fomc minutes · September 20, 1993
FOMC Minutes
Meeting of September 21, 1993
A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at 9:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
Mr. Greenspan, Chairman
Mr. McDonough, Vice Chairman
Mr. Angell
Mr. Boehne
Mr. Keehn
Mr. Kelley
Mr. LaWare
Mr. Lindsey
Mr. McTeer
Mr. Mullins
Ms. Phillips
Mr. Stern
Messrs. Broaddus, Jordan, Forrestal, and Parry,
Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market
Committee
Messrs. Hoenig, Melzer, and Syron, Presidents of
the Federal Reserve Banks of Kansas City,
St. Louis, and Boston, respectively
Mr. Kohn, Secretary and Economist
Mr. Bernard, Deputy Secretary
Mr. Coyne, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Gillum, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Mattingly, General Counsel
Mr. Patrikis, Deputy General Counsel
Mr. Prell, Economist
Mr. Truman, Economist
Messrs. R. Davis, Lang, Lindsey, Promisel,
Rolnick, Rosenblum, Scheld, Siegman,
Simpson, and Slifman, Associate
Economists
Mr. Fisher, Manager for Foreign Operations,
System Open Market Account
Mr. Ettin, Deputy Director, Division of Research
and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Madigan, Associate Director, Division of
Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Stockton, Associate Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Ms. Low, Open Market Secretariat Assistant,
Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of
Governors
Ms. Browne, Messrs. T. Davis, Dewald, and
Goodfriend, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal
Reserve Banks of Boston, Kansas City,
St. Louis, and Richmond, respectively
Messrs. Judd, King, and Ms. White, Vice Presidents,
Federal Reserve Banks of San Francisco,
Atlanta, and New York, respectively
Mr. Gavin, Assistant Vice President, Federal
Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Ms. Krieger, Manager, Open Market Operations,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
By unanimous vote, the minutes for the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee held on
August 17, 1993, were approved.
By unanimous vote, Joan E. Lovett and Peter R. Fisher were selected to serve at the pleasure of the
Committee in the capacities of Manager for Domestic Operations, System Open Market Account,
and Manager for Foreign Operations, System Open Market Account respectively, on the
understanding that their selection was subject to their being satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York.
Secretary's Note: Advice subsequently was received that the selections indicated above
were satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The Manager for Foreign Operations reported on developments in foreign exchange markets and on
System transactions in foreign currencies during the period August 17, 1993, through September 20,
1993. By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified these transactions.
Ms. Betsy B. White, Vice President for Domestic Operations of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, reported on developments in domestic financial markets and on System open market
transactions in government securities and federal agency obligations during the period August 17,
1993, through September 20, 1993. By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified these transactions.
The Committee then turned to a discussion of the economic and financial outlook and the
formulation of monetary policy for the intermeeting period ahead. A summary of the economic and
financial information available at the time of the meeting and of the Committee's discussion is
provided below, followed by the domestic policy directive that was approved by the Committee and
issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The information reviewed by the Committee at this meeting suggested that economic activity,
adjusted for the temporary depressing effects of the flood in the Midwest, was continuing to expand
at a moderate pace. Consumer spending was up, and business purchases of durable equipment had
recorded further healthy gains. On the other hand, housing activity had shown a muted response to
the declines in mortgage rates that had occurred through the spring, and gains in manufacturing
output and in employment had been limited in recent months. After rising at an accelerated rate in
the early part of the year, consumer prices had increased more slowly in recent months and producer
prices had fallen.
Total nonfarm payroll employment edged lower in August after a sizable gain in July. Hiring in the
service-producing sectors, especially in health and business services, was down in August from the
pace of recent months, and more jobs were lost in manufacturing. Construction employment also
moved lower, retracing part of the July increase. On the other hand, the average workweek rose to a
relatively high level in August, and as a result, aggregate hours worked by production or
nonsupervisory workers were significantly above the second-quarter average. The civilian
unemployment rate declined to 6.7 percent.
