greenbooks · January 20, 1975
Greenbook/Tealbook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Content last modified 6/05/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
January 17, 1975
SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee
By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
The Domestic Nonfinancial Economy
Gross national product in the final quarter of 1974, at
a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,428 billion, was $11.7 billion
above the third quarter rate according to Commerce Department preliminary estimates.
In real term, total output of goods and services
declined at a 9.1 per cent annual rate.
Prices as measured by the
GNP implicit price deflator, which reflect shifts in composition of
expenditures, rose at a 13.7 per cent annual rate; prices as measured
by the gross private product fixed weighted price index rose at a 12.0
per cent annual rate.
Nonfarm inventory investment in the fourth quarter, at $14.4
billion, annual rate, was double that in the third quarter, and it
accounted for about half the rise in total GNP.
Personal consumption
expenditures for durable goods and outlays for residential structures
declined sharply in
the fourth quarter.
And consumer spending for
nondurable goods rose by only a small amount.
Total consumption
expenditures increased by only a small amount and personal saving and
the ratio of personal saving to disposable personal income increased
sharply further to 8.5 per cent from 7.5 per cent.
In contrast to
weakness in these sectors, Federal government purchases of goods and
services for national defense rose markedly--much more than indicated
earlier.
In real terms, the only strength was in inventory investment
and net exports of goods and services, each of which were up by a small
amount.
Personal consumption expenditures, residential construction
outlays, and business fixed investment declined, and government
purchases of goods and services were unchanged.
- 2 GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS
(Quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted.
Expenditures and income figures are billions
of dollars, with quarterly figures at annual rates.)
Gross National Product
Final purchases
Private
Excluding net exports
GNP in constant (1958) dollars
1974-III
Change
Amount
from
74-11
1974-IV
Change
Amount
from
74-III
1416.3
1407.6
1095.3
1098.4
32.5
37.3
29.4
31.0
1428.0
1413.5
1091.1
1089.9
823.1
-4.0
803.7
11.7
5.9
-4.2
-8.5
-19.4
----- Per Cent Change Per Year------Gross National Product
Gross Domestic Product
Gross Private Product
Gross Private Nonfarm Product
GNP in constant prices
GDP in constant prices
GPP in constant prices
GPNfP in constant prices
GNP implicit price deflator
GNP fixed weighted price index
GPP fixed weighted price index
Inventories.
9.7
9.4
10.1
10.4
-1.9
-2.1
-2.3
-2.3
11.9
12.7
13.8
3.3
4.0
2.2
2.0
-9.1
-8.9
-10.1
-9.0
13.7
13.7
12.0
Book value of retail trade inventories grew at a
$11.1 billion annual rate in November, much below the $33.1 billion
October rate and below the third quarter average growth rate of $12,8
billion.
Nonautomotive retail.stocks declined in November at a $1.0 billion
annual rate.
The annual growth rate of book value of wholesale trade
inventories was $2.5 billion in November, much below both the upward revised
October rate of $13.7 billion and the third quarter average rate of $8.6
billion,
-3-
For manufacturing and trade, the rate was $37.2 billion in
November, much below the $71,9 billion October rate and the $59.2
billion third quarter average rate.
The manufacturing and trade
inventory-sales ratio rose in November to 1.59 from the October rate
of 1.54.
Wholesale prices.
The wholesale price index for December
declined 0.5 per cent, seasonally adjusted (not at an annual rate), as
the index of farm and food products dropped sharply and that for
industrial commodities was unchanged.
The index of farm and food products fell 2.5 per cent,
seasonally adjusted, chiefly as a result of lower prices for manufactured
animal feeds, grains, fresh fruits and vegetables, cotton, wool, and
soybeans.
The sugar and confectionery group also declined.
The index of industrial commodities was unchanged, the first
time in over 2 years that the monthly index didn't rise.
Price
reductions, mainly for copper, ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal,
textile products, and hides and skins, offset price increases, primarily
those for machinery and equipment, chemicals, and fuels.
