greenbooks · December 16, 1974
Greenbook/Tealbook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Content last modified 6/05/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee
By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
December 13, 1974
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
The Domestic Nonfinancial Economy
Industrial production declined further by an estimated 2.3
per cent in November.
At 122.0 per cent of the 1967 base, the total
index was 4.3 per cent below a year earlier.
Reductions in output
were widespread among consumer goods, business equipment, and industrial
materials.
Auto assemblies declined 16 per cent in November to an
annual rate of 7.0 million units.
As sales of new domestic cars
continued well below production, further output cutbacks are being
made in December.
Production of consumer household goods was reduced
sharply further in November and output of nondurable consumer goods
eased off further.
Production of business equipment declined 1.0 per
cent as weaknesses in some equipment industries became apparent.
Out-
put of construction products continued to drop.
Production of steel declined in November, in part because
of the coal strike, and there were reductions in output of other
durable and nondurable industrial materials.
- 2INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
(Seasonally adjusted)
Month
ago
Per cent changes
Annual Rate
Year
QIII
QII
QI
ago
125.6 124,9 122.0
-2.3
-4.3
- 6.6
1.9
- .3
123.7 123,0 121.4
-1.3
-3.1
- 5.8
2.6
.6
Final products
Consumer goods
Durable goods
Nondurable goods
Business equipment
122.8
129.4
128.6
129.6
132,3
120.9
126.
120.4
129.0
131.0
-1,4
-1.6
-5.0
- .2
-1.1
-2.2
-5.2
-13.1
-1.9
2.5
3.0
- 6.5
-11.5
2.5
-26.6 14.7
- 5.2 -2.2
.6 7.2
Intermediate products
Construction products
126.9 124.4 122.7
127.5 123.7 120.2
-1.4
-2.8
-6.4
-10.1
- 4.6
- 5.1
1.2
-2.7
-4.3
-7.7
128.8 128.0 122.9
-4.0
-6.5
- 6.4
- .3
-1.6
Total
Products, total
Materials
r/
p/
e/
_
Indexes 1967=100
1974
Sept. Oct. Nov.
(r) (P) (e)
122,6
128.6
126.8
129.3
132.4
2.3
- .6
-5.1
3.1
4.0
Revised.
Preliminary.
Estimated.
The Wholesale price index for November rose 1.2 per cent,
seasonally adjusted (not at an annual rate), to a level 23.5 per cent
above a year earlier.
The increase was propelled largely by higher
sugar prices and a further large, but decelerating, increase in
industrial commodities.
The index of farm and food products increased 2.5 per cent
seasonally adjusted, chiefly as a result of increases for sugar, milk,
fresh fruits and vegetables, and meats.
-3The index of industrial commodities rose 0.9 per cent,
seasonally adjusted, paced by increases for machinery and equipment
and chemicals.
Also higher were prices for furniture and household
durables, nonmetallic minerals, metals and metal products, and paper
products.
month.
Lumber and wood products declined for the seventh consecutive
Textile products and hides and skins also declined, and the
fuels and power group was unchanged.
WHOLESALE PRICES
(Per cent changes at seasonally adjusted
compound annual rates)¹
Nov '73 Dec.'72 June '73 Dec.'73 June '74 Sept.'74 Oct.'74
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Nov.'74 June'73 Dec. '73 June'74 Sept.'74 Oct. '74 Nov.'74
All commodities
23.5
20.2
10.9
18.2
35.2
29.4r
14.6
Farm and food products
15.0
45.8
10.4
-11.5
59.2
61.5r
29.9
Industrial commodities
Crude materials
Intermediate materials
Finished goods
Producer
Consumer, excl.food
Nondurable, excl.
foods
Durable
27.4
31.3
30.7
21.7
22.6
21.3
10.6
23.0
12.2
6.3
5.4
6.7
10.9
40.4
11.7
7.1
5.3
8.1
34.0
44.3
38.0
24.5
20.0
26.8
28.3
29.1
32.2
22.7
31.8
18.5
13.4
-5.2
12.6
23.5
29.1
20.8
10.3
-3.1
9.0
8.8
16.6
4.9
25.6
14.4
8.5
4.5
11.3
2.8
35.6
13.2
19.1
15.6
15.6
37.0
6.2
2.7
42.1
51.Or
29.4
-1.1
18.5
27.0
15.4
Consumer finished foods
Note: Farm and food products include farm products and processed foods and feeds.
1/ Not compounded for one-month changes.
-4The surge in sugar prices was a major factor in the sharp
rise in the farm and food index and in the increase in the overall WPI
last month.
For example, if the sugar and confectionery group were
excluded from the farm and food products index, the index would have
declined 0.4 per cent, unadjusted, and would have been about unchanged,
seasonally adjusted.
If the sugar and confectionery group were
excluded from the total WPI, the increase would have been 0.3 per cent,
unadjusted, and an estimated 0.5 per cent, seasonally adjusted.
WHOLESALE PRICES
(Percentage changes)
October to November, 1974
Seasonally adjusted
Not seasonally adjusted
Including sugar* Excluding sugar* Including sugar* Excluding sugar*
WPI
Farm and food
products
1.0
0.3
1.2
0.5e
2.1
-0.4
2.5
O.Oe
Processed foods
and feeds
3.4
-0.9
3.5
*Sugar and confectionery group in processed foods and feeds.
-0.8e
CORRECTIONS
Part I: Table I-8, line 4 from bottom of the table, Housing
starts, private, QIII 1974, the figure should be 81.0 (not 16.0) per cent
compound annual rate.