Industrial production posted a further moderate gain in August. Manufacturing output more than
accounted for the increase, as strikes damped mining production and utilities output was unchanged
following large gains in earlier months. Within manufacturing, the output of motor vehicles and parts
was unchanged. Excluding the motor vehicle component, another sharp gain in computers and
related electronic components boosted the production of business equipment, while the output of
consumer goods declined as a result of a retrenchment in appliance production following the advance
posted in July. Total utilization of manufacturing capacity edged up again in August.
Total retail sales were little changed in real terms in July and August. Despite the recent
sluggishness, however, real spending for goods in July and August was appreciably above the level
in the second quarter. In addition, real expenditures for services had grown rapidly in July; this
reflected both high energy consumption associated with unusually hot weather and robust spending
for other services. The persistence of hot weather through August suggested that spending on energy
services continued at a high level for that month. After a slight decline in July, housing starts rose
substantially in August. Single-family starts accounted for all of the August increase, as multifamily
starts fell further and continued to hover around their thirty-year low.
Growth in real business fixed investment appeared to be slowing in the third quarter from the robust
pace earlier in the year. Shipments of nondefense capital goods dropped substantially in July, with all
of the decline occurring in the volatile aircraft component. For capital goods other than aircraft and
parts, shipments again moved higher in July; while the demand for computing equipment
strengthened after dropping off somewhat in the second quarter, shipments of other types of durable
equipment softened. In addition, heavy-truck sales were off substantially in July after advancing
steadily since late 1992, and fleet sales of light vehicles were down in July and August. Investment
in nonresidential structures posted its largest advance in three years in the second quarter. However,
construction activity fell in July in reflection of a sharp decline in the construction of commercial
structures other than offices.
Business inventories contracted sharply in July after changing little in June. The bulk of the July
decline occurred in the retail sector and reflected drawdowns in inventories at automobile
dealerships. Non-auto retail inventories edged down in July; with sales flat, the ratio of non-auto
inventories to sales remained near the high end of the range for the past several years. In the
wholesale trade sector, stocks were trimmed somewhat further in July, but the inventory-to-sales
ratio remained at the midpoint of its range over the past three years. Manufacturing stocks were
unchanged in July after a small reduction in June. With shipments down in July owing to weak
shipments of aircraft and motor vehicles, the stocks-to-sales ratio rebounded in July but was still at a
low level.
The nominal U.S. merchandise trade deficit decreased in July, but it remained essentially unchanged
from its average rate in the second quarter. The value of exports edged lower in July, while the value
of imports fell by more, retracing nearly all of the sizable June rise. The decline in imports was
primarily in automotive products, consumer goods, and oil. The performance of the major foreign
industrial economies continued to present a mixed picture. Economic activity in Japan, after
increasing slightly in the first quarter, evidenced renewed weakness in the second quarter that
apparently persisted into the third quarter. In western Germany, real output rose in the second quarter,
but much of the gain apparently stemmed from unintended inventory accumulation. In France and
Italy, economic activity appeared to have leveled out in the second quarter after declining earlier. By
contrast, both the United Kingdom and Canada recorded further modest gains in economic activity.
Producer prices of finished goods fell sharply further in August; higher prices for consumer foods
were more than offset by lower prices for the energy and the nonfood, non-energy components of the
index. For finished goods other than food and energy, producer prices increased over the twelve
months ended in August by a considerably smaller amount than in the previous twelve-month period.
Consumer prices rose a little faster in August than in July, with an increase in food prices
counterbalancing a decline in prices of consumer energy goods. For nonfood, non-energy items,
consumer prices advanced over the twelve months ended in August by an amount comparable to that
recorded for the twelve months ended in August 1992. Average hourly earnings of production or
nonsupervisory workers were up in August after little change on balance in June and July; the rise
reflected in part overtime earnings in manufacturing. Over the twelve months ended in August, this
measure of earnings increased by about the same amount as in the previous twelve-month period.
At its meeting on August 17, 1993, the Committee adopted a directive that called for maintaining the
existing degree of pressure on reserve positions and that, in contrast to the two previous directives,
did not include a tilt toward possible firming of reserve conditions during the intermeeting period.