The December
index gave evidence of further moderation in rates of price increase
for most industrial commodity groups that showed increases.
-4-
WHOLESALE PRICES
(Per cent changes at seasonally adjusted
annual rates) 1/
Dec.'73 Dec.'72 June'73 Dec.'73 June'74 Sept'74 Nov.'74
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Dec.'74 June'73 IDec.'73 June'74 Sent'74 Dec.'74 Dec.'74
All commodities
20.9
20.2
10.9
18.2
35.2
13.4
Farm and food products
11.0
45.8
10.4
-11.5
59.2
21.9
Industrial commodities
Crude materials
Intermediate materials
Finished goods
Producer
Consumer, excl. food
Nondurable, excl, foods
Durable
25.6
23,0
14.8
10.6
23,0
12.2
6.3
5.4
6.7
8.5
4.5
10.9
40.4
11.7
7.1
5.3
V.1
11.3
2.8
34.0
44.3
38.0
24.5
20.0
26.8
35.6
13.2
28.3
29.1
32.2
22.7
31.8
18.5
19.1
15.6
8.2
-14.8
8.2
13.3
18.7
10.6
7.7
17.4
Consumer finished foods
13,0
27.0
18.5
-1.1
29.4
29.1
Note:
1/
23.5
21.2
22.t
20.5
23.9
-5.9
-29.8
0.0
-39.2
2.1
5.3
6.2
4.9
.8
9.0
-14.7
Farm and food products include farm products and processed foods and feeds.
Not compounded for one-month changes.
-5-
Private housing starts dropped further from the already sharply
reduced November pace, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 868
thousand.
Building permits, however, turned upward in December.
The
level of starts was only slightly above the low of October, 1966, and
brought the fourth quarter 1974 average to 989 thousand units, down
almost a fifth from the third quarter rate and the lowest in 8 years.
Unlike November, the December starts reduction was concentrated
largely in single-family units.
For the year as a whole all starts
totaled 1.34 million units, compared with 2.04 million in 1973.
NEW HOUSING UNITS
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates, in millions of units)
QIII
QIV
1974
Nov.(r)
1970
QI
Per cent change in
December from:
Dec. () Month ago Year ago
Permits
1.10
.91
.77
.73
.80
+10
-38
Starts
1.24
1.21
,99
.99
.87
-12
-38
.69
.55
.87
.34
.75
.24
.79
.20
.68
.19
-14
- 6
-12
-70
1-family
2- or more-family
-
6 -
Merchant builder sales of new single-family homes rose in
November from the very low October figure but remained well below
November 1973.
Builder backlogs of unsold homes were reduced only
slightly further and still represented almost 11½ months' supply at
the November sales rate.
The median price of the mix of homes sold in
November was essentially unchanged from October and continued to be
above the median asking price of unsold new homes.
Sales of used
homes in November were again below a year earlier.
The median price
on such units was 8 per cent above November 1973--the smallest year-
over-year increase for any month in 1974.
SALES, STOCKS AND PRICES OF NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
Homes
Homes
sold 1/ for sale 2/
(thousands of units)
1973
(l
QII
726
680
426
436
Months'
supply
7.0
7.7
Median price of:
Homes sold
Homes for sale
(thousands of dollars)
30.4
32.7
29.4
31.2
QIII
566
453
9.6
33.5
32.1
QIV
483
446
11.1
34.0
32.9
1974
QI
QII
QIII
525
567
483
453
435
415
10.4
9.2
10.3
35.2
35.6
36.4
34.0
35.0
35.7
Aug.
Sept.(r)
Oct.
Nov.(p)
457
481
410
429
433
415
410
405
11.4
10.4
12.0
11.3
35.7
36.8
37.1
37.0
35.5
35.7
35.9
36.0
1/
2/
Seasonally adjusted annual rate.
Seasonally adjusted, end of period.
- 7 -
In commenting on the growth of Federal Spending in his State of
the Union message, the President indicated that where spending is curbed,
the U.S. Treasury may be legally obligated to spend more than $360 billion
in FY '76 even if no new programs are enacted.
