bluebooks · August 17, 1992
Bluebook
Prefatory Note
The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.
1
In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.
Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class I FOMC
MONETARY POLICY ALTERNATIVES
Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
By the staff
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Strictly Confidential (FR)
August 14, 1992
Class I - FOMC
MONETARY POLICY ALTERNATIVES
Recent Developments
(1)
On July 2, the day after the FOMC meeting, the discount
rate and the intended federal funds rate were reduced 50 basis points to
3 and 3-1/4 percent, respectively.
These actions were taken in response
to data suggesting that the economic expansion was more subdued than
anticipated, and against a background of marked weakness in the broad
monetary aggregates, sluggish credit growth, and continuing disinflaOver the balance of the period, the intended federal funds rate
tion.
remained at 3-1/4 percent.
The allowance for adjustment and seasonal
borrowing was maintained at $225 million until July 30, when it was
raised by $25 million to account for increasing demands for seasonal
credit.
Borrowing averaged close to its allowance in the two complete
maintenance periods since the meeting, and the federal funds rate has
averaged 3.25 percent.
(2)
The weak economic data and policy easing prompted a con-
siderable decline in market rates across the maturity spectrum on
July 2.
Note and bond markets have rallied further in recent weeks, as
incoming information suggested limited momentum in the economic recovery
and more favorable price and wage trends.
On balance over the period,
rates on both three-month Treasury bills and on thirty-year Treasury
bonds dropped a little more than 40 basis points.
Intermediate-term
rates fell by even more--from 60 to 70 basis points.
This pattern sug-
gests that the drop in long-term rates was accounted for by downward
revisions of expected credit demands and inflation over the next few
1. Financial markets quotations in the bluebook reflect data
available through noon, August 14.
years, rather than a reconsideration of longer-term inflation expectations.
Rates on fixed-rate home mortgages fell about 45 basis points
over the intermeeting period, somewhat less than yields on intermediateterm Treasuries, partly reflecting a reassessment of prepayment risk as
a result of the unexpectedly sharp pickup in refinancing activity.
In
other markets, spreads of yields on private securities over Treasury
issues remained quite narrow.
Most broad stock price indexes were
little changed on balance over the period.
(3) The dollar's foreign exchange value on a weighted average
basis has declined about 2-1/2 percent since the last FOMC meeting, as a
depreciation of about 3-1/2 percent against the mark and other ERM currencies more than offset a slight appreciation against the yen.
Since
its recent peak in mid-April the dollar has fallen 10 percent, more than
retracing the runup from year-end.
The net depreciation of the dollar
over the intermeeting period mainly reflected a weakening of near-term
U.S. economic prospects and the associated declines in U.S. interest
rates.
Although the Bundesbank raised its discount rate 75 basis points
on July 16, market interest rates in Germany moved only slightly higher.
However, against the backdrop of questions about the future of monetary
union, interest rates in other European countries rose somewhat more as
central banks had to tighten to support their currencies.
The Desk
intervened on July 20, August 7, and August 11, purchasing a total of
$770 million against marks to moderate the dollar's decline.
The Bank of Japan lowered
its discount rate by 1/2 percentage point; short-term market rates in
Japan declined about 60 basis points, while long-term rates dropped by
40 basis points.
Japanese stock prices declined by 6 percent, reaching
six-year lows, while European stock markets fell 7 to 11 percent.
(4) M2 and M3 continued to contract in July, decreasing at
1-1/4 and 1-3/4 percent annual rates, respectively, leaving them below
the parallel bands associated with their annual ranges.
Both aggregates
were substantially weaker than projected, reflecting in part a shortfall
In addition, velocities may have
in the expansion of nominal income.
shifted up a little more than anticipated, perhaps owing to a further
rechanneling of credit demands outside of the depository sector, encouraged by the drop in long-term market interest rates.
Bank loans con-
tinued to slide in July and overall bank credit was flat.
With little
need for additional funds, institutions cut rates on retail deposits
promptly following the July 2 easing.
Rates on liquid deposits de-
creased substantially, but by less than the reduction in money market
yields, and growth of those deposits (including demand deposits, other
checkable deposits, savings deposits, and MMDAs) picked up. 2
Yields
on retail time deposits were reduced more in line with declines in market rates of comparable maturity, and small time deposits extended their
steep runoff.
Outflows from retail money market mutual funds acceler-
ated, in contrast to the usual pattern following declines in short-term
yields.
Faced with wide spreads between yields on M2 balances and rates
on both capital market instruments and household credit, many households
evidently have continued to redirect balances toward bond and stock
funds and the repayment of credit.
Weakness in bank credit was also
reflected in sizable runoffs of large CDs, but the non-M2 component of
2. Reflecting strong growth of transaction deposits and an acceleration of currency, M1 growth rebounded to an 11-1/2 percent rate in
July. Growth in total reserves resumed, and the monetary base expanded at a 9-1/2 percent rate.
M3 was supported by flows into institution-only money market funds,
whose yields fell less quickly than market rates.
(5)
Recent declines in long-term interest rates fueled ac-
tivity in bond and mortgage markets, but private debt growth overall
apparently remained sluggish.
