragetocounter 1
the pressures of soaring demand, many employers
have been reluctant to adjust other features of the
health benefits package in view of the need to retain
1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
workers in a labor market that has been very tight in
Note. ChangesareQ4toQ4exceptthechangefor2001:Q1,whichisfrom
recentyears. 2000:Q1.
18 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
the willingness of businesses to expand and update sizable advance in the second quarter. Unlike the
their capital stocks to take advantage of the new surges in energy prices in 1999 and 2000, the
efficiency-enhancing capital that is becoming avail- increases in the first half of 2001 were not driven by
able at declining cost in many cases. To be sure, the developments in crude oil markets. Indeed, natural
current weakness in business investment will likely gas prices were the major factor boosting overall
damp the growth of the capital stock relative to the energy prices early this year as tight inventories and
paceofthepastcoupleofyears.Butoncethecyclical concerns about potential stock-outs pushed spot
weakness in the economy dissipates, continued prices to extremely high levels; natural gas prices
advances in technology should provide impetus to have since receded as additional supplies have come
renewed capital spending and a return to solid on line and inventories have been rebuilt. In the
increasesinproductivity. spring, gasoline prices soared in response to strong
demand,refinerydisruptions,andconcernsaboutlean
inventories; with refineries back on line, imports up,
Prices and inventories restored, gasoline prices have since
fallen noticeably below their mid-May peaks. Elec-
Inflation moved higher in early 2001 but has mod- tricitypricesalsorosesubstantiallyinthefirsthalfof
erated some in recent months. After having risen the year, reflecting higher natural gas prices as well
21⁄
4
percent in 2000, the chain price index for per- as the problems in California. Capacity problems
sonal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased in California and the hydropower shortages in the
about 31⁄
4
percent in the first quarter of 2001 as Northwestpersist,thoughCalifornia’selectricitycon-
energy prices soared and as core consumer prices— sumption has declined recently and wholesale prices
which exclude food and energy—picked up. Energy have dropped. In contrast, capacity in the rest of the
prices continued to rise rapidly in April and May but country has expanded appreciably over the past year
eased in June and early July. In addition, core PCE and, on the whole, appears adequate to meet the
priceinflationhasdroppedbackafterthefirst-quarter normalseasonalriseindemand.
spurt, and the twelve-month change in this series, Core PCE prices rose at a 21⁄
2
percent annual rate
whichisausefulindicatoroftheunderlyinginflation inthefirstquarter—aheftyincreasebythestandards
trend,stoodat11⁄
2
percentinMay,aboutthesameas of recent years. But the data are volatile, and the
the change over the preceding twelve months. The first-quarter increase, no doubt, exaggerates any
core consumer price index (CPI) continued to move pickup. Based on monthly data for April and May,
up at a faster pace than the core PCE measure over core PCE inflation appears to have slowed consider-
the past year, rising 21⁄
2
percent over the twelve ably in the second quarter; the slowing was concen-
monthsendinginMay,alsothesamerateasoverthe trated in the goods categories and seems consistent
precedingyear. with reports that retailers have been cutting prices to
PCE energy prices rose at an annual rate of about spursalesinanenvironmentofsoftdemand.
11 percent in the first quarter and, given the big Core consumer price inflation—whether measured
increasesinAprilandMay,apparentlypostedanother by the PCE index or by the CPI—in recent quarters
Changeinconsumerprices Changeinconsumerpricesexcludingfoodandenergy
Percent, annual rate Percent, annual rate
Chain-typepriceindexforPCE Chain-typepriceindexforPCE
CPI CPI 6
5
Q1
5
4
4
3 Q1
3
2
2
1
1
1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Note. TheCPIisforallurbanconsumers(CPI-U). Note. TheCPIisforallurbanconsumers(CPI-U).
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 19
almost certainly has been boosted by the effects of rable year-earlier period. The price index for gross
higher energy prices on the costs of producing other domestic purchases—which is defined as the prices
goods and services. Additional pressure has come paid for consumption, investment, and government
from the step-up in labor costs. That said, firms purchases—also accelerated in the first quarter—to
appeartohaveabsorbedmuchofthesecostincreases an increase of about 23⁄
4
percent; the increase in this
in lower profit margins. Meanwhile, non-oil import measureoverthepastyearwas21⁄
4
percent,aboutthe
prices have remained subdued, thus continuing to same as over the preceding year. Excluding food and
restrain input costs for many domestic industries and energy, the latest four-quarter changes in both GDP
tolimittheabilityoffirmsfacingforeigncompetition andgrossdomesticpurchasespriceswereroughlythe
to raise prices for fear of losing market share. In sameasovertheprecedingyear.
