greenbooks · July 26, 1971
Greenbook/Tealbook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Content last modified 6/05/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee
July 23, 1971
By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
The Domestic Economy
Cyclical indicators.
The preliminary and confidential Census
composite index of leading indicators declined 0.5 per cent in June,
after rising for seven months.
In contrast, the leading index continued
to rise in June 1968, in a comparable stage of the steel stockpiling
cycle.
But two volatile series--inventory change and the change in
consumer instalment debt--are excluded from the preliminary calculation,
and when these become available they could change the amount or even
the sign of the June indication.
Contributing to the decline were a rise in initial claims
for unemployment insurance and declines in new orders for durable goods,
contracts and orders for plant and equipment, housing permits, industrial materials prices and stock prices.
The manufacturing workweek
and the ratio of price to unit labor cost rose.
The preliminary
coincident and lagging composites increased in June.
COMPOSITE CYCLICAL INDICATORS
(1967=100)
12 Leading
Trend Adjusted
1971:
January
February
March
April
May (r)
June (prel.)
(H) Current high value.
5 Coincident
6 Lagging
118.6
120.0
122.7
121.1
121.8
122.5
125.3
124.0
124.1
124.1
124.5 (H)
123.9
123.0
123.8
125.8 (H)
123.8
123.4
123.6
-2Vacancy rates.
Underscoring the strength in the demand for
shelter, residential vacancy rates remained exceptionally low in the
second quarter despite the recent accelerated pace of residential
construction activity.
For rental vacancies, the average of 4.9 per
for use in the second quarter
cent of all units available and fit
was unchanged from the previous quarter and the lowest for any second
quarter since 1957.
Vacancy rates for home-owner units also held at
a reduced rate during the second quarter.
RESIDENTIAL VACANCY RATES
(Percent)
Average for second quarter of:
1957
1965
1968
1969
1970
1971
Rental Units
4.9
7.5
5.7
5.1
5.0
4.9
Northeast
3.0
4.8
3.5
2.9
2.7
2.8
North Central
South
West
4.4
5.8
7.5
6.6
7.7
12.0
4.8
7.2
7.6
4.8
6.4
6.4
5.6
6.4
5.4
5.0
6.6
5.4
.9
1.4
1.0
.9
.9
.9
Home-owner Units
Manufacturers' orders and shipments.
New orders for durable
goods declined 1 per cent in June, according to the advance report.
Steel orders continued to fall off moderately and capital equipment
and defense orders also were down.
These declines were partly offset
by increases for motor vehicles and "all other" durables,
of which is construction materials.
about half
Excluding the steel stockpiling
-3-
situation and the volatile defense series, durable goods orders were
down slightly in June from May but remained above the second-quarter
average, which was itself improved from the first quarter.
MANUFACTURERS' NEW ORDERS FOR DURABLE GOODS
(Seasonally adjusted)
Q I
Q II
(prel.)
1971
May
(rev.)
June
(adv)
Monthly Averages,
Billions of Dollars
Durable goods, total
Excluding steel & defense
Primary metals
Iron and steel
Other
Change
June
from May
Per Cent
31.7
27.0
30.9
27.2
31.2
27.5
30.8
27.4
-1.1
- .4
5.2
2,6
2.6
4.9
2.2
2.7
5.0
2.1
2.8
4.7
2.1
2.7
-4.3
-3.6
-4.9
4.5
2.4
1.4
8.5
9.3
2.8
- .7
-10.4
-2.4
1.5
4.4
4.6
4.5
Motor vehicles & parts
2.4
2.2
2.4
Household durables
1.5
1.5
2.0
Defense products
8.5
8.7
8.8
Capital equipment
All other durables
8.8
9.2
9.2
NOTE: Detail may not add to total because of rounding.
The backlog of unfilled orders at durable goods manufacturers
dropped over $2 billion in June, reflecting a $1.2 billion drop in
the defense backlog, an expected drop in steel backlogs as steel shipments to stockpiling users increased, and a further decline in the
capital equipment backlog.