In the household sector, mortgage ap-
plications shot up as mortgage rates touched new lows; most such
applications were to refinance existing mortgages, but those for home
purchases climbed as well.
Consumer installment credit contracted at a
1 percent rate in June, and bank data for July suggest little pickup.
Nonfinancial firms continued to issue bonds at a brisk pace in July,
mainly to refund high-cost debt and pay down short-term loans.
Both
business loans at banks and commercial paper ran off in July, and overall funding needs appear to have remained modest.
Senior lending
officers at commercial banks reported that underwriting standards on
business loans were about unchanged over the past three months, continuing the trend of recent surveys; in contrast to previous surveys, banks
did not report further tightening in other terms of lending.
Bond
offerings remained brisk in the tax-exempt sector, but a sizable proportion of the issues were for refunding purposes, and a large volume of
bonds were retired with the proceeds of issues sold some time ago.
With
federal debt continuing to expand at a rapid pace, overall nonfinancial
sector debt has increased at an estimated 4-3/4 percent rate through
July, leaving this aggregate just within its monitoring range.
-5-
MONEY, CREDIT, AND RESERVE AGGREGATES
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates of growth)
May
June
July
QIV'91
to
July
14.6
-3.1
11.6
11.9
Money and credit aggregates
M1
M2
.5
-3.8
-1.3
1.1
M3
-.7
-4.4
-1.8
-.5
Domestic nonfinancial
debt
5.2
5.5
4.9P
4.7P
Bank credit
-.9
1.7
-.1
2.4
Nonborrowed reserves 1
10.5
-8.1
4.8
15.3
Total reserves
12.1
-6.3
6.2
15.5
7.7
3.9
9.6
155
229
284
1000
913
968
Reserve measures
Monetary base
Memo:
8.1
(Millions of dollars)
Adjustment plus seasonal
borrowing
Excess reserves
p - Partly projected.
1.
Includes "other extended credit" from the Federal Reserve.
NOTE:
Monthly reserve measures, including excess reserves and borrowing, are calculated by prorating averages for two-week reserve
maintenance periods that overlap months. Reserve data incorporate adjustments for discontinuities associated with changes
in reserve requirements.
Policy Alternatives
(6)
Three alternatives are presented below for consideration
by the Committee.
Under alternative B, federal funds would continue to
trade around 3-1/4 percent in combination with an initial allowance for
adjustment plus seasonal borrowing of $250 million.3
Under alterna-
tive A, the federal funds rate would drop to 2-3/4 percent.
This could
be achieved by a reduction in the borrowing allowance to $225 million
with the funds rate dropping below the discount rate, or by a cut in the
discount rate of 1/2 percentage point with an unchanged borrowing allowance.
Alternative C involves a return of the federal funds rate to
3-3/4 percent and a borrowing allowance of $275 million.
(7)
Market sentiment of late seems to have tilted toward some
prospect of another policy ease in coming months.
Although money market
interest rates might firm a bit over the intermeeting period under the
unchanged policy of alternative B, any increase would be limited if,
consistent with the Greenbook forecast, information continued to suggest
modest economic expansion.
Bond rates also should remain around their
current reduced levels, and could even edge down if inaction by the
Federal Reserve, along with indicators of wages and prices, were seen as
reinforcing disinflationary trends.
If political dynamics seem to
portend even higher budget deficits ahead, these downward pressures on
bond yields may tend to be offset.
The dollar, under alternative B,
would be expected to trade around its recent lower levels.
(8) Under alternative A, short-term interest rates would fall
by nearly the full 50 basis point drop in the federal funds rate, especially were the easing to take the form of a discount rate cut, which
3. The borrowing allowance likely will need to be reduced in late
September to reflect the usual fall-off in demands for seasonal
credit.
would be seen as implying that the reduction more likely would be sustained.
Banks would be expected to trim another 1/2 percentage point
off the prime rate, still preserving large spreads over funding costs.
Some market participants might read the easing as increased emphasis on
spurring economic activity, at the cost of limiting progress against
inflation.
Nonetheless, given the outlook for tepid economic expansion
and slower inflation that recently has come to be more firmly embedded
in market expectations, nominal as well as real bond yields would be
likely to decline noticeably.
Easing in the United States might lessen
constraints on more expansive monetary policies in a few other countries, but with many countries, especially in Europe, highly unlikely to
follow suit, the dollar would tend to depreciate significantly further.
(9) A reversal of the July easing would take market participants completely by surprise and short-term interest rates would rise by
at least 1/2 percentage point under alternative C.
Bond rates, too,
would retrace some of their recent declines under this alternative, at
least initially, and quality spreads on private debt could widen if such
a tightening were seen as placing the recovery at risk.
The dollar
would rebound appreciably.
(10)
Growth rates of the monetary aggregates under the three
alternatives are presented below.
The table gives projected money
growth rates through year-end, on the assumption that the contemplated
reserve conditions under each alternative are maintained over that
period.
Growth rates for M2 and M3 are projected to be quite subdued.
For the June-to-September period, expansion in the broad aggregates is
likely to fall well short of the rates envisioned at the time of the
last Committee meeting, even if alternative A is adopted.