The President, therefore,
has asked for a moratorium on any new spending initiatives, and he
reinforced this request by issuing the following preliminary FY '76
Budget estimates:
Fiscal Years
Per cent Change
1974
1975e
1976e
75/74
Revenues
264.9
280
303
6%
Outlays
268.4
314
349
Deficit
3.5
34
46
76/75
8%
17%
11%
The FY '76 expenditure estimate shown above appears to have
been derived in the following way:
Administration's Base Estimate
Plus: increased outlays assoc. with
energy proposal
$360 billion
7 1/
Less: saving resulting from 5% ceiling
placed on pay and programs tied
to CPI
6
Less: proposed budget reductions and
other actions
Administration's Preliminary FY '76 estimate
11.5
$349 billion
1/ Consists of $3 billion higher Federal costs due to oil price hike,
$2 billion new payments to compensate State and local government and
$2 billion in cash payments to low income people.
- 8 -
A number of adjustments need to be made in order to compare
the above budget spending total with the staff projections shown in the
January 15 Greenbook.
We did not assume the energy related outlays nor
the 5 per cent ceiling on increases in renumeration.
We did, however,
incorporate a major portion of the other requested reductions.
Once,
these adjustments are made, spending according to the Administration
basis would appear to be $314 billion in FY 1975 and $351 billion in
FY 1976.
These figures indicate a substantially higher underlying
spending estimate by the Administration, since the corresponding
Greenbook figures were $309 and $343 billion.
The reasons for these
differences in terms of specific programs are as yet unknown, hence
the extent of error in our estimates cannot yet be evaluated.
-9The Domestic Financial Situation
Mortgage market.
According to the HUD (FHA) opinion survey,
average interest rates on new commitments for conventional new- and
existing-home mortgages fell further during December to 9.45 per cent.
Private secondary market yields on FHA-insured new-home mortgages were
9.51 per cent at year end--87 basis points below the recent high at the
end of September.
These movements are generally consistent with the
FHLMC series on primary market rates and FNMA secondary market auction
yields reported in the Greenbook.
AVERAGE RATES AND YIELDS ON NEW-HOME MORTGAGES
(HUD-FHA Field Office Opinion Survey)
Secondary market 1/
Primary market
End
of
Conventional loans
Spread 4/
Level 2/
Mnnth
(per cent)
1974-Low
8.55 (Feb.)
(basis points)
Level 3/
(per cent)
FHA-insured loans
Discounts
Spread 4/
(basis points)
(points)
2.3 (Feb.)
-66 (Sept.)
8.54 (Feb.)
- 8 (Sept.)
High
9.80 (Sept.)
45 (Feb.)
10.38 (Sept.)
44 (Feb.)
6.3 (July,
Sept.)
Jan.
8.65
40
Feb.
8.55
45
8.54
44
2.3
Mar.
Apr.
8.60
8.90
-4
- 8
8.66
9.17
2
19
3.2
5.1
May
June
9.15
9.25
6
-25
9.46
9.46
37
- 4
5.3
5.3
July
Aug.
9.40
9.60
n.a.
-39
9.85
10.30
Sept.
9.80
-66
10.38
Oct.
Nov.
Dec,
9.70
9.55
9.45
-33
-13
n.a.
10.13
9.51
n.a,
31
- 8
10
n.a.
6.3
5.8
6.3
4.6
3.8
1/ Any gaps in data are due to periods of adjustment to changes in maximum permissible contract rates on FHA-insured loans.
2/ Average contract rate (excluding fees or points) on commitments for conventional
first mortgage loans, rounded to the nearest 5 basis points.
3/ Average gross yield (before deducting servicing costs) to investors on 30-year
minimum-downpayment FHA-insured first mortgages for immediate delivery in the
private secondary market (excluding FNMA), assuming prepayment in 15 years.
4/
Average gross mortgage rate or yield minus average yield on new issues of
Aaa utility bonds in the last week of the month.