The durable goods backlog has been de-
clining for four months and is 6 per cent below its February peak,
whereas it only declined 2 per cent in the comparable stockpiling
period in 1968.
The defense products backlog is 11 per cent below its
- 4 -
February peak and 5 per cent below last June, and the capital equipment
backlog is 3.5 per cent below January of this year and 8 per cent
below a year earlier.
Shipments increased 2 per cent, reflecting a sharp jump
in defense products and increases for steel, autos, household, and
"all other" durables, partly offset by declines for capital equipment
and nonferrous metals.
Consumer prices.
Consumer prices rose at the rate of about
5.5 per cent in June, less rapidly than in May.
However, the second
quarter rate of increase was up sharply from that in the first
quarter, reflecting mainly the greater stability of mortgage interest
rates and a faster rise in prices of non-food commodities.
Excluding
home finance charges, the rate of rise in the CPI, unadjusted, was not
only much higher in the second quarter than the first, but was substantially above that in either the first or the second half of 1970.
The faster rise of the CPI less mortgage costs this year
compared to the last half of 1970 is in large part due to the brisk
rise in food prices this year.
Non-food commodity prices rose very
little in the first three months of the year but accelerated over the
second quarter with significant increases for used cars, new cars,
apparel, and new homes.
There was a drop in the rate of rise in
"services less home finance" in the second quarter.
-5-
EFFECT OF MORTGAGE COSTS ON CONSUMER PRICES
(Percentage changes at annual rates, not seasonally adjusted)
June 1970
to
Dec. 1970
All items,
All items,
CPI
less mortgage
costs 1/
Services
Services less home
finance 1/ 2/
1/
2/
Dec. 1970
to
March 1971
March 1971
to
June 1971
May 1971
to
June 1971
4.9
2.4
5.8
7.2
4.8
3.8
6.6
7.2
7.0
3.2
5.2
6.8
6.9
8.5
6.3
6.9
Confidential.
Excludes mortgage interest costs, property taxes and homeowners'
insurance.
In June, gasoline prices rose after several months of decline,
apparel prices levelled off after a previous large rise, new car prices
failed to decline seasonally, and used car prices continued up.
Food
prices also rose more than seasonally, with further large increases
for meats,
fish and poultry--especially the latter--and fruits and
vegetables.
Among services, fares for airplanes, railroads and taxi-
cabs rose rapidly.
Some of the items which have contributed heavily to the rise
in consumer prices in the last few months had risen at more moderate
rates some time during the last year.
From June 1970 to June 1971,
for example, used car prices were up about 5 per cent, a substantial
rise, but less steep than the increase in new cars.
Gasoline prices
rose very strongly last month, but were still below June, 1970.
-6-
In June, fruit and vegetables (including processed) were up 5.5 per
cent from last June 1970, but meats were at about the same level.
The food index as a whole was 3.5 per cent higher than a year earlier.
(Percentage changes,
All items
Food
Commodities less food
Apparel
Gasoline 1/
CONSUMER PRICES
seasonally adjusted annual rates)
Dec 1970
to
March 1971
March 1971
to
June 1971
May 1971
to
June 1971
June 1970
to
June 1971
2.8
6.0
1.0
5.3
6.3
4.9
5.6
6.3
4.2
4.5
3.5
4.1
1.0
-5.8
4.4
.0
10.9
3.5
-3.4
3.2
30.3
5.4
14.7
7.7
5.1
5.2
6.8
5.6
New cars
4.7
Used cars 1/
-9.5
Home purchase
3.2
Services 1/
1/ Not seasonally adjusted.
Auto sales.
-. 4
Seasonally adjusted sales of domestic model autos
rose sharply in the second 10 days of July and for the first 20 days
were at an annual rate of 9.1 million units.
-7The Domestic Financial Situation
Demand deposit ownership.