addition, apart from energy, price pressures at earlier
stages of processing have been minimal. Indeed,
excluding food and energy, the producer price index U.S. Financial Markets
(PPI)forintermediatematerialshasbeenflatoverthe
past year, and the PPI for crude materials has fallen Longer-term interest rates and equity prices have
11 percent. Moreover, inflation expectations, on bal- shown remarkably small net changes this year, given
ance,seemtohaveremainedquiescent:Accordingto the considerable shifts in economic prospects and
the Michigan survey, the median expectation for major changes in monetary policy. To some extent,
inflation over the upcoming year generally has been the expectations of the economic and policy devel-
running about 3 percent this year, similar to the opments in 2001 had already become embedded in
readingsin2000. financial asset prices as last year came to a close;
Incontrasttothestep-upinconsumerprices,prices from the end of August through year-end, the broad-
for private investment goods in the NIPA were up est equity price indexes fell 15 percent and
only a little in the first quarter after having risen investment-gradebondyieldsdeclined40to70basis
about 2 percent last year. In large part, this pattern points. In addition, however, equity prices and long-
was driven by movements in the price index for term interest rates were influenced importantly by
computers, which fell at an annual rate of nearly growing optimism in financial markets over the sec-
30percentinthefirstquarterasdemandforhigh-tech ond quarter of 2001 that the economy and profits
equipment plunged. This drop in computer prices would rebound strongly toward the end of 2001 and
wasconsiderablygreaterthantheaveragedecreaseof in 2002. On net, equity prices fell 6 percent in the
roughly 20 percent per year in the second half of the first half of this year as near-term corporate earnings
1990sandtheunusuallysmall11percentdecreasein were revised down substantially. Rates on longer-
2000.MonthlyPPIdatasuggestthatcomputerprices termTreasuryissuesrosealittle,butthoseoncorpo-
were down again in the second quarter, though much ratebondswereaboutunchanged,withthenarrowing
lessthaninthefirstquarter. spread reflecting greater investor confidence in the
Alltold,theGDPchain-typepriceindexroseatan outlook.Butriskspreadsremainedwidebyhistorical
annual rate of 31⁄
4
percent in the first quarter and has standards for businesses whose debt was rated as
risen 21⁄
4
percent over the past four quarters, an marginallyinvestmentgradeorbelow;manyofthese
acceleration of 1⁄
2
percentage point from the compa- firms had been especially hard hit by the slowdown
andthenear-termoversupplyofhigh-techequipment
Alternativemeasuresofpricechange and services, and defaults by these firms became
Percent,Q1toQ1 more frequent. Nevertheless, for most borrowers the
1998 1999 2000 environment for long-term financing was seen to be
Pricemeasure to to to quite favorable, and firms and households tended to
1999 2000 2001
taplong-termsourcesofcreditinsizetobolstertheir
Chain-type
financialconditionsandlockinmorefavorablecosts.
Grossdomesticproduct .............. 1.5 1.8 2.3
Grossdomesticpurchases ............ 1.2 2.3 2.2
Personalconsumptionexpenditures ... 1.5 2.5 2.2
Excludingfoodandenergy......... 1.8 1.6 1.7
Fixed-weight Interest Rates
Consumerpriceindex................ 1.7 3.3 3.4
Excludingfoodandenergy......... 2.2 2.2 2.7
In response to the abrupt deceleration in economic
Note. A fixed-weight index uses quantity weights from a base year to
aggregatepricesfromeachdistinctitemcategory.Achain-typeindexisthe growth and prospects for continued weakness in the
geometricaverageoftwofixed-weightindexesandallowstheweightstochange economy,theFOMCloweredthetargetfederalfunds
eachyear.Theconsumerpriceindexesareforallurbanconsumers.Changesare
basedonquarterlyaverages. rate23⁄ 4 percentagepointsinsixstepsinthefirsthalf
20 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
RatesonselectedTreasurysecurities Measuresoflong-terminflationexpectations
Percent Percent
Two-year
6.5
Ten-year FRBPhiladelphiasurvey 3.5
6.0 Michigansurvey
3.0
5.5
Three-month 5.0 2.5
4.5
2.0
4.0 TIISinflationcompensation
1.5
3.5
J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J
1999 2000 2001
1999 2000 2001
Note. ThedataaredailyandextendthroughJuly12,2001. Note. The data for the Michigan survey, which are monthly and extend
through June 2001, measurefive-year to ten-year inflation expectations. The
datafortheFRBPhiladelphiasurvey,whicharequarterlyandextendthrough
2001:Q2,measureten-yearinflationexpectations.TIISinflationcompensation
is the rate of inflation at which the price of the ten-year Treasury inflation-
of this year, an unusually steep decline relative to
indexedsecurityequalsthevalueofaportfolioofzero-couponsecuritiesthat
many past easing cycles. Through March, the policy replicatesitspayments;dataforthismeasureareweeklyaveragesandextend
throughJuly13,2001.
