greenbooks · March 21, 1966
Greenbook/Tealbook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Content last modified 6/05/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee
By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
March 18, 1966
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
The Domestic.Economy
The industrial commodity price index from mid-January to
mid-February increased .3 per cent -- after rising .2 per cent in the
previous month -- to 103.3 per cent of the 1957-59 average.
Contributing
to much of the rise were sharp increases in metals and machinery,
lumber, and hides and leather.
The BLS weekly indexes indicate little
change into mid-March, but other information continues to suggest a
further rise.
Average prices of foodstuffs increased 2 per cent from
mid-January to mid-February as livestock and meats, oils, eggs, and
dairy products rose.
Weekly estimates, however, indicate a slight
decline in foodstuffs into mid-March.
Thus, the total wholesale price
index, after rising .7 per cent further from mid-January to mid-February
to a point 4 per cent higher than in the first quarter of last year,
apparently has changed little into mid-March.
New orders for durable goods declined slightly in February
but remained well above shipments, and unfilled orders increased
substantially further.
The new older decline reflected mainly a large
drop for defense products which had been at a sharply advanced level
in January and which often show pronounced month-to-month fluctuations.
February orders for defense products remained above shipments and the
order backlog expanded further.
New orders for steel increased sharply
in February and unfilled orders, which had been edging up from the
- 2 -
November low, showed a large gain.
New orders for machinery and equip-
ment were up moderately and the order backlog continued its steady
advance.
The over-all ratio of unfilled orders to shipments of durable
goods, at 2.87 in February, was somewhat above the 2.84 average prevailing from last September to January and was up from 2.70 in
February 1965 and from 2.50 in February 1964.
The latter was about
the low for this expansion period.
Seasonally adjusted private housing starts,which began to
decline in January, dipped sharply further in February to an annual
rate of 1.32 million.
The decline in February amounted to 17 per cent,
from the January rate which was revised upward by 3 per cent.
The continuing unsettled nature of underlying mortgage market
conditions appears to have been a factor in this development.
However,
interpretation of this influence on the magnitude of the decline is
difficult because of the inherent volatility of the housing series and
the special effect of weather conditions. These were much more favorable
than usual in December (when starts reached an annual rate of 1.77
million) and considerably less so in February.
On a three-month moving average, starts in the NovemberJanuary period. were at an annual rate of 1.63 million compared with
1.50 million for all of 1965.
In the December-February period, the
average annual rate was 1.56 million.
Permits also declined further in February.
- 3The Domestic Financial Situation
Despite recent relative stability in the corporate and
municipal bond markets the high levels that rates had reached resulted
in the cancellation of the $440 million New Jersey Turnpike issue.
This negotiated issue was rejected due to the 4.23 per cent interest
cost, reducing the total volume of state and local offerings in March
to approximately $700 million.
Thus with April's somewhat lighter
schedule of offerings, plus a continued reduction in the advertised
inventory of municipal dealers to less than $400 million, pressure from
the supply side for further increases in municipal yields have been
reduced.
Seasoned corporate bonds trading in the secondary market
experienced a five basis point rise in the usual lagged response to
earlier pressures in the corporate market.
But, the new issue yield
series dropped 9 basis points to 5.29 per cent during the most recent
week, and even at this reduced yields level, the week's major new issue
was virtually a sell-out on the first day.
Common stock prices -- as measured by Standard and Poor's
composite index -- rose slightly after midweek and recovered about 1
per cent of their decline.
This price recovery, however, was accompanied
by diminished trading volume, averaging 6.4 million shares per day.
Despite the 3 per cent decline in common stock prices during
the last 2-1/2 weeks of February, total customer credit in the stock
market rose $224 million during the month to nearly $8 billion.
Most
-4-
of this gain occurred in customers' net debit balances which increased
$202 million to a new high of $5-3/4 billion; bank loans to others than
brokers and dealers rose $22 million.
Corrections:
Page IV--C - 1:
The words "corresponding to balances on" should be deleted
from the lower label of the chart "U.S. Balance of Payments."
The top line in the chart "U.S. Balance of Payments -- cont."
should be labeled:
Pensions.