Moreover,
growth of M2 and M3 over the rest of the year would remain damped,
leaving these aggregates below their annual target ranges under all
the alternatives.4
Ml,
on the other hand, is likely to expand at a
double-digit pace over coming months, boosted by mortgage prepayments,
low time deposit rates, and special factors. 5
Alt. A
Alt. B
Alt. C
Growth from June
to September
M2
1-1/4
M3
Ml
1/4
13
3/4
1
0
12-1/2
-1/4
12
Growth from September
to December
M2
M3
Ml
3-1/4
1
11
2-1/4
1/4
9-1/4
1-1/4
-1/2
7-3/4
Growth from 1991:Q4
to 1992:Q4
M2
M3
Ml
1-3/4
0
12-1/2
1-1/2
0
12
1-1/4
-1/4
11-1/2
(11)
Data for late July and early August indicate that ex-
pansion of the monetary aggregates is strengthening a bit, perhaps as
a consequence of the substantial decline across the maturity spectrum
in market interest rates since the last FOMC meeting.
However, the
shortfall in July is not expected to be recovered, and underlying
4. To reach the lower end of its annual range, M2 would need to
grow at a 5-1/4 percent annual rate from July through the end of the
year and M3 at a 4 percent rate.
5. Ml and M2 will be boosted in mid- to late-September by shifts to
OCDs of funds now commingled in large time deposits under sweep
account arrangements recently prohibited by the Board. About $4 to $5
billion of such accounts has been identified at
, but other
banks may be affected as well. The staff foresees little effect on
the monetary aggregates from the closing of other Regulation D loopholes to take effect in September; the provision classifying teller's
checks as transactions deposits will not take effect until December.
Alternative Levels and Growth Rates for Key Monetary Aggregates
Alt. A
Alt. B
Alt. C
Alt. A
Alt. B
Alt. C
Alt. A
Alt. B
Alt. C
Levels in billions
1992 June
July
3458.7
3454.9
3458.7
3454.9
3458.7
3454.9
4158.0
4151.8
4158.0
4151.8
4158.0
4151.8
951.8
961.0
951.8
961.0
951.8
961.0
August
September
October
November
December
3460.1
3469.0
3478.8
3487.8
3496.5
3459.8
3467.3
3474.5
3480.6
3486.7
3459.6
3465.6
3470.2
3473.4
3476.9
4155.7
4159.8
4163.2
4166.9
4170.4
4155.3
4158.0
4159.1
4155.0
4156.4
4155.2
4153.7
4152.2
-3.8
-1.3
-3.8
-1.3
Monthly Growth Rates
1992 June
July
1.8
3.1
3.4
3.1
3.0
-3.8
-1.3
-4.4
-1.8
4160.1
4161.1
-4.4
-1.8
971.8
982.8
994.3
1002.4
1009.5
-3.1
11.6
-3.1
11.6
-3.1
11.6
1.0
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.4
-0.4
-0.5
-0.4
13.5
13.6
14.0
9.8
8.5
13.1
12.7
12.4
8.0
7.0
11.2
11.0
6.2
5.5
11.1
16.4
9.8
9.1
11.0
11.1
16.4
9.8
8.8
8.1
5.5
5.5
12.0
7.7
9.9
1.6
2.1
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.0
Quarterly Ave. Growth Rates
1991 Q4
2.3
1992 Q1
4.3
Q2
0.0
-0.4
Q3
Q4
3.1
2.3
4.3
0.0
-0.6
2.3
2.3
4.3
0.0
-0.7
1.5
0.9
2.2
-1.9
-1.2
1.0
0.9
2.2
-1.9
-1.3
0.5
0.9
2.2
-1.9
-1.4
0.0
11.1
Mar
Jun
Sep
Jun
-1.8
1.0
2.2
1.6
-1.8
0.8
1.3
1.1
-3.1
0.2
1.0
0.6
-3.1
0.0
0.3
0.1
-3.1
-0.2
-0.4
-0.3
5.5
13.0
10.9
12.1
1.5
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.2
1.3
0.0
-0.2
0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.1
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
12.6
12.5
12.4
92
92
92
92
to
to
to
to
Jun
Sep
Dec
Dec
92
92
92
92
Q4 91 to Q4 92
Q4 91 to Sep 92
Q4 91 to Dec 92
1992 Target Ranges:
-1.8
1.2
3.2
2.2
1.7
1.4
1.8
2.5 to 6.5
971.2
980.2
989.3
994.4
999.0
-4.4
-1.8
1.7
2.6
2.5
2.1
2.1
August
September
October
November
December
971.5
981.5
991.8
998.4
1004.2
1.0 to 5.0
16.4
9.8
9.4
10.9
12.5
12.5
9.3
11.0
12.1
12.3
11.8
11.6
12.1
11.3
Chart 1
ACTUAL AND TARGETED M2
Billions of dollars
3700
Actual Level
* Short-Run Alternatives
6.5%
-
-
3650
3600
--
f
S,,
O
N
1991D
1991
I
I
J
F
I
M
3550
-
350
--
3400
o.,, 2.5%
-
I
-
I
A
I
M
I
J
I
J
A
199
1992
I
I
S
I
O
I
N
3350
D
Chart 2
ACTUAL AND TARGETED M3
Billions of dollars
4425
Actual Level
SShort-Run Alternatiives
5%
4375
-
4325
- 4275
- 4225
1%
S-
4175
0 A
B
8
,'A
I
--
I
O
N
1991
D
J
F
-
I
M
I
A
I
M
I
J
I
J
1992
I
A
I
S
I
O
4075
I
N
4125
D
Chart 3
M1
Billions of dollars
Actual Level
------ Growth From Fourth Quarter
* Short-Run Alternatives
990
970
950
S-'5%
930
910
,-890
O
N
1991
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
1992
870
A
S
O
N
D
Chart 4
DEBT
Billions of dollars
Actual Level
- - - Estimated Level
SProjected Level
12300
8.5%
12100
I
S
11900
V
V
V
V
V
o
Vo
s
11700
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
11500
V
11300
11100
O
N
1991
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
1992
A
S
O
N
10900
D
-10-
growth rates are expected to be slower than might have been anticipated at these lower interest rate levels.