- 10 INTEREST RATES
Highs
1974
Lows
Dec. 16
1975
Jan. 16
Short-Term Rates
Federal funds (wkly. avg.) 13.55(7/3)
3-month
Treasury bills(bid)
Comm. paper(90-119 day)
Bankers' acceptances
Euro-dollars
CD's (NYC)90-119 day
Most often quoted new
6-month
Treasury bills (bid)
Comm. paper (4-6 mo.)
Federal agencies
CD's (NYC) 180-269 day
Most often quoted new
1-year
Treasury bills (bid)
Federal agencies
CD's (NYC)
Most often quoted new
Prime municipals
8.81(2/27)
8.72(12/18)
9.74(8/23) 6.93( 2/6) 7.14
12.25(7/17) 7.75(2/22)
9.13
12.50(8/15) 7.75(2/26) 8.95
14.38(7/16) 8.25(2/18) 10.25
7.22(1/15)
6.49
7.50
7.60
8.25
12.00( 9/4) 7.88(2/20)
8.75(12/18)
7.38(1/15)
9.86(8/23) 6.80(2/19)
12.13(7/10) 7.50(2/22)
10.63(8/28) 7.16(2/19)
6.96
9.00
7.54
6.49
7.50
7.21(1/15)
11.90(8/21) 7.50(2/27)
8.00(12/18)
7.25(1/15)
9.65(8/23) 6.37(2/15)
10.18(8/26) 7.01(2/19)
6.59
7.40
6.44
8.00(12/18)
7.00(1/15)
4.10(1/17)
9.75(7/17) 7.00(2/27)
6.50(7/12) 3.70(2/15)
4.40(12/20)
7.31(1/15)
Intermediate and Long-Term
Treasury coupon issues
5-years
20-years
Corporate
Seasoned Aaa
Baa
New Issue Aaa Utility
Municipal
Bond Buyer Index
Mortgage--average yield
in FNMA auction
8.79(8/23)
8.72(8/26)
6.72(2/14)
7.40( 1/4)
7.23
7.84
7.31(1/14)
7.80(1/14)
9.40(10/8) 7.73( 1/2) 8.85(12/16) 8.84(1/15)
10.53(12/2) 8.54( 1/2) 10.53(12/16) 10.64(1/15)
10.61(10/2) 8.05(2/13)
9.51(12/18)
9.37p
7.15(12/12)5.16( 2/6)
7.08(12/18)
6.90
9.52(12/16)
9.37(1/13)
10.59( 9/9) 8.43(2/25)
CORRECTIONS:
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS
1975
Proj.
1975
I
Disposable income
Personal saving
Saving rate (per cent)
Corporate profits and I.V.A.
Corporate profits before tax
II
1064.4
93.6
8.8
1019.7
80.9
7.9
90.5
115.9
119.5
288.2
-47.8
294.0
-29.7
-2.1
-2.2
-3.1
116.5
72.1
75.4
115.2
70.6
72.9
89.6
1062.4
104.5
9.8
1976
III
1088.8
105.6
9.7
Projection
IV
I
II
1086.8
83.2
7.7
1110.4
86.9
7.8
1133.0
91.0
8.0
83.3
111,0
90.9
115,0
98.2
118.0
102.6
119.5
104.8
270.2
277.5
-63.7
311.2
-38.9
321.0
-35.9
324.8
-38.6
- .5
- .9
119.5
Federal government receipts
and expenditures (NIA basis)
Receipts
Surplus or deficit (-)
State and local government surplus or
deficit (-), (NIA basis)
Industrial production (1967=100)
Capacity utilization, mfg. (per cent)
Major materials (per cent)
116.9
71.3
74.2
-------------------Disposable income
Corporate profits before tax
8.8
-17.7
Federal government receipts and
expenditures (NIA basis)
Receipts
-1.2
Industrial oroduction
-5.9
-5 9
NOTE:
6.2
-32.8
-3.6
-15.3
-15 3
-58.9
-2.5
116.8
71.0
73.5
119.1
71.7
74.9
121.2
72.3
75.9
- .6
122.4
72.3
76.2
In Per Cent Per Year-------------------------10.3
- .7
9.0
8.4
-25.6
15.2
10.8
5.2
.0
-28.7
11.3
58.2
13.2
4.8
17.8
-4_2
-4 2
5.6
In the January 15 Greenbook, there were some computational errors in the GNP tables.
corrected figures for Part I, pages 8, 9, 10, and 1t.