With preliminary estimates of the
ownership of gross IPC demand deposits at all commercial banks are now
available for June of this year, a full year's data can now be examined.
As may be seen in Table 1, gross IPC demand deposits are estimated
to have increased $13.1 billion from June 1970 to June 1971, which is
a somewhat greater increase than that recorded for the demand deposit
component of the money stock.
Growth in deposit holdings by consumers
accounted for somewhat more than half of the advance in total IPC
deposits over the year, while increases in deposits owned by nonfinancial businesses and financial businesses accounted for about
one-fourth and one-eighth,respectively, of the total advance (see
last colunm in Table 1).
Particularly given the fact that consumers
owned less than a third of total IPC balances in June of last year-nonfinancial businesses owned more than half of the total and
financial businesses owned about one-tenth of the total this evidence
offers convincing evidence that consumers have been mainly responsible
for the strength in demands for money during the past year.
With only a year's data, quarterly changes in deposit
holdings are difficult to interpret, because of our inability to
measure seasonal factors, but some tentative judgment can be offered.
As may be seen in Table 2, consumer deposit holdings increased in
each quarter of the year ending in June of this year, with expansion
Table 1
OWNERSHIP OF GROSS IPC DEMAND DEPOSITS
(Not adjusted for seasonal factors)
Level (Billions of dollars)
|n
June 1970 I June 1971 p
Change
j Billions
jof dollars
Per cent distribution
June 1970 Change from June
Per cent
level
11970 to June 1971
163.4
176.5
13.1
8.0
100.0
100.0
Financial business
16.6
18.3
1.7
10.2
10.1
13.0
Non-financial business
85.9
89.2
3.3
3.8
52.6
25.2
Consumers
49.9
57.2
7.3
14.6
30.5
55.7
Gross IPC Demand Deposits
Held by:
1.4
Foreign
All other
/
1.3
-
.1
7.1
.9
.9
9.4
5.9
9.6
10.5
Money stock
207.8
223.5
15.7
Demand deposit component
of money stock
160.1
172.5
12.4
Memo:
- Preliminary.
Includes mainly non-profit institutions.
NOTE:
All data are daily averages (some data based on averages of Wednesday dates).
-
.8
6.9
-9over the last half of 1970 essentially equalled by the increase over
the first half of 1971.
A roughly equivalent statement applies to
the timing of changes in financial business balances.
The pattern
of change in nonfinancial business deposit holdings, on the other
hand, was markedly different, for, although these balances also
increased in both the third and fourth quarter of last year, they
dropped sharply in the first quarter of this year before rising again
in the second quarter.
Moreover, the second quarter increase fell
well short of the first quarter decline so that on a seasonally
unadjusted basis, nonfinancial businesses deposits show a fairly
large net decline for the first half of this year.
Table 2
CHANGES IN THE OWNERSHIP OF GROSS IPC DEMAND DEPOSITS
(Not seasonally adjusted in $ billions)
Q3
1970
Q4
1971
Q2
Q1
1970
2nd half
1971
1st half
Gross IPC demand deposits
Financial business
4.5
.4
7.2
.3
-4.3
.9
5.7
.1
11.7
.7
1.4
1.0
Nonfinancial business
2.3
4.6
-6.7
3.3
6.9
-3.4
Consumers
1.5
2.2
1.1
2.5
3.7
3.6
Foreign
--
- .1
.