As noted above, weaker
expansion of income than previously anticipated likely plays an important role in explaining the lower path of money.
In addition, how-
ever, the forces restraining money relative to income appear to be
more intense than we thought.
Spending is being financed out of in-
ternal funds and by drawing down money balances, and what net borrowing there is seems likely to be even more concentrated in capital
markets and away from banks.
Bank credit is now projected to increase
at only a 2 percent annual rate in the second half of the year.
The
redirection of household funds to capital market instruments and debt
repayment will continue to be encouraged by the further declines in
deposit rates.
Moreover, runoffs of brokered deposits may be acceler-
ating after the June 16 effective date of FDICIA restrictions.
(12)
Under alternative B, M2 is expected to resume expanding
this month and to grow at a 2-1/4 percent pace on balance over the
remainder of the year.
M2 growth will be supported by large inflows
to demand deposits in the months ahead, owing to the resumption of
strong mortgage refinancing activity and a buildup in compensating
balances occasioned by recent declines in market rates.
With
flows into OCDs also strong, Ml is projected to expand at a 10 percent
pace over the balance of the year.
Beyond Ml, outflows from M2
money funds are projected to abate, although the very steep yield
curve is expected to continue to draw balances from such accounts and
6. Actual growth in the fourth quarter will be boosted relative to
expectations at the last meeting
effects.
7. Nearly half of the growth in M2 over the balance of the year is
projected to come from increases in demand deposits and MMDAs associated with mortgage prepayments.
8. Total reserves and the monetary base would be expected to increase at around a 10 percent pace over June to December.
from retail time deposits to capital market investments.
On a quar-
terly average basis, M2 would contract slightly this quarter, and
increase at a 2-1/4 percent rate in the fourth quarter.
This projec-
tion assumes the unchanged federal funds rate of alternative B exIt im-
tended through year-end and the Greenbook economic forecast.
plies velocity growth at a 4 percent annual rate in the third quarter
and 3-1/4 percent in the fourth.
With the assumed income and interest
rates, standard money demand models predict velocity decreases through
this period; experimental models that embody yield-curve effects and
other alternative measures of opportunity costs are predicting velocity increases in the second half of the year, though not as large as
embodied in the staff forecast.
(13)
The firming in M2 under alternative B shows through in
part to M3, which bottoms out in coming months and then edges higher.
Acting to limit any pickup in this aggregate is the likelihood of
anemic advances in bank credit and funding needs and some further
declines in thrift credit.
The failure of M3 to grow this year, as
implied in all the alternatives, would be unprecedented in the
official series, which begins in 1959.
The extraordinary behavior of
M3 is a function not only of weak depository credit but of restrained
credit growth overall.
With spending financed out of higher profits
and by drawing down liquid assets, the debt of nonfederal sectors is
projected to expand at only a 2-3/4 percent pace over the balance of
the year, implying a further drop in debt-to-income ratios for both
households and businesses.
Continued strong federal borrowing will
boost total debt growth to 4-3/4 percent for the year--near the lower
end of its annual monitoring range.
(14)
The lower interest rates of alternative A would be
expected to buoy money growth over the balance of the year.
Although
-12-
there is some question about the strength of the near-term response of
M2 to lower short-term rates, the anticipated decline in long-term
rates under this alternative should damp additional adverse yield
curve effects.
Over time, the lower real and nominal interest rates
would raise income growth and, through that channel, further augment
demands for money, though the effects through year-end would be small.
The slightly faster growth in M2 deposits would feed through partly to
M3, as would relatively more attractive rates on M3 money funds,
leading to a resumption of 1 percent expansion in this aggregate over
the balance of the year.
(15)
Under alternative C, M2 and M3 would drop further below
their annual ranges, as opportunity costs widen, banks become even
more cautious lenders, and income growth is more restrained.
The
effects on M1 would be especially marked in the fourth quarter, given
the drop in mortgage prepayments that would accompany the backup in
long-term rates.