Accordingly, the directive indicated that in the context of the Committee's long-run objectives for
price stability and sustainable economic growth, and giving careful consideration to economic,
financial, and monetary developments, slightly greater reserve restraint or slightly lesser reserve
restraint might be acceptable during the intermeeting period. The reserve conditions associated with
this directive were expected to be consistent with modest growth of M2 and little net change in M3
over the balance of the third quarter.
Open market operations were directed during the intermeeting period toward maintaining the
existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. The federal funds rate remained close to 3 percent
over the period, while adjustment plus seasonal borrowing averaged somewhat above anticipated
levels, reflecting demand for adjustment credit by banks experiencing temporary technical
difficulties.
Other short-term interest rates were little changed on balance over the intermeeting period, while
yields on intermediate- and long-term debt obligations declined somewhat. The drop in longer-term
yields appeared to be associated with incoming data indicating continuing sluggishness in economic
activity and the more favorable performance of broad measures of prices. Major indexes of stock
prices increased somewhat further over the intermeeting period, evidently reflecting lower bond
yields and heavy inflows to stock mutual funds.
In foreign exchange markets, the trade-weighted value of the dollar in terms of the other G-10
currencies depreciated on balance over the intermeeting period. Much of the dollar's decline reflected
the strength of the mark and other European currencies, which was related in part to the
unexpectedly slow pace of monetary easing in Germany and other European countries. Against the
yen, the dollar rebounded early in the intermeeting period from the historical low that occurred
around the time of the Committee's August meeting. The dollar was buoyed by joint central bank
sales of yen against the dollar and by the accompanying public statement from the U.S. Treasury that
was seen by market participants as signaling a new attitude toward any further appreciation of the
yen. On September 21, the dollar rose sharply on news that President Yeltsin had dissolved the
Russian Parliament.
Growth of M2 continued at a slow rate in August. The sluggishness in this aggregate, which occurred
despite further rapid expansion in its Ml component, apparently reflected ongoing efforts by
households to shift funds away from depository accounts in search of better returns. M3 turned up
after declining in June and July; however, expansion of this aggregate continued to be held down by
declines in institution-only money market funds. For the year through August, M2 and M3 were
estimated to have grown at rates close to the lower ends of the Committee's ranges for the year. Total
domestic nonfinancial debt had expanded moderately in recent months, and for the year through July
it was estimated to have increased at a rate in the lower half of the Committee's monitoring range.
The staff projection prepared for this meeting suggested moderate growth in economic activity and
limited reductions in margins of unemployed labor and capital through next year. Fiscal restraint,
uncertainty about other government policies, and slow growth of foreign industrial economies over
the near term would act as a constraint on the economy. However, improving balance-sheet positions
and credit supply conditions were lifting an unusual constraint on spending, and the lower interest
rates would encourage further increases in consumer spending, housing construction, and business
fixed investment. The continued slack in labor and product markets, coupled with some tempering of
inflation expectations, was expected to foster further reductions in wage and price inflation.
In the Committee's discussion of current and prospective economic conditions, members commented
that recent developments had not altered their outlook for moderate and sustained expansion in
economic activity. The members acknowledged that the interpretation of ongoing developments
presented some unusual problems, notably the difficulty of reconciling the appreciable growth in
employment thus far this year with the slow expansion in measured output: the associated drop in
measured productivity was especially surprising in light of the business drive toward more efficient
operations. Moreover, the economic outlook clearly remained subject to a variety of uncertainties,
including potential developments abroad that were especially difficult to predict. Nonetheless, while
temporary factors were likely to depress third-quarter expansion, the members saw little in the
current statistical or anecdotal reports on the domestic economy that pointed to the likelihood of a
significant deviation from a moderate growth trend. It was noted in this connection that the inhibiting
effects of increased fiscal restraint and expected further weakness in net exports needed to be
weighed against the favorable effects on interest-sensitive spending of considerably reduced
intermediate- and long-term interest rates and the much improved financial condition of many
business firms and households. With regard to the outlook for inflation, some members suggested
that the prospects for continued slack in resource utilization were consistent with a disinflationary
trend, but the disparate factors bearing on the outlook for inflation as well as the swings in price
performance experienced in recent quarters argued for caution in assessing the future course of
inflation.