73
7 r3
~-r
This table shows
A - 1
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A*
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERENMENT OUTLOOK
During 1974, states and localities experienced a deterioration in their fiscal position. Expenditures rose rapidly as a result
of accelerating wage demands by public employees and higher prices
for goods and services. In contrast, the growth of receipts was
curtailed by tax reductions, reduced gasoline consumption and a slowdown in economic activity toward the end of the year. Own-source
revenues which include personal taxes, indirect business taxes and
corporate profits taxes, grew by only $11.7 billion in 1974, as
compared to $13.3 billion in 1973 and $16.6 billion in 1972. The
rate of increase of Federal grants continued to moderate in 1974,
rising at rates well below those prevailing in 1971 and 1972. After
a very sharp rise of $8.4 billion in 1972, caused largely by the
initial distribution of revenue sharing funds, grants increased by
only $3.1 billion in 1973 and by approximately $2.8 billion in 1974.
As a result of these developments, the NIA surplus of state and local
governments dropped from $9.2 billion in 1973 to approximately $1.8
billion in 1974.
When the receipts and expenditures of social insurance
funds are excluded, the current fiscal positions of states and
localities is much worse. Unlike their Federal counterparts, the
surpluses of state-local insurance funds are not available to finance
As a
current operating deficits or capital spending projects.
result, they are usually excluded from the overall national income
accounts measure when assessing the fiscal health of these governments. On this basis, the operational surplus (or deficit) which
excludes surplus social insurance funds, recorded a large $8.2
billion deficit in 1974, following surpluses of $3.9 billion in 1972
and $.1 billion in 1973. (Estimates of the state and local surplus
for the period 1967 to 1974 can be found in Table I).
*Prepared by James Fralick, Economist, Government Finance Section,
Division of Research and Statistics, and Martha Scanlon, Economist,
Capital Markets Section.
A-
2
Table I
State and Local Surplus or Deficit
(billions of dollars)
deficit
Surplus Social
Insurance
Funds
1967
-1.6
4.4
-6.0
1968
-
.3
5.0
-5.3
1969
.7
5.7
-5.0
1970
1.8
6.5
-4.7
1971
3.4
7.3
-3.9
NIA
Surplus or
1972
12.3
Operational
Surplus or
deficit A-B
8.4
1973
9.2
9.1
1974
1.8
10.0
-8.2
10.8
-12.8
1975 est.
-2.0
The fiscal position of states and localities is likely to
deteriorate even further in 1975. Cost induced expenditure increases
and previously negotiated wage settlements will continue to put upward pressure on purchases. Partially offsetting this increase in
current operating expenditures, is an expected sharp contraction in
the growth of construction outlays. Nevertheless, the rate of growth
of state and local purchases is expected to be 10 per cent in 1975
down only slightly from the 13 per cent gain posted in 1974.
In the absence of any structural changes--such as the
imposition of new taxes or legislated rate increases in existing
ones--revenues are expected to grow at a rather sluggish 8.7 per
cent, just slightly higher than the 7.2 per cent gain registered
in 1974.
Inflation, of course, will continue to provide additional
growth in general sales taxes and state personal income taxes.
A-
3
But further erosion of the property tax base, through reductions
and exemptions--particularly for the aged and the poor--and pressure
from the courts to shift the financing of schools to other means,
will partially offset these inflation induced revenue gains. Moreover, Federal grants--stimulated in part by an expanded public
employment program--are expected to grow only modestly with the
rate of increase probably insufficient to ease the state and local
governments' overall budgetary problem.
As the year progresses and as the state and local fiscal
position worsens, the pressure for tax increases should grow.