Part II: Page 4, line 3 from the bottom, the figure
should be 3.4 per cent (not 3.2).
Part II: Page 6, line 7 of full paragraph, the figure
should be 14 per cent (not 15).
-5INTEREST RATES
Highs
Lows
12
Nov. 18
Dec.
9.34(11/20)
8 .06(12/il)
Short-Term Rates
Federal funds (wkly. avg.)
3-month
Treasury bills (bid)
Comm. paper (90-119 day)
Bankers' acceptances
Euro-dollars
CD's (NYC) 90-119 day
Most often quoted new
6-month
Treasury bills (bid)
Comm. paper (4-6 mo.)
Federal agencies
CD's (NYC) 180-269 day
Most often quoted new
1-year
Treasury bills (bid)
Federal agencies
CD's (NYC)
Most often quoted new
Prime municipals
13.55(7/3)
8.81(2/27)
7.38
9.00
9.00
10.25
9.74<8/23) 6.93(2/6)
12.25(7/17) 7.75(2/22)
12.50(8/15) 7.75(2/26)
14.38(7/16) 8.25(2/18)
7.52
8.88
8.85
9.88
12.00( 9/4) 7.88(2/20)
8.50(11/20)
8.75(12/11)
9.86(8/23) 6.80(2/19)
12.13(7/10) 7.50(2/22)
10.63(8/28) 7.16(2/19)
7.52
8.63
8.08
7.18
8.75
7.61
11.90(8/21) 7.50(2/27)
8.25(11/20)
8.00(12/11)
9.65(8/23) 6.37(2/15)
10.18(8/26) 7.01(2/19)
7.23
8.05
'6.75
7.65
9.75(7/17) 7.00(2/27)
6.50(7/12) 3.70(2/15)
8.00(11/20)
4.40(11/22)
8.00(12/11)
4.60<12/13)
8.79(8/23) 6.72(2/14)
8.72(8/26) 7.40( 1/4)
7.61
7.94
7.26
7.83
9.40(10/8) 7.73( 1/2) 8.85
10.53(12/2) 8.54( 1/2) 10.50
8.85
10.50
Intermediate and Long-Term
Treasury coupon issues
5-years
20-years
Corporate
Seasoned Aaa
Baa
New Issue Aaa Utility
Municipal
Bond Buyer Index
Mortgage--average yield
in FNMA auction
10.61(10/2) 8.05(2/13)
9.17(11/21)
9.60(12/12)
7.15(12/12)5.16( 2/6)
6.53(11/21)
7.15(12/12)
10.59( 9/9) 8.43(2/25)
9.81(11/18)
9.61(12/2)
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A
DEMAND DEPOSIT OWNERSHIP SURVEY *
Revised data for the demand deposit ownership survey for
the third quarter of 1974 indicated slower growth in gross IPC demand
deposits (not seasonally adjusted) at all commercial banks.
This slow-
down continues the weakness reflected in the second quarter data, and
is also consistent with changes in M1 over the two quarters (Table 1).
Although the data are not seasonally adjusted, comparison with third
quarter data for earlier survey years, and with the mean change in
deposits calculated over the third quarters for the years 1970-74,
indicates that changes in demand deposits in each ownership category
were weaker than historical experience would have suggested (with the
exception of foreign IPC deposits).
Although the third quarter weak-
ness was spread across ownership categories, Table 2 indicates that
IPC demand deposit growth of nonfinancial businesses and households
were especially weak at non-weekly reporting banks.
1/ Prepared by Steven M. Roberts, Economist,
Division of Research and Statistics.
Banking Section,
Table 1
CHANGE IN LEVEL OF GROSS IPC DEPOSITS BY OWNERSHIP
CATEGORY, ALL COMMERCIAL BANKS ¹
(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)
Financial business
QII
QIII
QIV
Nonfinancial business
QI
QII
QIII
QIV
Househlds
Year
QI
1970
1971
1972
n.a.
1.0
1.7
n.a.
-.2
-2.3
--.2
--
.3
.6
.9
n.a.
-6.4
-5.8
n.a.
3.3
5.0
2.7
1.9
4.0
4.6
6.9
8.4
n.a.
.8
-3.9
1973
1974
-. 2
-. 2
-. 1
-. 6
.2
-. 3
.2
-7.1
-7.7
3.8
3.7
1.7
2.1
7.8
.6
-.8
-.1
-6.8
4.0
2.5
QIII--Mean
70-74
Foreign
QIII
Year
QI
QII
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
n.a.
n.a.
-. 1
QIII--Mean
70-74
QIV
QI
-. 2
-.1
n.a.
-. 1
.1
--
--
.1
.3
1.6
.1
-. 1
.3
-. 5
-. 2
.3
-. 1
0
0
-. 1
.1
.2
-1.4
0
All other
QIII
QI
n. a.
QIV
QI
QIII
QIV
n.a.
1.8
5.7
2.4
1.2
2.6
2.2
1.2
2.4
-. 3
.6
2.2
.8
1.8
.7
.9
-.7
2.6
1.7
QI
QII
Total
QIII
n. a.
n.a.
QII
4.9
.1
-4.2
-6.3
-8.0
-8.9
7.1
6.3
3.8
5.3
2.1
7.0
4.0
2.2
-. 3
-6.8
5.5
4.1
-1.3
Changes are based on daily averages of last-month-in-quarter to last-month-in-quarter, not
annualized. Data are before deduction for cash items in process of collection.
