greenbooks · July 12, 1965
Greenbook/Tealbook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Content last modified 6/05/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
SUPPLEiENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINAUCIAL CONDITIONS
Prepared for the
Federal Open Narket Committee
By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
July 9,
1965
SA -
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A:
1
SURVEY OF BANK LENDING PRACTICES.
JUNE 1965
The results of the fourth quarterly survey of changes in bank lending practices are summarized in
tables.
the following paragraphs and accompanying
Reports were received from the 81 banks included in
the quarterly
interest rate survey.
Three-fifths of the respondents
(49 out of 81 banks)
reported that
demand for commercial and industrial loans had strengthened in the second quarter.
Over half of these had indicated greater loan demand in
1965 as well.
the first
quarter of
The widespread and sustained nature of the loan demand is
dicated by the fact that only a sixth of the banks in
in-
the survey failed to show
stronger loan demand in at least one of the past four quarters and about the
same proportion reported stronger demand in all four quarters.
Accompanying the heavy demand for loans, many banks firmed their
lending policies in various ways.
In the second quarter, half of the banks
raised interest rates to business borrowers
(presumably by reducing the number
of firms eligible for the prime rate as well by raising rates to borrowers in
the non-prime category),
the first
quarter.
but this was a somewhat smaller proportion than in
More than half of the banks raising rates also firmed their
compensating balance requirements.
Another 6 per cent firmed compensating
balance requirements but made no change in
interest rates.
Fewer banks reported firmer policies with respect to other terms and
conditions of the loan than for interest rates and compensating balances.
Higher standards of credit-worthiness were imposed on business borrowers by
one-fourth of the banks while about one-sixth of the total instituted firmer
policies on collateral and maturity of loans.
In each of these categories the
SA - 2
the proportions were appreciably higher than in the first quarter.
Compared to a year ago,
fifths of the survey banks,
interest rates were firmed by nearly four-
with 12 per cent of the total firming rates in
all four quarters and another 10 per cent in
addition,
three of the quarters.
In
two-thirds of the banks that firmed interest rates also tightened
compensating balance requirements over the past year.
The magnitudes of the
increases in rates and in balance requirements and the proportions of borrowers
affected,
however, are not revealed by the Survey.
Some classes of borrowers were affected more than others by the
tightening of lending standards in the second quarter of this year.
In re-
viewing lines of credit or loan applications nearly half of the survey banks
(two-thirds more than in the first quarter) had established firmer policies
for new business borrowers and most of these had also firmed their policies
with respect to loans to non-local service area customers.
As in previous
surveys, few banks indicated that they had firmed policies for established
customers,
As a result of the increased demand for loans, one bank commented
that it
had found it necessary to reserve loanable funds for seasonal borrowers
and regular customers, while another had needed to turn down some good quality
applications.
Several banks commented on the influence on lending policies of
the high level of their loan-deposit ratios, and one of the largest banks in
the country indicated that it had tightened its lending standards because it
did not wish to go beyond its present ratio.
Two-fifths of the banks--half again as many as in the March Survey-reported that the applicant's value to the bank as a depositor or source of
SA - 3
collateral business was a more important consideration than earlier.
By
contrast, only one-fifth of the banks--somewhat fewer than in March--stated
that the applicant's intended use of the loan proceeds was more important than
formerly.
A fifth of the banks reported that they were less aggressive than
formerly in seeking new loans (a higher percentage than in any previous survey)
and nearly all of these were banks that had experienced strengthened
mand in
two or more quarters of the past year.
Likewise,
loan de-
a sixth reported
less willingness to make term loans and nearly all of these indicated strengthened loan demand in the second quarter and many in earlier quarters as well.
As reported in previous surveys,
finance companies were less affect-
ed by firming of lending standards than non-financial businesses.
Only 12 per
cent of the banks had firmed their policies on interest rates and on size of
compensating balance requirements for finance companies in the second quarter
and only one-fourth had done so over the past year.
These changes are be-
lieved to have affected principally the smaller finance companies.
Interest
rates and size of compensating balance requirements applicable to large finance
companies operating on a nation-wide basis presumably are determined for the
most part by the big money market banks, which have reported few changes in
these terms.
However,
in enforcing balance requirements and granting new or
larger credit lines to finance companies, where smaller banks appear to have
somewhat more leeway, the number of banks with firmer policies in the second
quarter was greater--about one-fourth and one-third of the total respectively.
for quotation or publication
July 2, 1965.
U. S. Total 81 Large Banks
Survey of Changes in Bank Lending Practices
March-June 1965 and June 1964-June 1965
(Numbers of banks)
Lending to Nonfinancial Businesses
COMPARED TO 3 MOS.
Stronger
1.
Strength of loan demand
49
Greater
2.
3.
Aggressiveness of bank
in seeking new loans
5
Factors considered in deciding
whether to approve credit
requests:
More
important
Weaker
AGO
COMPARED TO 1 YRL
Unchanged
Stronger
Weaker
28
4
Less
60
Less
importaint
Unchanged
14
Unchanged
16
AGO
Unchanged
Greater
16
Unchanged
Less
41
24
More
Less
important important
Unchanged'
Applicant's value to the
bank as a depositor or
source of collateral
business
48
51
2
28
Applicant's intended use
of loan proceeds
4.
50
Practices with respect to
reviewing lines of credit
or loan applications of:
Firmer
Established customers
4
New customers
36
Local service area customer s 8
Nonlocal service area
customers
5.
Terms and conditions of
loans:
Firmer
Interest rates
Compensating or supporting
balances
Standards of credit-worthiness
Type and amount of collateral
Maturity
40
28
22
12
1-,
Easier
1
-
Easier
Unchanged
77
44
72
Unchanged
Unchanged
Firmer
Easier
15
50
18
I
3
65
28
62
36
1
41
Easier
Unchanged
Firmer
63
-
18
- 2-
COMPARED TO 3 MOS. AGO
6.
Term loans
More
willing
Willingness to make
Less
willing
13
Longer
Shorter
COMPARED TO 1 YR. AGO
Unchanged
More
willing
67
6
24
Longer
Shorter
Unchanged
Less
willing
Unchanged
50
Unchanged
Maximum maturity bank
will approve
Years
Number of banks
3
5
6
7
8
10
5
41
1
11
5
5
13
n. a.
Lending to Finance Companies
Firmer
Interest rates
Size of compensating or
supporting balances required
Enforcement of balance
requirements
Establishing new or larger
credit lines
Source:
Easier
Unchanged
Firmer
Easier
Unchanged
59
21
5
29
4
Survey of Lending Practices at Large Banks in the Federal Reserve Quarterly
Interest Rate Survey conducted as of June 15, 1965.
54
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1965, July 12). Greenbook/Tealbook. Greenbooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19650713_part1
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_greenbook_19650713_part1,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Greenbook/Tealbook},
year = {1965},
month = {Jul},
howpublished = {Greenbooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/greenbook_19650713_part1},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}