Given the likely Federal tax cut, state and local governments
might take the opportunity to raise their own tax rates. However,
an electorate already facing the financial strains brought on by
rising unemployment and continued inflation is likely to resist any
new taxes. On the expenditure side, many jurisdictions are likely
to propose expenditure cuts, but implementation will be difficult
given the desire by the states and localities to maintain existing
service levels. In view of these constraints on needed fiscal
adjustments, the deficit of state and local governments in 1975 is
expected to be $2.0 billion on an NIA basis and $12.8 billion on
an operational basis. 1/
Given these rather dreary fiscal prospects, State and
local demands on securities markets can be expected to rise in
calendar 1975. The outlook for bond yields, however, remains
clouded, since it will depend importantly on the willingness and
capacity of major institutional investors to absorb new issues.
In 1974, gross financing in municipal bond markets dropped to $22.7
billion from the previous year's high of $24.0 billion, chiefly
because heavy customer loan demands and the high cost of
market funds kept commercial banks from adding to their security
portfolios. Acquisitions of municipals by casualty companies--the
other major institutional buyer--were also limited in 1974 by the
severe erosion of casualty company surpluses resulting from the
combination of sharply higher loss claims and drastically reduced
stock prices.
1/
It should be noted that the overall figures conceal wide
differences in the experiences of individual governments.
A number of states will continue to run sizeable surpluses
whereas other states and many cities will be in a less
enviable position.
The President's recently announced energy proposal includes
a $2 billion increase in Federal grants to help states and
localities meet an expected increase in fuel costs. Since
the increase in revenues (grants) is expected to equal the
increase in fuel related purchases, the NIA deficit for 1975
should remain at the $2.0 billion level described above.
A-
4
Although the volume of new municipal bond offerings picked
up some early last fall, the increase was not sustained through the
fourth quarter. Part of this fourth quarter slackening probably
reflected normal seasonal financing patterns; but, in addition,
market conditions were disrupted late in the quarter by the financing
difficulties of New York City. 1/ This disruption reversed a market
downtrend in municipal bond yields that had begun in late summer.
At year end, the Bond Buyer 20-bond yield index averaged 7.08 per
cent, nearly 2 percentage points above the level prevailing at the
start of 1974.
Bond markets may improve somewhat during 1975, as money
market pressures ease and commercial banks and other institutional
investors restructure their investment portfolios. But, a heavy
calendar of new State and local issues early in the year--before
dealer inventories have been worked down--would no doubt slow downward adjustments in municipal rates. Furthermore, there is some
speculation that banks may acquire fewer municipals in the first
half than otherwise as a result of reduced incentives for tax preference income and greater emphasis on rebuilding their liquidity
positions perhaps at the expense of increasing their portfolio of
long term bonds. Easing in municipal bond markets may also be
slowed by spillover effects from the anticipated heavy financing
demands of the Treasury.
While many state and local unitspostponed bond offerings
in 1974, short term borrowings in the tax-exempt sector rose to a
record high of $29 billion. New York City accounted for a large
proportion of the short term financings, tapping the market for
over $7.4 billion during the year. New York's financing difficulties
late in the year became apparent, when the city had to pay a record
rate of 9.48 per cent on $600 million of notes sold December 2.
1/
In December, New York City paid an average rate of slightly more
than 9.4 per cent on two issues of short-term notes totaling
$600 million. The December sale followed a large New York City
financing in October which had sold poorly. Although the New
York experience should not be considered as characteristic of
municipal market conditions generally--since the terms were
affected by the exceptionally large calendar of New York offerings
in earlier months, as well as an unusual amount of public
attention focused on the City's financial plight--the large
volume of New York issues did sharply increase dealer inventories and thus had an impact on the market's willingness to
absorb new issues.
A - 5
While other higher rated municipalities have received more favorable
terms on note issues than New York City, in general, pressures in
these markets have prevented tax-exempt rates from dropping substantially, despite recent easing in other markets. While the outlook for such rates calls for some decrease, the depth of decline in
municipal rates may not be as great as in other short term yields.
Indeed, expected demands in this market, resulting from worsening
fiscal prospects of state and local governments, may even exceed the
record levels of last year.