Figures may not add to totals due to rounding.
1/
QIV
7.3
9.7
12.6
9.7
Table 2
THIRD QUARTER CHANGE IN LEVEL OF GROSS IPC DEMAND DEPOSITS
BY OWNERSHIP CATEGORY, AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS VS. NON-WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS ¹
(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)
Financial business
Households
Nonfinancial business
Year
WRB
Non-WRB
TOTAL
WRB
Non-WRB
TOTAL
WRB
Non-WRB
TOTAL
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
-. 1
-. 3
-. 4
.3
-. 2
.1
.1
.4
-. 1
-. 1
0
-. 2
0
.2
-. 3
.9
.4
1.8
-. 1
1.1
1.8
1.5
2.2
1.8
1.0
2.7
1.9
4.0
1.7
2.1
.9
.2
.5
.1
.3
1.6
1.1
2.1
1.7
.4
2.4
1.2
2.6
1.8
.7
Year
WRB
Foreign
Non-WRB
TOTAL
WRB
All other
Non-WRB
TOTAL
WRB
Total
Non-WRB
TOTAL
1970
1971
-. 2
-. 1
0
0
-. 2
-. 1
.2
-. 5
.2
-. 3
.4
-. 8
1.7
-. 2
3.7
2.4
5.3
2.1
1972
0
0
6
.2
.2
.4
2.0
5.0
7.0
1973
1974
.1
0
0
-.1
.1
-.1
.3
0
-. 1
-.1
.2
-.1
.7
1.2
3.3
1.1
4.0
2.3
Changes are based on daily averages of last-month-in-quarter to last-month-in-quarter, not
annualized. Data are before deduction for cash items in process of collection. Only data
for total and weekly reporting banks are reported; thus figures for non-weekly reporting
banks are residuals.
Figures may not add to totals due to rounding.
/
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX B
LENDING PRACTICES SURVEY, NOVEMBER 15,
1974
Loan demand was reported to be weaker or unchanged from three
months earlier at the large majority of respondents to the Quarterly
Survey of Changes in Bank Lending Practices taken November 15. Only 8
of the 124 responding banks predicted that loan demand would be stronger
in the coming three months, while 53 banks were predicting moderation in
loan demand. The weakening in demand that was being experienced and is
expected for the coming quarter contrasts with the two previous surveys
in which most banks had reported that credit demands from business
customers were stronger and expected to intensify. The strengthening
of loan demand anticipated in the May survey was borne out by subsequent
loan growth, but following the August survey, growth of business loans
has slackened sharply relative to the pace earlier in the year.
The moderation in the intense pressure for credit led to some
easing in their practices relating to interest rates charged at onethird of the respondents. Much of the easing occurred at the smaller
banks (under $1 billion in deposits) on the panel, with 40 per cent of
such banks reporting easing of rates. Three-quarters of the large banks
on the panel indicated firmer or unchanged interest rate policies.
Since the prime rate at major banks fell well over 100 basis points
between the survey taken in September and the most recent survey, the
unchanged or firmer policies reported must be interpreted relative to
other short-term rates, particularly the commercial paper rate, which
fell much more than the prime rate in the interval between surveys.
Apparently, the banks reporting firmer interest rate policies--25
in all--are not lowering their rates as rapidly as market rates have
dropped.
In the nonprice terms of business lending, there was essentially
no easing, and in some indicators of nonprice terms, further tightening
had occurred at many of the respondents. Such tightening was reported by
over 30 per cent of the respondents on compensating balance requirements,
over 40 per cent on standards of credit worthiness in the evaluation of
loan applications, and more than half on policies regarding use of the
proceeds of the loan, particularly with respect to loans for speculative
and "non-productive" uses. The tightening of the terms of lending follow
severe tightening indicated in the May and August surveys.
Nonprice terms of lending to financial businesses also have
become more firm in the last three months. The tightening was most
obvious in policies concerning new or larger commitments, with more than
40 per cent of the respondents reporting firmer policies in this area.
- B2 There was virtually no easing in the restrictive policies toward
mortgages adopted earlier in the year, and a substantial minority
of the banks became more restrictive in limiting mortgages in their
portfolios.
*
Prepared by Paul W. Boltz, Economist, Banking Section, Division of
Research and Statistics.