In their review of developments around the nation, members commented that business conditions
remained uneven across local areas and industries, but they characterized general economic activity
in most regions as ranging from little change to moderate growth since mid-summer. However,
business conditions continued to be quite weak in some areas, notably in California, and business
sentiment appeared to have remained cautious in much of the nation. One member emphasized
uneven conditions of a different kind. Relatively disadvantaged members of the population, often
living in inner cities, had high and rising expectations about their economic prospects. At the same
time, however, some traditional paths of upward mobility were being cut back, such as the military
and civil service within the government and office jobs more generally. In addition, regulations
aimed at correcting some problems in financial institutions--such as real estate appraisal and
downpayment requirements--were having unintended adverse effects on lower-income businesses
and households, and other proposals aimed at promoting minority lending were in danger of
promising more than they could deliver. An apparently widening gap between economic realities and
aspirations might not have measurable implications for the macroeconomic outlook over short
periods of time, but they reflected a worrisome trend in terms of the longer-run health of the
economy.
In other comments, members referred to a number of financial developments that had favorable
implications for sustained economic expansion. Business firms and consumers had made substantial
progress in strengthening their balance sheets, and while the process of adjusting balance sheets
evidently was still under way, the material improvement accomplished thus far had diminished
financial risks and constraints on spending. Banking institutions had bolstered their capital positions
and were in a better position to accommodate increases in loan demand. Bond and stock markets had
exhibited considerable strength. In this connection, however, a few members commented on the
apparently growing concern in financial markets that current equity prices were high relative to
earnings and dividends. A correction in U.S. equity markets could trigger cumulative selling,
especially by mutual funds, which had garnered substantial new investors, some of whom might not
fully appreciate the risks of their new assets relative to deposits. On the positive side, there were
good reasons for optimism on the trajectory of business profits in an environment of low inflation
and moderate growth. Moreover, some managers of mutual funds reportedly were taking steps to
strengthen the liquidity of their portfolios, and members reported on efforts to improve individual
investor awareness of the risks of equity investments.
During their review of the prospective performance of key sectors of the economy, members gave
somewhat mixed reports on retail sales in recent weeks, but they generally anticipated that consumer
spending would provide continued if not strong support to sustained economic expansion. As had
been true for an extended period, consumer attitudes remained hesitant in the context of concerns
about employment and income prospects and, in the case of many consumers with higher incomes,
increased income tax liabilities. Some members expressed the view that more vigorous growth in
employment might well occur as the expansion matured, and such a development would be likely to
have a favorable effect on consumer attitudes and spending.
Cautious attitudes also appeared to have held back housing demand and construction activity despite
declines in mortgage interest rates. The combination of some further declines in mortgage interest
rates recently and a tendency for house prices to stabilize or even to firm in some markets seemed to
have induced appreciable and widespread strengthening in demand for single-family housing.
Indeed, despite persisting weakness in some areas, housing markets were described as quite strong in
many parts of the country, and the overall improvement in housing activity might not be captured in
the latest statistics. Other construction activity appeared on the whole to have bottomed out and
might have begun to trend higher. Anecdotal reports suggested a pickup in the volume of commercial
property transactions, though apparently not yet in the prices of commercial properties in most areas,
and rising construction outlays were anticipated for commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities
as economic activity continued to expand. Office construction was likely to remain generally
depressed as excess capacity continued to be absorbed, but such construction might not decline
further. Members also anticipated appreciable further growth in business spending for equipment,
notably for the purpose of enhancing productivity in an environment of strong competitive pressures;
concurrently, spending to expand capacity seemed likely to remain relatively limited unless
consumer spending gathered more momentum in coming quarters than was now anticipated. On
balance, business fixed investment was expected to continue to provide considerable support to the
economic expansion.
The passage of deficit-reduction legislation in July implied increased fiscal restraint but also
appeared to have improved confidence in financial markets and in the business community more
generally regarding the ability of the federal government to enact needed legislation. At the same
time, the new taxes stemming from that legislation and a greater focus on the potential for further
legislation, notably health care reform and its implications for mandated business costs, were a key
factor in sustaining cautious attitudes among business executives. Members also referred to the
constraining effects in many areas, and on the economy more generally, of current and prospective
cutbacks in defense expenditures, spending curbs by state and local governments, and the outlook for
further tax increases by many of these governments.