In addition to New York City, there have been a few recent
reports of financing difficulties by major municipalities, such as
Cleveland and Detroit. Generally, these reports are of potential
problems in cities that are having fiscal difficulties and may have
to go into the market with medium or lower credit ratings. Investors
have shown a clear preference for shorter maturity, high quality bonds
and demanded high premiums from lower rated units. This preference
is evidenced in the Bond Buyer indices. The spread between the
20-bond index and the 11-bond index of municipal yeilds increased
from 13 basis points at the beginning of 1974 to a record 46 basis
points at year-end.
The 11-bond index is a subset of the 20-bond index and includes those 11 issues with the highest ratings. This composite
rating of the 11-bond index is equivalent to the second best rating
by Moody's Investors Serivce, while the average of the 20-bond
index falls between the second and third rating by this agency. 1/
The increasing spread between the two indexes indicates that in all
probability there will be wide differences in the experience of
individual governments in the bond markets during coming months.
Units that have low ratings may expect to face serious difficulties
in floating bonds without incurring sizable costs, even if other
market rates continue to move down. In some cases, legal ceilings
on the rate a State or municipality may pay for borrowed funds may
effectively keep them out of the municipal market. In contrast,
high quality names may find borrowing conditions improved, although
still costly by historical standards.
1/
The spread between the two indexes may also reflect slight
differences in the average maturity of the included bonds.
However, it is reasonable to assume that most of the increase
in the spread in the last year was associated with quality
differences.
A-
6
Municipal Bond Yields
(Indices are as of the first Thursday of each month)
In per cent
20-Bonds
11-Bonds
5.05
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
5.18
5.16
5.27
5.73
5.91
6.01
6.64
6.70
6.88
6.68
6.66
6.89
1975 - Jan.
7.08
6.62
1974 - Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
5.04
5.16
5.61
5.78
5.83
6.42
6.44
6.56
6.34
6.33
6.50
Difference
B-
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX B
RECENT MOVEMENTS IN
CURRENCY AND DEMAND DEPOSITS*
In 1974 rates of growth in both the money stock (M1) and the
demand deposit component of M 1 were lower than in the preceeding four
years. The growth rate of currency, on the other hand, accelerated to
a post-war high.
TABLE B - 1
MONEY STOCK, CURRENCY, AND DEMAND DEPOSITS
ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Seasonally adjusted
Money
Stock
Period
Currency
Demand
Deposits
Annual-
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
3.5
6.2
6.1
8.7
6.1
6.0
6.7
7.1
8.2
8.3
2.8
5.9
6.0
8.9
5.5
1974
4.5
9.9
2.9
3.4
11.3
7.3
9.7
2.3
11.8
QIII
QIV
0.6
8.7
6.1
9.3
-1.0
8.6
1974-QI
QII
QIII
QIV
5.4
6.5
1.6
4.1
11.0
8.2
7.4
11.6
3.8
5.9
-0.2
1.8
1/
Quarterly1973-QI
QII
1/ All growth rates calculated from end of period monthly averages.
A staff study undertaken to determine the causes of these
divergent growth rates found that the rapid 1974 expansion in currency
*Prepared by David Lindsey, Helen Farr, and Richard Porter, Econometric
and Computer Applications Section, Division of Research and Statistics.
B - 2
growth could be readily explained by factors believed to influence the
public's demand for currency. However, the slow growth of demand deposits in the last half of the year was difficult to explain. No fully
convincing rationale for the slow rate of growth of the demand deposit
component of the money stock could be offered.
Currency growth in 1974. The annual data shown in the preceeding table indicate a gradual acceleration in the rate of currency growth
for each year since 1969, but the increase in the growth rate for 1974
was larger than in prior years. The 9.9 per cent growth in currency last
year appears to have reflected the 8.9 per cent growth in nominal consumer
expenditures over the same period. This variable captures the transactions motive for holding currency and in the Board's quarterly econometric model plays an important role in determining the demand for
currency. Indeed, simulation of the model accurately predicted the
higher growth rate of this component of M 1.