Still, M1 would be expected to increase at a 10 per-
cent rate from June to December.
-13-
Directive Language
(16)
sented below.
Draft language for the operational paragraph is preFour alternatives for the last sentence, labeled a, b,
c, and d, are shown.
The first, (a), would follow the usual practice,
retaining the current mid-quarter approach of updating the Committee's
expectations for the quarter.
The second, (b), would retain the cur-
rent format but extend the money projections through year end.
A third
alternative, (c), would give an indication of Committee expectations
for growth in M2 and M3, but would also suggest that continued expansion at a subdued pace leaving the aggregates below their long-run
ranges would be acceptable in the context of unusual strength in
velocity.
A fourth alternative, (d), would convey the same thought
without giving precise expectations for money growth.
OPERATIONAL PARAGRAPH
In the implementation of policy for the immediate
future, the Committee seeks to DECREASE SOMEWHAT/maintain/
INCREASE SOMEWHAT the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions.
In the context of the Committee's long-
run objectives for price stability and sustainable economic
growth and giving careful consideration to economic,
financial, and monetary developments, slightly (SOMEWHAT)
greater reserve restraint might (WOULD) or slightly
(SOMEWHAT) lesser reserve restraint (MIGHT) would be
acceptable in the intermeeting period.
(a) The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to
be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 over the
period from June through September at annual rates
-14-
of about
____
AND ____[DEL:
2 and 1/2] percent, respec-
tively.
(b) The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to
be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 over the
period from June through[DEL:
September]DECEMBER at
annual rates of about
___ AND ____[DEL:
2 and 1/2] per-
cent, respectively.
(c) The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to
be associated with some pickup in the growth of M2
and M3 to annual rates of about
____
and ____ per-
cent over the period from June through December.
Such growth would leave the expansion of both
aggregates below the Committee's ranges for the
year but is anticipated to be consistent with the
Committee's policy objectives given the unusual
strength in velocity.
(d) The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to
be consistent with some pickup in the monetary
aggregates, but if unusual strength in velocity
persists, M2 and M3 below their annual ranges could
be consistent with the Committee's policy
objectives.
August 14, 1992
SELECTED INTEREST RATES
(percent)
Short-Term
federal
funds
Treasury bills
secondary market
3-monthI 6-month I
Long-Term
CDs
secondary
market
comm.
paper
money
market
mutual
bank
prime
U.S. government constant
maturity yields
corporate
conventional home mortgages
A-utility municipal secondary
primary
recently
Bond
market I
market
1-year
3-month
1-month
fund
loan
3-year
offered
Buyer
11
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
7.46
4.22
6.46
3.84
6.49
3.93
6.43
4.01
7.75
4.25
8.49
4.88
7.37
4.53
9.93
7.07
7.47
5.24
8.35
6.96
8.52
7.58
9.96
8.49
7.40
6.76
9.97
8.38
9.75
8.35
7.78
6.02
-- High
-- Low
Monthly
Aug 91
Sep 91
Oct 91
Nov 91
Dec 91
4.20
3.12
4.05
3.14
4.22
3.21
4.51
3.31
4.32
3.29
5.02
3.36
4.51
3.08
6.50
6.00
6.32
4.71
7.65
6.54
8.07
7.38
8.99
8.15
6.87
6.12
9.22
8.12
9.03
7.96
6.22
5.30
5.66
5.45
5.21
4.81
4.43
5.33
5.21
4.99
4.56
4.07
5.39
5.25
5.04
4.61
4.10
5.45
5.26
5.04
4.64
4.17
5.65
5.47
5.33
4.94
4.47
5.72
5.57
5.29
4.95
4.98
5.38
5.24
5.03
4.82
4.61
8.50
8.20
8.00
7.58
7.21
6.80
6.50
6.23
5.90
5.39
7.90
7.65
7.53
7.42
7.09
8.14
7.95
7.93
7.92
7.70
9.25
9.05
9.02
8.95
8.68
7.05
6.97