easings combined with declining equity prices and
accumulating evidence that the slowdown in eco-
nomic growth was more pronounced than had been thesecondquarter.Despitethisincrease,thereislittle
initially thought led to declines in yields on evidence that inflation is expected to go up from its
intermediate- and longer-term Treasury securities. current level. At the end of last year, inflation com-
Over the second quarter, despite the continued pensation had declined to levels suggesting investors
decreaseinshort-termratesandfurtherindicationsof expected inflation to fall, and the rise in inflation
a weakening economy, yields on intermediate-term compensation in the second quarter largely reversed
Treasury securities were about unchanged, while thosedeclines.Moreover,surveymeasuresoflonger-
those on longer-term securities rose appreciably. On term inflation expectations have changed little since
net, yields on intermediate-term Treasury securities themiddleoflastyear.
fell about 3⁄
4
percentage point in the first half of this Yields on longer-maturity corporate bonds were
year, while those on longer-term Treasury securities about unchanged, on net, over the first half of this
roseabout1⁄
4
percentagepoint. year.Yieldsoninvestment-gradebondsareneartheir
The increase in longer-term Treasury yields in the lows for the past ten years, but those on speculative-
second quarter appears to have been the result of a grade bonds are elevated. Spreads of corporate bond
numberoffactors.Themaininfluenceseemstohave yields relative to swap rates narrowed a bit, although
been increased investor confidence that the economy they still remain high. Amidst signs of deteriorating
would soon pick up. That confidence likely arose in credit quality and a worsening outlook for corporate
part from the aggressive easing of monetary policy earnings, risk spreads on speculative-grade bonds
andalsoinpartfromtheimprovingprospectsfor,and had risen by about 2 percentage points late last year,
passage of, a sizable tax cut. The tax cut and the reaching levels not seen since 1991. Much of this
growing support for certain spending initiatives widening was reversed early in the year, as investors
implied stronger aggregate demand and less federal became more confident that corporate balance sheets
saving than previously anticipated. The prospect that would not deteriorate substantially, but speculative-
thefederaldebtmightbepaiddownlessrapidlymay grade bond spreads widened again recently in
also have reduced slightly the scarcity premiums responsetonegativenewsaboutsecond-quarterearn-
investors were willing to pay for Treasury securities. ings and declines in share prices, leaving these
Finally,aportionoftherisemayhavebeentheresult spreads at the end of the second quarter only slightly
ofincreasedinflationexpectations.Inflationcompen- belowwheretheybegantheyear.Nonetheless,inves-
sation as measured by the difference between nomi- tors, while somewhat selective, appear to remain
nal Treasury rates and the rates on inflation-indexed receptive to new issues with speculative-grade
Treasury securities rose about 1⁄
4
percentage point in ratings.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 21
Corporatebondyields remains in the elevated range it shifted to in late
1998. Judging from the widening since 1998 of the
Percent
averagespreadbetweenratesonriskierandless-risky
loans, banks have become especially cautious about
lendingtomarginalcredits.
20
Equity Markets
15
After rising in January in response to the initial
Highyield
easing of monetary policy, stock prices declined in
10 February and March in reaction to profit warnings
AA andweakeconomicdata,withtheWilshire5000,the
broadest major stock price index, ending the first
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 quarter down 13 percent. Stock prices retraced some
of those losses in the second quarter, rising 7 per-
Note. ThedataaremonthlyaveragesandextendthroughJune2001.The
AArateiscalculatedfrombondsintheMerrillLynchAAindexwithsevento cent,asfirst-quarterearningsreleasescameinalittle
tenyearsremainingtomaturity.Thehigh-yieldrateistheyieldontheMerrill
above sharply reduced expectations and as investors
Lynch175high-yieldindex.