NOT FOR QUOTATION OR PUBLICATION
TABLE 1
QUARTERLY SURVEY OF CHANGES IN BANK LENDING PRACTICES
AT SELECTED LARGE BANKS IN THE U.S.¹
COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS
NOVEMBER 15, 1974
(STATUS OF POLICY ON
(NUMBER OF BANKS & PERCENT OF TOTAL BANKS REPORTING)
MUCH
TOTAL
BANKS
STRONGER
PCT
BANKS
PCT
EARLIER)
MODERATELY
STRONGER
ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
MODERATELY
WEAKER
BANKS
BANKS
BANKS
PCT
PCT
PCT
MUCH
WEAKER
BANKS
PCT
STRENGTH OF DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL LOANS (AFTER ALLOWANCE FOR
BANK'S USUAL SEASONAL VARIATION)
COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS AGO
124
100.0
12.9
66
53.2
41
33.1
ANTICIPATED
124
100.0
6.5
63
50.8
53
42.7
DEMAND IN
NEXT 3 MONTHS
ANSWERING
QUESTION
BANKS
LENDING
TERMS
PCT
MUCH
FIRMER
POLICY
BANKS
PCT
MODERATELY
FIRMER
POLICY
ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
POLICY
MODERATELY
EASIER
POLICY
BANKS
BANKS
BANKS
PCT
PCT
PCT
TO NONFINANCIAL BUSINESSES
AND CONDITIONS:
INTEREST RATES CHARGED
100.0
3.2
16.9
46.0
COMPENSATING OR SUPPORTING BALANCES
100.0
5.6
26.6
67.8
0.0
STANDARDS
100.0
15.3
28.2
56.5
0.0
100.0
7.3
21.0
70.9
0.8
100.0
1.6
24.2
70.2
NEW CUSTOMERS
106.0
25.0
23.4
44.3
LOCAL
100.0
2.4
18.7
74.0
100.0
19.5
25.2
51.2
OF CREDIT WORTHINESS
MATURITY OF
TERM LOANS
REVIEWING CREDIT LINES OR
ESTABLISHED
33.9
LOAN APPLICATIONS
CUSTOMERS
SERVICE AREA CUSTOMERS
NONLOCAL SERVICE AREA. CUSTOMERS
1/ SURVEY OF LENDING PRACTICES
AS OF
NOVEMBER 15, 1974.
AT 125 LARGE BANKS REPORTING
IN THE FEDERAL
RESERVE QUARTERLY INTEREST RATE SURVEY
MUCH
EASIER
POLICY
BANKS
PCT
NOT FOR
QUOTATION OR PUBLICATION
1
TABLE
ANSWERING
QUESTION
BANKS
PCT
(CONTINUED)
MUCH
FIRMER
POLICY
BANKS
PCT
MODERATELY
FIRMER
POLICY
ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
POLICY
MODERATELY
EASIER
POLICY
BANKS
BANKS
BANKS
PCT
PCT
PCT
MUCH
EASIER
POLICY
BANKS
PCT
FACTORS RELATING TO APPLICANT ²
VALUE AS DEPOSITOR OR
SOURCE OF COLLATERAL BUSINESS
124
100.0
15
12.1
28
22.6
65.3
INTENDED USE OF THE LOAN
124
100.0
24
19.4
37
29.8
49.2
LENDING TO
"NONCAPTIVE" FINANCE
COMPANIES
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
INTEREST RATES
CHARGED
COMPENSATING OR
SUPPORTING BALANCES
100.0
2
1.6
12.9
68.6
16.9
100.0
6
4.8
12.9
82.3
0.0
ENFORCEMENT OF BALANCE REQUIREMENTS
100.0
13
10.5
16.9
72.6
0.0
ESTABLISHING NEW OR LARGER CREDIT LINES
100.0
26
21.0
22.6
54.0
2.4
ANSWERING
QUESTION
BANKS
WILLINGNESS TO MAKE
PCT
CONSIDERABLY
LESS
WILLING
BANKS
PCT
MODERATELY
LESS
WILLING
ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
MODERATELY
MORE
WILLING
BANKS
PCT
BANKS
BANKS
21
16.9
69.4
PCT
OTHER TYPES OF LOANS
100.0
TERM LOANS TO BUSINESSES
12.1
100.0
4.1
20
16.3
75.5
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE LOANS
100.0
15.7
20
16.5
66.1
MULTI-FAMILY MORTGAGE LOANS
100.0
21.7
20
16.7
61.6
ALL OTHER MORTGAGE LOANS
100.0
18.9
26
21.3
59.8
CONSUMER
INSTALMENT LOANS
PARTICIPATION LOANS WITH
CORRESPONDENT BANKS
123
100.0
8.1
14
11.4
90
73.2
LOANS TO BROKERS
123
100.0
8.1
16
13.0
95
77.3
2/ FOR THESE FACTORS, FIRMER MEANS THE FACTORS WERE CONSIDERED MORE IMPORTANT
CREDIT REQUESTS, AND EASIER MEANS THEY WERE LESS IMPORTANT.
IN MAKING DECISIONS FOR APPROVING
PCT
CONSIDERABLY
MORE
WILLING
BANKS
PCT
SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX C
MONTHLY LOAN COMMITMENT SURVEY
OCTOBER 31, 1974 *
The most recent Monthly Loan Commitment Survey taken at 137
large banks at the end of October indicates that total unused commitments increased substantially during October, but not enough to compensate for the decline in September; in October unused commitments remained below the year's peak reached in August. However, it is
apparent from the twelve months of data now available in the monthly
commitments survey that unused commitments, while large, have not
been growing as rapidly as loans made under commitments.
Total unused commitments to commercial and industrial firms,
nonbank financial institutions, and for mortgages grew at a not seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.7 per cent between November 1973 and
October 1974, while loans made under commitments in such categories
Commitments to nonbank financial institutions
grew 20.5 per cent.
at the 137 responding banks were essentially unchanged in the period,
and commitments for mortgages fell at almost a 30 per cent annual
rate.
Thus, the 8.2 per cent growth of C&I unused commitments accounted
for all the growth in unused commitments. With the relatively slow
growth of unused commitments, the utilization ratios (the proportion
of loans outstanding under commitment to total commitments) have
risen steadily in nearly all categories of loans reported on the survey.
However, with a current ratio of 50 per cent, the potential for takedowns at these banks is substantial.