6.89
6.89
6.87
9.44
9.18
9.04
8.86
8.56
9.24
9.01
8.86
8.71
8.50
7.08
6.87
6.71
6.42
6.19
Jan 92
Feb 92
Mar 92
Apr
92
May 92
Jun 92
Jul
92
Weekly
Apr 29 92
4.03
4.06
3.98
3.73
3.82
3.76
3.24
3.80
3.84
4.04
3.75
3.63
3.66
3.21
3.87
3.93
4.18
3.87
3.75
3.77
3.28
3.95
4.08
4.40
4.09
3.99
3.98
3.45
4.05
4.07
4.25
4.00
3.82
3.86
3.37
4.11
4.11
4.28
4.02
3.87
3.91
3.44
4.18
3.84
3.73
3.66
3.52
3.45
3.25
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.02
5.40
5.72
6.18
5.93
5.81
5.60
4.92
7.03
7.34
7.54
7.48
7.39
7.26
6.86
7.58
7.85
7.97
7.96
7.89
7.84
7.61
8.57
8.79
8.91
8.82
8.70
8.62
8.38
6.67
6.83
6.86
6.80
6.72
6.66
6.32
8.65
8.92
9.17
8.98
8.85
8.66
8.25
8.43
8.76
8.93
8.85
8.67
8.51
8.13
5.89
5.88
6.11
6.15
6.00
5.87
5.51
3.65
3.69
3.84
4.11
3.93
3.92
3.59
6.50
6.02
7.58
8.07
8.86
6.83
9.02
8.84
6.10
91
-- High
-- Low
92
I 10-year I 30-year
fixed-rate fixed-rate I
ARM
May
May
May
May
6
13
20
27
92
92
92
92
3.77
3.84
3.89
3.80
3.65
3.62
3.57
3.70
3.78
3.73
3.67
3.83
4.09
3.99
3.88
4.05
3.89
3.79
3.76
3.85
3.92
3.84
3.82
3.89
3.55
3.51
3.51
3.47
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
5.96
5.83
5.67
5.87
7.55
7.40
7.27
7.41
8.02
7.90
7.81
7.88
8.73
8.64
8.68
8.65
6.77
6.70
6.69
6.74
8.88
8.80
8.81
8.75
8.75
8.64
8.53
8.60
6.02
5.97
5.93
5.96
Jun
Jun
Jun
Jun
3
10
17
24
92
92
92
92
3.85
3.69
3.73
3.72
3.72
3.68
3.65
3.64
3.85
3.82
3.75
3.75
4.08
4.02
3.94
3.95
3.91
3.88
3.84
3.84
3.94
3.92
3.91
3.89
3.49
3.45
3.44
3.42
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
5.78
5.71
5.60
5.53
7.35
7.33
7.27
7.22
7.87
7.87
7.85
7.83
8.65
8.65
8.61
8.56
6.73
6.69
6.62
6.58
8.72
8.67
8.66
8.58
8.59
8.54
8.48
8.43
5.94
5.90
5.84
5.78
Jul
Jul
Jul
Jul
Jul
1
8
15
22
29
92
92
92
92
92
3.87
3.24
3.28
3.22
3.12
3.59
3.22
3.21
3.17
3.17
3.67
3.31
3.26
3.24
3.24
3.89
3.51
3.43
3.36
3.39
3.82
3.43
3.35
3.32
3.32
3.88
3.48
3.42
3.41
3.37
3.44
3.35
3.24
3.19
3.14
6.50
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
5.40
5.04
4.92
4.83
4.75
7.13
6.90
6.94
6.88
6.68
7.78
7.62
7.65
7.65
7.51
8.44
8.41
8.44
8.32
8.22
6.55
6.36
6.33
6.22
6.12
8.36
8.25
8.26
8.16
8.24
8.29
8.13
8.09
8.08
8.05
5.69
5.56
5.50
5.45
5.37
Aug
Aug
5 92
12 92
3.33
3.24
3.17
3.14
3.26
3.21
3.44
3.31
3.33
3.29
3.38
3.36
3.11
3.08
6.00
6.00
4.91
4.71
6.69
6.54
7.45
7.38
8.15
6.24
6.20
8.12
-
8.06
7.96
5.30
5.30
Aug
Aug
Aug
7 92
12 92
13 92
3.20
3.22
3.30
3.14
3.12
3.09
3.19
3.20
3.18
3.30
3.30
3.29
3.29
3.28
3.28
3.37
3.35
3.34
6.00
6.00
6.00
4.71
4.71
4.72
6.57
6.48
6.55
7.40
7.33
7.36
Daily
NOTE: Weekly data for columns 1 through 11 are statement week averages. Data in column 7 are taken from Donoghue's Money Fund Report. Columns 12,13 and 14 are 1-day quotes for Friday, Thursday or Friday, respectively,
following the end of the statement week. Column 13 is the Bond Buyer revenue index. Column 14 is the FNMA purchase yield, plus loan servicing fee, on 30-day mandatory delivery commitments. Column 15 is the average
contract rate on new commitments for fixed-rate mortgages (FRMs) with 80 percent loan-to-value ratios at major institutional lenders. Column 16 is the average initial contract rate on new commitments for 1-year, adjustablerate mortgages (ARMs) at major institutional lenders offering both FRMs and ARMs with the same number of discount points.
Strictly Confidential (FR)Class II FOMC
Money and Credit Aggregate Measures
Seasonally adjusted
AUG.
Money stock measures and liquid assets
Period
M1
M2
nontransactions
components
in M3 only
4
Bank credit
17,
1992
Domestic nonfinancial debt'
M3
L
total loans
and
investments'
5
6
7
8
9
U.S.
government'
other'
total'
10
_
2
in M2
3
0.6
4.2
8.0
4.8
4.0
2.8
6.2
3.9
1.1
-0.9
-7.2
-5.6
3.6
1.7
1.2
4.8
1.8
0.5
7.5
5.5
3.6
7.3
10.3
11.3
8.4
6.1
2.3
8.1
7.0
4.4
QUARTERLY AVERAGE
1991-3rd QTR.
1991-4th QTR.
1992-1st QTR.
1992-2nd QTR.