became more confident that economic growth and
Interest rates on commercial paper and C&I loans corporate profits would soon pick up. On net, the
have fallen this year by about as much as the federal Wilshire 5000 ended the half down 6 percent, the
funds rate, although some risk spreads widened. The DJIA declined 3 percent, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq
averageyieldspreadonsecond-tiercommercialpaper fell13percent.EarningspershareoftheS&P500in
overtop-tierpaperwidenedtoabout100basispoints the first quarter decreased 10 percent from a year
in late January, about four times its typical level, earlier. A disproportionate share of the decline in
followingdefaultsbyafewprominentissuers.Asthe S&Pearnings—morethanhalf—wasattributabletoa
year progressed, investors became less concerned plunge in the technology sector, where first-quarter
about the remaining commercial paper borrowers, earnings were down nearly 50 percent from their
and this spread has returned to a more normal level. peakinthethirdquarteroflastyear.
According to preliminary data from the Federal The decline in stock prices has left the Wilshire
Reserve’s quarterly Survey of Terms of Business 5000 down by about 20 percent, and the Nasdaq
Lending,thespreadoverthetargetfederalfundsrate downbyabout60percent,fromtheirpeaksinMarch
of the average interest rate on commercial bank C&I 2000. Both of these indexes are near their levels at
loans edged up between November and May and the end of 1998, having erased the sharp run-up in
prices in 1999 and early 2000. But both indexes
Spreadofaveragebusinessloanrate remainmorethantwoandone-halftimestheirlevels
overintendedfederalfundsrate
Majorstockpriceindexes
Percentage points
January 4, 1999 = 100
2.2
Nasdaq
200
2.0
Wilshire5000
1.8 150
1.6
100
S&P500
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Note. Thedata,whicharebasedontheFederalReserve’sSurveyofTerms J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J ASOND J FMAMJ J
ofBusinessLending,areforloansmadebydomesticcommercialbanks.The 1999 2000 2001
surveyisconductedinthemiddlemonthofeachquarter;thefinalobservationis
forMay2001andispreliminary. Note. ThedataaredailyandextendthroughJuly12,2001.
22 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
S&P500earnings–priceratioandtherealinterestrate generallyinvestingthedifferencebypurchasingother
Treasury securities on the open market. The Federal
Percent
Reserve also has increased its holdings of longer-
S&P500earnings–priceratio term repurchase agreements (RPs), including RPs
backed by agency securities and mortgage-backed
8
securities, as a substitute for outright purchases of
Treasury securities. In the first half of the year,
6
longer-termRPs,typicallywithmaturitiesoftwenty-
eightdays,averaged$13billion.
4 As reported in the previous Monetary Policy
Report, the FOMC also initiated a study to evaluate
2 assets to hold on its balance sheet as alternatives to
Realinterestrate Treasury securities. That study identified several
optionsforfurtherconsideration.Inthenearterm,the
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 Federal Reserve is considering purchasing and hold-
Note. ThedataaremonthlyandextendthroughJune2001.Theearnings– ing Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities, which
priceratioisbasedonI/B/E/Sconsensusestimatesofearningsoverthecoming areexplicitlybackedbythefullfaithandcreditofthe
year.Therealrateisestimatedasthedifferencebetweentheten-yearTreasury
rateandthefive-yeartoten-yearexpectedinflationratefromtheFRBPhiladel- U.S. government, and engaging in repurchase opera-
phiasurvey. tions against foreign sovereign debt. For possible
at the end of 1994, when the bull market shifted into implementationlater,theFederalReserveisstudying
a higher gear. The ratio of expected one-year-ahead whether to auction longer-term discount window
earnings to equity prices began to fall in 1995 when, credit, and it will over time take a closer look at a
as productivity growth picked up, investors began to broaderarrayofassetsforrepurchaseandforholding
buildinexpectationsthatincreasesinearningswould outright, transactions that would require additional
remain rapid for some time. This measure of the legalauthority.
earnings-price ratio remains near the levels reached
in 1999, suggesting that investors still anticipate
robust long-term earnings growth, likely reflecting Debt and the Monetary Aggregates
expectations for continued strong gains in
productivity. The growth of domestic nonfinancial debt in the first
Despite the substantial variation in share prices halfof2001isestimatedtohaveremainedmoderate,
over the first half of this year, trading has been slowingslightlyfromthepacein2000asareduction
orderly, and financial institutions appear to have in the rate of increase in nonfederal debt more than
encountered no difficulties that could pose broader offsettheeffectsofsmallernetrepaymentsoffederal
systemic concerns. Market volatility and a less ebul- debt. In contrast, the monetary aggregates have
lientoutlookhaveledinvestorstobuyamuchsmaller grown rapidly so far this year, in large part because
share of stock on margin. At the end of May, margin the sharp decline in short-term market interest rates
debt was 1.15 percent of total market capitalization, has reduced the opportunity cost of holding the
equal to its level at the beginning of 1999 and well depositsandotherassetsincludedintheaggregates.
belowitshighof1.63percentinMarchoflastyear.