Though not keeping pace with loans made under commitments,
the stock of unused commitments at major banks continues to be very
large--despite the evidence from the Lending Practices Surveys and
discussions with bankers that commitments policies became extremely
In the present atmosphere
restrictive in the spring and remain so.
in financial markets, corporate borrowers place a high value on formal
commitments for credit from major banks, and the banks are reported to
be raising fees for commitments in response to the demand. However,
the data thus far available do not provide an adequate basis for
The weakening in
evaluating the effectiveness of these policies.
economic activity that is expected to continue for some time will
likely act as a brake on the pace of takedowns in the short-term,
but as economic activity picks up, the stock of unused commitments
will likely again place a heavy burden on banks to meet the credit
needs of their business customers.
*
Prepared by Paul W. Boltz, Economist, Banking Section, Division
of Research and Statistics.
NOT FOR
QUOTATION OR
PUBLICATION
MONTHLY SURVEY OF BANK LOAN COMMITMENTS
AT SELECTED LARGE U.S. BANKS ¹
(AS OF OCT. 31, 1974)
TABLE 1 - UNUSED
COMMITMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN BILLIONS)
I
I
I
(1)
FIRMS
TOTAL
CHG
I
NOVEMBER 30
83.81
DECEMBER 31
83.21 -( ).71
1
0.01
I1
FEBRUARY 28
85.21
2.51
0.91
I
MARCH 31
I
85.41
MAY 31
I1
86.81
I1
JUNE 30
86.71
88.31
I
1.61
3.71
I
5.31 -4.61
4.91
5.51
4.51
10.31
I
AUGUST 31
90.81
2.91
6.71
OCTOBER
31
88.61
90.71
- 2.51
2.41
OCT 74
86.71
0.71
I
6.41 -4.51
I
I
5.71-10.41
I
NOV 73 -
54.71
1
18.21 -1.31
I
23.51
18.51
24.01
I
0.01
I
4.51
I
0.01
I
I1
56.91
1.31.
2.11
-0.51
4.11
18.41 -0.41
24.21
0.71
25.01
3.41
(8)
4.51 -1.71
4.81
7.11
4.91
1.711
1
-1.6
5.01
2.51
I
27.81
I
I
27.11 -2.71
I
I1
28.11
3.91
I
28.41 1.11
I
28.11 -1.31
I
8.91
0.41
-2.41 122.01
18.61
18.81
1.11
25.11
I
19.21
20.31
26.11
6.21
4.11I1
21.21
I1
2.01
21.61
I
23.31 7.81
0.21
I
3.91
27.91
2.41
I
4.51
28.01
0.41
26.71
3.61
29.011
19.61
1.91
55.41 -1.31
5.01 -0.21
27.01 -3.91
I
1.11
25.61
1.71
56.91 2.71
I
56.21 -1.31
I
56.91
1.21
58.31
57.41
56.41
56.41
4.81 -4.11
27.01
I1
4.51 -6.41
0.31
0.31 120.71 -0.8
8.21 -1.21
122.01
8.11 -1.91
120.91 -0.9
I1
4.71
4.71
5.71
26.41
0.81
1
4.71 -0.81
4.51 -4.11
27.11
2.81
I
26.51 -2.31
122.51
1
7.21 -8.31 125.11
7.91 -2.61
6.81 -5.6
I
2.31
I
I
4.31 -4.31
.7
27.41
0.41
4.71 -0.41
27.21
3.41
6.51
-4.81
-2.8
1
-0.11
8.01
-2.81
LOAN COMMITMENT SURVEY ARE SELECTED WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS WITH TOTAL DEPOSITS
NOTE:
1.0
I1
26.11 -3.31
I
2.41
I
56.11 -3.71
8.31
I1
NUMBER OF BANKS
**
119.11 -1.0
2.4
1
-0.81 123.01
0.8
I
8.61I
8.31
8.31 -3.71 121.71 -1.0
8.71
AVERAGE
1/ BANKS PARTICIPATING IN THE MONTHLY
OF $100 MILLION OR MORE.
(9)
TOTAL
I
REAL
ESTATE
I COMMITMENTS
MORTGAGES I
AMT
It
CHG
AMT % % CHG
CHG
AMT
% CHG
AMT
I
I
I
0.0
0.01 120.4
0.0O
8.91
I
I
I. 0
6.01 0.91
57.11
I1
I
5.91
I
SEPTEMBER 30
-1.01
I
-8.21
6.31
24.01
I
I
1.81
55.01
I
-2.31
6.91
I
0.01
I
10.61
6.31
I
24.3)
I
5.81
6.41
I
18.91 0.01
I
18.51 -2.31
(61
I
(7)
I
C
I
I NON-BANK
I
OTHER
I FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS
COMMITMENTS
AMT
% CHG AMT
% CHG
I
I
I
-( 0.11
(3)
(5)
I
(4)
I
C
C
I
I
I
C
I
I
REVOLVING TERM LOANS &
CONFIRMED
CREDITS
REV. CREDITS
LINES
AMT
I% CHG
AMT
% CHG AMT
% CHG
% CHG
% CHG AMT
AMT
I
5.51
I
I
JULY 31
I
I
0.11
I
I
I
I
0.01
I
85.41 -( 0.71
APRIL 30
I
5.31
I
I
86.01
TERM
LOANS
CHG
AMT %
I
I
JANUARY 31
(2)
C &I
MINOR INCONSISTENCIES MAY OCCUR DUE TO ROUNDING. **
121.81
124.51
1.2
2.1
-2.6
2.2
1
122.01
0.3
NOT FOR
QUOTATION OR
PUBLICATION
MONTHLY SURVEY OF BANK LOAN COMMITMENTS
AT SELECTED LARGE U.S. BANKS ¹
(AS OF OCT. 31, 1974)
TABLE 2 - LOANS UNDER COMMITMENTS ²
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN BILLIONS)
NOVEMBEk 30
DECEMBER 31
JANUARY 31
FEBRUARY 28
MARCH 31
APRIL 30
(1)
I
(21
I
(3)
I
(4)
(5)
I
(6)
I
(7)
I
(8)
I
(9)
c
I
I
C
I
I
C
I
CC I
I
C & I
C S
NON-BANK
I
REAL
TOTAL
I
FIRMS
I
TERM
I REVOLVING ITERM LOANS IE CON FIRMED I
OTHER
IFINANCIAL
ESTATE
I COMMITMENTS
TOTAL
I
LOANS
I
CREDITS
IREV. CREDITSI
LINES
ICOMMITMENTS IINSTITUTIONSI MORTGAGES I
ANT
12 CHtr ANT
il CNCi AMT I
r c I AMT
It runr.