7.5
11.0
16.5
9.8
0.6
2.3
4.3
-0.0
-1.6
-0.7
0.0
-3.7
-9.8
-5.4
-7.3
-10.5
-1.3
0.9
2.2
-1.9
0.7
0.2
1.5
0.2
1.9
6.1
3.7
2.4
13.9
12.3
8.2
13.1
1.6
1.6
2.3
2.7
4.5
4.2
3.8
5.3
MONTHLY
1991-JULY
AUG.
SEP.
OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
3.8
9.1
7.6
12.2
14.3
9.0
-1.5
0.7
0.7
2.0
4.8
2.8
-3.3
-2.1
-1.7
-1.5
1.5
0.6
-9.5
-4.5
-9.5
0.3
-9.5
-6.5
-3.0
-0.2
-1.2
1.8
2.3
1.1
1.2
-1.5
-2.6
0.8
3.1
-0.3
0.3
1.3
5.3
7.1
7.4
6.2
12.3
15.3
12.3
13.3
11.3
7.5
1.0
0.8
1.5
1.6
2.3
1.3
3.7
4.3
4.1
4.4
4.5
2.8
16.4
27.2
10.3
4.9
14.6
-3.1
11.6
3.2
9.6
-0.6
-2.0
0.5
-3.8
-1.3
-1.5
3.3
-4.5
-4.5
-4.8
-4.0
-6.2
-8.2
-3.0
-13.4
-15.1
-6.4
-7.5
-4.3
1.2
7.4
-2.8
-4.2
-0.7
-4.4
-1.8
-1.5
7.0
1.8
-2.2
-2.3
2.3
3.3
0.2
2.7
5.3
-0.8
1.8
-0.3
6.0
7.0
15.0
13.1
12.7
15.1
2.1
3.8
2.3
2.7
2.7
2.2
3.0
4.6
5.5
5.3
5.2
5.5
939.0
942.8
954.3
951.8
961.0
3473.9
3468.1
3469.5
3458.6
3454.9
2534.9
2525.3
2515.2
2506.8
2493.9
716.6
707.6
703.8
699.4
696.9
4190.5
4175.7
4173.3
4158.0
4151.8
5019.4
5010.3
5000.7
5010.3
2854.8
2867.5
2865.5
2869.7
2868.9
2832.2
2863.2
2893.4
2929.9
8494.3
8513.3
8532.2
8547.7
11326.5
11376.6
11425.5
11477.7
6
13
20
27 p
959.6
956.3
961.0
962.3
3455.8
3454.4
3452.2
3454.7
2496.2
2498.1
2491.1
2492.4
679.9
701.7
702.2
700.1
4135.7
4156.2
4154.4
4154.9
3 p
966.8
3457.1
2490.3
699.1
4156.2
ANN. GROWTH RATES ()
ANNUALLY (Q4 TO Q4)
1989
1990
1991
1992-JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUNE
JULY p
LEVELS ($BILLIONS)
MONTHLY
1992-MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUNE
JULY p
MEEKLY
1992-JULY
AUG.
:
:
1.
Adjusted for breaks caused by reclassifications.
2.
Debt data are on a monthly average basis, derived by averaging end-of-month levels of adjacent months, and have been adjusted to remove
discontinuities.
p-preliminary
pe-preliminary estimate
Strictly Confidential (FR)FOMC
Class
Components of Money Stock and Related Measures
seasonally adjusted unless otherwise noted
Currency
Demand
deposits
Other
checkable
deposits
Overnight
RPs and
Eurodollars
NSA'
Savings
deposits'
1
2
3
4
5
ANNUALLY (4TH QTR.)
1989
1990
1991
221.2
245.5
266.0
279.2
277.5
287.0
282.8
292.7
329.1
76.2
78.8
72.6
MONTHLY
1991-JULY
Period
Small
denomination
time
deposits'
6
Money market
mutual funds
general
Institupurpose
tions
and broker/
only
dealer'
7
8
AUG.
17,
1992
Large
denomination
time
deposits'
Term
RPs
NSA'
Term
Eurodollars
NSA'
Savings
bonds
Shortterm
Treasury
securities
Commercial paper'
Bankers
acceptances
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LEVELS I$BILLIONS) :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
884.7
919.9
1028.8
1145.3
1167.7
1079.1
311.2
346.2
359.8
106.8
130.1
173.6
561.3
501.9
443.1
106.8
93.6
73.3
78.8
68.0
60.5
116.8
125.2
137.0
320.3
331.1
321.4
349.1
357.4
337.9
40.3
33.6
24.4
259.3
279.3
313.7
64.8
986.1
1129.5
367.9
155.4
471.2
AUG.
78.8
62.7
133.5
332.8-
339.8
28.1
261.3
280.1
317.3
67.3
994.1
1120.8
362.4
158.6
465.5
78.4
63.6
134.4
330.6
336.3
27.2
SEP.
262.9
280.6
320.6
66.4
1002.4
1111.0
359.9
162.6
458.5
76.7
61.5
135.2
322.9
337.7
25.8
OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
264.8
266.0
267.3
283.8
287.6
289.5
324.5
329.7.