The prospects for net exports also were cited as a negative factor in the economic outlook.
Expectations of persisting weakness in some major foreign economies implied relatively limited
growth in U.S. exports in a period when moderate expansion in this country was likely to foster
somewhat more rapid increases in U.S. imports. Some members also commented that the
controversial NAFTA legislation under consideration in the Congress continued to dominate business
discussions in parts of the country. It was suggested that whatever its eventual benefits for the three
nations immediately involved might be, a defeat of that legislation could prove to be a setback for the
GATT negotiations with dislocative implications for world trade.
Many members referred to the more favorable price developments that had occurred since the early
part of the year when key measures of inflation had surged. While it was premature to conclude that
a distinct disinflationary trend had been re-established, the members generally agreed that price
pressures were likely to remain subdued given their projections of some continuing slack in resource
utilization. Favorable developments tending to support that conclusion included the persistence of
intensely competitive conditions in most markets for goods around the country. The costs of
materials purchased by business firms generally were reported to be rising only slowly, if at all.
There were indications of fairly tight labor markets in some areas, but wage pressures remained
limited even in those markets. At the same time, the costs of worker benefits continued to rise fairly
rapidly and many business contacts were expressing concern about the possibility of further
mandated cost increases related to the health care reform legislation. For the next several months,
relatively rapid increases in food prices associated with weather-related crop losses and an increase
in the excise tax on gasoline would tend to boost consumer prices. On balance, these developments
were not seen as inconsistent with longer-run progress toward price stability, though the inflation
outlook remained subject to considerable uncertainty.
In the Committee's discussion of policy for the intermeeting period ahead, all of the members agreed
that recent economic and financial developments pointed to the desirability of an unchanged policy
stance. The members recognized that neither the pace of the economic expansion nor the uncertain
progress toward price stability reflected a wholly satisfactory economic performance, but at this
point the present posture of monetary policy continued to offer the best promise in their view of
promoting sustained economic growth in the context of subdued if not declining inflation.
From the perspective of a variety of financial measures, the current monetary policy continued quite
accommodative. Short-term interest rates were low, indeed close to zero after adjustment for
inflation, and there had been appreciable further declines in longer-term interest rates. Growth of M2
remained slow, but it had picked up since earlier in the year, and M3 had expanded in August, albeit
at a sluggish rate, after declining in previous months. One member observed that growth in M2,
adjusted to include certain stock and bond mutual funds, was estimated to have accelerated since
early spring to a fairly healthy pace. Narrow measures of money and reserves, though subject to a
variety of influences, were growing at rates that suggested an ample provision of liquidity to the
economy.
In considering possible adjustments to policy during the intermeeting period, all of the members
endorsed a proposal to retain a symmetrical directive. While current economic uncertainties were
mirrored in uncertainties about the future course of monetary policy, the members agreed that
developments in the period until the next meeting in mid-November were not likely to call for any
adjustment to policy. Beyond the nearer term, however, both the timing and, in the view of at least
some members, the direction of the next policy change could not be foreseen at this time. While they
did not see convincing evidence that monetary policy was overly stimulative at this point, some
members were concerned the current stance, as reflected in short-term interest rates, was quite
accommodative and probably would need to be firmed at some point. These members stressed the
need to remain especially alert to potential inflationary developments against the background of
persisting inflationary expectations and uncertain progress toward price stability. Other members,
while sharing this concern to an extent, gave some weight to the possibility that the expansion might
remain quite sluggish for a period; under the circumstances, they foresaw the need to maintain an
accommodative policy posture and could not rule out the possibility that the next policy move might
have to be toward greater monetary stimulus.