~W"
i i V . AMT
Ma l
1I
CHGI AMT
IZ CHGI AMT
I1 CHG AMT AMT
IZ CHGI
CHGI AMT .11 CMH
12
I
I
195
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70.31
0.01 18.51 0.01
0.01 38.01 0.01 25.81 0.01I 6.51 0.01
18.11
0.01 18.01 0.01 106.41
0.0
19.51
1
1
I
I
I1
I
71.91 2.31
19.01 2.81 19.51
-0.11
38.51 1.31 26.61 3.41
6.71
3.01 19.81 9.71 18.21 1.31 109.91 3.3
I
I
-7.11
I
I
70.81 -1.41
18.91 -0.51 19.61 0.51
38.41 -0.31 25.51 -4.21
6.81
1.41
18.41
18.21 0.01 107.51 -2.2
I
1
1
I1
I
I
1
10.2
72.31 2.11
19.11 1.21 20.11
2.51 39.21 2.11
26.51 3.71
6.61 -2.81
18.31 -0.41
18.31
1.3
0.21 108.9)
I
I1
I
I
1
77.01
6.51
19.41 1.31 21.01 4.71 40.41 3.01 29.81 12.51
6.81
3.51
19.31
5.61
5.3
18.41 0.61 114.81
I1
1
I1
I
79.21
2.81 20.51 5.61 21.31 1.01 41.71 3.21 30.91
6.61 -3.11
18.41 -0.21 118.21
20.61
6.51
2.9
I1
MAY 31
JUNE 30
JULY 31
79.81
82.11
I
83.71
0.81 20.61
I1
I
2.91 20.91
1
1.91
21.51
0.91
21.61
1.81
42.31
I
1.01
22.11
84.61
1.11
SEPTEMBER 30
86.91
2.71
23.01
OCTOBER 31
85.01 -2.11
NOV 73 - OCT 74
AVERAGE
79I
79.41
1.8
2.21
23.31
1.81
24.61
22.4121.5I
1
-4.011
24.81
1.41
21.91
22.01I
20.51
7.21
7.91
20.51 -0.61
2.31
43.01
1.71
32.11
5.51
7.11 -1.31
22.21
8.71
3.71
44.51
3.41
32.21
32.21
0.41
22.41
0.81
0.01
7.01
7.11 -0.31
7.01 0.71
I1
AUGUST 31
30.41 -1.51
18.41
0.01 118.71
0.4
I1
I1
3.11
I1
I
1.41
1.41
1
I1
1.51
45.31
1.81
32.21
5.41
47.01
3.71
0.91
46.31 -1.41
32.91 2.21
I
31.61 -3.71
I1
2.21
1
42.41
1.68
30.01
2.01
22.11 -1.81
6.91
0.91
1
18.31 -0.21 122.71
3.4
I
1
19.51
6.21 125.61
2.3
I
19.01 -2.51 125.61
0.0
I
19.11
0.61 128.41
2.2
1
19.31 1.11 126.41 -1.5
6.91
0.81
20.71
18.6
18.61
I
22.01 -1.9|
I
7.11 -1.01
1
22.51
2.11
I1
2.01
.
0.71 118.81
NUMBER OF BANKS
1/ BANKS PARTICIPATING IN THE MONTHLY LOAN COMMITMENT SURVEY ARE SELECTED WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS WITH TOTAL DEPOSITS
OF $100 MILLION OR MORE.
2/ LOANS UNDER COMMITMENTS ARE DEFINED AS ALL LOANS UNDER COMMITMENTS CURRENTLY OR PREVIOUSLY IN FORCE, LESS REPAYMENTS OF THE
PRINCIPAL. THE REPORTED DATA ARE DISTORTED BY TAKEDOWNS OF LOAN COMMITMENTS BY OVERSEAS BRANCHES OF US BANKS AND LOAN SALES.
1.6
1.6
MONTHLY SURVEY OF BANK LOAN COMMITMENTS
AT SELECTED LARGE U.S. BANKS ¹
(AS OF OCT. 31, 1974)
NOT FOR
QUOTATION OR
PUBLICATION
TABLE 3 - UTILIZATION RATIO ²
(PERCENTAGES)
I
(1)
I
I
FIRMS
TOTAL
I
C
I
(2)
C c I
TERM
LOANS
(3)
I
C
REVOLVING
CREDITS
(71
(6)
I
1
(5)
I
(4)
I NON-BANK
C c I
I
I
C c
I
CCI
OTHER
I FINANCIAL
ITERM + REV.I CONFIRMED I
INSTS.