333.2
69.4
73.0
75.3
1015.0
1028.7
1042.6
1095.2
1079.2
1063.0
359.3
359.5
360.5
168.2
173.6
179.1
450.0
442.3
437.1
75.5
73.6
70.9
62.8
61.5
57.2
136.1
137.1
137.9
321.5
324.7
317.9
336.2
337.9
339.7
25.3
24.5
23.3
1992-JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
269.4
271.6
271.8
293.9
305.1
309.6
339.0
346.3
349.5
76.6
76.4
73.1
1061.2
1083.9
1098.0
1042.9
1019.8
1002.9
360.1
363.9
358.0
182.4
188.2
185.3
427.9
420.7
413.0
70.8
72.0
73.7
55.3
55.9
57.9
138.9
140.1
141.2
311.5
321.2
328.6
334.8
327.5
337.0
23.2
22.9
22.2
APR.
MAY
JUNE
273.6
274.7
276.2
311.2
315.1
311.0
350.0
356.5
356.7
70.8
66.9
68.4
1111.2
1122.4
1127.0
985.6
969.1
956.3
354.1
355.0
353.3
189.2
194.8
199.7
405.7
400.9
396.2
72.3
71.6
70.0
55.0
52.7
51.3
142.4
143.5
144.6
328.8
332.5
338.6
341.7
329.4
347.1
21.6
22.0
22.0
JULY p
278.9
315.6
358.7
67.9
1134.3
941.7
349.8
207.7
389.8
67.2
50.2
Net of money market mutual fund holdings of these items.
Includes money market deposit accounts.
Includes retail repurchase agreements. All IRA and Keogh accounts at commercial banks and thrift institutions are subtracted from small time deposits.
Excludes IRA and Keogh accounts.
Net of large denomination time deposits held by money market mutual funds and thrift institutions.
p-preliminary
NET CHANGES IN SYSTEM HOLDINGS OF SECURITES
Millions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted
August 14, 1992
Treasury bills
Nt
SR
Net
2
purchases
s
mp
Redemptions
(-)
1,468
17,448
20,038
12,730
4,400
1,000
-11,263
13,048
19,038
327
425
3,1043
946
50
6,583
2,160
4,356
7,664
5,858
1,000
---02
---03
---04
1,160
4,356
7,664
5,858
300
900
1,165
178
2,950
550
650
2,433
1992 ---Q1
---02
-1,000
4,415
1,600
-2,600
4,415
Period
1989
1990
1991
1991 ---Q1
1991 August
September
October
November
December
1992 January
February
March
April
May
June
July
5,776
529
2,198
2,823
837
-1,628
123
505
1,600
Net
change
yea
1-5
-
Treasurycoupons
rhass 3
over 10
5-10
2,452
2,278
5,776
529
2,198
2,823
837
2,133
300
-3,228
123
505
1,027
1,425
258
-100
1,280
597
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
CLASS II-FOMC
1
Redemptions
(-)
Net
Change
284
-1,683
11,128
-1,614
-------
4,150
1,450
1,815
3,867
5,310
5,698
9,419
7,299
-16,864
992
152
14,106
-----
2,452
3,730
-233
7,896
-14,636
1,137
340
850
6,116
1,374
2,185
4,022
1,092
-2,134
2,216
6,942
-8,871
16,035
-3,313
1,150
1,930
-49
4,149
3,796
-85
-12,874
-2,010
248
345
-1,203
1,996
-914
3,567
300
-----
-----
1,027
1,425
...
4,110
306
4,110
306
-----
2,278
5
Net RPs
-10,390
13,240
27,726
-----
650
Net change
outright
holdings
total 4
1,315
375
11,282
375
655
Federal
agencies
redemptions
(')
200
3,530
Weekly
April 29
May 6
13
20
27
June 3
10
17
24
July 1
8
15
22
29
August 5
12
Memo: LEVEL (bil. $)6
August 12
668
3,442
306
668
3,442
306
200
200
2,278
3,530
707
3,411
3,836
-9
---
90
90
140.6
1. Change from end-of-period to end-of-period.
2. Outright transactions in market and with foreign accounts.
3. Outright trahsactions in market and with foreign accounts, and short-term notes acquired
in exchange for maturing bills. Excludes maturity shifts and rollovers of maturing issues.
-20
-15
-50
-13
285
195
31.5
67.1
1,490
-598
3,639
-4,120
10,994
-6,274
-2,998
-1,690
5,070
-2,729
2,917
-3,023
3,007
-4,875
10,828
-10,190
16.1
25.5
140.2
286.5
-5.4
4. Reflects net change in redemptions (-) of Treasury and agency securities.
5. Includes change in RPs (+), matched sale-purchase transactions (-), and matched purchase sale transactions (+).
6. The levels of agency issues were as follows:
....
1 year 1
August 12
2.21
1-5
2.5
1
5-10
0.8
1 over 10
0.2
total
1
5.7
Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1992, August 17). Bluebook. Bluebooks, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/bluebook_19920818
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_bluebook_19920818,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {Bluebook},
year = {1992},
month = {Aug},
howpublished = {Bluebooks, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/bluebook_19920818},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}