- .1
All other
.4
.3
.2
0
- .1
.7
-.1
- 10 -
INTEREST RATES
1971
Tune 28
Jsuly 22
Hihs
Lows
5.46 (7/21)
3.29 (3/10)
4.96 (6/23) 5.46 (7/21)
5.53
5.62
8.00
5.67
5.50
3.22 (3/11)
(7/22)
(7/22)
3.88 (3/10)
4.94 (3/17)
3.27 (2/24)
3.62 (3/15)
4.96
5.34
5.62
5.50
6.87
6.33
5.10 (6/25) 5.67
5.50
5.38
5.62 (7/22)
5.88 (7/21)
3.62 (3/24)
3.80 (3/17)
5.50 (6/23) 5.62
5.50
5.80
5.77
5.75
5.75
5.91
3.35
4.00
4.00
3.53
5.18
Short-Term Rates
Federal funds (weekly averages)
3-month
Treasury bills (bid)
Bankers' acceptances
Euro-dollars
Federal agencies
Finance paper
CD's (prime NYC)
Most often quoted new issue
Secondary market
6-month
Treasury bills
Bankers' acceptances
Commercial paper (4-6 months)
Federal agencies
(7/19)
(7/22)
(6/1)
(7/19)
(7/22)
(7/22)
(7/22)
(3/11)
(3/10)
(3/10)
5.67
5.75
5.75
5.50
5.59 (6/25) 5.91
(3/29)
5.62 (e)
CD's (prime (NYC)
Most often quoted new issue
5.75 (7/22)
Secondary market
6.12 (7/21)
4.00 (3/24)
3.70 (3/3)
5.62 (6/23) 5.75
6.00
5.80
5.84 (6/30)
3.45 (3/11)
5.76
6.00 (7/22)
3.55 (7/8)
4.38 (3/3)
2.15 (3/24)
5.75 (6/23) 6.00
3.40 (6/25) 3.50
6.92 (7/22)
6.56 (6/15)
4.74 (3/22)
5.69 (3/23)
6.73
6.45
6.92
Seasoned Aaa
Baa
7.69 (6/2)
8.93 (1/5)
7.05 (2/16)
8.28 (2/16)
7.62
8.77
7.63
8.75
New Issue Aaa
8.23 (5/20)
6.76 (1/29)
7.84 (6/23) 7.90
6.23 (6/24)
6.23 (6/24) 5.97
5.80 (6/25) 5.65
8.22
1-year
Treasury bills (bid)
5.71
CD's (prime NYC)
Most often quoted new issue
Prime municipals
Intermediate and Long-Term
Treasury coupon issues
5-years
20-years
6.41
Corporate
Municipal
Bond Buyer Index
Moody's Aaa
5.80 (6/25)
5.00 (3/18)
4.75 (2/11)
Mortgage--implicit yield
in FNMA auction 1/
8.23 (7/12)
7.43 (3/1)
1/
8.23 (7/12)
Yield on 6-month forward commitment after al lowance for commitment fee and
required purchase and holding of FNMA stock. Assumes discount on 30-year
loan amortized over 15 years. e--estimated.
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A:
THE EFFECT OF POSTAL WAGE SETTLEMENT ON THE
FEDERAL BUDGET
The postal wage agreement reached on July 20 resulted in a
two-year contract providing wage increases of up to $1,710 for each
of 650,000 employees. The following table shows the three stages
of the wage increase:
Item
1.
2.
3.
Lump sum payment to those
employed over 6 months
Five $250 increases
Cost-of-living increase
Per cent
Increase 1/ Date Payable
3.9
1st yr--3.2
2nd yr--3.1
Immediately
July 20, 1971
through
Jan. 20, 1973
Maximum--2.0 July 1972
Increase
Per
Employee
$ 300
1,250
160
$1,710
In addition, employees were given protection against job lay-offs
during the life of the contract. In return the Postal Service was
given the right to introduce technological changes and to discipline
workers.
The eventual annual cost to the Postal Service is estimated
to be more than $1 billion--with a cost of $700 million in fiscal
1972 and an additional $400 million in fiscal 1973. The effect of
the wage settlement on Federal budget is uncertain. If a postal rate
increase is not sought, an additional Congressional appropriation
may be necessary, and the deficit will increase.
1/
Based on the current average wage of $7,777.
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1971, July 26). Greenbook/Tealbook. Greenbooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19710727_part1
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_greenbook_19710727_part1,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Greenbook/Tealbook},
year = {1971},
month = {Jul},
howpublished = {Greenbooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19710727_part1},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}