ICOMMITMENTSI
I
LINES
I
I
I
I
I
(8)
REAL
I
ESTATE
MORTGAGES
I
I
(9)
TOTAL
I
110)
SHORT
-TERM
TOTAL3/
.
I
47.0
39.7
67.2
67°2
48.0
41.0
39.6
67.7
46.8
39.4
39.2
68.0
47.0
39.6
57.9
40.8
68.9
48.5
41.7
35.8
57.2
43.3
68.8
49.5
42.8
62.8
34.8
S 60.1
43.1
69.0
49.3
42.5
53.6
62.3
36.3
61.3
46.0
69.4
50.4
44.1
77.3
53.0
62.5
36.1
59.9
46.0
71.2
50.6
43.9
48.2
76.6
52.4
61.9
35.6
60.3
44.8
72.5
50.1
43.2
SEPTEMBER 30
49.5
77.8
53.2
62.7
37.0
S 61.0
45.9
73.7
51.3
44.5
OCTOBER 31
48.4
79.0
51.6
61.5
35.5
62.3
44.7
74.9
50.4
43.3
47.5
77.2
52.5
62.1
34.4
69.9
49.1
42.1
30
45.6
77.6
50.8
61.0
31.9
59.0
DECEMBER 31
46.4
77.4
51.4
61.6
32.8
JANUARY 31
45.4
78.2
51.8
61.9
FEBRUARY
45.7
77.6
52.1
MARCH 31
47.4
77.0
APRIL 30
48.1
MAY 31
I
39.4
67.7
60.1
42.3
31.0
58.8
62.0
31.7
57.7
53.3
62.6
34.6
76.2
53.3
62.5
47.9
76.8
53.5
JUNE 30
48.6
75.2
JULY 31
48.7
AUGUST 31
NOVEMBER
28
NOV 73 - OCT
AVERAGE
74
I
I
I
I
596
I
42.9
I
59.6
I
42.9
I
NUMBER OF BANKS
1/
2/
3/
BANKS PARTICIPATING IN THE MONTHLY LOAN COMMITMENT SURVEY ARE SELECTED WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS WITH TOTAL DEPOSITS
OF $106 MILLION OR MORE.
THE UTILIZATION RATIO IS THE RATIO, EXPRESSED AS A PERCENTAGE, OF LOANS UNDER COMMITMENTS TO THE SUM OF UNUSED COMMITMENTS
AND LOANS UNDER COMMITMENTS
EXCLUDES REAL ESTATE LOANS AND TERM LOANS.
NOT FOR
QUOTATION OR
PUBLICATION
MONTHLY SURVEY OF BANK LOAN COMMITMENTS
AT SELECTED LARGE U.S. BANKS ¹
(AS OF OCT. 31, 1974)
TABLE 4
- NEW COMMITMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN BILLIONS)
(8)
(9)
(7)
I
I
(5)
I
(6)
I
(4)
1
(3)
(1)
I
(2)
1
TOTAL
NON-BANK
I
REAL
I
CCI
I
C
C
I
I
C
I
I
C
I
C e
I
I
I
ESTATE
I COMMITMENTS
FINANCIAL I
OTHER
FIRMS
TERM
I REVOLVING ITERM LOANS SI CONFIRMED I
MORTGAGES I
TOTAL
I
LINES
ICOMMITMENTS INSTITUTIONS!
LOANS
I
IREV. CREDITSI
CREDITS
It
CG
AMT
I r CGI
AMT
It CHGI AMT
IZ CHGL AMT
12 CHGI AMLT
AMT
It CHGI AMT
CLHG!. AMT 12 CtE
I1 CHGt AMT
I
I
I
I
I
4.91
0.01
I
0.01
1.21
I
1.11
0.01
I
I
5.01
1.11
1.31
22.61
I
I
I
I
I
NOVEMBER 30
DECEMBER 31
JANUARY 31
4.81 -3.01
0.81-39.61
FEBRUARY 28
I
I
4.51 -6.41
I
I
0.81
MARCH 31
6.21
1.31
59.71
I
I
38.11
6.91 11.01
APRIL 30
MAY 31
I
JUNE 30
JULY 31
AUGUST 31
SEPTEMBER 30
OCTOBER 31
NOV 73 -
OCT 74
I
2.41
I
1.21 -8.81
I
I
1.31
6.21
I
I
6.21 -5.81
I
I
7.21 15.81
I
I
6.61 -9.11
I
I
6.31 -4.51
I
I
6.11 -2.71
6.0 2.
I
I
6.01
2.71
I
1.21
-5.71
I
I
I
2.31
I
0.01
1.81
0.01
I
1.11 -5.81
I
I
0.91-21.91
I
I
0.91
5.91
I
I
2.41
8.01
1.71-31.71
I
I
1.71
3.91
I
I
0.01
I
1.81 -0.91
2.11
0.81
22.11
1.11 22.11
0.81
I
1
0.91-11.11
I
I
22.61
2.11 -3.01
0.61-30.21
2.61 50.41
2.71 31.21
0.61 10.61
1.61 28.51
I
2.81
3.01
8.41
0.61 -0.51
I
I
1.51 -5.91
I
1
5.51
1.61
1.21
0.81
2.6) 58.11
I
I
1.01-15.81
I
I
2.41 -5.31
1.01 -5.71
I
I
2.31 -5.01
I
0.81-13.4|
2.21
I
1
I
I
I
1.11 0.21
1.61
I
1.61
I
-5.91
.