Debt and Depository Intermediation
Federal Reserve Open Market Operations
The debt of the domestic nonfinancial sectors is esti-
As noted earlier, the Federal Reserve has responded mated to have expanded at a 43⁄
4
percent annual rate
to the diminished size of the auctions of Treasury overthefirsthalfof2001,atouchbelowthe51⁄
4
per-
securities by modifying its procedures for acquiring centgrowthrecordedin2000.Changesinthegrowth
such securities. To help maintain supply in private of nonfederal and federal debt this year have mostly
hands adequate for liquid markets, since July of last offset each other. The growth of nonfederal debt
yeartheSystemhaslimiteditsholdingsofindividual moderated from 81⁄
2
percent in 2000 to a still-robust
securities to specified percentages, ranging from 71⁄
4
percent pace in the first half of this year. House-
15 percent to 35 percent, of outstanding amounts. To holds’ borrowing slowed some but was still substan-
stay within these limits, the System has at times not tial, buoyed by continued sizable home and durable
rolled over all of its holdings of maturing securities, goodspurchases.Similarly,businessborrowingmod-
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 23
Growthofdomesticnonfinancialdebt PercentofallU.S.commercialbankassets
atwell-capitalizedbanks
Percent
Percent
8
100
6
Total 80
4
60
2
40
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Nonfederal Note. Thedataarequarterlyandextendthrough2001:Q1.Capitalstatusis
10 determined using the regulatory standards for the leverage, tier 1, and total
capitalratios.
5 quarter, bank profits remained in the high range
recorded for the past several years, and virtually all
+
0 banks—98 percent by assets—were well capitalized.
–
Withbanks’financialconditionstillquitesound,they
Federal
remainwellpositionedtomeetfutureincreasesinthe
5
demandforcredit.
1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
The Monetary Aggregates
Note. Annual growth rates are computed from fourth-quarter averages.
Growthinthefirsthalfof2001istheJuneaveragerelativetothefourth-quarter
averageatanannualrateandisbasedonpartiallyestimateddata.Domestic
The monetary aggregates have expanded rapidly so
nonfinancialdebtconsistsoftheoutstandingcreditmarketdebtofgovernments,
householdsandnonprofitorganizations,nonfinancialbusinesses,andfarms. far this year, although growth rates have moderated
erated even as bond issuance surged, as a good por-
somewhatrecently.M2rose101⁄
4
percentatanannual
rate in the first half of this year after having grown
tion of the funds raised was used to pay down com-
mercial paper and bank loans. Tending to boost debt
61⁄
4
percentin2000.Theinterestratesonmanyofthe
components of M2 do not adjust quickly or fully to
growthwasaslowinginthedeclineinfederaldebtto
a 61⁄
4
percent rate in the first half of this year from
M2growthrate
63⁄
4
percent last year, largely because of a decline in
taxreceiptsoncorporateprofits. Percent, annual rate
The share of credit to nonfinancial sectors held at
H1
banks and other depository institutions edged down
10
in the first half of the year. Bank credit, which
accounts for about three-fourths of depository credit,
8
increased at a 31⁄
2
percent annual rate in the first half
of the this year, well off the 91⁄ 2 percent growth 6
registered in 2000. Banks’ loans to businesses and
households decelerated even more, in part because 4
borrowers preferred to lock in the lower rates avail-
able from longer-term sources of funds such as bond 2
and mortgage markets and perhaps also in part
becausebanksfirmeduptheirlendingstanceinreac-
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
tiontoconcernsaboutloanperformance.Loandelin-
Note. M2 consists of currency, travelers checks, demand deposits, other
quencyandcharge-offrateshavetrendedupinrecent checkabledeposits,savingsdeposits(includingmoneymarketdepositaccounts),
quarters, and higher loan-loss provisions have small-denominationtimedeposits,andbalancesinretailmoneymarketfunds.