At the conclusion of the Committee's discussion, all the members indicated their support of a
directive that called for maintaining the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions and that did
not include a presumption about the likely direction of any adjustment to policy during the
intermeeting period. Accordingly, in the context of the Committee's long-run objectives for price
stability and sustainable economic growth, and giving careful consideration to economic, financial,
and monetary developments, the Committee decided that slightly greater or slightly lesser reserve
restraint might be acceptable during the intermeeting period. According to a staff analysis, the
reserve conditions contemplated at this meeting were expected to be consistent with modest growth
in M2 and M3 over the balance of the year.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was authorized and
directed, until instructed otherwise by the Committee, to execute transactions in the System account
in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
The information reviewed at this meeting suggests that economic activity is continuing
to expand at a moderate pace. Total nonfarm payroll employment edged down in August
after a sizable gain in July, but the average workweek rose to a relatively high level and
the civilian unemployment rate declined to 6.7 percent. Industrial production has
advanced moderately over recent months. Retail sales changed little in real terms in July
and August after increasing appreciably in the second quarter. Housing starts were down
slightly in July but rose substantially in August. Available indicators suggest a slowing
in the expansion of business capital spending from a robust pace earlier in the year. The
nominal U.S. merchandise trade deficit was about unchanged in July from its average
rate in the second quarter. After rising at an accelerated rate in the early part of the year,
consumer prices have increased more slowly and producer prices have fallen in recent
months.
Short-term interest rates have changed little since the Committee meeting on August 17,
while yields on intermediate and long-term debt obligations have declined somewhat. In
foreign exchange markets, the trade-weighted value of the dollar in terms of the other
G-10 currencies depreciated substantially over the intermeeting period.
M2 continued to expand at a slow rate in August, while M3 turned up after declining in
June and July. For the year through August, M2 and M3 are estimated to have grown at
rates close to the lower end of the Committee's ranges for the year. Total domestic
nonfinancial debt has expanded at a moderate rate in recent months, and for the year
through July it is estimated to have increased at a rate in the lower half of the
Committee's monitoring range.
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will
foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. In furtherance of these
objectives, the Committee at its meeting in July lowered the ranges it had established in
February for growth of M2 and M3 to ranges of 1 to 5 percent and 0 to 4 percent
respectively, measured from the fourth quarter of 1992 to the fourth quarter of 1993. The
Committee anticipated that developments contributing to unusual velocity increases
would persist over the balance of the year and that money growth within these lower
ranges would be consistent with its broad policy objectives. The monitoring range for
growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt also was lowered to 4 to 8 percent for the
year. For 1994, the Committee agreed on tentative ranges for monetary growth,
measured from the fourth quarter of 1993 to the fourth quarter of 1994, of 1 to 5 percent
for M2 and 0 to 4 percent for M3. The Committee provisionally set the monitoring range
for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt at 4 to 8 percent for 1994. The behavior
of the monetary aggregates will continue to be evaluated in the light of progress toward
price level stability, movements in their velocities, and developments in the economy
and financial markets.
In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to
maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. In the context of the
Committee's long-run objectives for price stability and sustainable economic growth,
and giving careful consideration to economic, financial, and monetary developments,
slightly greater reserve restraint or slightly lesser reserve restraint might be acceptable in
the intermeeting period. The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to be
consistent with modest growth in M2 and M3 over the balance of the year.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, McDonough, Angell, Boehne, Keehn, Kelley,
LaWare. Lindsey, McTeer, Mullins, Ms. Phillips, and Mr. Stern.
Votes against this action: None.
It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee would be held on Tuesday, November 16,
1993.
The meeting adjourned at 12:35 p.m.
During the intermeeting period, available members participated in three telephone conference calls to
discuss issues relating to the release of information about discussions at Federal Open Market
Committee meetings. These calls were prompted by hearings on such issues that were held by the
House Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. The discussions took into account
information that unedited transcripts for meetings since early 1976 were maintained by the FOMC
secretariat at the Board of Governors. The members did not reach any decisions on these matters
during these conferences. In the course of two further telephone conferences during the intermeeting
period, the Committee reviewed economic and financial developments affecting Mexico and
discussed various contingencies that might involve the Federal Reserve.
Donald L. Kohn
Secretary
Return to top
FOMC
Home | Monetary policy
Accessibility | Contact Us
Last update: May 4, 2007
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1993, September 20). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19930921
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_19930921,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {FOMC Minutes},
year = {1993},
month = {Sep},
howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19930921},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}