Balance on Goods, Services, Remittances and
SA - 1
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX:
RECENT SURVEY OF CD RATES*
To obtain a better impression of the current CD market, the
Reserve Banks Wednesday the 16th collected rate information on the
large denomination CDs issued by weekly reporting banks with deposits
in excess of $500 million. As the table indicates, CD rates have
reached high levels at some banks -- as high as 5-1/2 per cent for longerterm CDs at 7 banks. However, many of the banks outside New York are
not attempting to match the rates offered by prime banks. They are
confining their efforts to attract funds primarily to local and regional
markets. Several will not issue long CDs at all. But, as in past
periods of intense competition for CD funds, many of these banks are
continuing to attract money. Indeed, in the two weeks prior to the tax
date, banks outside New York were able to increase outstanding CDs
by $300 million. New York banks -- faced with large maturities -struggled to increase their outstandings by $300 million in the same
period. It is likely that much of the inflow outside New York was
sought to position the banks for tax date pressures, but still the large
size of the inflow is surprising -- especially since this rate survey
indicates that several banks outside of New York have decided to let
some of their CDs run-off.
Two New York City banks are offering 5-1/2 per cent for CDs
maturing in 1967. These banks, on our maturity survey last month,
had unusually short maturities and now are probably attempting to
lengthen their structure and pull in funds in anticipation of future
run-offs. Evidently, these high rates have acted as successful magnets.
On our maturity survey last month, New York City banks had scheduled
maturities on the March tax and dividend dates -- both of which fall
in the week ended Wednesday -- of over $500 million. This does not
count CDs that matured on other days last week, yet outstanding CDs
at New York only declined $150 million in the 7 days ended March 16 -implying sales of at least $350 million, and probably more. It is
likely that a good portion of that inflow went to the two large banks
offering such attractive rates.
* Prepared by Edward C. Ettin, Economist, Banking Section,
Division of Research and Statistics.
OFFERING RATES ON LARGE DENOMINATION
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
By Maturity
Large Weekly Reporting Member Banks
March 16, 1966
(Per cent)
89 days
90 - 179 days
Most Often
Quoted
S
Most Often
angel
Quoted
180 days - 1 year
Range
Most Often
Quoted
Over 1 year
Ra g Most Often
Range
Quoted
(By Size)
$500 million $ 1 billion
38
$1 billion
10
&
over nonprime
$1 billion &
over prime
4.005.05
5.00
4.00 5.25
5.00
4.00 5.38 -
5.00
4.50 5.375
5.25
4.755.50
4.00-
--
4.00 -
--
4.25 -
--
4.50 -
--
4.00-
5.00
7
5,125
5.25
5.375
5.25
5.50
5.25
4.855.00
5.00
4.8755.25
5.00
5.00 5.25
5.125
5.1255.50
5.25
5.255.50
5.25
4.305.00
4.75
4.40 5.25
4.75
4.60 5.25
4.875
4.75 5.375
5.00
4.755.375
5.00
5.25-
--
5.375
5.00 5.50
5.25
New York City
$1 billion &
over prime
outside New
12
York City__
(By District)1/
13
Boston
4.75-
--
4.90
15
New York
4.755.05
Philadelphia
5
Cleveland
7
Richmond
4
Atlanta
2
4.80
.25
5.00
5.00
.125
5.00
5.005.125
5.125
5.25
.125
5.00
4.00-
.00 -
--
4.00
4.90 S_______
.90
--
-
-
5.25
5.25
5.005.50
5.25
5.25
5.15 5.125
5.25
5.1255.25
5.25
4.00 -
5.375
5.25
4.625-
--
5.10
4.75
5.10
5.25
5.25
5.25 -
5.25
5.25
4.75 -
4.75 -
4.60 -
.40 4.90
5.125
4.90 5.38
5.00 -
+.75 -
4.305.00
_
.00
'.855.00
4.6255.00
5.00 -
.80 -
5.50
4.875-
5.25
--
5.00
--
5.50
5.50
-
4.50
--
--
5.375
4.90 5.50
5.375
Chicago
11
St. Louis
2
Minneapolis
2
Dallas
San Francisco
3
4.00 -
4.00-
4.50 -
5.00
4.755.00
4.905.00
5.00
--
5,125
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.90
5.00 5.125
5.00
4.50-
--
4.50 -
4.8758
75
4.005.00
4.75
754""
4.00 5.00
4.75
1/ Kansas City has no weekly reporting bank in this survey.
5,25
4.90 5.25
5.05 5.25
---
4.50 5.375
4.90 5.375
5.20 5.25
5.25
5.25
5. 125
5.00
5.00
4.50 -
4.50 -
4.75 -
4.90 -
5.00
4.25 5.15
4.875
--
5.L25
5.00
5.25
5.00
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1966, March 21). Greenbook/Tealbook. Greenbooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19660322_part1
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_greenbook_19660322_part1,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Greenbook/Tealbook},
year = {1966},
month = {Mar},
howpublished = {Greenbooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19660322_part1},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}