Seefootnoteunderthedomesticnonfinancialdebtchartfordetailsonthecom-
weighed on profits. Nevertheless, through the first putationofgrowthrates.
24 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
M3growthrate Monetaryauthoritiesinmostcasesreactedtosigns
of slowdown by lowering official rates, but by less
Percent, annual rate
than in the United States. Partly in response to these
H1 actions,yieldcurveshavesteepenednoticeablysofar
12 in 2001. Although long-term interest rates moved
downduringthefirstquarter,theymorethanreversed
10
those declines in most cases as markets reacted to
8 a combination of the anticipation of stronger real
growthandtheriskofincreasedinflationarypressure.
6
Foreign equity markets—especially for high-tech
stocks—werebuffetedearlythisyearbymanyofthe
4
same factors that affected U.S. share prices: negative
2 earnings reports, weaker economic activity, buildups
of inventories of high-tech goods, and uncertainties
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 regarding the timing and extent of policy responses.
In recent months, the major foreign equity indexes
Note. M3consistsofM2pluslarge-denominationtimedeposits,balances
ininstitutionalmoneymarketfunds,RPliabilities(overnightandterm),and movedupalongwithU.S.stockprices,buttheyhave
eurodollars(overnightandterm).Seefootnoteunderthedomesticnonfinancial
edged off lately and in most cases are down, on
debtchartfordetailsonthecomputationofgrowthrates.
balance,fortheyearsofar.
changes in market interest rates. As a consequence, Slower U.S. growth, monetary easing by the Fed-
thesteepdeclinesinshort-termmarketratesthisyear eralReserve,fluctuationsinU.S.stockprices,andthe
have left investments in M2 assets relatively more largeU.S.externaldeficithavenotundermineddollar
attractive, contributing importantly to the accelera- strength. After the December 2000 FOMC meeting,
tion in the aggregate. M2 has also probably been the dollar lost ground against the major currencies;
buoyedbythevolatilityinthestockmarketthisyear, but shortly after the FOMC’s surprise rate cut on
and perhaps by lower expected returns on equity
Foreigninterestrates
investments, leading investors to seek the safety and
liquidityofM2assets.
Percent
M3, the broadest monetary aggregate, rose at a
Short-term (three-month)
131⁄
4
percent annual rate through June, following
91⁄ 4 percent growth in 2000. All of the increase in U.K. interbank 6
M3, apart from that accounted for by M2, resulted
from a ballooning of institutional money market
Euro-area interbank 4
funds, which expanded by nearly a third. Yields on
these funds lag market yields somewhat, and so the
Canadian finance paper
2
returns to the funds, like those on many M2 assets,
becamerelativelyattractiveasinterestratesonshort- Japanese CD
+
termmarketinstrumentsdeclined. 0
–
International Developments Long-term (ten-year government bonds)
Canada United Kingdom
So far this year, average foreign growth has weak-
6
enedfurtherandiswellbelowitspaceofayearago.
Activityabroadwasrestrainedbythecontinuedhigh
Germany
level of oil prices, the global slump of the high-
4
technologysector,andspillovereffectsfromtheU.S.
economic slowdown, but in some countries domestic
Japan
demand softened as well in reaction to local factors. 2
High oil prices kept headline inflation rates some-
whatelevated,buteventhoughcoreratesofinflation
haveedgedupincountrieswhereeconomicslackhas
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
diminished, inflationary pressures appear to be well 2000 2001
undercontrol. Note. ThedataareweeklyandextendthroughJuly11,2001.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 25
January 3, the dollar reversed all of that decline as The dollar has gained about 9 percent against
market participants evidently reassessed the pros- the yen, on balance, as the Japanese economy has
pects for recovery in the United States versus that remained troubled by structural problems, stagnant
inourmajortradingpartners.Thedollarasmeasured growth, and continuing deflation. Industrial produc-
by a trade-weighted index against the currencies of tion has been falling, and real GDP declined slightly