I
8.11
I
I
2.81 -0.41
I
2.81
I
3.81
f
3.51
I
3.31
I
3.01
0.31
I
33.51
1
-8.51
I
-5.21
I
-8.11
.7
4.1
2.71
I
I
2.81 -5.41
0.71
9.71
2.61 -5.91
0.61 -8.31
I
4.71
I
0.01
I
0.71-13.31
1.31 41.31
I
9.11
I
0.91
I
1.41 27.41
I
I
1.21-12.21
I
I
2.71
0.91
0.61 -2.71
1.11 -6.31
2.41 -9.41
0.51-13.91
1.21
0.61 11.51
I
I
0.81 -34.2'1
I
I
2.41 -1.51
2.41 -0.91
I
0.71-24.31
I
I
0.91 27.71
I
I
1.11 18.71
0.71
I
19.91
1.11 29.71
I
I
2.41
3.21
0.71
0.51
9.11
1.0L
I
I
4.21
I
I
0.81
0.01
I
I
1.01 34.31
I
I
0.91-13.21
I
I
0.81 -8.21
I
I
0.91 11.41
I
I
0.91
1.71
I
I
0.91 -1.71
I
I
0.91 -4.11
I
I
0.71-22.01
I
I
4.81
0.71
I
I
0.51-24.11
0.51 -6.41
I
8.11 33.2
1
8.91 10.7
8.91 -0.2
8.31 -6.6
9.01
8.6
I
8.51 -5.6
7.71
-9.4
7.71
0.5
7.81
2.2
I
0.81 -2.51
NUMBER OF BANKS
1/ BANKS PARTICIPATING IN THE MONTHLY LOAN COMMITMENT SURVEY ARE SELECTED WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS WITH TOTAL DEPOSITS
OF $100 MILLION OR MORE.
MINOR INCONSISTENCIES MAY OCCUR DUE TO ROUNDING. **
7.11
7.7
I
6.71 -5.6
1
6.11 -9.1
-2.51
AVERAGE
** NOTE:
0.0
I
I
0.8
6.61
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX D
GERMmAN POLICY ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECEMBER 12,
1974*
Following two days of Cabinet deliberations, on December 12 the
German government announced measures to restimulate the faltering domestic
economy. In a joint press conference of the Ministers of Economics,
Finance and Labor the government presented a package which includes
substantial investment incentives, increased assistance to the unemployed,
and use of part of the countercyclical funds held on deposit with the
Bundesbank. As described by the Ministers, the main features of the new
program are summarized below:
1) Investment Incentives. A bonus of 7.5 per cent will be paid
to enterprises ordering investment goods or commencing projects for the
seven months between December 1, 1974 and June 30, 1975. In order to
assure swift impact on the economy, goods so ordered must be delivered by
July 1, 1976, and qualifying construction projects must be completed by
July 1, 1977. An exception will apply to delivery of goods on major
energy projects, where delivery will be permitted as late as July 1, 1978.
The investment bonus method is reported to have been chosen in preference
to tax credits, since the latter might have little incentive effect for
enterprises currently losing money and having little if any tax liability.
This measure will require special legislation.
2) Government Investment.
The Federal Government, using a
portion of the countercyclical funds to be drawn from special deposits
held with the Bundesbank, will spend DM 1.13 billion in priority sectors
such as construction and energy. Projects will be chosen for their
immediate impact and low followup costs. This portion of the program will
supplement the DM 950 million in sectoral assistance, primarily to construction, announced in September.
3) Labor Assistance. A further DM 600 million will be spent
by the Federal Labor Office to combat rapidly rising unemployment, which
in November reached almost 800,000 out of a labor force of 23 million.
Seasonally adjusted, the German unemployment rate has climbed steadily
this year, from 1.6 per cent in January to a level of 3.8 per cent in
November; and the number of workers on short-time reached 461,000 in the
same month. Under the new program, employers who hire the unemployed
prior to
May 1, 1975, will receive special incentive payments over a six
month period. In addition, the Federal Labor Office will provide relocation incentives to unemployed workers and make available supplementary
benefits to workers on short-time for a period of two years, as against
the one year period presently in effect.
*
Prepared by John F. Wilson, Economist, World Payments and Economic Activity
Section, Division of International Finance.
D -2
The estimated cost during 1975 of the programs outlined above
is DM 1.73 billion, which will be met by the government's drawing DM 3.5
billion of the countercyclical funds raised through the now-expired
temporary stability surcharges on investment expenditures and on personal
income taxes. The drawing represents about one-third of the DM 10 billion
in such funds. The difference between the drawing and cost of the
December 12 program will reportedly be applied to the budget deficit for
1975, which for the Federal and State Governments is now estimated to
total some DM 50 billion.
With the measures announced on December 12, overall German
policy has clearly shifted toward combating the recessionary influences
which have deepened throughout 1974. The stimulus provided by the
package is meant to take effect quickly, and will supplement previously
announced tax reform measures going into effect in January, 1975, and
the recent easing of monetary policy, as described in the December 11
Greenbook. In early December the Bundesbank Central Council also announced,
for the first time, a target of 8 per cent growth for the monetary base
during 1975.
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1974, December 16). Greenbook/Tealbook. Greenbooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19741217_part2
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_greenbook_19741217_part2,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Greenbook/Tealbook},
year = {1974},
month = {Dec},
howpublished = {Greenbooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19741217_part2},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}