The behavior of currency by denomination shown in Table B-2
also conformed to the expected pattern in a year of high inflation,
because the rate of growth of large denominations exceeded that of coin
and small denominations. As prices in general rise, cash transactions
necessarily involve higher nominal amounts. To facilitate these transactions more easily, the public will tend to decrease the fraction of
their currency held in small denominations and the rate of growth of
large denominations will then exceed the rate of growth of small denominations. Table B - 2 shows that this was the case in every year since
1969. The growth in currency by denomination in 1974 was not surprising,
therefore, despite press accounts to the contrary.
A more detailed examination of currency denomination by
Reserve Districts revealed no extraordinary movements. The differences
in growth by District were no larger than would normally be expected.
Demand Deposit growth in 1974. The degree of slowdown in the
growth of the demand deposit component of M 1 in the last half of 1974
was not forecast by either judgmental or econometric projections by the
Board staff. The expansion in nominal GNP at a 5.9 per cent annual rate
of growth from the second to the fourth quarter of 1974, and the sharp
decline in short-term interest rates, beginning last summer, would
suggest that the public's demand for demand deposits should have slowed
somewhat in the third quarter, but begun to rise in the fourth quarter.
While this pattern in fact developed, the rates of growth in both quarters were lower than expected; private demand deposits were essentially
unchanged in the third quarter, and rose at less than a 2 per cent
rate in the fourth quarter.
B - 3
TABLE B - 2
DENOMINATIONS IN CIRCULATION
ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Total
in
1/
Year1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
Coin
and Small
Circulation
Denomination Currency-
6.0
6.4
7.5
5.8
9.6
10.7
5.2
5.2
6.1
6.0
5.9
7.8
Large
Denomination
Currency-/
8.0
9.1
10.8
10.5
12.3
16.4
1/ All growth rates calculated from November to November.
2/ Outside Treasury and FR Banks.
3/ Coin and $1 through $20 denominations.
4/ $50 through $10,000 denominations.
Several conceivable explanations were ruled out upon investigation. Substantial upward revision in preliminary demand deposit
data or downward revision in preliminary nominal income data was considered unlikely. A major shift in the sectoral demand for deposits
was not borne out by the data on demand deposit holdings by individuals,
partnerships and corporations. Changes in compensating balances,
minimum balance requirements, and "Now" accounts were judged to have
been relatively unimportant.
Consideration was also given to the impact on demand deposits
of the sharp increase in money market mutual funds and variable rate
notes, but it was felt that the growth of these assets -- which tend to
substitute more for interest bearing deposits and money market instruments than for demand deposits -- could explain only part of the weakness in demand deposits.
The staff also considered the impact of declining public
confidence in the safety of commercial banks. Did the failure of
Franklin National significantly reduce the public's faith in the soundness of the banking system? One poll suggests that 36.2 million
B -4
Americans would have mentioned Franklin National's financial difficulties if asked in late October 1974. However, the continued strong
growth of total time deposits is difficult to reconcile with a crisis
of confidence in banks.
The interpretation of this slow growth of private demand
deposits is made more complicated because it could reflect an upward
shift in banks' demand for free reserves (perhaps because of increasing
bank caution) as well as a downward shift in the public's demand for
demand deposits (for whatever reason). To the extent that the demand
has shifted downward, lower interest rates and/or higher nominal income
than previously thought are required to produce a given rate of growth
of deposits. To the extent that banks have also become more cautious
lenders, more reserves than otherwise are needed to produce a given
rate of growth of demand deposits.
Since the staff cannot at this time isolate the sources of
the shifts in public and bank behavior, it is perhaps prudent to assume
that the shifts are temporary -- suggesting that private demand deposits will soon respond more predictably to interest rates, income and
reserve movements.
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1975, January 20). Greenbook/Tealbook. Greenbooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19750121_part3
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_greenbook_19750121_part3,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Greenbook/Tealbook},
year = {1975},
month = {Jan},
howpublished = {Greenbooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19750121_part3},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}