major industrial countries gained in value steadily in inthefirstquarter,withbothprivateconsumptionand
thefirstthreemonthsof2001,reachingafifteen-year investment contracting. Japanese exports also have
high in late March. Continued flows of foreign funds sagged because of slower demand from many key
into U.S. assets appeared to be contributing impor- trading partners. Early in the year, under increasing
tantly to the dollar’s increase. Market reaction to pressure to respond to signs that their economy was
indications that the U.S. economy might be headed weakening further, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) slightly
toward a more prolonged slowdown undercut the reduced the uncollateralized overnight call rate, its
dollar’s strength somewhat in early April, and the key policy interest rate. By March, the low level of
dollareasedfurtheraftertheunexpectedApril18rate equity prices, which had been declining since early
cutbytheFOMC.However,thedollarhasmorethan 2000, was provoking renewed concerns about the
made up that loss in recent months as signs of weak- solvency of Japanese banks. In mid-March, the BOJ
ness abroad have emerged more clearly. On balance, announced that it was shifting from aiming at a
the dollar is up about 7 percent against the major particular overnight rate to targeting balances that
currencies so far this year; against a broader index private financial institutions hold at the Bank, effec-
that includes currencies of other important trading tively returning the overnight rate to zero; the BOJ
partners,thedollarhasappreciated5percent. also announced that it would continue this easy
monetary stance until inflation moves up to zero or
above. After the yen had moved near the end of
NominalU.S.dollarexchangerates March to its weakest level relative to the dollar in
more than four years, Japanese financial markets
Week ending January 5, 2000 = 100
were buoyed by the surprise election in May of
Exchange rate indexes
Junichiro Koizumi to party leadership and thereby to
prime minister. The yen firmed slightly for several
115
Major currencies weeks thereafter, but continued weak economic fun-
damentals and increased market focus on the daunt-
110
ing challenges facing the new government helped
pushtheyenbackdownandbeyonditspreviouslow
Broad 105 level.
At the start of 2001, economic activity in the euro
100 areahadslowednoticeablyfromthemorerapidrates
seen early last year but still was fairly robust. Aver-
age GDP growth of near 2 percent was only slightly
below estimated rates of potential growth, although
Selected bilateral rates Japanese yen
somekeycountries(notablyGermany)wereshowing
Euro
120 signsoffalteringfurther.Althoughhighpricesforoil
U.K. pound
and food had raised headline inflation, the rate of
115
changeofcorepriceswasbelowthe2percentceiling
foroverallinflationsetbytheEuropeanCentralBank
110
(ECB). The euro also was showing some signs of
strength, having moved well off the low it had
105
reached in October. However, negative spillovers
Canadian dollar
from the global slowdown started to become more
100
evident in weaker export performance in the first
quarter,andleadingindicatorssuchasbusinessconfi-
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
dence slumped. Nevertheless, the ECB held policy
2000 2001
steady through April, as further weakening of the
Note. ThedataareweeklyandextendthroughJuly11,2001.Indexes(top
euro against the dollar (following a trend seen since
panel)aretrade-weightedaveragesoftheexchangevalueofthedollaragainst
majorcurrenciesandagainstthecurrenciesofabroadgroupofimportantU.S. theFOMC’sratecutinearlyJanuary),growthofM3
tradingpartners.Bilateralrates(bottompanel)areinforeigncurrencyunitsper
inexcessoftheECB’sreferencerate,andsignsofan
dollar.
26 Monetary Policy Report to the Congress July 2001
edging up of euro-area core inflation were seen as In Argentina, the weak economy and the govern-
militatingagainstaneasingofpolicy. ment’s large and growing debt burden stoked market
In early May, the ECB surprised markets with a fears that the government would default on its debt
25 basis point reduction of its minimum bid rate andalteritsone-for-onepegofthepesotothedollar.
and parallel reductions of its marginal lending and In April, spreads on Argentina’s internationally
deposit rates. In explaining the step, the ECB noted traded bonds moved up sharply, and interest rates
thatmonetarydevelopmentsnolongerposedathreat spiked. In June, the government completed a nearly
to price stability and projected that moderation of $30 billion debt exchange with its major domestic
GDPgrowthwoulddampupwardpricepressure.The and international creditors aimed at alleviating the
eurohascontinuedtofallsincethenand,onbalance, government’s cash flow squeeze, improving its debt
has declined 9 percent against the dollar since the amortizationprofile,andgivingittimetoenactfiscal
beginningoftheyear.Facedwithasimilarslowdown reforms and revive the economy. Argentine financial
in the U.K. economy that was exacerbated by the conditions improved somewhat following agreement
outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease, the Bank of onthedebtswap.However,thisimprovementproved
Englandalsocutitsofficialcallratethreetimes(bya temporary, and an apparent intensification of market
total of 75 basis points) during the first half of the concerns about the possibility of a debt default trig-
year.TheLaborParty’svictoryinparliamentaryelec- gered a sharp fall in Argentine financial asset prices
tions in early June seemed to raise market expecta- at mid-July. This financial turbulence in Argentina
tions of an early U.K. euro referendum and put addi- negatively affected financial markets in several other
tional downward pressure on sterling, but that was emerging market economies. The turmoil in Argen-
partly offset by signs of stronger inflationary pres- tina took a particular toll on Brazil, where an energy
sure. On balance, the pound has lost about 6 percent crisis added to other problems that have kept growth
against the dollar this year, while it has strengthened
againsttheeuro. Emergingmarkets
The exchange value of the Canadian dollar has
swungoverawiderangein2001.Inthefirstquarter, Week ending January 5, 2000 = 100
the Canadian dollar fell about 5 percent against Daily exchange rates
the U.S. dollar as the Canadian economy showed
Brazil 130
signs of continuing a deceleration of growth that had
started in late 2000. Exports—especially autos, auto
equipment, and electronic equipment—suffered from 120
weaker U.S. demand. Softer global prices for non- Korea
oilcommoditiesalsoappearedtoputdownwardpres- 110
sure on the Canadian currency. With inflation well
within its target range, the Bank of Canada cut its Argentina
100
policy rate several times by a total of 125 basis
Mexico
points.Sofarthisyear,industriesoutsideofmanufac-
turing and primary resources appear to have been Percentage points
much less affected by external shocks, and domestic Bond spreads
demand has maintained a fairly healthy pace. Since 12
the end of March, the Canadian dollar has regained Argentina
much of the ground it had lost earlier and is down 10
Brazil
about2percentonbalancesincethebeginningofthe
8
year.
Global financial markets were rattled in February 6
by serious problems in the Turkish banking sector. Mexico
4
Turkish interest rates soared and, after market pres-
suresledauthoritiestoallowtheTurkishliratofloat,
2
it experienced a sharp depreciation of more than Korea
30 percent. An IMF program announced in mid-May
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
that will bring $8 billion in support this year and 2000 2001
requireanumberofbankingandotherreformshelped
Note. ThedataareweeklyandextendthroughJuly11,2001.Exchangerates
steadythesituationtemporarily,butmarketsentiment (toppanel)areinforeigncurrencyunitsperdollar.Bondspreads(bottompanel)
are the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index ‘‘plus’’ (sovereign yield)
startedtodeteriorateagaininearlyJuly.
spreadsoverU.S.Treasuries.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 27
very slow since late last year. Intervention purchases example, fell from a 15 percent annual rate in late
of the real by the Brazilian central bank and a 2000toclosetozeroinmid-2001.Theturnaroundof
300 basis point increase in its main policy interest the high-tech component of industrial production in
rate helped take some pressure off the currency, but those countries was even more abrupt—from more
therealhasdeclinedabout24percentsofarthisyear. than a 30 percent rate of increase to a slight decline
TheweakperformanceoftheMexicaneconomyat by midyear. In the Philippines and Indonesia, eco-
theendoflastyearcausedlargelybyafallinexports nomicdifficultieswerecompoundedbyseriouspoliti-
to the United States (notably including a sharp drop cal tensions. Currencies in many of these countries
in exports of automotive products) and tight mone- moved down versus the dollar, and stock prices
tary policy carried over into early 2001. With infla- declined. In Korea, the sharp slump in activity that
tion declining, the Bank of Mexico loosened mone- beganlatelastyearcontinuedinto2001,asweakness
tary policy in May for the first time in three years. intheexternalsectorspreadtodomesticconsumption
Problems with Mexican growth did not spill over to andinvestment.TheBankofKorealowereditstarget
financial markets, however. The peso has remained interest rate a total of 50 basis points over the first
strong and is up about 3 percent so far this year, and half of the year in response to the weakening in
stockpriceshaverisen. activity. The Chinese economy, which is less depen-
Average growth in emerging Asia slowed signifi- dent on technology exports than many other coun-
cantly in the first half; GDP grew more slowly or tries in the region, continued to expand at a brisk
even declined in economies that were more exposed pace in the first half of this year, as somewhat softer
to the effects of the global drop in demand for high- export demand was offset by increased government
tech products. Average growth of industrial produc- spending.
tion in Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, for
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (2001, July 17). Monetary Policy Report. Monetary Policy Reports, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/monetary_policy_report_20010718
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_monetary_policy_report_20010718,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Monetary Policy Report},
year = {2001},
month = {Jul},
howpublished = {Monetary Policy Reports, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/monetary_policy_report_20010718},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}